PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Hybrid use of Borda count and PROMETHEE method for maintenance strategy selection problem

Autorzy
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
For long-term success, organizations and manufacturing companies must exploit the potential strengths of collective decision making in maintenance management. The maintenance strategy selection issue has been studied in a single decision-maker framework for a long time. This research is one of the first attempts at dealing with the enhancement of maintenance management through the participation of stakeholders in the decision making process. In this context, the author introduces a participatory multi criteria decision model that combines Borda count and PROMETHEE methodology to select the most appropriate maintenance strategy; in accordance with the decision makers’ preferences on a set of strategies evaluated according to conflicting criteria. Therefore, the PROMETHEE II method is used to manage the individual decisions of each stakeholder, while the Borda count is in charge of collectively selecting the best maintenance strategy, taking as a starting point stakeholder's preferences being established thanks to PROMETHEE II. In the same context, the proposed model was applied to a real scenario: a textile company, and can be easily replicated in other industries.
Rocznik
Strony
139--160
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 36 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • University of Relizane Bourmadia, Relizane, Algeria
Bibliografia
  • [1] Abdulgader F. S., Eid R., Erdebilli B., Development of Decision Support Model for Selecting a Maintenance Plan Using a Fuzzy MCDM Approach: A Theoretical Framework, Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing, 11, 2018, 1-14.
  • [2] Aghaee A., Aghaee M., Reza F. M., Shirin S., Sobhani S. M., A novel fuzzy hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach for evaluating maintenance strategies in petrochemical industry, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 27, 2, 2020, 351-365.
  • [3] Alireza A., Gupta S., Ramin K., Selection of Maintenance Strategy for Aircraft Systems Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methodologies, International Journal of Reliability Quality and Safety Engineering, 17, 3, 2010, 223-243.
  • [4] Arjomandi A. M., Dinmohammadi F., Mosallanezhad B., Shafiee M., A fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP-VIKOR analytical model for maintenance strategy selection of safety critical assets, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 13, 4, 2021, 1-21.
  • [5] Bertolini M., Bevilacqua M., A combined goal programming-Ahp approach to maintenance selection problem, Reliability Engineering System Safety, 91, 7, 2006, 839-848.
  • [6] Besiktepe D., Ozbek M. E., Atadero R. A., Identification of the criteria for building maintenance decisions in facility management: first step to developing a multi-criteria decision-making approach, Buildings MDPI, 10, 9, 2020, 166.
  • [7] Besiktepe D., Ozbek M. E., Atadero R. A, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Building Maintenance Strategy Selection using Choosing by Advantages, Journal of Facility Management Education and Research, 5, 1, 2022, 1-12.
  • [8] Bevilacqua M., Braglia M., The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 70, 1, 2000, 71-83.
  • [9] Borjalilu N., Ghambari M., Optimal maintenance strategy selection based on a fuzzy analytical network process: A case study on a 5-MW powerhouse, International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 10, 2, 2018, 1-10.
  • [10] Brandt F., Conitzer V., Endriss U., Procaccia A., Lang J., Handbook of Computational Social Choice, Cambridge University Press, chapter 3, 2016.
  • [11] Brans J. P., Mareschal B., PROMETHEE methods In: Figueira J., Greco S., Ehrgott M., editors ,multiple criteria decision analysis state of art surveys, Boston: Springer Verlag, 2005, 163-169.
  • [12] Brans J. P., Vincke P., A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: The PROMETHEE Method for MCDM, Management Science, 31, 6, 1985, 647-656.
  • [13] Brans J. P., Mareschal B., The Promcalc and Gaia decision support system for multicriteria decision aid, Decision Support Systems, 12, 4-5, 1994, 297-310.
  • [14] Coulibaly A., Zaraté P., Camilleri G., Implementing Voting Tools in GRUS, 3rd International Conference on Decision Support Systems Technologies (ICDSST), Namur, Belgium, 2017, 67-72.
  • [15] Darestani S. A., Palizban T., Imannezhad R., Maintenance strategy selection: a combined goal programming approach and BWM-TOPSIS for paper production industry, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 28, 1, 2020, 14-36. [16] Emovon I., Normany R., Murphy A. J., Hybrid MCDM based methodology for selecting the optimum maintenance strategy for ship machinery systems, Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 29, 3, 2015, 519-531.
  • [17] Fu C., Chang W., Yang S., Multiple criteria group decision making based on group satisfaction, Information Sciences, 518, 2020, 309-329.
  • [18] Goumas M., Lygerou V., An extension of the Promethee method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects, European Journal of Operational Research, 123, 3, 2000, 606-613.
  • [19] Haris A., Elkind E., Faliszewski P., Lackner M., Skowron P, The Condorcet Principle for Multiwinner Elections:From Shortlisting to Proportionality, Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-17), 2017, 84-90.
  • [20] Jafari A., Jafarian M., Zareei A., Zaerpour F., Using fuzzy Delphi method in maintenance strategy selection problem, Journal of Uncertain Systems, 2, 4, 2008, 289-298.
  • [21] Jayaswal P., Sagar M. K., Kushwah K, Maintenance strategy selection by fuzzy TOPSIS method of material handling equipment, Int J Emerging Trends EngDevel, 2, 3, 2013, 126-135.
  • [22] Johnson J., An algorithmic approach to detect non-injectivity of the Partial Borda Count, Senior Projects Spring, 2019.
  • [23] Kim J., Ebdon C., Asset Maintenance Practices and Challenges in U.S. Counties, Public Works Management and Policy, 26, 3, 2021, 259-278.
  • [24] Li X., Ran Y., Zhang G., He Y., Maintenance strategy selection: A multi criteria group decision-making method based on cloud DEMATEL-ANP, Resaearch Square ,2023, doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1382908/v1. PPR:PPR461295.
  • [25] Macharis C., Brans, J., Mareschal B., The GDSS PROMETHEE procedure, Journal of Decision Systems, 7, 4, 1998, 283-307.
  • [26] Morente-Molinera J. A., Wu X., Morfeq A., Al-Hmouz R., Herrera-Viedma E., A novel multi-criteria group decision-making method for heterogeneous and dynamic contexts using multi-granular fuzzy linguistic modelling and consensus measures, Information Fusion, 53, 2020, 240-250.
  • [27] Muinde M., Muchiri N., Ikua W., Maintenance strategy selection using analytic hierarchy process: a case study, J Sustain Res Eng, 1, 4, 2014, 21-29.
  • [28] Özturk A., Kecek G., Personnel selection in an accommodation enterprise by promethee method, International Journal of Business and Commerce, 5, 03, 2013, 1-19.
  • [29] Pacuit E., Voting Methods, Metaphysics Research Lab, 2019, Stanford University.
  • [30] Rahiminezhad G. M., Khorramrouz F., Esmaeilnezhad M., Mokhatab R. F., Hisjam M., Maintenance strategy selection in a cement company: An integrated AHP-FAHP approach, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2020, 2217-030197.
  • [31] Ratnayake R. M. C., Markeset T., Technical integrity management: measuring HSE awareness using AHP in selecting a maintenance strategy, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 16, 1, 2010, 44-63.
  • [32] Sagar M. K., Jayaswal P., Kushwah K., Exploring Fuzzy SAW Method for Maintenance Strategy Selection Problem of Material Handling Equipment, International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 3, 2, 2013, 600-605.
  • [33] Shafiee M., Labib A., Maiti J., Starr A., Maintenance strategy selection for multicomponent systems using a combined analytic network process and cost-risk criticality model, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability, 233, 2, 2019, 1748006-1771207.
  • [34] Shyjith K., Ilangkumaran M., Kumanan S., Multi-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate optimum maintenance strategy in textile industry, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 14, 4, 2008, 375-386.
  • [35] Yong C. P., Ali A. S., Ahmad, F., Chua S. J. L., Influences of key stakeholders’ involvement in maintenance management, Property Management, 35, 2, 2017, 217-231.
  • [36] Zhang H., Dong Y., Chiclana F., Yu S., Consensus efficiency in group decision making: A comprehensive comparative study and its optimal design, European Journal of Operational Research, 275, 2, 2019, 580-598.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-ba1227c6-5064-40e5-aa31-aef28e1f6717
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.