Productivity of Winter Wheat (T. aestivum, T. durum, T. spelta) Depending on Varietal Characteristics in the Context of Climate Change

• Autorzy: Korkhova Margaryta , Panfilova Antonina , Domaratskiy Yevhenii , Smirnova Iryna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12912/27197050/163124

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This article presents the results of studies of winter wheat species and varieties depending on the meteorological conditions of the research years. The purpose of the research is to determine the density of the productive stem, the mass of 1000 grains, the yield and quality of winter wheat grain, depending on the species and varietal composition. Methods. Experimental studies were conducted during 2015/2016–2020/2021 yrs in the experimental field of Mykolaiv National Agrarian University (Ukraine). Agricultural techniques for growing winter wheat of various species were generally accepted for the southern steppe zone of Ukraine. Its predecessor was sown peas. Results. It was determined that a larger number of productive stems per unit area (467–853 pcs./m²) formed plants of the studied varieties of soft winter wheat, while the smallest (443–694 pcs./ m²) were plants of winter durum wheat varieties. The largest mass of grain from one ear (1.06–1.20 g) on average over the years of research was formed by plants of spelt wheat varieties, and the smallest was formed 0.96–1.01 g of soft wheat plants. It was found that a higher yield of soft winter wheat (6.03 t/ha) on average over the years of research was formed in the Vidrada variety, hard wheat (5.58 t/ha) was formed in the Bosphorus variety, spelt was formed 5.36 t/ha in the Europa variety. The highest grain yield (7.13 t/ha) among the species and varieties put for study was provided by the Vidrada variety (T. aestivum) in 2016 yr, which was 5.3% more than in the variety Shestopalivka (T. aestivum), 5.9% more than the Linkor variety (T. durum), by 7.0% than the Bosphorus variety (T. durum), by 12.5% than that of the Europa variety (T. spelta) and 43.5% more than the Zorya Ukrainy variety (T. spelta). It was determined that the largest mass fraction of protein in grain was provided by the spelt Zorya Ukrainy wheat variety as 19.2–25.6% depending on the year of research, while the smallest was provided as 11.0–14.2% by the Shestopalivka soft wheat variety. In the conditions of the Southern steppe of Ukraine, to ensure a high grain yield (5.24–6.03 t/ha) with a high protein content (14.1–15.1%), it was recommended to sow the variety of soft winter wheat Vidrada, hard winter wheat as Linkor and spelt as Europe.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

soft wheat; hard wheat; spelt; varieties; grain yield; mass fraction of protein

• Wydawca: Lubelski Oddział Polskiego Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology ; WNGB Wydawnictwo Naukowe
• Czasopismo: Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 24, iss. 4
• Strony: 236--244
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 33 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Korkhova Margaryta

• Mykolayiv National Agrarian University George Gongadze St., 9, Mykolayiv, 54020, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6713-5098

autor

Panfilova Antonina

• Mykolayiv National Agrarian University George Gongadze St., 9, Mykolayiv, 54020, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0006-4090

autor

Domaratskiy Yevhenii

• Mykolayiv National Agrarian University George Gongadze St., 9, Mykolayiv, 54020, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3912-1611

autor

Smirnova Iryna

• Mykolayiv National Agrarian University George Gongadze St., 9, Mykolayiv, 54020, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8976-3818

Bibliografia

• 1. Beil I., Kreyling J., Meyer C., Lemcke N. and Malyshev, A. 2021. Late to bed, late to rise – Warmer autumn temperatures delay spring phenology by delaying dormancy. Global Change Biology, 27(22), 5806-5817. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15858.
• 2. Budzyński W.S., Bepirszcz K., Jankowski K.J., Dubis B., Hłasko-Nasalska A., Sokólski M.M., Olszewski J. and Załuski D. 2018. The responses of winter cultivars of common wheat, durum wheat and spelt to agronomic factors. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 156(10), 1163-1174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859619000054.
• 3. Clarke B., Otto F., Stuart-Smith R., and Harrington L. 2022. Extreme weather impacts of climate change: an attribution perspective. Environmental Research Climate. 1 (012001). https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/ac6e7d.
• 4. Diordiieva L., Riabovol I., Riabovol O., Serzhyk A., Novak and S. Kotsiuba. 2018. The characteristics of wheat collection samples created by Triticum aestivum L, Triticum spelta L hybridization. Agronomy Research, 16(5), 2005-2015. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.18.181/
• 5. Domaratskiy Ye, Berdnikova O, Bazaliy V, Shcherbakov V, Gamayunova V, Larchenko O, Domaratskiy A and Boychuk I. 2019. Dependence of winter wheat yielding capacity on mineral nutrition in irrigation conditions of southern Steppe of Ukraine. Indian Journal of Ecology, 46(3), 594-598.
• 6. Domaratskiy Ye., Kozlova O., Domaratskiy O., Lavrynenko Iu., Bazaliy V. 2020. Effect of nitrogen nutrition and environmentally friendly combined chemicals on productivity of winter rapeseed under global climate change. Indian Journal of Ecology, 47(2), 330-336.
• 7. Domaratskіy Ye. 2021. Leaf area formation and photosyntetic activity of sunflower plents depending on fertilizers and growth regulators. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 22(6), 99-105.
• 8. Domaratskіy Ye., Kozlova O., Dobrovolskiy A., Bazaliy V. 2022. Optimization of water consumption of high-oleic sunflower hybrids under nonirrigated conditions of the steppe zone of Ukraine. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 23(6), 14-21
• 9. Domaratskіy Ye., Bazaliy V., Dobrovolskiy A., Pichura V., Kozlova O. 2022. Influence of eco-safe growth-regulating substances on the phytosanitary state of agrocenoses of wheat varieties of various types of development in non-irrigated conditions of the steppe zone. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 23(8), 299-308.
• 10. FAO. 2022. Ukraine: Note on the impact of the war on food security in Ukraine, 20 July 2022. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc1025en.
• 11. Jablonskytė-Raščė D., Maikštėnienė S. and Mankevičienė A. 2013. Evaluation of productivity and quality of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and spelt (Triticum spelta L.) in relation to nutrition conditions. Zemdirbyste, 100(1), 45-56. DOI:10.13080/z-a.2013.100.007.
• 12. Klipakova Yu., Priss O., Belousova Z. and Yeremenko O., 2019. Productivity of winter wheat depending on presowing cultivation of seeds. Bulletin of Agricultural Science, 97 (4), 16-23. https://agrovisnyk.com/pdf/en_2019_04_03.pdf.
• 13. Korkhova, M., Panfilova, A., Chernova, A. and Rozhok O., 2019. The effect of pre-sowing seed treatment with biopreparations on productivity of cultivars of Triticum spelta L. AgroLife Scientific Journal, 8(1), 120-127.
• 14. Korkhova, M. and Mykolaichuk, V. 2022. Influence of weather conditions on the duration of interphysical periods and yield of durum winter wheat. Scientific horizons, 25(2), 36-46. DOI: 10.48077/scihor.
• 15. Kienko Z.B., Prysiazhnyuk L.M., Shovgun O.O., Ivanytska A.P. and Pavlyuk N.V. 2017. The method of conducting a qualification examination of plant varieties for suitability for distribution in Ukraine. Methods of determining plant production quality indicators. Tkachyk S.O. (Ed.), Vinnytsia: FOP Korzun D.Yu, p. 159.
• 16. Lozinskiy M., Burdenyuk-Tarasevych L., Grabovskyi M., Lozinska T., Sabadyn V., Sidorova I., Panchenko T., Fedoruk Y. and Kumanska Y. 2021. Evaluation of selected soft winter wheat lines for main ear grain weight. Agronomy Research, 19(2), 540–551. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.21.071
• 17. Malyshev A.V. 2020. Warming events advance or delay spring phenology by affecting bud dormancy depth in trees. Experimental Plant Ecology. 11(856). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00856.
• 18. McNutt President M. and Ramakrishnan V. 2020. Climate Change Evidence & Causes. An overview from the Royal Society and the US National Academy of Sciences, p. 24. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/royal_society_content/policy/projects/climate-evidence-causes/climate-change-evidencecauses.pdf.
• 19. Panfilova A., Gamayunova V. and Smirnova I. 2020. Influence of fertilizing with modern complex organicmineral fertilizers to grain yield and quality of winter wheat in the southern steppe of Ukraine. Agraarteadus, 31(2), 196–201. doi:10.15159/jas.20.28
• 20. Panfilova A. and Mohylnytska A. 2019. The Impact of nutrition optimization on crop yield of winter wheat varieties (Triticum aestivum L.) and modeling of regularities of its dependence on structure indicators. Agriculture and Forestry. 65(3), 157–171. doi: 10.17707/AgricultForest.65.3.13.
• 21. Pichura V., Potravka L., Dudiak N., Vdovenko N. 2021. Space-time modeling of climate change and bioclimatic potential of steppe soil. Indian Journal of Ecology, 48(3), 671-680.
• 22. Pichura V., Potravka L., Vdovenko N., Biloshkurenko O., Stratichuk N., Baysha K. 2022. Changes in climate and bioclimatic potential in the steppe zone of ukraine. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 23 (12), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/154844
• 23. Poltoretskyi S., Hospodarenko H., Liubych V., Poltoretska N. and Demydas, H. 2018. Toward the theory of origin and distribution history of Triticum spelta L. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 8(2), 263-268. doi: 10.15421/2018_336.
• 24. Rachoń L., Bobryk-Mamczarz A. and Kiełtyka-Dadasiewicz A. 2020. Hulled wheat productivity and quality in modern agriculture against conventional wheat species. Agriculture, 10(275), 1-13. doi:10.3390/agriculture10070275.
• 25. Ratajczak K., Sulewska H., Grazyna S. and Matysik P. 2020. Agronomic traits and grain quality of selected spelt wheat varieties versus common wheat. Journal of Crop Improvement, 34(5), 654–675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2020.176192.
• 26. Sugár E., Fodor N., Sándor R., Bónis P., Vida G. and Árendás T. 2019. Spelt wheat: An alternative for sustainable plant production at low N-Levels. Sustainability, 11, 6726. doi: 10.3390/su11236726.
• 27. Save and grow in practice: corn rice wheat. A Practical Guide to Sustainable Cereal Production. Rome: FAO.
• 28. Solomon S. and Daniel K. 2021. Evaluation of Durum wheat varieties for yield and yield related traits in highland areas of Southern Ethiopia. Ukranian Journal of Ecology, 11(2), 80-83. doi: 10.15421/2021_81.
• 29. Takac V., Tóth V., Rakszegi M., Mikic S., Mirosavljevic M. and Kondic-Špika A. 2021. Differences in processing quality traits, protein content and composition between spelt and bread wheat genospecies grown under conventional and organic production. Foods, 10, 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10010156.
• 30. Toth V., Lang L., Vida G., Miko P. and Rakszegi M. 2022. Characterization of the protein and carbohydrate related quality traits of a large set of spelt wheat genospecies. Foods, 11(14), 2061. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142061.
• 31. Tkachyk S.O., Prysiazhniuk O.I. and Leschuk N.V. 2017. The method of conducting a qualification examination of plant varieties for suitability for distribution in Ukraine. Vinnytsia: FOP Korzun D.Yu., p. 119.
• 32. Ushkarenko V.O. and Vozhegova R.A., 2020. Methodology of the field experiment. Oldie+: Odesa. Ukraine, p. 448.
• 33. Wang J., Chatzidimitriou E., Wood L., Hasanalieva G., Markelou E., Iversen P.O., Seal C., Baranski M., Vigar W., Ernst L., Willson A., Thapa M., Barkla B.J., Leifert C. and Rempelos L. 2020. Effect of wheat species (Triticum aestivum vs T. spelta), farming system (organic vs conventional) and flour species (wholegrain vs white) on composition of wheat flour – Results of a retail survey in the UK and Germany – 2. Antioxidant activity, and phenolic and mineral content. Food Chemistry. X.6. 100091.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).