PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Exploring the need for a new paradigm in engineering management and the decision-making process in technology-based organisations

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Engineering management and engineering projects are subject to greater levels of uncertainty and complexity as part of the current dynamic and competitive industrial environment. Engineering managers need to navigate the arising challenges and consequently gain access to effective decision-making processes. Engineering education has a clear role to play here. However, formal education in quantitative methods is only part of the solution — engineers and engineering managers should also have access to a broader set of skills and knowledge to be effective in the industrial landscape. Therefore, we now need a new paradigm for engineering management and the decision-making process. This article draws on supporting material from the literature and the insights gained from a series of industrial cases using the participatory action research method and a process of inductive reasoning to allow synthesis of generalised propositions that are linked to the industrial cases and antecedent factors from the literature. The findings lead to a set of areas that require further development to support engineering managers to be more effective when dealing with increasing levels of uncertainty and complexity. This includes a number of areas, which are as follow: the need for engineering managers to have enhanced professional skills and knowledge; the importance of experience-based judgement; effective knowledge management; supportive leadership and overall organisational culture; and a holistic approach to decision-making. The research study has practical relevance to engineering management practitioners working in industrial companies to support self-evaluation and professional development. The findings are also pertinent to academic researchers seeking to evaluate decision-making models as part of extending the current understanding of the field of engineering management in technology-based organisations.
Rocznik
Strony
7--21
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 71 poz., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
  • London South Bank University, United Kingdom
  • Freerange Buddy Publications, Canada
Bibliografia
  • Afonasova, M. A., Panfilova, E. E., Galichkina, M. A., & Ślusarczyk, B. (2020). Digitalization in economy and innovation: The effect on social and economic processes. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(2), 22-32.
  • Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2012). Using performance management to win the talent war. Business Horizons, 55(6), 609-616.
  • Akbarnia, M., Amidpour, M., & Shadaram, A. (2009). A new approach in pinch technology considering piping in total cost targeting for heat exchanger network. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 87(3), 357-365.
  • Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., Davis, S. J., & Terry, S. J. (2020). Covid-induced economic uncertainty (No. w26983). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Balzer. W. K., & Smith, P. K. (1990). User’s manual for the Job Descriptive Index (JDI) and the Job in General (JIG) Scales. Bowling Green University.
  • Bar-On, R., Tranel, D., Denburg, N. L., & Bechara, A. (2004). Emotional and social intelligence. Social Neuroscience: Key Readings, 223, 52.
  • Carrillo, P., Ruikar, K., & Fuller, P. (2013). When will we learn? Improving lessons learned practice in construction. International Journal of Project Management, 31(4), 567-578.
  • Carson, K. P., Cardy, R. L., & Dobbins, G. H. (1991). Performance appraisal as effective management or deadly management disease: Two initial empirical investigations. Group and Organization Studies, 16(2), 143-159.
  • Chesbrough, H. (2002). Graceful exits and missed opportunities: Xerox’s management of its technology spin-off organizations. Business History Review, 76(4), 803- 837.
  • Chevalier, J. M., & Buckles, D. J. (2019). Participatory action research: Theory and methods for engaged inquiry. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Cohen, G., Blake, R. S., & Goodman, D. (2016). Does turnover intention matter? Evaluating the usefulness of turnover intention rate as a predictor of actual turnover rate. Review of Public Personnel Admin, 36(3), 240-263.
  • Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and explicit knowledge. University of Chicago Press.
  • Demski, J. S. (1998). Performance measure manipulation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(3), 261-285.
  • Diamond Jr, A. M. (2019). Openness to creative destruction: Sustaining innovative dynamism. Oxford University Press. Drucker, P. (1959), The Landmarks of Tomorrow, New York: Harper & Row.
  • Elbanna, S. (2006). Strategic decision‐making: Process perspectives. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 1-20.
  • Fayol, H. (1918). Administration industrielle et générale (Vol. 2). Dunod et Pinat.
  • Fisher, J. G. (1998). Contingency theory, management control systems and firm outcomes: past results and future directions. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 10, 47.
  • Fox, J. (2009). The myth of the rational market: A history of risk, reward, and delusion on Wall Street. New York: Harper Business.
  • Gabor, A., & Tarrant, J. (1990). The man who discovered quality: How W. Edwards Deming brought the quality revolution to America: The stories of Ford, Xerox, and GM. New York: Times Books.
  • Gavetti, G. (2004). Kodak (A) Volume 9 of Harvard Business School case studies, Harvard Business School.
  • Hazlett, S. A., McAdam, R., & Gallagher, S. (2005). Theory building in knowledge management: in search of paradigms. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(1), 31-42.
  • Herzberg, F. I. (1966). Work and the Nature of Man. The World Publishing Company.
  • Hovnanian, G., Kroll, K., & Sjödin, E. (2019). How analytics can drive smarter engineering and construction decisions. McKinsey & Company Capital Projects & Infrastructure.
  • Ireland, V., Croser, P., & Croser, S. (2010). Moving organisations from a systems engineering approach to a System of Systems approach. Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Systems Engineering Research, New Jersey, USA: Hoboken.
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy. California Management Review, 39(1), 53-79.
  • Kennedy, D. (2010). Flogging the Innocent: Higher Profits, Great Ethics, Enjoyable Work. Edmonton: Freerange Buddy Publications.
  • Kennedy, D. (2015). What if the Gurus Were Right?: Part III. In Proceedings of the International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management. American Society for Engineering Management (ASEM).
  • Kennedy, D., & Huston, M. (2012). Don’t promote the villains-A closer look at proper metrics helps uncover those who game the system. Industrial Engineer, 44(10), 28.
  • Kennedy, D., & Nur, M. (2012). The rise of taylorism in knowledge management. 2012 Proceedings of PICMET’12: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies, IEEE, 2283-2289.
  • Kennedy, D., & Philbin, S. P. (2018). The imperative need to develop guidelines to manage human versus machine intelligence. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 5(2), 182-194.
  • Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling, 12th edition. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Ketokivi, M., & Mantere, S. (2010). Two strategies for inductive reasoning in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 315-333.
  • Koontz, H. (1961). The management theory jungle. Academy of Management Journal, 4(3), 174-188.
  • Koschmann, T. (1996). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology: An introduction. CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm, 116, 1-23.
  • Krykavskyy, Y., Pokhylchenko, O., & Hayvanovych, N. (2019). Supply chain development drivers in industry 4.0 in Ukrainian enterprises. Oeconomia Copernicana, 10(2), 273-290. doi: 10.24136/oc.2019.014
  • Kuhn, T. S. (1977). Second thoughts on paradigms. In T. S. Kuhn (Ed.), The Essential Tension (pp. 293-319). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lannes, W. J. (2001). What is engineering management?. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(1), 107-115.
  • Litzinger, T., Lattuca, L. R., Hadgraft, R., & Newstetter, W. (2011). Engineering education and the development of expertise. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 123-150.
  • Lucia, S., Kögel, M., Zometa, P., Quevedo, D. E., & Findeisen, R. (2016). Predictive control, embedded cyberphysical systems and systems of systems–A perspective. Annual Reviews in Control, 41, 193-207.
  • Mahoney, J. T. & Pandian, J. R. (1992). The resource‐based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 363-380.
  • Maier, R., & Hadrich, T. (2011). Knowledge management systems. Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management, Second Edition, IGI Global, 779-790.
  • McGuire, J. W. (1982). Management theory: Retreat to the academy. Business Horizons, 25(4), 31-37.
  • McGure, J.W. (1982). Management theory: Retreat to the academy. Business Horizons, Jul/Aug 1982, 31-37.
  • Mintzberg, H. (1973). The Nature of Managerial Work. Engle-wood Cliffs.
  • Mitchell, J. E., Nyamapfene, A., Roach, K., & Tilley, E. (2019). Faculty wide curriculum reform: the integrated engineering programme. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1-19.
  • Nittala, S., & Jesiek, B. K. (2018). Work Experiences of Engineering Managers: Challenges, Strategies, Competencies. 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), IEEE, 1-4.
  • Nwaiwu, F., Duduci, M., Chromjakova , F., & Otekhile, C.-A. F. (2020). Industry 4.0 concepts within the Czech SME manufacturing sector: an empirical assessment of critical success factors. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(1), 58-70. doi: 10.3846/ btp.2020.10712
  • Parviainen, P., Tihinen, M., Kääriäinen, J., & Teppola, S. (2017). Tackling the digitalization challenge: how to benefit from digitalization in practice. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 5(1), 63-77.
  • Paul-Hus, A., Desrochers, N., De Rijcke, S., & Rushforth, A. D. (2017). The reward system of science. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(5), 478-485.
  • Peters, T. J. (2004). A skunkworks tale. The Stanford Magazine 1983, Reprinted in the Human Side of Managing Technological Innovation: A Collection of Readings, 405-413.
  • Phelps, L. D., Parayitam, S., & Olson, B. J. (2007). Edwards Deming, Mary P. Follett and Frederick W. Taylor: Reconciliation of differences in organizational and strategic leadership. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 6.
  • Philbin, S. P. (2008). Managing complex technology projects. Research-Technology Management, 51(2), 32-39.
  • Philbin, S. P., & Kennedy, D. A. (2014). Diagnostic framework and health check tool for engineering and technology projects. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 7(5), 1145-1166.
  • Philbin, S. P., Kauffmann, P., & Wyrick, D. A. (2019). Engineering Education, Skills and Industry Alignment–Comparative Analysis of the UK and USA. Proceedings of the International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management, Philadelphia (PA) USA. American Society for Engineering Management (ASEM), 1-11.
  • Rana, T. M., Salaria, M. R., Herani, G. M., & Amin, M. (2009). Identifying factors playing important role in the increasing employees’ turnover rate: A case of telecom industry in Pakistan. Industrial Journal of Management & Social Sciences, 3(2), 80-89.
  • Ribiere, V. M., & Sitar, A. S. (2003). Critical role of leadership in nurturing a knowledge-supporting culture. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 1(1), 39-48.
  • Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the Worker. Harvard University Press.
  • Sarchet, B. R. (1989). Engineering Management-Key To The Future. Engineering Management Journal, 1(1), 4-7.
  • Savory, A., & Butterfield, J. (1998). Holistic management: a new framework for decision making. Island press.
  • Siderska, J. (2020). Robotic Process Automation- a driver of digital transformation? Engineering Management in Production and Services, 12(2), 21–31.
  • Silva, A. F. R. (2014). Bankruptcy forecasting models civil construction. Doctoral dissertation Universitário de Lisboa.
  • Sim, G. (2016). Individual Disruptors and Economic Gamechangers: Netflix, New Media, and Neoliberalism. The Netflix Effect: Technology and Entertainment in the 21st Century. (pp. 185-202). London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Slocum, J. (2006). Grooming for the top post and ending the CEO succession crisis. Organizational Dynamics, 35(1), 96-105.
  • Taylor, F.W. (1911). Scientific Management. New York: Harper and Brothers.
  • Tworek, K., Walecka-Jankowska, K. & Zgrzywa-Ziemak, A. (2019). Towards organisational simplexity— a simple structure in a complex environment. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 11(4), 43-53.
  • Upton, D.M. (1998). Designing, Managing, and Improving Operations. Prentice Hall.
  • Vetrova, E., Doroshenko, S., Tihomirov, N., Khakimova, G., & Kakava, L. (2020). Model of investment decision-making in a small industrial enterprise. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 7(4), 7-23. doi: 10.23762/FSO_ VOL7_NO4_1
  • Wolff, L. (2008). The death of lifelong employment in Japan. Corporate governance in the 21st century: Japan’s gradual transformation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L., & Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2941-2962.
  • Yin, R. K. (2002). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Zhang, H., Kitchenham, B., & Jeffery, R. (2007). Planning software project success with semi-quantitative reasoning. 2007 Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC’07), 369-378.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-bd10c552-6d78-46da-84c5-31cd85de9058
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.