Safe navigation of cruise ships in greenlandic waters - legal frame and practical challenges

• Autorzy: Rasmussen H. B. , Feldtmann B.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.14.01.26

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Climate change provides for improved conditions for maritime navigation and results in increased activity in the Arctic. Those increased activities influence the safety at sea and risk of accidents. A disaster as the Costa Concordia incident would have far more serious consequences in Greenlandic waters than it had in Italy, therefore the question of prevention and disaster-preparedness is crucial. One approach to avoid risks is to create specific legislation. The legal system guiding safe navigation of cruise ships in/around Greenlandic waters is complex: the legal regime for navigation is set in different general and specific international, regional and national legal acts, partly non-binding, therefore issues of effectiveness arise. Safety is also influenced by practical issues, e.g. the lack of sufficient nautical charts for Greenlandic waters and “preparedness” at land to handle potential disasters, such as the SAR-system and preparedness of different actors, for example hospitals.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

cruise vessels; safe navigation; Greenlandic waters; practical challenges; arctic area; legal frame; legal regime; safety at sea

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 14, no. 1
• Strony: 207--212
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Rasmussen H. B.

• University of Southern Denmark, Aalborg, Denmark

autor

Feldtmann B.

• Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

Bibliografia

• 1. Civil Aviation Authority, 2014. CAP 795: Safety Management Systems - Guidance to Organisations, http://publicapps.caa.co.uk/modalapplication.aspx?catid =1&pagetype=65&appid=11&mode=detail&id=6616
• 2. Bekendtgørelse no. 1967 11. dec. 2015, Bekendtgørelse for Grønland om skibes sikre sejlads m.v. (order no 1697)
• 3. Dekker S., 2017. Malicious Compliance, HindSight, Vol 25 pp. 8 – 9 https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/publicatio n/Hindsight/hindsight-25-op-ed-1.pdf
• 4. DMAIB, 2016. Marine Accident Report December 2016 INUK II Foundering on 14 August 2016 http://www.dmaib.dk/Ulykkesrapporter/INUK%20II%2 0-%20Foundering%20on%2013%20August%202016.pdf
• 5. Engtrø E., Njå O., Gudmestad O.T., 2018. Polarkoden- funkjonsbaseret forskriftsverk for polare farvann. Hvordan kan standarter presentere gode nok løsninger. In: Lindøe P.H., Kringen J., Braut G. S., Regulering og standarisering, Perspektiver og praksis, Universitetsforlaget, Oslo
• 6. Feldtmann B., Siig, K., 2018. UNCLOS as a system of regulation and connected methodology – some reflections. SIMPLY 2017 (502), Oslo
• 7. Frier C., Østergaard K., Polarkodens egnethed som retligt værn mod negative eksternaliteter i Arktis?, 2016. In: Motzfeldt H. M., Schaumburg-Müller S., Gottrup R. & Østergaard, K. (ed.) Mod og mening: Hyldestskrift til Frederik Harhoff, pp. 581-594.
• 8. Hale A., Borysc D., 2013. Working to rule, or working safely? Part 1: A state of the art review, Safety Science, Vol 55, June, p.207-221 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.011
• 9. Hale,A.R., & Hovden,J., 1998. Managment and culture: the third age of safety. a review of approaches to organizational aspects of safety, health and enviromental. In A.M. Feyer, & A. Williamson (Eds.), Occupational Injury Risk, prevention and intervention (pp.129-167).: Taylor & Francis.
• 10. Hollnagel, E. 2017, Can we ever imagine how work is done?, HindSight, Vol 25 pp. 10 – 13 https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/publicatio n/files/hindsight-25.pdf
• 11. Hollnagel,E., Woods,D.D., & Levson,N., 2006. Resilience Engineering:Concepts and Precepts. Abingdon, Oxon: Ashgate Publishing Group.
• 12. IMO circular on the GREENPOS/COASTAL CONTROL (IMO SN/Circ. 221 of 29 May 2002; Bekendtgørelse om skibsrapporteringssystemer i farvandene ved Grønland; BEK 170/2003)
• 13. IMO Polar Code
• 14. Jensen, Ø, 2016. The International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters: Finalization, Adoption and Law of the Sea Implications. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 60–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.236
• 15. Knudsen F.,2009. Paperwork at the service of safety? Workers’ reluctance against written procedures exemplified by the concept of ‘seamanship’, Safety Science, vol 47, issue 2, p. 295-303 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.04.004
• 16. Rasmussen,J., 1997. Risk management in a dynamic society: A modelling problem. Safety Science, 27(2-3), 183-213.
• 17. Reason,J. (1997). Managing the Risk of Organizational Accidents. Ashgate.
• 18. Solberg, K.E., Gudmestad, O.T.; Kvamme, B.O. 2016 SARex Spitzbergen : Search and rescue exercise conducted off North Spitzbergen : Exercise report. Universitetet i Stavanger http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2414815
• 19. Solberg, K.E., Gudmestad, O.T., Skjærseth, E. 2017 SARex2 : Surviving a maritime incident in cold climate conditions. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2468805

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).