Effectiveness of Dairy and Domestic Wastewater Treatment and Technological Reliability of the Wastewater Treatment Plant in Michów, Poland

• Autorzy: Zawadzka Beata , Siwiec Tadeusz , Marzec Michał

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/142117

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The study aimed to assess the operation of the mechanical and biological wastewater treatment plant in Michów (Poland) in terms of the effectiveness of removing contaminants from mixed wastewater (dairy and domestic) and technological reliability. The wastewater treatment plant is owned by the Dairy Cooperative “Michowianka”. It is intended to treat mixed sewage, consisting of technological and sanitary sewage as well as part of rainwater from the plant, domestic wastewater supplied by a sewerage system from Michów, and wastewater delivered from septic tanks. In 2017 and in the first quarter of 2018, the permeate from the whey thickening process was also sent to the treatment plant. The period 2017-2021 was covered by the analysis. The analysis included the indicators from the fundamental group (TSS, BOD5, COD), biogenic indices (total phosphorus, total nitrogen, and ammonium nitrogen). The applied technology ensured the removal of total suspended solids, BOD5, and COD at the level of over 96%. Total phosphorus was removed with an average efficiency of 91%. Slightly lower effects were found in the elimination of total nitrogen – 78.5% on average, while the ammonium nitrogen removal rate was 88% on average. Due to the high efficiency of the facility, the values of the standard contamination indicators at the outflow, as a rule, met the requirements specified in the water permit. The technological reliability of the wastewater treatment plant in Michów, determined by the Weibull method, was at a high level, usually exceeding 90%. The reliability analysis shows that the facility in Michów has a high capacity to treat wastewater to the extent required for the wastewater receiver, and that the treated wastewater discharge does not cause negative changes in the environment. It indicates a high probability of obtaining the wastewater quality at the outflow from the treatment plant meeting the water permit requirements.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

domestic wastewater; dairy wastewater; wastewater treatment effectiveness; technological reliability

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 22, nr 10
• Strony: 141--151
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 59 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Zawadzka Beata

• Lubelska Spółdzielnia Usług Mleczarskich, ul. Probostwo 4, 20-089 Lublin, Poland

autor

Siwiec Tadeusz

• Department of Environmental Engineering and Geodesy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, ul. Leszczyńskiego 7, 20-069 Lublin, Poland

autor

Marzec Michał

• Department of Environmental Engineering and Geodesy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, ul. Leszczyńskiego 7, 20-069 Lublin, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8338-0672

Bibliografia

• 1. Abdulgader M., Yu Q.J., Zinatizadeh A., Williams P. 2009. Biological treatment of milk processing wastewater in a sequencing batch flexible fibre biofilm reactor. Asia-Pac J. Chem. Eng., 4, 698–703.
• 2. Andrade L.H., Mendes F.D.S., Espindola J.C., Amaral M.C.S. 2014. Nanofiltration as tertiary treatment for the reuse of dairy wastewater treated by membrane bioreactor. Sep. Purif. Technol., 126, 21–29.
• 3. Andraka D. & Dzienis L. 2003. Required reliability level of wastewater treatment plants according to European and Polish regulations. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Białostockiej. Ser. Inżynieria Środowiska, 16, 24–28 (in Polish).
• 4. Ashekuzzaman S.M., Forrestal P., Richards K., Fenton O. 2019. Dairy industry derived wastewater treatment sludge: generation, type and characterization of nutrients and metals for agricultural reuse. J. Clean. Prod., 230, 1266–1275.
• 5. Bae T.H., Han S.S., Tak T.M. 2003. Membrane sequencing batch reactor system for the treatment of dairy industry wastewater. Process Biochem., 39, 221–231.
• 6. Bazrafshan E., Moein H., Mostafapour F.K., Nakhaie S. 2013. Application of Electrocoagulation Process for Dairy Wastewater Treatment. Journal of Chemistry. DOI: 10.1155/2013/640139
• 7. Bharati S.S. & Shinkar N.P. 2013. Dairy industry wastewater sources, characteristics and its effects on environment. Int. J. Curr. Eng. Technol., 3, 1611–1615.
• 8. Bortoluzzi A.C., Fait ̃ao J.A., Di Luccio M., Dallago R.M., Steffens J., Zabot G.L., Tres M.V. 2017. Dairy wastewater treatment using integrated membrane systems. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 5(5), 4819–4827.
• 9. Brazzale P., Bourbon B., Barrucand P., Fenelon M., Guercini S., Tiarca R. 2019. Wastewater treatment in dairy processing – innovative solutions for sustainable wastewater management. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation, 500, 67.
• 10. Bugajski P. 2014. Analysis of reliability of the treatment plant Bioblok PS-50 using the method of Weibull. Infrastructure and Ecology of Rural Areas, 2 (3), 667–677 (in Polish).
• 11. Bugajski P., Chmielowski K., Kaczor G. 2016. Reliability of a collective wastewater treatment plant. J. Ecol. Eng., 17(4), 143–147.
• 12. Bugajski P., Wałęga A., Kaczor G., 2012. Application of the Weibull reliability analysis of household sewage treatment plant. Gaz, Woda i Technika Sanitarna, 2, 56–58 (in Polish).
• 13. Carvalho F., Prazeres A.R., Rivas J. 2013. Cheese whey wastewater: characterization and treatment. Sci Total Environ., 445–446, 385–396.
• 14. Charalambous P., Shin J., Shin S.G., Vyrides I. 2020. Anaerobic digestion of industrial dairy wastewater and cheese whey: performance of internal circulation bioreactor and laboratory batch test at pH 5–6. Renew. Energy, 147, 1–10.
• 15. Dairy Cooperative „Michowianka”. 2017–2020. Reports on measurements of the amount of wastewater flowing to the wastewater treatment plant in Michów. Michów (unpublished materials) (in Polish).
• 16. Demirel B., Yenigun O., Onay T.T. 2005. Anaerobic treatment of dairy wastewaters: a review. Proc. Biochem., 40, 2583–2585.
• 17. Farizoglu B., Keskinler B., Yildiz E., Nuhoglu A. 2007. Simultaneous removal of C, N, P from cheese whey by jet loop membrane bioreactor (JLMBR). J. Hazard. Mater., 146, 399–407.
• 18. Frigon J.C., Breton J., Bruneau T., Moletta R., Guiot S.R. 2009. The treatment of cheese whey wastewater by sequential anaerobic and aerobic steps in a single digester at pilot scale. Bioresource Technol., 100, 4156–4163.
• 19. Heaven M.W., Wild K., Verheyen V., Cruickshank A., Watkins M., Nash D. 2011. Seasonal and wastewater stream variation of trace organic compounds in a dairy processing plant aerobic bioreactor. Bioresource Technol., 102(17), 7727–7736.
• 20. https://pl.wikipedia.org
• 21. Ince O. 1998. Performance of a two-phase anaerobic digestion system when treating dairy wastewater. Water Res., 32, 2707–2713.
• 22. Janczukowicz W., Zieliński M., Dębowski M. 2008. Biodegradability evaluation of dairy effluents originated in selected sections of dairy production. Bioresource Technol., 99(4), 199–205.
• 23. Ji S., Ma W., Wei Q., Zhang W., Jiang F., Chen J. 2020. Integrated ABR and UASB system for dairy wastewater treatment: Engineering design and practice. Sci. Total Environ., 749. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142267.
• 24. Jóźwiakowski K., Bugajski P., Kurek K., Fátima Nunes de Carvalho M., Adelaide Almeida M., Siwiec T., Borowski G., Czekała W., Dach J., Gajewska M. 2018. The efficiency and technological reliability of biogenic compounds removal during long-term operation of a one-stage subsurface horizontal flow constructed wetland. Sep. Purif. Technol., 202(31), 216–226.
• 25. Jucherski A., Nastawny M., Walczowski A., Jóźwiakowski K., Gajewska M. 2017. Assessment of the technological reliability of a hybrid constructed wetland for wastewater treatment in a mountain eco-tourist farm in Poland. Wat. Sci. Technol., 75(11), 2649–2658.
• 26. Karadag D., Köroğlu O.E., Ozkaya B., Cakmakci M. 2015. A review on anaerobic biofilm reactors for the treatment of dairy industry wastewater. Process Biochem., 50, 2, 262–271.
• 27. Karthikeyan V., Venkatesh K.R., Arutchelvan V. 2015. A Correlation Study on Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Dairy Wastewater. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 7(2), 89–92.
• 28. Kroll J. & Budzyński J. 2001 Application of membrane processes in the processing of whey. Przegląd Mleczarski, 2, 66–68 (in Polish).
• 29. Kumar S., Gupta N., Pakshirajan K. 2015. Simultaneous lipid production and dairy wastewater treatment using Rhodococcus opacus in a batch bioreactor for potential biodiesel application. J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 3, 1630–1636.
• 30. Kushwaha J.P., Srivastava V.C., Mall I.D. 2011. An Overview of Various Technologies for the Treatment of Dairy Wastewaters. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 51(5), 442–452.
• 31. Lubelska Spółdzielnia Usług Mleczarskich (LSUM) w Lublinie. Laboratorium Usług Badawczych – Pracownia Ochrony Środowiska. 2017–2021. Reports on tests carried out at the request of the Diary Cooperative “Michowianka” (unpublished materials) (in Polish).
• 32. Łoszak J. 2014. Water law survey for special use of water in the field of groundwater abstraction and treated industrial and municipal wastewater disposal at km 2+610 and rainwater wastewater at km 2+610 of the inflow from Michów. Lublin. Typescript (in Polish).
• 33. Miryahyaei S., Das T., Othman M., Batstone D., Eshtiaghi N. 2020. Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge with cellulose, protein and lipids: role of rheology and digestibility. Sci. Total Environ., 731. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139214.
• 34. Mucha J. 1994. Geostatistical methods in documenting deposits. Skrypt, Katedra Geologii Kopalnianej. AGH Kraków, 155 (in Polish).
• 35. Neczaj E., Kacprzak M., Kamizela T., Lach J., Okoniewska E. 2008. Sequencing batch reactor system for the co-treatment of landfill leachate and dairy wastewater. Desalination, 222, 404–409.
• 36. Ozturk A., Aygun A., Nas B. 2019. Application of sequencing batch biofilm reactor (SBBR) in dairy wastewater treatment. Korean J. Chem. Eng., 36(2), 248–254.
• 37. PN-ISO 5667–10:1997. Water quality – Sampling – Guidance on sampling techniques (in Polish).
• 38. PN-EN 872:2007 + Ap1:2007; Water Quality – Determination of suspended solids – method by filtration trough filters (in Polish).
• 39. PN-ISO 6060:2006. Determination of the Chemical Oxygen Demand. Titration method (in Polish).
• 40. PN-EN 1899–1:2002 and PN-EN ISO 5815–1:2019–12. Water quality – Determination of Biochemical Oxygen Demand after n days (BOD) – Part 1: Dilution and vaccination method with the addition of allythiourea (in Polish).
• 41. PN-EN ISO 6878:2006 + Ap1:2010 + Ap2:2010. Water quality – Determination of phosphorus – Ammonium molybdate spectrometric method (in Polish).
• 42. PN-ISO 7150–1:2002. Water quality – Determination of ammonia nitrogen – Part 1: Manual spectrometric method (in Polish).
• 43. PN-EN 26777:1999. Water quality – Determination of nitrite – Molecular absorption spectrometry method (in Polish).
• 44. PN-82/C-04576.08. Tests for the content of nitrogen compounds. Determination of nitrite nitrogen by colorimetric method with sodium salicylate (in Polish).
• 45. PN-EN 25663:2001. Water quality – Determination of Kjeldahl nitrogen – Method after mineralization with selenium (in Polish).
• 46. Prazeres A.R., Carvalho F., Rivas J. 2012. Cheese whey management: a review. J. Environ. Manage., 110, 48–68.
• 47. Regulation of the Minister of Environment of 18 November 2014 laying down conditions for the introduction of sewage into water or soil and substances particularly harmful to the aquatic environments, 2014, 1800 (in Polish).
• 48. Regulation of the Minister of Maritime Economy and Inland Navigation of 12 July 2019 on substances which are particularly harmful to the aquatic environment and the conditions to be met when discharging wastewater into water or soil and when discharging rainwater or snowmelt into water or water installations, 2019, 1311 (in Polish).
• 49. Sarkar B., Chakrabarti P.P., Vijaykumar A., Kale V. 2006. Wastewater treatment in dairy industries – possibility of reuse. Desalination, 195(1–3), 141–152.
• 50. Singh S., Rinta-Kanto J.M., Kettunen R., Tolvanen H., Lens P., Collins G. 2019. Anaerobic treatment of LCFA-containing synthetic dairy wastewater at 20°C: process performance and microbial community dynamics. Sci. Total Environ., 691, 960–968.
• 51. Slavov A.K. 2017. General Characteristics and Treatment Possibilities of Dairy Wastewater – A Review. Food Technol Biotechnol., 55(1), 14–28.
• 52. Staroste of Lubartów District. 2014. Decision on granting Dairy Cooperative „Michowianka” a water-legal permit to discharge treated wastewater from the plant and the Michów commune into the waters of the inflow from Michów (RLŚ.6341.25.2014). Lubartów (unpublished materials) (in Polish).
• 53. Struk-Sokołowska J. 2011. The influence Of dairy wastewater ON cod fractions in municipal wastewater. Inżynieria Ekologiczna, 24, 132–133 (in Polish).
• 54. Struk-Sokołowska J. & Ignatowicz K. 2013. Municipal and Dairy Wastewater Co-treatment Using SBR Technology. Rocznik Ochrony Środowiska (Annual Set of Environment Protection), 15, 1881–1898 (in Polish).
• 55. Tawfik A., Sobhey M., Badawy M. 2008. Treatment of a combined dairy and domestic wastewater in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor followed by activated sludge (AS system). Desalination, 227, 167–177.
• 56. Venkata Mohan S., Babu V.L., Sarma P.N. 2008. Effect of various pretreatment methods on anaerobic mixed microflora to enhance biohydrogen production utilizing dairy wastewater as substrate. Bioresource Technol., 99, 59–67.
• 57. Vourch M., Balannec B., Chaufer B., Dorange G. 2008. Treatment of dairy industry wastewater by reverse osmosis for water reuse. Desalination, 219(1–3), 190–202.
• 58. Watkins M. & Nash D. 2010. Dairy factory wastewaters, their use on land and possible environmental impacts – a mini review. Open Agric J., 4, 1–9.
• 59. Zinadini S., Rahimi M., Zinatizadeh A.A., Mehrabadi Z.S. 2015. High frequency ultrasoundinduced sequence batch reactor as a practical solution for high rate wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 3, 217–226.