The method of multi-criteria analysis for the prioritization of innovations in the construction industry

• Autorzy: Malara Zbigniew , Miśko Rafał

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.58691/man/169579

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The construction industry is a vital sector that contributes to the economy’s development. On the other hand, it also contributes to the natural environment through emissions and waste. Moreover, the construction industry is under pressure to develop and adopt new technologies, tools and practices. A proper tool for selecting innovation is needed. This paper presents MCDA tool for construction companies, namely the Bellinger method. The proposed tool facilitates decision-making because it helps to choose between alternatives.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

MCDA; innovation; construction sector

PL

MCDA; innowacja; sektor budowlany

• Wydawca: University of Zielona Góra, Faculty of Economics and Management
• Czasopismo: Management
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 27, no. 1
• Strony: 56--67
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 30 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Malara Zbigniew

• Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4404-4959

autor

Miśko Rafał

• Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4154-419X

Bibliografia

• [1] Albors-Garrigos, J., Barrera, R., R. (2011). Impact of public funding on a firm’s innovation performance: Analysis of internal and external moderating factors. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15.06, pp. 1297-1322. DOI: 10.1142/S136391961100374X.
• [2] Anaman, K. A. (2007). Analysis of the causality links between the growth of the construction industry and the growth of the macro-economy in Ghana. Construction management and economics, 25.9, pp. 951-961. DOI:10.1080/01446190701411208.
• [3] Barann, B., Hermann, A., Cordes, A. K., Chasin, F., Becker, J. (2019). Supporting digital transformation in small and medium-sized enterprises: a procedure model involving publicly funded support units. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Grand Wailea, Hawaii 8-11.01.2019.
• [4] Benachio, G. L. F., Freitas, M. D. C. D., Tavares, S. F. (2020). Circular economy in the construction industry: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 121046. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121046.
• [5] Bross, I. D. (1965). Design for Decision. Free Press.
• [6] Cinelli, M., Coles, S. R., Kirwan, K. (2014). Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment. Ecological indicators, 46, pp. 138-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.06.011.
• [7] Duchaczek, A., Skorupa, D. (2013). Risk quantification in management of a construction project (in Polish), Studia i Materiały Miscellanea Oeconomicae, 1.
• [8] Esmail, B. A., Geneletti, D. (2018). Multi-criteria decision analysis for nature conservation: A review of 20 years of applications. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9.1, pp. 42-53. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12899.
• [9] Freeman, C. (1982). Economics of industrial innovation. London: Pinter Publishers.
• [10] Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R. (2004). Axiomatic characterization of a general utility function and its particular cases in terms of conjoint measurement and rough-set decision rules. European Journal of Operational Research, 158(2), pp. 271-292. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2003.06.004.
• [11] Hu, M., Voet, E. van der., Huppes, G. (2010). Dynamic material flow analysis for strategic construction and demolition waste management in Beijing. Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 14(3), pp. 440-456. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2010.00245.x.
• [12] Hussain, K.., He, Z., Ahmad, N., Iqbal, M. (2019). Green, lean, six sigma barriers at a glance: a case from the construction sector of Pakistan. Building and Environment, 161: 106225. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106225.
• [13] Jelodar, M.B., Wilkinson, S., Tooky, J. (2018). Construction Innovation: a system controlled by construction project dynamics, In Proceedings of The Construction, Building and Real Estate Research Conference, London, United Kingdom, 23-24.04.2018.
• [14] Kostic, Z. (2018). Innovation and Digital Transformation as a Competition Catalyst. Ekonomika. Journal for Economic Theory and Practice and Social Issues, 64.1350-2019-2780: pp. 13-24.
• [15] Loudon, D., Della-Bitta A. (1995). Comportamientodel Consumidor, Conceptosy Aplicaciones. Mexico City: McGraw-Hill.
• [16] Madyda, A. (2018). Innovations in Polish enterprises of the construction sector (in Polish). Zarządzanie i Finanse, 16.1, pp. 83-90.
• [17] Malara, Z. (1990). An example of using the Bellinger analysis method to assess construction solutions (in Polish), Nowator nr 6.
• [18] Malara, Z. (1995). Multi-criteria analysis as an instrument of quality research and improvement (in Polish), Badania Operacyjne i Decyzje, 3, pp. 67-76.
• [19] Malara, Z. (1999). The use of multi-criteria analysis for the needs of managers’ work evaluation systems in sport(in Polish) Badania Operacyjne i Decyzje, 3-4, pp. 55-63.
• [20] Malara, Z., Miśko, R., Pol, M. (2019). Application of Bellinger’s analysis in choosing an innovative solution (in Polish) In: Malara, Z., Tutaj, J. (Ed.). Innowacje a dobrostan społeczeństwa, gospodarki i przedsiębiorstw : próba pomiaru. Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej.
• [21] Nalmpantis, D., Roukouni, A., Genitsaris, E., Stamelou, A., Naniopoulos, A. (2019). Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). European Transport Research Review, 11(1), pp. 1-16. DOI: 10.1186/s12544-019-0356-6.
• [22] Palacio, A.B., Meneses G.D., Perez P.J.P. (2002). The configuration of the university image and its relationship with the satisfaction of students. Journal of Educational Administration, 40 (5), pp. 486-487. DOI: 10.1108/09578230210440311.
• [23] Parkitna, A. (2020). Determinants of small business efficiency (in Polish), Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej.
• [24] Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage, New York: Free Press.
• [25] Słowiński, R., Greco, S., Matarazzo, B. (2002). Axiomatization of utility, outranking and decision rule preference models for multiple-criteria classification problems under partial inconsistency with the dominance principle. Control and Cybernetics, 31(4), pp. 1005-1035.
• [26] Steward, T. J., French, S., Rios, J. (2013). Integrating multi-criteria decision analysis and scenario planning-Review and extension. Omega, 41.4, pp. 679-688. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2012.09.003.
• [27] Suszyński, C. (2007). Restructuring and the growth and development of enterprises (in Polish). In Lachiewicz, S. (Ed). Zarządzanie rozwojem organizacji, Łódź: Monografie Politechniki Łódzkiej.
• [28] Trzciński, R. (2013). Application of FIDIC Contractual Conditions in Contracts for Construction Projects (in Polish). In: Knosala, R. (Ed.). Innowacje w zarządzaniu i inżynierii produkcji, Opole: Oficyna Wydawnicza Polskiego Towarzystwa Zarządzania Produkcją.
• [29] Watróbski, J., Jankowski, J., Ziemba, P., Kaczmarczyk, A., Zioło, M. (2019). Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection. Omega, 86, pp. 107-124. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2018.07.004.
• [30] Yusof, N. B., Shafiei, M. W. M., Said, I., Abidin, N. Z. (2010). Factors Influencing Firms’ readiness Towards Innovation In House Building Industry: A Multi-Dimensional Construct. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 2.3, pp. 74-88.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023)