Effects of different fertigation levels on maize yield and nutrient uptake under semi-arid mediterranean conditions

• Autorzy: Demirbas A. , Akpinar C. , Coskan A. , Karakoy T.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14597/infraeco.2017.2.2.055

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of four fertigation levels (25, 50, 75 and 100% of fertilizer dose, 240:100:200 kg N:P:K ha-1) and to compare with conventional practices (CP). The fertigation levels F1 25% of total fertilizer (60:25:50 kg N:P:K ha-1) treatments, F2 treatment is 50% of total fertilizer (120:50:100 kg N:P:K ha-1), F3 treatment is 75% of total fertilizer (180:75:150 kg N:P:K ha-1), F4 treatment is 100% of total fertilizer (240:100:200 kg N:P:K ha-1). The experiment was conducted during 2012 summer (from 20 June to 15 September) under the field conditions in the Menzilat soil series (Typic Xerofluvents) which is located in the East Mediterranean coastal part of Turkey. The experiment was designed as a completely randomized-block with three replications. The maize plant (Zea mays L.) was sown as second crop following with wheat cultivation. The maize yield was higher in F3 fertigation level treatment (12.47 Mg ha-1) compared to the other treatments. Lowest yield was recorded in F2 (8.45 Mg ha-1) treatment. The results shown that the half of the fertilizer application with conventional practices and the other half with fertigation are more efficient under Menzilat soil series conditions. For future, it is important to see the long term effect of fertigation on soil nutrients dynamic under the Mediterranean soil conditions.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

fertigation; maize; second crop; yield

• Wydawca: Stowarzyszenie Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich
• Czasopismo: Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: nr II/2
• Strony: 727--736
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 26 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Demirbas A.

• Department of Crop and Animal Production, Vocational School of Sivas, University of Cumhuriyet 58140 İmaret-Sivas, Turkey

autor

Akpinar C.

• Department of Organic Farming Business Management, Kadirli School of Applied Sciences, University of Osmaniye Korkut Ata, 80750 Kadirli-Osmaniye, Turkey

autor

Coskan A.

• Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition Faculty of Agriculture University of Suleyman Demirel 32260 Cunur-Isparta, Turkey

autor

Karakoy T.

• Department of Crop and Animal Production, Vocational School of Sivas, University of Cumhuriyet 58140 İmaret-Sivas, Turkey

Bibliografia

• Abd El-Wahed M.H., Ali E.A. (2013). Effects of irrigation system, amounts of irrigation water and mulching on corn yield, water use efficiency and net profit. Agric. Water Manag., 120(31), 64-71.
• Anonymous, (2008). Turkish Methorology Service. Ankara, Turkey.
• Bremner, J.M. (1965). Method of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Methods. American Society of Agronomy Inc. Madison, Wise S-1149-1178, USA.
• Castellanos, M.T., Tarquis, A.M., Ribas, F., Cabello, M.J., Arce, A., Cartagena, M.C., (2012). Nitrogen uptake dynamics, yield and quality as influenced by nitrogen fertilization in ‘Piel de sapo’ melon. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, (10)3: 756-767.
• Chapman, H. D., Pratt. F.P. (1982). Ammonium vandate-molybdate method for determination of phosphorus. Methods of analysis for soils, plants and water 1: 184-203.
• Hagin, J., M. Sneh, and A. Lowengart-Aycicegi. (2002). Fertigation - Fertilization through irrigation. IPI Research Topics No. 23. Ed. by A.E. Johnston. International Potash Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
• Hanson, B.R., Simunek, J., Hopmans, J.W. (2006). Evaluation of urea–ammonium-nitrate fertigation with drip irrigation using numerical modeling, Agric. Water Manage. 86 (1-2) 102-113.
• Hassan. S.W., Oad, F.C., Tunio, S.D., Gandahi A.W.,. Siddiqui, M.H, Oad, S.M., and Jagirani, A.W. (2010). Impact of Nitrogen Levels and Application Methods On Agronomic, Physiological and Nutrient Uptake Traits of Maize Fodder. Pak. J. Bot., 42(6): 4095-4101.
• Ibrahim, M.M., El-Baroudy, A.A., Taha, M.A. (2016). Irrigation and fertigation scheduling under drip irrigation for maize cropin sandy soil. Int. Agrophys, 30, 47-55.
• Jones, B. (1998). Plant Nutrition Manual. Crc Press, Boston.
• Kafkafi, U. (2008). Global aspect of fertigation usage. In Fertigation: Optimizing the utilization of water and nutrients, eds. P. Imas and M.R. Price, Beijing, 8-22.
• Kafkafi, U., Kant, S. (2005). Fertigation, in: H. Daniel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 1-9.
• Matar, A., Torrent, J., Ryan, J. (1992). Soil and fertilizer phosphorus and crop responses in the dryland Mediterranean zone. Advances in Soil Science 18: 81-146.
• Mohammad, M.J., (2004a). Utilization of applied fertilizer nitrogen and irrigation water by drip-fertigated squash as determined by nuclear and traditional techniques. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 68 (1), 1-11.
• Mohammad, M.J., (2004b). Squash yield, nutrient content and soil fertility parameters in response to fertilizer application and rates of nitrogen fertigation. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 68 (2), 99-108.
• Montgomery, M.A., Elimelech, M. (2007). Water and sanitation in developing countries: including health in the equation, Environ. Sci. Technol. 41 (1) 17-24.
• Muahammad, A. A., Zahoor, A., Quiser, M., Sher, A., Mian, M. A. (2015). “Optimizing Nitrogen Level to Improve Growth and Yield of Spring Planted Irrigated Maize (Zea Mays L.).” Journal of Advanced Botany and Zoology 2 (3): 1-4.
• Navalawala, B.N. (1991). Water logging and its related issues in India. J. Irrigation Power 1, 55-64.
• Nitrogen fertigation: an integrated agronomic and environmental study. Agricultural Water Management, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.06.016.
• Ortas, I. (2012). The effect of mycorrhizal fungal inoculation on plant yield, nutrient uptake and inoculation effectiveness under long-term field conditions. Field Crops Research 125, 35-48.
• Page, A. L. (1982). Methods of soil analysis: chemical and microbiological proerpteis. Amen Society of Agronomy.
• Patel, N., Rajput, T.B.S. (2000). Effect of fertigation on growth and yield of onion. In: Micro Irrigation, CBIP publication no. 282, pp. 451-454.
• Pereira, L.S. (2006). Irrigated agriculture: Facing environmental and water scarcity challenges. International Symposium on water and land management for sustainable Irrigated Agriculture, Cukurova University April 4-8, 2006, Turkey.
• Shannon, M.A. Bohn, P.W. Elimelech, M., Georgiadis, J.G., Marinas, B.J., Mayes, (2008). Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades, Nature 452 (7185) 301-310.
• Shigure, P.S. Lallan Ram, Marathe, R.A., Yadav, K.P., Ram, L., (1999). Effect of nitrogen fertigation as vegetative growth and leaf nutrient content of acid lime (Citrus aurantifolia, Swingle) in Central India. Indian J. Soil Conserv. 27 (1), 45-49.
• Singandhupe, R.B. Rao, G.G.S.N., Patil, N.G., Brahmanand, P.S. (2003). Fertigation studies and irrigation scheduling in drip irrigation system in tomato crop (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). European Journal of Agronomy 19, 327-340.

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).