Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Purpose: The conditions in which enterprises from the SME sector have to operate are not easy. The enormous changeability of the environment contributed to a shift in the ways of managing a company. In these uncertain and quite difficult times, the key variable when verifying the conducted activity is pro-social or pro-ecological activity in the form of CSR activities. The aim of the study is to define CSR models implemented by entrepreneurs from the SME sector. Design/methodology/approach: The research task was carried out based on the literature on the subject and the results of a survey from the first half of 2021, conducted among 164 enterprises based in the Slaskie Voivodeship. Due to the nature of the obtained data (qualitative features), the correlation studies used the ф - Youla correlation coefficient based on the X2 statistic. Findings: The conducted analyses have shown that the pandemic has led to changes in the approach of entrepreneurs to the subject of CSR. The conducted research has shown that the importance of CSR activities increases with the increase in the size of the enterprise. The conducted research allowed us to verify the adopted hypotheses. The results showed that the pandemic has indeed led to changes in the approach of entrepreneurs to the subject of CSR, as there is a decrease in the positive perception of CSR as an important element of the functioning of the company on the market. Originality/value: The conducted study allowed to identify the tendency towards pro-social activity of enterprises from the SME sector in the time of the COVID 19 pandemic. In the course of the research, an upward trend was determined in the case of medium-sized enterprises, stable in the case of small enterprises and a downward trend in the case of micro-enterprises. The study also allowed for a model approach to CSR activities in selected groups of enterprises.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
369--378
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 31 poz.
Twórcy
- The Management Faculty, Czestochowa University of Technology
Bibliografia
- 1. Barić, A. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholders: review of the last decade (2006-2015). Bus. Syst. Res., 8, 133.
- 2. Beck, C., Frost, G., Jones, S. (2018). CSR disclosure and financial performance revisited: a cross-country analysis. Australian Journal of Management, 43(4), pp. 517-537.
- 3. Boronat-Navarro, M., Pérez-Aranda, J.A. (2019). Consumers’ perceived corporate social responsibility evaluation and support: the moderating role of consumer information Tour. Econ., 25(4), pp. 613-638.
- 4. Boubakary, B., Moskolaï, D.D. (2016). The influence of the implementation of CSR on business strategy: An empirical approach based on Cameroonian enterprises. Arab Economic and Business Journal, Vol. 11, Iss. 2, pp. 162-171.
- 5. Bryce, C., Ring, P., Ashby, S., Wardman, J. (2020). Resilience in the Face of Uncertainty: Early Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 23, pp. 880-887.
- 6. Carroll, A.B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance. Academy Management Review, Vol. 4(4).
- 7. Carroll, B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, Vol. 34(4).
- 8. Chen, R.C., Hung, S.W., Lee, C.H. (2017). Does corporate value affect the relationship between CSR and stock returns? J. Sustain. Fin. Invest., 7(2), 188-196.
- 9. Crane, A., Matten, D. (2021). COVID-19 and the future of CSR research. Journal of Management Studies, 89(1), pp. 280-284.
- 10. Darwish, S., El Naggar, N. (2021). The effect of covid-19 on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices reflections from the Kingdom of Bahrain. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory, Iss. 24, pp. 1-10.
- 11. Donthu, N., Gustafsson, A. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on business and research. Journal of Business Research, 117, pp. 284-289.
- 12. Gartfa-Sânchez, I.M., Garcia-Sanchez, A. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility during COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, Vol. 6, Iss. 4, 126.
- 13. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, M.R., Martin-Samper, R.C., Koseoglu, M.A., Okumus, F. (2019). Hotels' corporate social responsibility practices, organizational culture, firm reputation, and performance. J. Sustain. Tourism, 27(3), pp. 398-419.
- 14. Gonzâlez-Rodrigueza, M.R., D^az- Fernandez, C., Simonetti, B. (2015). The social, economic and environmental dimensions of corporate social responsibility: The roleplayed by consumers and potential entrepreneurs. International Business Review, 24(5), pp. 836-848.
- 15. He, H., Harris, L. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on corporate social responsibility and marketing philosophy. Journal of Business Research, 116, pp. 176-182.
- 16. Johnson, R.B., Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. London: Sage Publications.
- 17. Kabir, M.A., Chowdhury, S.S. (2022). Empirical analysis of the corporate social responsibility and financial performance causal nexus: Evidence from the banking sector of Bangladesh. Asia Pacific Management Review, Vol. 28, Iss. 1, pp. 1-12.
- 18. Lang, L. (2022). CSR Initiative as a PR Strategy during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, Vol. 4, No. 1.
- 19. Lee, Y.J., Cho, M. (2022). Socially stigmatized company’s CSR efforts during the COVID- 19 pandemic: The effects of CSR fit and perceived motives. Public Relations Review, Vol. 48, Iss. 2, 102180.
- 20. Li, Y.X., Chen, C.H. (2023). The impact of employee-perceived CSR on organizational citizenship behavior evidence from China. Asia Pacific Management Review.
- 21. Moura-Leite, R.C., Padgett, R.C. (2011). Historical background of corporate social responsibility. Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 7(4), pp. 13-20.
- 22. Mutuc, E.B., Cabrilo, S. (2022). Corporate social responsibility, intellectual capital and financial performance: evidence from developed and developing. Review of Managerial Science, 16(1), pp. 1-41.
- 23. Mutuc, E.B., Lee, J.S. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and market-adjusted stock returns: an Asian perspective. Asia-Pac Soc Sci Rev, 19(3), pp. 88-107.
- 24. Olejniczak-Szuster, K. (2021). Przedsiębiorca społecznie odpowiedzialny: motywy strategie działania w dobie pandemii COVID-19. Częstochowa: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Częstochowskiej
- 25. Ou, J., Wong, I.A., Huang, G.I. (2021). The coevolutionary process of restaurant CSR in the time of mega disruption. International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 92, 102684.
- 26. Sidhoum, A.A., Serra, T. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and dimensions of performance: An application to U.S. electric utilities. Utilities Policy, 48, pp. 1-11.
- 27. Singh, S.H., Chen, J., Del Giudice, M., El-Kassar, A.N. (2019). Environmental Ethics, Environmental Performance, and Competitive Advantage: Role of Environmental Training. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 146, pp. 203-211.
- 28. Tang, Z., Tang, J. (2018). Stakeholder corporate social responsibility orientation congruence, entrepreneurial orientation and environmental performance of Chinese small and medium-sized enterprises. British Journal of Management, 29(4), 634-651.
- 29. Tong, Z., Xie, Y., Xiao, H. (2021). Effect of CSR contribution timing during COVID-19 pandemic on consumers’ prepayment purchase intentions: Evidence from hospitality industry in China. International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 97, 102997.
- 30. Walton, C.C. (1967). Corporate Social Responsibilities. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
- 31. Yu, Y., Choi, Y. (2016). Stakeholder pressure and CSR adoption: The mediating role of organizational culture for Chinese companies. The Social Science Journal, 53(2), pp. 226-235.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-bb22e261-2784-4b11-8f39-f9e5885ee71d