Concept of separation method between aircraft in the transition period

• Autorzy: Żuchowska Daria , Stelmach Anna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0016.1444

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The current concept of air traffic control based on human work was created many years ago and is now approaching the limit of its performance. Therefore, new concepts for air traffic control are being sought. One of the ideas is to delegate the responsibility for ensuring separation between aircraft to aircraft crews. The issue of self-separation is quite a difficult task. Analysis of the literature concludes that the transition from one phase to another will occur in stages. This paper focuses on the transition period. The concept of a method of ensuring separation when changing traffic organization was proposed. A vital element of the separation method in the transition period is to define the negotiation and communication process between aircraft, which was presented in this paper.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Airborne Separation Assurance System; distributed air traffic control; new concepts of air traffic control; multi-agent systems

PL

ruch lotniczy; sterowanie ruchem lotniczym; kontrola ruchu lotniczego; system wieloagentowy

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej
• Czasopismo: Prace Naukowe Politechniki Warszawskiej. Transport
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: z. 135
• Strony: 5--16
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 26 poz., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Żuchowska Daria

• Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Transport

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4390-925X

autor

Stelmach Anna

• Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Transport

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2301-6908

Bibliografia

• 1. Alipio, J., Castro, P., Kaing, H., Shahd, N., Sheizai, O., Donohue, G. L., Grundmann, K. (2003). Dynamic airspace super sectors (DASS) as high-density highways in the sky for a new US air traffic management system, AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics System Conference.Ballin, M., Wing, D., Hughes, M., Conway, S., (1999). Airborne Separation Assurance and Traffic Management: Research of Concepts and Technology.
• 2. Barry, B., Sunders D. M., Lewicki, R. J. (2018). Zasady negocjacji. Kompendium wiedzy dla trenerów, Rebis.
• 3. Beers, C., Huisman, H. (2001) Transition between Free Flight and Managed Airspace, 4th International Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, New-Mexico.
• 4. Eisenbeiss, H. (2004). A mini unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV): system overview and image acquisition, International Archives of Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol 36, no. 5/W1, pp. 1-7.
• 5. Endriss, U. (2006). Monotonic concession protocol for multilateral negotiation, Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems.
• 6. Goodchild, C., Vilaplana, M. A., Elefante, S. (2000). Co-operative Optimal Airborne Separation Assurance in Free Flight Airspace, w 3rd USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, Napoli.
• 7. Havel, K., Balint, V., Novak, A. (2017). A Number of Conflicts at Route Intersections - Rectangular Model. Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina. 19. 145-147. 10.26552/com.C.2017.2.145-147.
• 8. Hexmoor, H., Heng, T. (2009). Air Traffic Control and Alert Agent, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Autonomous agents, New York, NY, USA.
• 9. Hill, J. C., Johnson, F. R., Archibald, J. K., Frost, R. L., Stirling, W. C. (2005). A Cooperative Multi- Agent Approach to Free Flight, 4th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2005), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
• 10. Hoffman, E., Nicolan, J. P., Pusch, C., Zeghal, K. (2001) Limited Delegation of Separation Assurance to Aircraft: The Freer Flight Evolutionary Air Ground Cooperative ATM Concepts, Eurocontrol Experimental Centre.
• 11. Hoffman, E., Zeghal, K., Cloeree, A., Grimuad, I., Nicolan, J.-P. (2000). Is limited delegation of separation assurance promising?, 3rd USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, Napoli.
• 12. Idzikowska, T., Rutkowska, P. (2019). Standaryzacja w strategii regulacyjnej UE dotyczącej rozwoju zakresu zastosowania BSP, Prace Naukowe Politechniki Warszawskiej. Transport, vol. 125, pp. 13-26.
• 13. International Civil Aviation Organization. (2005). Annex 2 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. Rules of the Air.
• 14. International Civil Aviation Organization. (2016). Doc 4444. Procedures for Air Navigation Services. Air Traffic Management.
• 15. Johnson, M. W., Miller, T., McBurney, P. (2007). Modelling Multi-Agent Interaction Protocols using Categories Enriched over Pointed Sets, Technical Report, University of Liverpool.
• 16. Kovacik, L., Novak, A., Kazda, A., Lusiak, T. (2019). Automatic Commercial Aircraft Formation Flight. 106-109. 10.1109/NTAD.2019.8875618.
• 17. Krozel, J., Peters, M., Bilimoria, K. D., Lee C., Mitchell, J. S. B. (2001). System Performance Characteristics of Centralized and Decentralized Air Traffic Separation Strategies, 4th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, Santa Fe, USA.
• 18. Novak, A., Havel, K., Adamko, P. (2019). Number of conflicts at the route intersection – minimum distance model. Aviation. 23. 1-6. 10.3846/aviation.2019.9746.
• 19. Pietrzykowski, Z., Szewczuk, T., Wójcik, A., Banaś, P. (2013). Procesy wnioskowania w systemie automatycznej komunikacji w żegludze morskiej, Prace Naukowe Politechniki Warszawskiej, no. 95, pp. 421-431,
• 20. Pinheiro Dib, M.V., Weigang, L., & Magalhaes Alves de Melo, A.C. (2007). Approach of Balancing of the Negotiation among Agents in Traffic Synchronization. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 5, 338-345.
• 21. Rosenchein, J. S., Zlotkin, G. (1994). Rules of Encounter, MIT Press.
• 22. Wollkind, S., Valasek, J., Ioerger, T. (2004). Automated Conflict Resolution for Air Traffic Management Using Cooperative Multiagent Negotiation, Conference: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Coference and Exhibit
• 23. Wyganowska, M. (2018). Negocjacje jako element komunikacji wewnętrznej w sytaucjach konfliktowych w przedsiębiorstwie,Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Seria: Organizacja i zarządzanie, no 127, pp. 311-324.
• 24. Xue, M. (2009). Design Analysis of Corridors-in-the-sky, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, No. AIAA 2009-5989, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 1-11.
• 25. Yousefi, A., Donohouse, G., Sherry, L., (2004). High-volume tube-shape sectors (HTS): A network of high capacity ribbons connecting congested city pairs, Proceedings of the 23rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference , Salt Lake City.
• 26. Zeuthen, F. (1930) Problem of Monopoly and Economic Warfare, Routledge.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).