Tytuł artykułu
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether the lifestyles of young consumers (students) in Poland can influence their attitudes towards foods containing edible insects. Design/methodology/approach: The empirical survey was conducted via an online platform (CAWI) among 749 students in Poland in 2023. Findings: Most lifestyle determinants (commitment to learning, attention to the nutritional value of food, valuing the culinary traditions of the region of origin, health consciousness and physical activity) correlated positively with environmental concern in terms of willingness to eat food containing edible insects. Research limitations/implications: The research has certain limitations. Despite the large size of the study group, the results obtained are not representative and cannot be generalised to the Z population in Poland. Practical implications: The results of this study may prove beneficial in the development of strategies to enhance food security, particularly in the context of environmental protection. Social implications: The study contributes to the existing body of knowledge regarding the attitudes of young adults, commonly referred to as Generation Z, towards environmental care, food security concerns, and environmental sustainability. In doing so, it considers the influence of lifestyle variables. Originality/value: An investigation into the influence of younger consumers' lifestyles on their attitudes towards environmental care, food security concerns and environmental sustainability is of significant importance in the context of the future of entomophagy in Poland.
Słowa kluczowe
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
491--511
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 46 poz.
Twórcy
autor
- Faculty of Management and Quality Science, Gdynia Maritime University
autor
- Faculty of Engineering Sciences, University of Applied Science in Nowy Sącz
autor
- Faculty of Economic Sciences, Institute of Management Science and Quality, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
Bibliografia
- 1. Arvola, A., Lähteenmäki, L., Dean, M., Vassallo, M., Winkelmann, M., Claupein, E., Saba, A., Shepherd, R. (2007). Consumers' beliefs about whole and refined grain products in the UK, Italy and Finland. Journal of Cereal Science, No. 46(3), pp. 197-206. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2007.06.001.
- 2. Baigts-Allende, D., Doost, A.S., Ramírez-Rodrigues, M., Dewettinck, K., Van der Meeren, P., de Meulenaer, B., Tzompa-Sosa, D. (2021). Insect Protein Concentrates from Mexican Edible Insects: Structural and Functional Characterization. LWT, No. 152, 112267. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112267.
- 3. Cheseto, X., Kuate, S.P., Tchouassi, D.P., Ndung'u, M., Teal, P.E.A., Torto, B. (2015). Potential of the Desert Locust Schistocerca Gregaria (Orthoptera: Acrididae) as an Unconventional Source of Dietary and Therapeutic Sterols. PLoS ONE, No. 10, e0127171, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127171.
- 4. Costa-Neto, E.M. (2005). Entomotherapy, or the Medicinal Use of Insects. Journal of Ethnobiology, No. 25, pp. 93-114. Retrieved from: 10.2993/0278-0771(2005)25 [93:EOTMUO]2.0.CO;2.
- 5. Dobermann, D., Swift, J.A., Field, L.M. (2017). Opportunities and hurdles of edible insects for food and feed. Nutrition Bulletin, No. 42(4), pp. 293-308. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.12291.
- 6. FAO (2021). Looking at edible insects from a food safety perspective. Challenges and opportunities for the sector. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations.
- 7. Fessler, D.M.T., Navarrete, C.D. (2003). Meat is good to taboo: dietary proscriptions as a product of the interaction of psychological mechanisms and social processes. Journal of Cognition and Culture, No. 3, pp. 1-40. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1163/ 156853703321598563.
- 8. Guiné, R.P.F., Duarte, J., Chuck-Hernández, C., Boustani, N.M., Djekic, I., Bartkiene, E., Sari´c, M.M., Papageorgiou, M., Korzeniowska, M., Combarros-Fuertes, P., Cerneliˇc- Bizjak, M., Martin-Hadmas, R., Straumite, E., Damarli, E., Florença, S.G., Ferreira, M., Costa, C.A., Correia M.R., Cardoso, A.P., Campos, S., Anjos, O. (2023). Validation of the scale knowledge and perceptions about edible insects through structural equation modelling. Sustainability, No. 15, 2992. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ su15042992.
- 9. Gumul, D., Oracz, J., Kowalski, S., Mikulec, A., Skotnicka, M., Karwowska, K., Areczuk, A. (2023). Bioactive compounds and antioxidant composition of nut bars with addition of various edible insect flours. Molecules, 28(8), 3556. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28083556.
- 10. Hall, F., Reddivari, L., Liceaga, A.M. (2020). Identification and characterization of edible cricket peptides on hypertensive and glycemic in vitro inhibition and their anti- inflammatory activity on RAW 264.7 Macrophage Cells. Nutrients, No. 12, 3588. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12113588.
- 11. Halloran, A., Flore, R., Vantomme, P., Roos, N. (2018). Edible insects in sustainable food systems. Cham: Springer, pp. 978-983, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-74011-9.
- 12. Hartmann, C., Siegrist, M. (2017). Siegrist, Insects as food: perception and acceptance Findings from current research. Ernahrungs Umschau, No. 64(3), pp. 44-50, doi: 10.4455/eu.2017.010.
- 13. Jonas, K., Broemer, P., Diehl, M. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence. European Review of Social Psychology, No. 11, pp. 35-74, doi:10.1080/14792779943000125.
- 14. Kornher, L., Schellhorn, M., Vetter, S. (2019). Disgusting or innovative-consumer willingness to pay for insect based burger patties in Germany. Sustainability, No. 11, 1878. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071878.
- 15. Kouřimská, L., Adámková, A. (2016). Nutritional and sensory quality of edible insects. NFS Journal, No. 4, pp. 22-26, doi:10.1016/j.nfs.2016.07.001.
- 16. Kowalski, St., Mikulec, A., Skotnicka, M., Mickowska, B., Makarewicz, M., Sabat, R., Wywrocka-Gurgul, A., Mazurek, A. (2022). Effect of the addition of edible insect flour from yellow mealworm (Tenebrio Molitor) on the sensory acceptance, and the physicochemical and textural properties of sponge cake. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, No. 72, pp. 393-405, doi:10.31883/pjfns/155405.
- 17. Lange, K.W., Nakamura, Y. (2021). Edible insects as future food: chances and challenges. Journal of Future Foods, No. 1, pp. 38-46. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jfutfo.2021.10.001.
- 18. Likert, R.A. (1932). Technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archiv of Psychology, No. 22, pp. 5-55. Retrieved from: https://legacy.voteview.com/pdf/Likert_1932.pdf
- 19. Lim, S.M., Thien, C.N., Toure, A.K., Poh, B.K. (2022). Factors influencing acceptance of grasshoppers and other insects as Food: A Comparison between two cities in Malaysia. Foods, No. 11, 3284. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ foods11203284.
- 20. Malm, M., Liceaga, A.M. (2021). Physicochemical properties of chitosan from two commonly reared edible cricket species, and its application as a hypolipidemic and antimicrobial agent. Polysaccharides, No. 2, pp. 339-353. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3390/polysaccharides2020022.
- 21. Mancini, S., Sogari, G., Menozzi, D., Nuvoloni, R., Torracca, B., Moruzzo, R., Paci, G. (2019). Factors predicting the intention of eating an insect-based product. Foods, No. 8(7), 270, doi:10.3390/foods8070270.
- 22. Megido, R.C., Gierts, C., Blecker, C., Brostaux, Y., Haubruge, É., Alabi, T., Francis, F. (2016). Consumer acceptance of insect-based alternative meat products in Western countries. Food Quality and Preference, No. 52, pp. 237-243, doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.05.004.
- 23. Mela, D.J. (1999). Food choice and intake: the human factor. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, No. 58, pp. 513-521. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0029665199000683.
- 24. Mignon, J. (2002). L'entomophagie: une question de culture? Tropicultura, No. 20, 151-155. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228084124_ L'entomophagie_une_question_de_culture.
- 25. Mikulec, A.T., Platta, A.M., Radzymińska, M., Ruszkowska, M., Mikulec, K., Suwała, G., Kowalski, St., Kowalczewski, P.Ł., Nowicki, M. (2024). Attitudes and purchase intentions of polish university students towards food made from insects - a modelling approach. PLoS ONE, No. 19(3), e0300871. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300871.
- 26. Modlinska, K., Adamczyk, D., Goncikowska, K., Maison, D., Pisula, W. (2020). The effect of labelling and visual properties on the acceptance of foods containing insects. Nutrients, No. 12, 2498. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092498.
- 27. Modlinska, K., Adamczyk, D., Maison, D., Goncikowska, K., Pisula, W. (2021). Relationship between Acceptance of Insects as an Alternative to Meat and Willingness to Consume Insect-Based Food-A Study on a Representative Sample of the Polish Population. Foods, No. 10, 2420. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ foods10102420.
- 28. Mohan, K., Ganesan, A.R., Muralisankar, T., Jayakumar, R., Sathishkumar, P., Uthayakumar, V., Chandirasekar, R., Revathi, N. (2020). Recent insights into the extraction, characterization, and bioactivities of chitin and chitosan from insects. Trends in Food Science & Technology, No. 105, pp. 17-42. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.08.016.
- 29. Nino, M.C., Reddivari, L., Ferruzzi, M.G., Liceaga, A.M. (2021b). Targeted Phenolic characterization and antioxidant bioactivity of extracts from edible acheta domesticus. Foods, No. 10, 2295, doi:10.3390/foods10102295.
- 30. Nino, M.C., Reddivari, L., Osorio, C., Kaplan, I., Liceaga, A.M. (2021a). Insects as a source of phenolic compounds and potential health benefits. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, No. 7, pp. 1077-1087, doi: 10.3920/JIFF2020.0113.
- 31. Ochieng, B.O., Anyango, J.O., Nduko, J.M., Cheseto, X., Mudalungu, C.M., Khamis, F. M., Ghemoh, C.J., Egonyu, P.J., Subramanian, S., Nakimbugwe, D., Ssepuuya, G., Chrysantus M. Tanga, C.M. (2022). Dynamics in nutrients, sterols and total flavonoid content during processing of the edible long-horned grasshopper (ruspolia differens serville) for Food. Food Chemistry, No. 383, 132397, doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2022. 132397.
- 32. Pal, P., Roy, S. (2014). Edible Insects: Future of Human Food - A Review. International Letters of Natural Sciences, No. 26, pp. 1-11, doi:10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILNS.26.1.
- 33. Piwowar, A., Wolańska, W., Orkusz, A., Kapelko, M., Harasym, J. (2023). Modelling the factors influencing polish consumers' approach towards new food products on the market. Sustainability, No. 15, 2818. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032818.
- 34. Platta, A., Mikulec, A., Radzymińska, M., Ruszkowska, M., Suwała, G., Zborowski, M., Kowalczewski, P.Ł., Nowicki, M. (2023a). Body image and willingness to change it-A study of university students in Poland. PLoS ONE, Vol. 18, No. 11, art. no. e0293617, 1-20. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293617.
- 35. Platta, A., Mikulec, A., Radzymińska, M., Ruszkowska, M., Suwała, G. (2023b). Eating- related health behaviors and body perception: a study of young adults in Poland Żywność. Nauka. Technologia. Jakość, No. 2(135), pp. 122-143, doi: 10.15193/zntj/2023/135/451.
- 36. Ribeiro, J.C., Sposito Gonçalves, A.T., Moura, A.P., Varela, P., Cunha, L.M. (2022). Insects as food and feed in Portugal and Norway - Cross-cultural comparison of determinants of acceptance. Food Quality and Preference, No. 102, 104650, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104650.
- 37. Roberts, J.A. (1996). Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising. Journal of Business Research, No. 36(3), pp. 217-231, doi: 10.1016/0148- 2963(95)00150-6.
- 38. Rothman, N.B., Pratt, M.G, Rees, L., Vogus, T.J. (2017). Undrstanding the dual nature of ambivalence: Why and when ambivalence leads to good and bad outcomes. Academy of Management Annals, No. 11(1), pp. 33-72, doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0066.
- 39. Rumpold, B.A., Schlüter, O.K. (2013). Nutritional composition and safety aspects of edible insects. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, No. 57(5), pp. 802-823, doi: DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201200735.
- 40. Sun, S.S.M. (2008). Application of agricultural biotechnology to improve food nutrition and healthcare products. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, No. 17, Supplement 1, pp. 87-90. PMID: 18296309.
- 41. Sun-Waterhouse, D., Waterhouse, G.I.N., You, L., Zhang, J., Liu, Y., Ma, L., Ga, J., Dong, Y. (2016). Transforming insect biomass into consumer wellness foods: A review. Food Research International, No. 89, pp. 129-151, doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2016.10.001.
- 42. van Harreveld, F., Nohlen, H.U., Schneider I.K. (2015). The ABC of ambivalence: Affective, behavioral, and cognitive consequences of attitudinal conflict. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, No. 52, pp. 285-324, doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.01.002.
- 43. van Huis, A., Van Itterbeeck, J., Klunder, H., Mertens, E., Halloran, A., Muir, G., Vantomme, P. (2013). Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome: FAO.
- 44. van Huis, A. (2017). Did early humans consume insects? Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, No. 3(3), pp. 161-163, doi: 10.3920/JIFF2017.x006
- 45. van Huis, A., Oonincx, D.G.A.B. (2017). The environmental sustainability of insects as food and feed. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, No. 37, p. 43. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0452-8.
- 46. Vane-Wright, R.I. (1991). Why not eat insects? Bulletin of Entomological Research, No. 81, pp. 1-4, doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300053165.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-bcfbe59b-b73e-4aa5-a6d8-f23318930591
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.