On the feasibility of assessing social situations using ecological momentary assessment - a comparison between Singapore and German test participants

• Autorzy: Schinkel-Bielefeld Nadja , Lee Zu Xuan , Thein Khine , Martin Jennifer , Stasiak Sonia

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.21008/j.0860-6897.2022.1.09

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) is a method comprising repeated self-reports in the participant’s natural environment which can be used to evaluate hearing aids in real life. Social situations are particularly important for such evaluations as these are situations where listening is critical and often difficult. However, as shown for a German subject sample by Schinkel-Bielefeld et al., these are also situations where test participants may skip a questionnaire as it could be perceived as impolite to answer a questionnaire on the smartphone. This leads to the underrepresentation of speech in noise situations in EMA assessment. However, the acceptance of smartphone use in public depends on cultural norms and may be larger in Asian countries. Repeating the previous study with 10 Singaporean hearing-impaired test participants, we observed that self-reports are often answered with some delay but not skipped in social situations. Also, contrary to the German study, speech in noise situations were not underrepresented in questionnaires in the Singapore study.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

ecological momentary assessment; cultural difference; compliance; bias; social situation; phubbing

PL

ekologiczna ocena chwilowa; różnice kulturowe; zgodność; tendencyjność; sytuacja społeczna; phubbing

• Wydawca: Poznan University of Technology. Institute of Applied Mechanics
• Czasopismo: Vibrations in Physical Systems
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 33, nr 1
• Strony: art. no. 2022109
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 14 poz., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Schinkel-Bielefeld Nadja

• WS Audiology, Henri-Dunant-Str. 100, 91058 Erlangen, Germany

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1273-176X

autor

Lee Zu Xuan

• National University of Singapore, 21 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119077

autor

Thein Khine

• WS Audiology, 18 Tai Seng Street, #08-08, Singapore 539775

autor

Martin Jennifer

• National University of Singapore, 21 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119077

autor

Stasiak Sonia

• WS Audiology, 18 Tai Seng Street, #08-08, Singapore 539775

Bibliografia

• 1. S. Shiffman, A.A. Stone, and M.R. Hufford; Ecological momentary assessment; Annu Rev Clin Psychol, 2008, 4, 1-32.
• 2. A.A. Stone, S. Shiffman; Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) in behavioral medicine; Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 1994, 16(3), 199-202.
• 3. N. Schinkel-Bielefeld, et al.; Evaluation of Hearing Aids in Everyday Life Using Ecological Momentary Assessment: What Situations Are We Missing?; Am J Audiol, 2020, 29(3S), 591-609.
• 4. R. Clapp; Singapore tops APAC for smartphone penetration; 2019; Available from: https://www.warc.com/content/paywall/article/warc-datapoints/singapore_tops_apac_for_smartphone_penetration/125723
• 5. L. Silver; Smartphone Ownership Is Growing Rapidly Around the World, but Not Always Equally; Pew Research Center, Report, Washington, 2019; Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/02/05/smartphone-ownership-is-growing-rapidly-around-the-world-but-not-always-equally
• 6. Annual survey on infocomm usage in households and by individuals for 2019; Infocomm Media Development Authority, Singapore, 2019. Available from: https://www.imda.gov.sg/infocomm-media-landscape/research-and-statistics/infocomm-usage-households-and-individuals.
• 7. M. Kwon, et al.; The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents; PloS one, 2013, 8(12), e83558.
• 8. Z. Yang, K. Asbury, M.D. Griffiths; Do Chinese and British university students use smartphones differently? A cross-cultural mixed methods study; International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 2019, 17(3), 644-657.
• 9. B. Lachmann, et al.; The role of empathy and life satisfaction in internet and smartphone use disorder. Frontiers in Psychology, 2018, 9, 398.
• 10. V. Chotpitayasunondh, K.M. Douglas; The effects of “phubbing” on social interaction; Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2018, 48(6), 304-316.
• 11. R. Leuppert, S. Geber; Commonly done but not socially accepted? Phubbing and social norms in dyadic and small group settings; Communication Research Reports, 2020, 37(3), 55-64.
• 12. B. Efron; The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans; CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, SIAM, 1982.
• 13. H. Hentschke, M.C. Stüttgen; Computation of measures of effect size for neuroscience data sets; European Journal of Neuroscience, 2011, 34(12), 1887-1894.
• 14. T.F. Van de Mortel; Faking it: social desirability response bias in self-report research; Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2008, 25(4), 40-48.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).