Towards Circular Cities – comparison analysis of the circular economy definitions within the Amsterdam and Łódź spatial policies

• Autorzy: Skiba Edyta , Hanzl Małgorzata

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0054.8978

Warianty tytułu

PL

W kierunku miast o obiegu zamkniętym – analiza porównawcza definicji gospodarki obiegu zamkniętego w politykach przestrzennych Amsterdamu i Łodzi

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The European Union sees its cities as potential frontrunners in the transition to the Circular Economy (CE), which is a tool to achieve targets set in the European Green Deal (EDG). The various Circular City Visions (CCV) published in different EU regions are based on the CE definition. However, more investigation needs to be done to discover how the differences in culture, politics, spatial management, and economy between Member States affect CE implementation strategies for cities, as well as the common understanding and definition of CE and CCV. Moreover, the CCV is a rather new topic among scholars, and the plurality of CE definitions creates the risk of blurring the concept. This article aims to verify the consistency of definitions used in different policies – especially in EU Member States, with a particular focus on the multi-speed Europe concept. To verify the differences and similarities between the policies on which the spatial policies of the EU Member States are based, a two-stage research was carried out. The case studies were selected among the EU cities. A representative from the Netherlands – Amsterdam – was selected for the so-called "Inner Six" of the EU. On the other hand, Łódź, Poland, was chosen as a representative of the Visegrad Group countries (V4).

PL

Unia Europejska postrzega swoje miasta jako liderów w przejściu na gospodarkę obiegu zamkniętego (GOZ), która jest narzędziem do osiągnięcia celów określonych w Europejskim Zielonym Ładzie (EZŁ). Wizje Miasta Obiegu Zamkniętego (WMOZ) publikowane w różnych regionach UE opierają się na definicji GOZ. Obecnie istnieje niewielka liczba prac analizujących wpływ różnic kulturowych, politycznych oraz różnic w zarządzaniu przestrzennym i gospodarce między państwami członkowskimi, które wpływają na strategie wdrażania GOZ w miastach. Ponadto rozbieżności te wpływają na wspólne dla Europy rozumienie i definiowanie GOZ oraz WMOZ. Dodatkowo WMOZ to stosunkowo nowy temat wśród badaczy, a różnorodność definicji GOZ stwarza ryzyko rozmycia tego pojęcia. Celem artykułu jest zweryfikowanie spójności definicji używanych w różnych politykach – przede wszystkim w państwach członkowskich UE, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem koncepcji Europy wielu prędkości. Aby zweryfikować różnice i podobieństwa między założeniami polityk, na których opierają się strategie przestrzenne państw członkowskich UE, przeprowadzono dwustopniowe badanie. Przykłady wybrano spośród miast UE. Jako reprezentant miast zlokalizowanych w krajach założycielskich UE tzw. wewnętrznej szóstki wybrany został Amsterdam w Holandii. Na reprezentanta grupy krajów wyszehradzkich (V4) została wybrana Łódź w Polsce.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

circular economy; definition; analysis; sustainable city; spatial politics; comparison analysis; Łódź; Amsterdam

PL

gospodarka obiegu zamkniętego; definicja; analiza; miasto zrównoważone; polityka przestrzenna; analiza porównawcza; Łódź; Amsterdam

• Wydawca: BUILDER CORP Sp. z o.o.
• Czasopismo: Builder
• Rocznik: 2025
• Tom: R.29, nr 1
• Strony: 6--13
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 34 poz., il., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Skiba Edyta

• Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environmental Engineering

• https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1258-0264

autor

Hanzl Małgorzata

• Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environmental Engineering

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2495-5867

Bibliografia

• [1] Chiara F. Fratini, Susse Georg, Michael S. Jørgensen, 2019, Exploring Circular Economy Imaginaries in Metropolitan Cities: A Research Agenda for the Governance of Urban Sustainability Transitions, Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 974-989, doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.193.
• [2] Wojciech Kębłowski, Deborah Lambert, David Bassens, 2020, Circular Economy and the City: An Urban Political Economy Agenda, Culture and Organization 26 (2), 145-158, doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2020.1718148.
• [3] Anna Petit-Boix, Sina Leipold, 2018, Circular Economy in Cities: Reviewing How Environmental Research Aligns with Local Practices, Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 1270-1281, doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.281.
• [4] Sharon Prendeville, Emma Cherim, Nancy Bocken, 2018, Circular Cities: Mapping Six Cities in Transition, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transition, 26, 171-194, doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.03.002.
• [5] Martin Calisto Friant, Katie Reid. Peppi Boesler, Walter J.V. Vermeulen, Roberta Salomone, 2023, Sustainable circular cities? Analysing urban circular economy policies in Amsterdam, Glasgow, and Copenhagen, Local Environment, doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2023.2206643.
• [6] Julian Kirchherr, Denise Reike, Marko Hekkert, 2017, Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: An Analysis of 114 Definitions, Resources, Conservation & Recycling 127, 221-232, doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005.
• [7] Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2012) Towards the Circular Economy: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition, http://tinyurl.com/pv7q7l4 (Accessed 19.03.2024).
• [8] Carl Folke, Stephen Polasky, Johan Rockström, Victor Galaz, Frances Westley, Michèle Lamont, Marten Scheffer, 2021 Our Future in the Anthropocene Biosphere, Our Future in the Anthropocene Biosphere, Ambio 50, 834-869, doi:10.1007/s13280-021-01544-8.
• [9] Isabel Marín-Beltrán, Federico Demaria, Claudia Ofelio, Louis M. Serra, Antonio Turiel, William J. Ripple, Sharif A. Mukul, Maria Clara Costa, 2022, Scientists’ Warning Against the Society of Waste, Science of the Total Environment, 811, 151359, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151359.
• [10] Thomas Wiedmann, Lenzen Manfred. Loren T. Keyßer, Julia K. Steinberger, 2020, Scientists’ Warning on Affluence, Nature Communications 11, doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y.
• [11] Graziela D. Araujo Galvão, Jeniffer de Nadae, Diego H. Clemente, Guilherme Chinen, et al., 2018, Circular Economy: Overview of Barriers, Procedia CIRP , Volume 73, 79-85, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.04.011.
• [12] Melissa Jackson, Aleta Lederwasch, Damien Giurco, 2014, Transitions in Theory and Practice: Managing Metals in the Circular Economy, Resources 3, (3) 516-543. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources3030516.
• [13] Abel Wolman, 1965, The Metabolism of Cities, Scientific American, 213(3), 179-190, 10.1038/scientificamerican0965-178.
• [14] Giulia Lucertini, Francesco Musco, 2020, Circular Urban Metabolism Framework, One Earth 2 (2): 138-142. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.004.
• [15] Akvilė Feiferytė-Skirienė, Žaneta Stasiškienė, 2021, Seeking Circularity: Circular Urban Metabolism in the Context of Industrial Symbiosis, Sustainability (Switzerland) 13 (16): 9094. doi:10.3390/su13169094.
• [16] Srinivasula V. Mohan, Kotamraju Amulya, J Annie Modestra, 2020, Urban Biocycles – Closing Metabolic Loops for Resilient and Regenerative Ecosystem: A Perspective, Bioresource Technology 306, 123098, doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123098.
• [17] Giorgia Silvestri, Gijs Diercks, Cristian Matti, The X-curve – a sense-making tool to foster collective narratives on system change, https://drift.eur.nl/app/uploads/2023/08/X-Curve-booklet-DRIFT-EIT-Climate-KIC-2022-1.pdf, https://www.amsterdam.nl/en/policy/sustainability/circular-economy/ (accessed 29.03.2024).
• [17] Implementation Agenda for Circular Amsterdam 2023-2026, https://www.amsterdam.nl/en/policy/sustainability/circular-economy/ (accessed 29.03.2024).
• [18] Irina Shmeleva, Małgorzata Łosiewicz, Edyta Skiba, et.al., Multicultural coastal cities what are the differences in culture of urban planning management? Comparison analysis of Gdansk and Gdynia, p. 293-344, in: Vibrant urban solutions for Baltic cities Eds. by Sławomir Ledwoń, Hanna Obracht-Prondzyńska, International Society of City and Regional Planners ISOCARP; The Hague, al.2016.
• [20] Marcin Dąbrowski, Viktor Varjú, and Libera Amenta, 2019, Transferring Circular Economy Solutions across Differentiated Territories: Understanding and Overcoming the Barriers for Knowledge Transfer, Urban Planning, Volume 4 (3), Pages 52-62 doi: 10.17645/up.v4i3.2162.
• [21] Jo Williams, 2021, Circular Cities: What Are the Benefits of Circular Development? Sustainability 13, (10), 5725, doi.org/10.3390/su13105725.
• [22] The Amsterdam City Doughnut, The Amsterdam Circular Strategy 2020-2025, The Monitor, Circular Amsterdam Implementation Agenda, the Circular Economy Lessons and Recommendations 2020-2021 https://www.amsterdam.nl/en/policy/sustainability/circular-economy/ (accessed 29.03.2024).
• [23] José Potting, Aldert Hanemaaijer, Roel Delahaye, et al., Circular economy: what we want to know and can measure Framework and baseline assessment for monitoring the progress of the circular economy in the Netherlands https://www.pbl.nl/sites/default/files/downloads/pbl-2018-circular-economy-what-we-want-to-know-and-can-measure-3217.pdf (accessed 29.03.2024).
• [24] Łódź. EkoPakt dla Łodzi, https://uml.lodz.pl/files/public/uploads/Ekopakt.pdf (in Polish) (accessed 4.04.2024).
• [25] Green bonds Framework https://bip.uml.lodz.pl/files/bip/public/BIP_TW_21/Bd_Zielone_obligacje_ramy_ang_202112 03.pdf (accessed 4.04.2024).
• [26] Łódź, Ekobudżet https://uml.lodz.pl/konsultacje/trwajace-konsultacje/jaki-ekobudzet-dla-lodzi/.
• [27] Integrated Development Strategy for Łódź 2020+ with a horizon of 2030+, https://uml.lodz.pl/files/bip/public/BSM_2021/strategia_UCHWALONA.pdf (accessed 7.05.2023).
• [28] Remøy, H. Wandl, A. Ceric, D. and van Timmeren, A. Facilitating Circular Economy in Urban Planning Urban Planning (ISSN: 2183-7635) 2019, Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 1-4 DOI: 10.17645/up.v4i3.2484.
• [29] Dixon Tim, Jenni Montogomery, Nigel Horton-Baker et al., 2018, Using urban foresight techniques in city visioning: Lessons from the Reading 2050 vision, Local Economy 2018, Vol. 33(8) 777-799, https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094218800677.
• [30] Will McDowall, Yong Geng, Beijia Huang et al., 2017, Circular Economy Policies in China and Europe, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 651-661, doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12597.
• [31] Josef-Peter Schöggl, Lukas Stumpf, Rupert J. Baumgartner, 2020, The narrative of sustainability and circular economy – A longitudinal review of two decades of research, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 163, 105073, doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105073.
• [32] Patrizia Ghisellini, Catia Cialani, Sergio Ulgiati, 2016, A Review on Circular Economy: The Expected Transition to a Balanced Interplay of Environmental and Economics Systems, Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11-32, doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007.
• [33] Andreas Obersteg, Alessandro Arlati, Arianne Acke et al., 2019, Urban Regions Shifting to Circular Economy: Understanding Challenges for New Ways of Governance Urban Planning, 4(3), 19-31, doi.org. 10.17645/up.v4i3.2158.
• [34] Boeri, Gaspari, J. Gianfrante, V. et al., Circular city: a methodological approach for sustainable districts and communities, in: Syngellakis S., Eco-Architecture VII, WIT Press, Southampton, United Kingdom, 2019, doi:10.2495/ARC180071.

Uwagi

Artykuł umieszczony w części "Builder Science"