Detekcja zmian pokrycia terenu na zdjęciach satelitarnych Landsat - porównanie trzech metod

• Autorzy: Niedzielko J. , Lewiński S.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Land cover change detection using Landsat imagery - comparison of three methods

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Environmental changes are amongst the most important research subjects in geography. The changes may be natural, but also may be caused by human activity. Land cover is a significant component of the changing environment. Monitoring of its changes involves usage of satellite techniques. Landsat mission provides comparable data since forty years, very useful in land cover studies. Utilization of satellite techniques in such researches is developing quickly. This paper is an example of methods that enable quick and quite accurate assessment of range and spatial distribution of land cover changes. Practical application of image difference, principal component analysis and supervised classification to detect land cover changes is presented. Methods are applied to study area containing different land cover classes. Accuracy of methods was tested and compared. Combining methods presented in earlier researches, five new methods were developed: image difference, image difference with classification, classification, principal component analysis, principal component analysis with classification. Methods were applied to three different input datasets: pairs of images with different level of preprocessing. First dataset was a pair of georeferenced Landsat Thematic Mapper images. The second dataset was the same pair of images, atmospherically corrected using dark object subtraction method. Normalization of one image to the other provided the third dataset. Accuracy assessment was executed. Results were obtained from confusion matrices. Overall accuracy of methods was high, from 77% to 91%. Supervised classification was the most accurate method. Combining fully automatic methods with supervised classification has increased overall accuracy of automatic change detection, however not significantly. Studies on combining change detection methods should be continued. Future studies should concentrate on the automation of change detection process.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

pokrycie terenu; wykrywanie zmian; Landsat; różnica obrazów; klasyfikacja nadzorowana; analiza głównych składowych

EN

land cover; change detection; landsat; image difference; supervised classification; principal components analysis

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Geograficzne, Oddział Teledetekcji i Geoinformatyki
• Czasopismo: Teledetekcja Środowiska
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: T. 47
• Strony: 87--98
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz., rys., tab., wykr., zdj.

Twórcy

autor

Niedzielko J.

• Wydział Geografii i Studiów Regionalnych Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego

autor

Lewiński S.

• Zespół Obserwacji Ziemi w Centrum Badań Kosmicznych PAN

Bibliografia

• 1. Aleksandrowicz S., Lewiński S., Kotarba A., 2012, Zastosowanie transformacji IR-MAD w detekcji zmian na zdjęciach satelitarnych. Archiwum Fotogrametrii, Kartografii i Teledetekcji, vol. 23, str. 11–17.
• 2. Bauer M.E., Yuan F., Sawaya K.E., Loeffelholz B. C., 2003, Multi-temporal landsat image classification and change analysis of land cover in the twin cities (Minnesota) metropolitan area. MutiTemp–2003, Second International Workshop on the Analysis of Multi-temporal Remote Sensing Images. July 16–18, 2003. Ispra, Italy.
• 3. Bochenek Z., 2004, Zastosowanie różnych metod określania zmian pokrycia terenu na obszarach miejskich z wykorzystaniem zdjęć satelitarnych. Archiwum Fotogrametrii, Kartografii i Teledetekcji, vol. 14.
• 4. Byeong-Hyeok Y., Kwang-Hoon C., 2008, An application research of multi-temporal satellite images for forest reclamation monitoring in the abandoned mine area. Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, Section TS21: Agriculture & Crops Forestry/Ecosystem.
• 5. Byrne G. F., Crapper P. F., Mayo K. K., 1980, Monitoring land-cover change by principal component analysis of multitemporal landsat data. Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 10, z. 3, str. 175–184.
• 6. Cakir H. I., Khorram S., Nelson S. A. C., 2006, Correspondence analysis for detecting land cover change. Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 102, str. 306–317.
• 7. Chen J., Gong P., He C., Pu R., Shi P., 2003, Land-Use/Land-Cover Change Detection Using Improved Change-Vector Analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, vol. 69, nr 4, str. 369–379.
• 8. Ciołkosz A., Poławski Z. F., 2006, Zmiany użytkowania ziemi w Polsce w drugiej połowie XX wieku. Przegląd Geograficzny, vol. 78, z. 2, str. 173–190.
• 9. Civco D. L., Hurd J. D., Wilson E. H., Song M., Zhang Z., 2002, A comparison of land use and land cover change detection methods. 2002 ASPRS-ACSM Annual Conference and FIG XXII Congress..
• 10. Deng J. S., Wang K., Deng Y. H., Qi G. J., 2008, PCA-based land-use change detection and analysis using multitemporal and multisensor satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 29, nr 16, str. 4823–4838.
• 11. Ellis Erle, 2010, Land-use and land-cover change. The Encyclopedia of Earth, http://www.eoearth.org.
• 12. Fraser R. H., Olthof I., Pouliot D., 2009, Monitoring land cover change and ecological integrity in Canada’s national parks. Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 113, str. 1397–1409.
• 13. Jankowski W., 1972, Mapy użytkowania ziemi w Polsce (Dorobek i perspektywy). Polski Przegląd Kartograficzny, vol. 4, nr 1, str. 14–26.
• 14. Jensen J. R., 2004, Introductory Digital Image Processing, Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Lewiński S., 2010, Klasyfikacja obiektowa zdjęcia satelitarnego średniej rozdzielczości MODIS, pierwsze wyniki. Archiwum Fotogrametrii, Kartografii i Teledetekcji, vol. 21, str. 211–219.
• 15. Lo C. P., Shipman R. L., 1990, A GIS approach to land-use change dynamics detection. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, vol. 56, nr 11, str. 1483–1491.
• 16. Lu D., Mausel P., Brondízio E., Moran E., 2004, Change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 25, nr 12, str. 2365–2407.
• 17. Lunetta R. S., Ediriwickrema J., Johnson D. M., Lyon J. G., McKerrow A., 2002, Impacts of vegetation dynamics on the identification of land-cover change in a biologically complex community in North Carolina, USA. Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 82, str. 258–270.
• 18. Mas J. F., 1999, Monitoring land-cover changes: a comparison of change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 20, nr 1, str. 139–152.
• 19. Michałowska K., Głowienka-Mikrut E., 2010, Wieloczasowe dane obrazowe w badaniu zmian pokrycia terenu. Archiwum Fotogrametrii, Kartografii i Teledetekcji, vol. 21, str. 281–289.
• 20. Mycke-Dominko M., Górska P., 2007, Zmiany użytkowania ziemi w Narwiańskim Parku Narodowym i jego otulinie w latach 1987–2005. Teledetekcja środowiska, vol. 37, str. 61–81.
• 21. Nasiłowska S., 2008, Zmiany użytkowania ziemi zlewni górnej Narwi w XIX–XX w. Teledetekcja Środowiska, vol. 40, str. 53–68.
• 22. Prakasam C., 2010, Land use and land cover change detection through remote sensing approach: A case study of Kodaikanal taluk, Tamil nadu. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, vol. 1, nr 2, str. 150–158.
• 23. Ridd Merrill K., Liu Jiajun, 1998, A Comparison of Four Algorithms for Change Detection in an Urban Environment. Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 63, str. 95–100.
• 24. Singh A., 1989, Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 10, nr 6, str. 989–1003.
• 25. Sochacka E., Pabjanek P., Olędzki J. R., 2008, Analiza zmian użytkowania ziemi zlewni Strugi Toruńskiej na podstawie wieloczasowych zdjęć lotniczych. Teledetekcja Środowiska, vol. 39, str. 67–84.
• 26. Sohl T. L., 1999, Change Analysis in the United Arab Emirates: An Investigation of Techniques. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, vol. 65, nr 4, str. 475–484.
• 27. Song C., Woodcock C. E., Seto K. C., Lenney M. P., Macomber S. A., 2001, Classification and Change Detection Using Landsat TM Data: When and How to Correct Atmospheric Effects? Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 75, str. 230–244.
• 28. Symeonakis E., Caccetta P.A., Wallace J.F., Koukoulas S., 2006, Multi-temporal land use and land cover change detection in the spanish mediterranean coast. ISPRS Commission VII Midterm Symposium “Remote Sensing: From Pixels to Processes”, Enschede.
• 29. Taylor J. C., Brewer T. R., Bird A. C., 2000, Monitoring landscape change in the National Parks of England and Wales using aerial photo interpretation and GIS. International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 21, nr 13–14, str. 2737-2752.
• 30. Wijanarto Antonius B., 2006, Application of Markov change detection technique for detecting Landsat ETM derived land cover change over Banten Bay. Jurnal Ilmiah Geomatika, vol. 12, nr 1, str. 11–21.
• 31. Villa P., Lechi G., Gomarasca M. A., 2009, Multivariate Differencing Techniques for Land Cover Change Detection: the Normalized Difference Reflectance Approach. W: Geoscience and Remote Sensing, str. 277–299.