PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Open innovation in the context of organisational strategy

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The paper aims to analyse the relationship between different types of corporate strategy and open innovation in the contexts of the age, size and the operational range of enterprises. The research targeted companies in Poland that were surveyed from January to April, using traditional and electronic forms of a questionnaire. The questionnaire was developed based on a 5-point Likert scale. The level of “openness” of innovation processes in an enterprise was determined according to a 3-point scale, namely, a closed innovator, a hybrid or semi-open innovator, and an open innovator. The strategy implemented by an enterprise was classed into main three types used to achieve a competitive advantage, i.e. cost leadership, differentiation or diversification. There is a strong correlation between open innovations, the cost leadership strategy and the differentiation strategy (negative correlation). The relationship between the age, size and the range of a company and the opening of innovative processes was also observed. The research aims to fill the knowledge gap existing in the literature regarding the links between a particular type of strategy and the opening of innovation processes.
Rocznik
Strony
86--95
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 43 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Poland
  • Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Acha, V. (2008). Open by design: the role of design in open innovation. The Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills, DIUS Research Report 8(10). doi: 10.5465/ambpp.2008.33653210
  • Ades, C., Figlioli, A., Sbragia, R., Porto, G., Plonski, G., & Celadon, K. (2013). Implementing Open Innovation: The Case of Natura, IBM and Siemens. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 8(1), 12-25. doi: 10.4067/S0718-27242013000300057
  • Arndt, O., & Sternberg, R. (2000). Do manufacturing firms profit from intraregional innovation linkages? An empirical based answer. European Planning Studies, 8, 465-486.
  • Barge-Gil, A. (2010). Open, Semi-Open and Closed innovators. Towards an Explanation of Degree of Openness. Industry and Innovation, 17(6), 577-607. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2010.530839
  • Bianchi, M., Cavaliere, A., Chiaroni, D., Frattini, F., & Chiesa, V. (2011). Organisational models for open innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry: an exploratory analysis. Technovation, 31(1), 22-33. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2010.03.002
  • Bogers M., Chesbrough, H., & Moedas, C. (2018). Open innovation: research, practices, and policies. California Management Review, 60(2), 5-16. doi: 10.1177/0008125617745086
  • Cassiman B., & Valentini, G. (2016). Open Innovation: Are Inbound and Outbound Knowledge Flows Really Complementary? Strategic Management Journal, 37(6). 1034-1046. doi: 10.1002/smj.2375
  • Celadon, K.L. (2014). Knowledge Integration and Open Innovation in the Brazilian Cosmetics Industry. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(3), 34-50. doi: 10.4067/S0718-27242014000300003
  • Cheng, C., & Huizingh, E. (2014). When Is Open Innovation Beneficial? The Role of Strategic Orientation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(6), 1235-1253. doi:10.1111/jpim.12148
  • Cheng, C., Yang, Ch., & Sheu, Ch. (2016). Effects of open innovation and knowledge-based dynamic capabilities on radical innovation: An empirical study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 41, 79-91. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2016.07.002
  • Chesbrough, H. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35-41. doi: 10.2307/41166416
  • Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. New Frontiers in Open Innovation. Oxford, Great Britain: Oxford University Press, Forthcoming. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682461.001.0001
  • Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, A.K. (2006). Beyond hightech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229-236. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x
  • Christensen, J.F., Olesen, M.H., & Kjaer, J.S. (2005). The industrial dynamics of open innovation – evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics. Research Policy, 34, 1533-1549. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.002
  • Cohen, W.M., & Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity. A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. doi: 10.2307/2393553
  • Crema, M., Verbano, Ch., & Venturini, K. (2014), Linking strategy with open innovation and performance in SMEs. Measuring Business Excellence, 18(2), 14-27. doi: 10.1108/MBE-07-2013-0042
  • Faludi, J. (2014). Fifty shades of innovation – from open toward user, and open collaborative forms of innovation - an overview. Vezetestudomany, XLV(11), 33-43.
  • Gassmann, O. (2006). Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda. R&D Management, 36(3), 223- 228. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00437.x
  • Gassmann, O., & Enkel, E. (2004). Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes. R&D Management Conference (RADMA). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00605.x
  • Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 213-221. doi: 10.1080/08956308.2017.1255054
  • Huizingh, E. (2011). Open innovation: state of the art. and future perspectives. Technovation, 31, 2-9. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.002
  • Joao, R., & Nijkamp, P. (2019). Impacts of innovation, productivity and specialization on tourism competitiveness– a spatial econometric analysis on European regions. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(10), 1150-1169. doi:10.1080/13683500.2017.1366434
  • Keupp, M.M., & Gassmann, O. (2009). Determinants and archetype users of open innovation. R&D Management, 39(4), 331-341. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00563.x
  • Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150. doi: 10.1002/smj.50
  • Lichtenthalter, U., & Ernst, H. (2008). Opening up the innovation process: the role of technology aggressiveness. R&D Management, 39, 38-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00522.x
  • Matricano, D., Candelo, E., Sorrentino, M., & Martinez- Martinez, A. (2019). Absorbing in-bound knowledge within open innovation processes. The case of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(4), 786-807. doi:10.1108/JKM-10-2018-0625
  • Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Gundrum, U. (1995). Innovationsforderung im landlichen Raum. Innovation Policy in Rural Areas. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 53, 177-185.
  • Michelino, F., Caputo, M., Cammarano, A., & Lamberti, E. (2014). Inbound and Outbound Open Innovation. Organization and Performances. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 9(3), 65-82. doi: 10.4067/S0718-27242014000300005
  • Nada, N., Turkyilmaz, A., & El-Badawy, A. (2011). SMEs Innovation Management Framework. Istanbul, Turkey: Fatih University.
  • Niedzielski, P., & Rychlik, K. (2007). Innowacje w sektorze produkcyjnym i usługowym – odmienność czy podobieństwo? [innovations in service sector and industry – differences and similarities]. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, 453(8), 177-186.
  • Nowakowska, A. (2011). Regionalny wymiar procesow innowacji [The regional dimension of innovation processes]. Łodź, Poland: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łodzkiego.
  • Orlando, B., Reniz, A., Sancetta, G., & Cucari, N. (2017). How does firm diversification impact innovation? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(4), 391-404. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2017.1313405
  • Parida, V., Westerberg, M., & Frishammar, J. (2012). Inbound open innovation activities in high-tech SMEs: the impact on innovation performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 283-309. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00354.x
  • Podmetina, D., Vaatanen, J., Torkkeli, M.T., & Smirnova, M.M. (2011). Open innovation in Russian firms: an empirical investigation of technology commercialization and acquisition. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 5(3), 298-317. doi: 10.1504/IJBIR.2011.040100
  • Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York, United States: The Free Press.
  • Rauter, R., Globocnik, D., Perl-Vorbach, E., & Baumgartner, R.J. (2018). Open innovation and its effects on economic and sustainability innovation performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, XXX, 1-8. doi:10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.004
  • Razak, A., Murray, P., & Roberts, D. (2018). Open innovation in universities: the relationship between innovation and commercialization. Knowledge and Process Management, 21(4), 260-269. doi: 10.1002/kpm.1444
  • Sandulli, F., Fernandez-Menendez, J., Rodriguez-Duarte, A., & Lopez-Sanchez, J. (2012). Testing the Schumpeterian hypotheses on an open innovation framework. Management Decision, 50(7), 1222-1232. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1978403
  • Schroll, A., & Mild, A. (2011). Open innovation modes and the role of internal R&D: An empirical study on open innovation adoption in Europe. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4), 475-495. doi: 10.1108/14601061111174925
  • Tafti, F.F., Abdolvand, N., & Harandi, S.R. (2019). A strategic alignment model for collaborative open innovation networks. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 19(1), 1-28. doi: 10.1504/IJBIR.2019.099751
  • Teirlinck, P., & Poelmans, E. (2012). Open innovation and firm performance in small-sized R&D active companies in the chemical industry: the case of Belgium. Journal of Business Chemistry, 9(3), 117-131. doi: 10.1504/IJBIR.2011.040100
  • Tylżanowski, R. (2015). Koncepcja Open Innovation jako źródło przewagi konkurencyjnej przedsiębiorstwa [The open innovation concept as a source of enterprise’s competitive advantage]. Handel Wewnętrzny, 4(357), 16-25.
  • van de Vrande, V., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Duysters, G. (2011). Technology In-Sourcing and the Creation of Pioneering Technologies. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, 974-987. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00853.x
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-bb2b91e9-851d-47ae-a49e-77cee7834926
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.