Health and safety management in the era of building Society 5.0

• Autorzy: Goździewska-Nowicka Agnieszka

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2024.192.19

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The purpose of the article is to make a detailed characterization of the cybernetic system of man-machine-environment in the context of maintaining occupational health and safety. Design/methodology/approach: Data for the study was collected using participant observation. Subsequently, any information obtained is presented in this paper as a case study. Findings: The results of the study indicate that occupational health and safety management in the era of building society 5.0 is highly dependent on the proper cooperation of man and machine in a turbulent work environment. Research limitations/implications: The survey is limited to employees of one manufacturing company. Therefore, it would be extremely valuable to observe whether work safety in other companies also depends primarily on the proper preparation of workers to work with machinery. Practical implications: The study provides guidance for human resource management to implement effective practices to enhance employee safety in the era of building society 5.0. Social implications: This study offers support to the employees of a manufacturing company, providing insight into how the work environment can be improved, thereby increasing health and safety. Originality/value: This is a study that aims to provide insight into how, in the era of building a 5.0 society, it is important to take care to prepare the employee to be a designer of a safe work environment in which people and machines work together to achieve the best work result.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

health and safety management; ergonomics; society 5.0

PL

zarządzanie bezpieczeństwem i higieną pracy; ergonomia; społeczeństwo 5.0

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: z. 192
• Strony: 313--326
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 20 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Goździewska-Nowicka Agnieszka

• Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5949-3901

Bibliografia

• 1. Andrew, O.C., Saudah, S. (2012). Individual factors and work outcomes of employee engagement. The 2012 International Conference on Asia Pacific Business Innovation and Technology Management, Pattaya, Thailand, Vol. 40. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, p. 501.
• 2. Avilla-Guitereez, M.J., Suares-Fernandes de Miranda, S., Aguayo-Gonzalez, F. (2020). Occupational Safety and Health 5.0—A Model for Multilevel Strategic Deployment Aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals of Agenda 2030. Sustainability, Vol. 14, p. 6.
• 3. Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Mobashar, M., Rejeb, A., Nilashi, M. (2022). Identifying industry 5.0 contributionss to sustainable development: A strategy roadmap for delivering sustainability values. Sustainable Production and Consumption, Vol. 33, p. 721.
• 4. Goździewska-Nowicka, A. (2019). The impact of ergonomics on the functioning of older people in the work environment. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Poznańskiej. Organization and Management, 80, pp. 17-19.
• 5. Hayashi, Y. (2019). Japanese Science and Technology Basic Plan: A perspective of policy process. Innovation and Development Policy, Vol. 1, p. 26.
• 6. Legg, S.J., Olsen, K.B., Laird, I.S., Hasle, P. (2015). Managing safety in small and medium enterprises. Safety Science, Vol. 71, p. 190.
• 7. Longo, F., Padovano, A., Umbrello, S. (2020). Engenharia de tecnologia ética e orientada para o valor na Indústria 5.0: uma perspectiva centrada no ser humano para o design da fábrica do futuro. Ciencias Aplicadas, 10, p. 4182.
• 8. Maddikunta, P.K.R., Pham, Q., Prabadevi, B., Deepa, N., Dev, K. (2022). Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications. Journal Industry, Infrastructure Integration, 26, p. 1257.
• 9. Mohd, J., Abid, H. (2020). Critical Components of Industry 5.0 Towards a Successful Adoption in the Field of Manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, Vol. 5, p. 328.
• 10. Occupational safety and health in Europe: state and trends 2023. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union (2023).
• 11. Osvalder, A.L., Ulfvengren, P. (2017). Human-machine systems. Work and technology on human terms, p. 352.
• 12. Pizoń, J., Gola, A. (2023). Human-Machine Relationship - perspective and future roadmap for industry 5.0 solutions. Machines 11(2), p. 203.
• 13. Rączkowski, B. (2022). BHP w praktyce. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo ODDK.
• 14. Ricciolli, L. (2023). Artificial Intelligence: innovation for society 5.0. SSRN, 2, p. 21.
• 15. Saniuk, S. (2022). Identification of Social and Economic Expectations: contextual Reasons for the Transformation Process of Industry 4.0 into the Industry 5.0 concept. Sustainability 14, p. 1391.
• 16. Shujiro, U. (2021). Japan’s Asia-Pacific Economic Strategy: Toward the Revival of the Japanese Economy. Asia-Pacyfic Review, Vol. 28, p. 37.
• 17. Tepe, S. (2021). The impact on industry 4.0 on Occupational Health and Safety. International Journal Advanced Engineering and Pure Science, Vol. 33, p. 125.
• 18. Twaróg, J., Mieczkowski, P. (2019). Krótka opowieść o społeczeństwie 5.0, czyli jak żyć i funkcjonować w dobie gospodarki 4.0 i sieci 5G. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krajowej Izby Gospodarczej Elektroniki i Telekomunikacji, p. 28.
• 19. Weinstein, M.B. (1997). Total Quality Safety Management and Auditing. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press LLC.
• 20. Yogeswara, T., Siddiqui, N.A., Hamsagar, R.S., Muenster, R.N. (2013). A study of environment, health and ehs (ehs)-culture evaluation and developing improvement plan for industries through a technical study. Journal of Industrial Pollution Control, 29(2), p. 268.