Use of the chief engineers experience to prioritize operational tasks in the ship engine room

• Autorzy: Kaminski P.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ntpe-2018-0014

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The frequent causes of ships’ detentions by port authorities are abnormalities of marine power plant functioning. Each extended ship lay time in port results in a waste of ship operating time thus costs rise to ship owners. This is connected with improper marine power plant management. In order to avoid this, a ship engineer should have at his disposal computer aided system supporting him in the managing of the marine power plant. One element of the decision making process in managing the marine engine room is to determine how important is each of the tasks which the operators have to do. This estimation is the base to choose the most important tasks and make optimal schedule with them using AHP method. Based on practice, a hierarchic structure of factors influencing a tasks validity in the engine room operating process was made. Next a preliminary questionnaire was conducted, which put questions to the experts as chief engineers next. This enabled to define numerical values of suitable coefficients influencing on the validity of operating tasks, show results of calculations in form of mileage parameters of engine as a function of crank angle.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

AHP; engine room; operation task priority

PL

AHP; maszynownia; priorytet zadania operacyjnego

• Wydawca: STE GROUP ; De Gruyter
• Czasopismo: New Trends in Production Engineering
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: Vol. 1, Iss. 1
• Strony: 113--118
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 10 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kaminski P.

• Gdynia Maritime University, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Cebi, S., Celik, M. (2008). Ship machinery installation based on fuzzy information axiom: The case of compressed air system. Computational Intelligence in Decision and Control-Proceedings of the 8th International FLINS Conference, pp. 1093-1098.
• 2. Downarowicz, J., Krause, J., Sikorski, M., Stachowski, W. (2000). Chosen methods of ergonomics and science about exploitation. Gdansk: Wydawnictwo PG.
• 3. Emovon, I., Norman, R.A., Murphy, A.J. (2018). Journal of intelligent manufacturing. 29(3), pp. 519-531.
• 4. Kaminski, P., Tarelko, W. (2007). Management of assignment of operational tasks realized in ship power plant. Polish Maritime Research. 15,1(55), pp. 42-51.
• 5. Kaminski, P. (2006). Identyfikacja elementow problemu decyzyjnego zarzadzania siłownia okretowa. Polioptymalizacja i CAD, pp. 94-101.
• 6. Kaminski, P. (2007). Model dwukryterialnej optymalizacji harmonogramu prac w siłowni okrętowej, jako zadanie pakowania. Pomiary Automatyka Kontrola, 53, pp. 25-28.
• 7. Podsiadlo, A., Tarelko, W. (2006). Modelling and developing a decision-making process of hazard zone identification in ship power plants. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 83(4), pp. 287-298.
• 8. Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytical Hierarchy Process, New York, McGraw-Hill.
• 9. Saaty, T.L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), pp. 9-26.
• 10. Witkowska, D. (2002). Artificial neural network and method statistical. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck.