Furthering sustainable development: The implementation of Green Procurement in Central and Eastern Europe. Methods and Experiences from Hungarian Public and Private Organizations

Diófási-Kovács, O.; Valkó, L.

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Furthering sustainable development: The implementation of Green Procurement in Central and Eastern Europe. Methods and Experiences from Hungarian Public and Private Organizations

Autorzy

Diófási-Kovács O. , Valkó L.

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

Warianty tytułu

Wspieranie rozwoju zrównoważonego: realizacja zielonych zamówień w Centralnej i Wschodniej Europie. Metody i przykłady z publicznych i prywatnych firm na Węgrzech

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The aim of the article is to show how one of the most active and demonstrative management tool for furthering sustainable development can be successfully implemented through a Central and Eastern European example. The Green Procurement Hungary Project (GPH project) was conducted in order to develop a toolkit most suitable for implementing green (public) procurement, in order to use the enormous purchasing power of public and private organizations for furthering sustainable consumption, eco-production and all together sustainable development. The article shows the relationship between sustainable-, green- and social procurement, introduces the state-of-the art of green public procurement in the EU with specific attention to the CEE countries and shows the methodology developed in the GPH project. This methodology has great significance for practitioners and policy makers as well for the implementation of sustainable procurement. Even on the European level, for example by the development of funding opportunities and by the evaluation of project proposals these experiences are valuable.

Celem artykułu jest ukazanie, jak jedno z najczęściej stosowanych narzędzi z zakresu zarządzania można wykorzystać do wspierania rozwoju zrównoważonego, na przykładzie Europy Centralnej i Wschodniej. Projekt węgierskich zielonych zamówień (The Green Procurement Hungary Project, GPH project) wprowadzono, aby poszukiwać najlepszych rozwiązań w tym zakresie. Celem jest wykorzystanie ogromnej mocy nabywczej firm publicznych i prywatnych dla wspierania zrównoważonej konsumpcji i eko-produkcji, a poprzez to zrównoważonego rozwoju. Artykuł ukazuje powiązania pomiędzy zrównoważonymi, zielonymi i społecznymi zamówieniami, wskazuje na najnowsze rozwiązania przyjęte w UE, szczególny nacisk kładąc na kraje Europy Wschodniej, omawia także ich stronę metodologiczną. Ten ostatni aspekt jest niezwykle istotny dla praktyków i polityków, jak również w kontekście bezpośredniego wdrażania zielonych zamówień. Nawet na ogólnoeuropejskim poziomie, przykładowo poprzez rozwój instrumentów finansowych, czy sposobów oceny zgłaszanych wniosków, te doświadczenia są bez wątpienia wartościowe.

Słowa kluczowe

sustainable procurement green public procurement green procurement sustainable consumption ecolabels sustainable development

zrównoważone zamówienia zamówienia publiczne zielone zrównoważona konsumpcja ekoetykieta rozwój zrównoważony

Wydawca

Lublin University of Technology

Czasopismo

Problemy Ekorozwoju

Rocznik

2015

Tom

Vol. 10, nr 2

Strony

115--126

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 56 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Diófási-Kovács O.

o.diofasi@survive.hu

Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Environmental Economics Budapest, Magyar tudósok körútja 2, H-1117, Hungary

autor

Valkó L.

valkol@eik.bme.hu

Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Environmental Economics Budapest, Magyar tudósok körútja 2, H-1117, Hungary

Bibliografia

1. AMBEC S., LANOIE P., 2008, Does it Pay to Be Green? a Systematic Overview, in: Acad. Manag. Perspect. vol. 22, no. 4, p. 45-62.
2. BOLTON P., 2006, Government procurement as a policy tool in South Africa, in: J. Public Procure. vol. 6, p. 193-217.
3. Adelphi, KAHLENBORN W., MOSER C., FRIJDAL J., ESSIG M., 2011, Strategic Use of Public Procurement in Europe, Final Report to the European Commission, MARKT/2010/ 02/C; http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/publicprocurement/docs/modernising_rules/strategic -use-public-procurement-europe_en.pdf (01.12.2013)
4. PÉTERNÉ BARANYI R., 2011, A környezetbarát termék védjegyezés ‘3win’ kapcsolatrendszere, a hazai rendszer gazdasági elemzése, Doktori Értekezés, http://www.omikk.bme.hu/ collections/phd/Gazdasag_es_Tarsadalomtudo manyi _Kar/2011/Peterne_Baranyi_Ritaertekez es .pdf (3.02.2012)
5. BOUWER M., JONK M., BERMAN T., BERSANI R., LUSSER H., NAPPA V., NISSINEN A., PARIKKA K., SZUPPINGER P., VIGANÒ C., 2006, Green Public Procurement in Europe 2006 – Conclusions and recommendations, Virage Milieu & Management bv, Korte Spaarne 31, 2011 AJ Haarlem, the Netherlands, http:// europa.eu.int/comm/environment/gpp (10.03.2011)
6. BOUWER M., JONK M., BERMAN T., BERSANI R., LUSSER H., NAPPA V., NISSINEN A., PARIKKA K., SZUPPINGER P., VIGANÒ C., 2005, Green Public Procurement in Europe 2005 – Status Overview, http://europa.eu.int/ comm/environment/gpp (10.03.2011)
7. BRAMMER S., WALKER H., 2011, Sustainable procurement in the public sector: an international comparative study, in: Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag, vol. 31, no. 4, p. 452-476.
8. Buying Social – European Commission: Buying Social A Guide to Taking Account of Social Considerations in Public Procurement, 2010, http://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/public-procurement/other-aspects/index_en.htm (10.03.2014).
9. BUY SMART+, Green Procurement for Smart Purchasing, Project funded by Intelligent Energy Europe, http://www.buy-smart.info(20.02. 2010)
10. BUY SMART+, Green Procurement In Europe, http://www.buy-smart.info (15.09.2014)
11. CEPS (Centre For European Policy Studies), The uptake of green public procurement in the EU27, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf /CEPS-CoE-GPP%20MAIN%20REPORT.pdf (11.08.2014)
12. CHANG, H.C., KRISTIANSEN P., 2006, Selling Australia as ‘clean and green’, in: Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ., vol. 50 no. 1, p. 103-113.
13. COMMISSION of the European Communities, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (COM (2008) 400), Public procurement for a better environment.
14. CSUTORA M., 2012, One More Awareness Gap? The Behaviour-Impact Gap Problem, in: Journal of Consumer Policy, vol. 35:p. 145–163
15. DIÓFÁSI O., 2013, Green Public Procurement, the driver of innovation through product development and ecolabelling, in: Proceedings 12th IAS-STS Annual Conference. Graz, Austria, 2013.05.06-2013.05.07 ed. T. Berger, no. 2 p. 1-15.
16. DIÓFÁSI O., VALKÓ L., 2011, Green (public) procurement in practice: methods, and tools for the successful implementation, in: Regional and business studies, vol. 3, no. 2 p. 11-23.
17. DIÓFÁSI O., VALKÓ L., 2011, Training methods for purchasing officers to facilitate green procurement in Hungary, in: 3rd International Symposium on Environmental Management Conference Proceedings: Towards Sustainable Technologies, 26.10.2011-28.10.2011, eds. Koprivanac N., Kusic H., Bozic L., Zagreb, p. 145-150.
18. DIÓFÁSI O., VALKÓ L., 2012, Facing ‘green’ consumers answering the challenge and taking the advantage, in: International journal of sales retailing & marketing, vol. 1., no. 2, p. 42-50.
19. DIÓFÁSI O., VALKÓ L., 2014, Step by step towards mandatory green public procurement, in: Periodica polytechnica-social and management sciences, Vol. 22, no. 1, p. 21-27.
20. DIÓFÁSI O., 2012, Green public procurement as a driver of sustainable consumption., in: Management and Environmental Protection. ed. Barbu C. M., Craiova, Asers Publishing, p. 103-129.
21. DOUGLAS M., 1987, How Institutions Think, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
22. EDLER, J., GEORGHIOU L., 2007. Public procurement and innovation – Resurrecting the demand side, in: Res. Policy vol. 36, p. 949-963.
23. EFFECT PROJECT Official Website, 2014, http://www.effectproject.eu/ (11.02.2014)
24. FROTA NETO J.Q., BLOEMHOF-RUWAARD J.M., VAN NUNEN J.A.E.E., VAN HECK E., 2008, Designing and evaluating sustainable logistics networks, in: International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 111 no.2, p. 195-208.
25. GPP Europe, Official website of the European Union on Green Public Procurement, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/index_en.htm (10.01.2015)
26. GPP Europe, National Action Plans in the Member States, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/action_plan_en.htm (10.01.2015)
27. GPP Europe , Official website of the European Union on Green Public Procurement, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/studies_en.htm (10.01.2015)
28. GPP Europe ,Official recommendations of the EU on GPP criteria; http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/eu_gpp_criteria_en.htm (10.01.2015)
29. GREEN Labels Purchase – making a greener procurement with energy labels project, http:///ec.europa.eu/energy/intelligent/projects/en/pro jects/greenlabelspurchase (10.01.2015)
30. GÜNTHER E., SCHEIBE L., 2006, The hurdle analysis. A self-evaluation tool for municipalities to identify, analyse and overcome hurdles to Green procurement, in: Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag vol. 13, p. 61-77.
31. HO. L. W. P., DICKINSON N. M.; CHAN, G. Y. S., 2010, Green procurement in the Asian public sector and the Hong Kong private sector, in: Nat. Resour. Forum vol. 34. p. 24-38.
32. HUNGARIAN Public Procurement Authority (HPPA), Annual Report of the National Public Procurement Authority 01.01-31.12.2013, B/ 147, http://www.kozbeszerzes.hu/tevekenysege k/eves-beszamolo/ (11.02.2014)
33. ICLEI- Procura+ Sustainable Procurement Campaign, http://www.procuraplus.org/(10.01.2015)
34. JOHNSEN T. , MIEMCZYK J., SPENCER R., WALKER H., 2012, Sustainable procurement: Past, present and future, in: Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management vol. 18 p. 201–206
35. LANDMARK PROJECT, Moving towards socially responsible procurement, 2011-2014, http://www.landmark-project.eu/ (12.04.2014)
36. LI L., GEISER K., 2005, Environmentally responsible public procurement (ERPP) and its implications for integrated product policy (IPP), in: J. Clean. Prod. vol. 13, p. 705-715.
37. MCCRUDDEN C., 2004, Using public procurement to achieve social outcomes, in: Natural Resources Forum vol. 28 p. 257-267.
38. MITRA S., WEBSTER S., 2008, Competition in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidies, in: International Journal of Production Economics vol. 111, no.2, p. 287-298.
39. NYGREN A., 1998, Environment as discourse: searching for sustainable development, in: Environmental Values vol. 7 no. 2, p. 201-222.
40. PIPLANI R., PUJAWAN N., RAY S., 2008, Sustainable supply chain management, in: International Journal of Production Economics vol. 111 no. 2, p. 193-194.
41. PPR, European Commission: Public Procurement Reform, What will change? Fact Sheet no 8, Social Aspects of the new rules.http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/publicprocurement/do cs/modernising_rules/reform/fact-sheets/fact-sheet-08-social_en.pdf (02.11.2014)
42. SHELTERED WORKSHOPS, Database for sheltered workshops in Hungary for the promotion of socially responsible public procurement, http://www.mnvzrt.hu/szocialisan_felelos_koz beszerzes (02.03.2015)
43. SRIVASTAVA S.K., 2007, Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art litera- ture review, in: International Journal of Management Reviews vol. 9 no.1, p. 53–80.
44. SWANSON M., WEISSMAN A., DAVIS G., SOCOLOF M., DAVIS K., 2005,. Developing priorities for greener state government purchasing: a California case study, in: J. Clean. Prod. vol. 13, p. 669-677.
45. TATRAI T. 2013, Public Procurement and Development, http://www.kozbeszkut.hu/(02.01.2015)
46. TESTA F., IRALDO F., FREY M., DADDI T., 2012, What factors influence the uptake of GPP (green public procurement) practices? New evidence from an Italian survey, in: Ecol. Econ. vol. 82, p. 88-96.
47. TESTA F., IRALDO F., FREY M., DADDI T., 2014, Drawbacks and opportunities of green public procurement: an effective tool for sustainable production, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro(02.09.2014)
48. THOMSON J., JACKSON T., 2007, Sustainable procurement in practice: lessons from local government, in: J. Environ. Plan. Manag., vol. 50 no. 3, p. 421-444.
49. TUKKER A., EMMERT S., CHARTER M., VEZZOLI C., STO E., ANDERSEN M.M., GEERKEN T., TISCHNER U., LAHLOU S., 2008, Fostering change to sustainable consumption and production: an evidence based view, in: Journal of Cleaner Production vol. 16, p. 1218–1225.
50. UNEP, Ecolabelling Subsite, http://www.unep.org/ resourceefficiency/Consumption/Standard-sandLabels/Eco-labelling/tabid/101342/Default.aspx (12.05.2014)
51. The impacts of sustainable public procurement, Study, http://www.unep.org/resourceefficiency/ Portals/24147/scp/procurement/docsres/Project Info/StudyonImpactsofSPP.pdf (05.01.2015)
52. VACHON S., KLASSEN R., 2006, Extending green practices across the supply chain – the impact of upstream and downstream integration, in: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 26 no. 7, p. 795-821.
53. VARNAS A., BALFORS B., FAITH-ELL C., 2009, Environmental consideration in procurement of construction contracts: current practice, problems and opportunities in green procurement in the Swedish construction industry, in: J. Clean. Prod., vol. 17 no. 13, p. 1214-1222.
54. WALKER H., BRAMMER S., 2009. Sustainable procurement in the United Kingdom public sector, in: Supply Chain Management vol. 14 no. 2, p. 128.
55. WCED (World Commission on Environemtn and Development), 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, New York.
56. ZHU Q., SARKIS J., 2004, Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises, in: Journal of Operations Management vol. 22 no. 3, p. 265.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-bb5f3fa7-af0e-4076-b4e5-bbdfeeafed1f