The influence of salivary pH on the adhesion of Candida albicans to acrylic prosthetic materials obtained using conventional and digital techniques

Al-Otaibi, Hanan; Alomair, Aseel; AlSewailem, Latifa; AlFadhel, Rana; Durayhim, Sarah Bin; Al-Otibi, Fatimah; Alharbi, Raedah; Alfouzan, Afnan; Al Taweel, Sara; Alshehri, Huda; Labban, Nawaf

doi:10.14314/polimery.2024.1.3

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

The influence of salivary pH on the adhesion of Candida albicans to acrylic prosthetic materials obtained using conventional and digital techniques

Autorzy

Al-Otaibi Hanan , Alomair Aseel , AlSewailem Latifa , AlFadhel Rana , Durayhim Sarah Bin , Al-Otibi Fatimah , Alharbi Raedah , Alfouzan Afnan , Al Taweel Sara , Alshehri Huda , Labban Nawaf

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14314/polimery.2024.1.3

Warianty tytułu

Wpływ pH śliny na adhezję Candida albicans do akrylowych materiałów protetycznych uzyskanych technikami konwencjonalnymi i cyfrowymi

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The influence of saliva pH on the adhesion of Candida albicans to PMMA-based prosthetic materials manufactured using conventional and digital techniques (3D printing, milling) was examined. The obtained data were subjected to statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA and the Tukey HSD post hoc test (α = 0.05). Materials obtained by 3D printing had the highest surface roughness, while those obtained conventionally had the highest number of CFU (colony-forming unit). The mean CFU value was highest at pH 4.5 and statistically significant compared to other pH values. No significant correlation was found between surface roughness and the average CFU value. The surface of materials obtained using the conventional and milling methods showed lower adhesion of Candida albicans.

Zbadano wpływ pH śliny na adhezję Candida albicans do materiałów protetycznych na bazie PMMA, wytwarzanych technikami konwencjonalnymi i cyfrowymi (druk 3D, frezowanie). Otrzymane dane poddano analizie statystycznej za pomocą jednoczynnikowej analizy ANOVA oraz testu post hoc Tukeya HSD (α= 0,05). Materiały uzyskane metodą druku 3D wykazywały największą chropowatość powierzchni, a otrzymane konwencjonalnie charakteryzowały się największą liczbą CFU (ang. colony-forming unit). Średnia wartość CFU była największa przy pH 4,5 i statystycznie istotna w po¬równaniu z innymi wartościami pH. Nie stwierdzono znaczącej korelacji pomiędzy chropowatością powierzchni a średnią wartością CFU. Powierzchnia materiałów otrzymanych metodą konwencjonalną i metodą frezowania wykazywała mniejszą adhezję Candida albicans.

Słowa kluczowe

PMMA Candida albicans CAD/CAM 3D printing

PMMA Candida albicans CAD/CAM druk 3D

Wydawca

Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz – Instytut Chemii Przemysłowej

Czasopismo

Polimery

Rocznik

2024

Tom

Vol. 69, nr 1

Strony

25--32

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 48 poz., fot., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Al-Otaibi Hanan

haalotaibi@ksu.edu.sa

Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2549-8717

autor

Alomair Aseel

College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6204-5532

autor

AlSewailem Latifa

College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2613-1032

autor

AlFadhel Rana

College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7438-0934

autor

Durayhim Sarah Bin

College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5024-9823

autor

Al-Otibi Fatimah

Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3629-5755

autor

Alharbi Raedah

Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8273-4080

autor

Alfouzan Afnan

Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2535-4641

autor

Al Taweel Sara

Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8681-3453

autor

Alshehri Huda

Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0891-8022

autor

Labban Nawaf

Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8311-8263

Bibliografia

[1] Polzer I., Schimmel M., Müller F. et al.: International Dental Journal 2010, 60, 143. https://doi.org/10.1922/IDJ_2184Polzer13
[2] Peyton F.A.: Dental Clinics of North America 1975, 19(2), 211. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-8532(22)01065-5
[3] Meng T.R., Jr., Latta M.A.: Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 2005, 6(4), 93. https://doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-6-4-93
[4] Bidra A.S., Taylor T.D., Agar J. R.: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2013, 109(6),361. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(13)60318-2
[5] Al-Otaibi H., Alshaalan N., Alqarni R. et al.: Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications 2021, 14, 110. http://doi.org/10.21786/bbrc/14.1/15
[6] Naji A.S., Kashi J.T, Hajizamani. H. et al.: Journal of Dental Biomaterials 2018, 5(1), 490.
[7] Zafar M.S. Polymers (Basel) 2020, 12(10), 2299. http://doi.org/10.3390/polym12102299
[8] Gad M.M., Al-Thobity A.M., Shahin S.Y. et al.: Interantional Journal Nanomedicine 2017, 12, 5409. http://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.s142857
[9] Pattanaik S., Vikas B.V.J., Pattanaik B. et al.: Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology 2010, 22(3), 136.
[10] Radford D.R., Sweet S.P., Challacombe S. J. et al.: Journal of Dentistry 1998, 26(7), 577. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(97)00034-1
[11] Donald R., Nahusona, Rika D. et al.: Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy 2020, 11(12), 1. http://doi.org/10.31838/srp.2020.12.1
[12] Coll P.P., Lindsay A., Meng J. et al.: Journal of American Geriatric Society 2020, 68(2), 411. http://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16154
[13] Gleiznys A., Zdanavičienė E., Žilinskas J. Stomatologija 2015, 17, 54.
[14] Murat S., Alp G., Alatalı C. et al.: Journal of Prosthodontics 2019,28(2), e873. http://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12942
[15] Chopde N., Jawale B., Pharande A. et al.: Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 2012, 13, 456. http://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1168
[16] Hajisadeghi S., Fateh R., Jangjoo A. et al.: Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2023, 30, 58. http://doi.org/10.34172/jkmu.2023.10
[17] Al-Otaibi H., Basaqer R., Almania S. et al.: Polimery 2023, 68(3), 149. http://doi.org/10.14314/polimery.2023.3.3
[18] Alfouzan A., Al-Otiabi H., Labban N. et al.: Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 2021, 13(3), 160. http://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2021.13.3.160
[19] Alfouzan A., AlNouwaisar A., AlAzzam N. et al.: Materials Research Express 2021,8(8),085402. http://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ac1e47
[20] Matos I.C., Bastos I.N., Diniz M.G. et al.: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2015, 114(2), 278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.01.017
[21] Bangalore D., Alshehri A., Alsadon O. et al.: Polymers (Basel) 2023, 15(9), 2164. http://doi.org/10.3390/polym15092164
[22] Vila T., Rizk A., Sultan A. et al.: PLoS Pathogens 2019,15(11), e1008058. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008058
[23] Deepthi P.V., Fernandez T., Karthikeyan S.: Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research 2016, 4(3), 92.
[24] Di Cosola M., Cazzolla A., Charitos I. et al.: Journal of Fungi (Basel) 2021, 7(6), 476. http://doi.org/10.3390/jof7060476
[25] Al-Fouzan A .F., A l-Mejrad L .A., A lbarrag A .M.: Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 2017, 9, 402. http://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.5.402
[26] Mayer F.L., Wilson D., Hube B.: Virulence 2013, 4(2), 119. http://doi.org/10.4161/viru.22913
[27] Patel M.: Pathogens 2022, 11(3) , 335. http://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11030335
[28] Bajunaid S. O.: Polymers (Basel) 2022, 14(5), 908. http://doi.org/10.3390/polym14050908
[29] Gulati M., Nobile C. J.: Microbes and Infection 2016, 18(5), 310. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2016.01.002
[30] Alfadda S., Al-Otaibi H., Al-Shaalan N. et al.: Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications 2020, 13(3), 1287. http://doi.org/10.21786/bbrc/13.3/46
[31] Alzaid M, AlToraibily F, Al-Qarni F.D. et al.: European Journal of Dentistry 2022, 17(1), 234. http://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1749160
[32] Constantinescu I. R., Ursache M.,Mardarez D.: Revista Medico-Chirurgicala a Societatii de Medici si Naturalisti din Iasi 2007, 111(2), 477.
[33] Sofya P., Rahmayani L.,Purnama R.: Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry 2017, 29(1), 58. http://doi.org/10.24198/pjd.vol29no1.12614
[34] Yildiz O., Seyrek M., Ulusoy G.: “Biocompatibility of Dental Polymers” in “Polymer Science: Research advances, Practical applications and Educational aspects”, (edit. Méndez-Vilas, A., Solano, A.) Formatex Research Center, Norristown 2016. p. 89.
[35] Alqutaibi A., Baik A., Almuzaini S. et al.: Polymers (Basel) 2023, 15(15), 3258. http://doi.org/10.3390/polym15153258
[36] Walther U.I., Walther S.C., Liebl B. et al.: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 2002, 63(5), 643. http://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10384
[37] Sokmen S.,Oktemer M.: Journal of Hacettepe Faculty of Dentistry 1988, 12, 1.
[38] Alifui-Segbaya F., Bowman J., White A.R. et al.: Acta Biomaterialia 2018, 78, 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.007
[39] Zamperini C.A., Machado A.L., Vergani C.E. et al.: Archives in Oral Biology 2010, 55(10), 763. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.06.015
[40] Bürgers R., Schneider-Brachert W., Rosentritt M. et al.: Clinical Oral Investigation 2009, 13, 293. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0226-4
[41] Meirowitz A., Rahmanov A., Shlomo E. et al.: Materials (Basel) 2021, 14(1), 221. http://doi.org/10.3390/ma14010221
[42] Aati S., Aneja S., Kassar M. et al.: Journal of Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 2022, 134, 105421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105421
[43] Darwish M., Nassani M.Z., Al-Hallak K.R. et al.: Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 2021, 22, 1257.
[44] Darwish M., Nassani M.Z.: European Journal of Dentistry 2016, 10(3), 321. http://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.184155
[45] Koujan A., Aggarwal H., Chen P. et al.: Journal of Prosthodontics 2023, 32(6), 512. http://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13583
[46] Larijani M., Zareshahrabadi Z., Alhavaz A. et al.: Current Medical Mycology 2022, 8(3), 23. http://doi.org/10.18502/cmm.8.3.11208
[47] Osman R.B., Khoder G., Fayed B. et al.: Polymers (Basel) 2023, 15(8), 1836. http://doi.org/10.3390/polym15081836
[48] Al-Dwairi Z.N., Al Haj Ebrahim A.A., Baba N.Z.: Journal of Prosthodontics 2023, 32(1), 40. http://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13491

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-ba9dc2c1-469d-4d88-a79a-8e454feeeec7