The hidden cost of winning at all cost: unethical pro-organisational behaviour a goal theory perspective

• Autorzy: Bugdol Marek , Sułkowski Łukasz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2024.29.2.07

Warianty tytułu

PL

Ukryty koszt zwycięstwa za wszelką cenę: nieetyczne zachowania proorganizacyjne perspektywa teorii celów

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This study aims at developing mechanisms to understand the phenomenon of unethical pro-organisational behaviour (UPB) under goal theory. This overview on UPB has several implications for a better understanding in the general context of UPB and offers a base for future and potentially more effective management strategies by which to curtail UPB in the workplace. The methodology used for this research is the systematic literature review, which refers to information from various databases that assist with the analysis of goal theories and their relationship with the phenomenon of UPB. Major findings of the review established that UPB is an outcome of managerial practices and the intensification of organizational goals. It identifies goal-setting and goal achievements theories that might promote the emergence of UPB in the form of organizational goals and managerial practices. Some existing goal theories, like goal-setting and goal achievement theories, were analyzed to realize their contribution to triggering UPB. Future researchers could develop and test interventions to address the identified goal-related factors to reduce the risk of UPB. Organizations can, therefore, promote ethical actions and, at the same time, achieve desired performance results by taking a more holistic approach toward goal management.

PL

Celem tego badania jest opracowanie mechanizmów zrozumienia zjawiska nieetycznego zachowania proorganizacyjnego (UPB) w kontekście teorii celów. Przegląd UPB ma kilka implikacji dla lepszego zrozumienia w ogólnym kontekście UPB i stanowi podstawę dla przyszłych i potencjalnie bardziej skutecznych strategii zarządzania, które mogą ograniczyć UPB w miejscu pracy. Metodyka zastosowana w tym badaniu to systematyczny przegląd literatury, który odnosi się do informacji z różnych baz danych wspomagających analizę teorii celów i ich związku ze zjawiskiem UPB. Główne wyniki przeglądu wykazały, że UPB jest wynikiem praktyk menedżerskich i intensyfikacji celów organizacyjnych. Zidentyfikowano teorie wyznaczania i osiągania celów, które mogą sprzyjać pojawieniu się UPB w formie celów organizacyjnych i praktyk menedżerskich. Niektóre istniejące teorie celów, takie jak teorie wyznaczania i osiągania celów, zostały przeanalizowane, aby zrozumieć ich wkład w wywoływanie UPB.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

unethical pro-organisational behaviour; goal-related theories; managerial behaviour; management ethics

PL

nieetyczne zachowanie proorganizacyjne; teorie związane z celami; etyka zarządzania; zachowania menedżerskie

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 29, No. 2
• Strony: 138--159
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 119 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Bugdol Marek

• Faculty of Management and Social Communication, Jagiellonian University, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9993-7765

autor

Sułkowski Łukasz

• Faculty of Management and Social Communication, Jagiellonian University, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1248-2743

Bibliografia

• 1.Aksoy, E., Bayazit, M., (2014). The relationships between MBO system strength and goal‐climate quality and strength. Human Resource Management, 53(4), 505–525.
• 2.Alniacik, E., Erbas Kelebek, E. F. and Alniacik, U., (2022). The moderating role of message framing on the links between organizational identification and unethical pro-organizational behavior. Management Research Review, 45(4), 502–523.
• 3.Bagozzi, R. P., Warshaw, P. R., (1990). Trying to Consume. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 127–140.
• 4.Bandura, A., (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
• 5. Barsky, A., (2008). Understanding the ethical cost of organizational goal setting: A review and theory development. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 63–81.
• 6.Bharadwaj, S., Deka, S., (2021). Behavioural intention towards investment in cryptocurrency: an integration of Rogers’ diffusion of innovation theory and the technology acceptance model. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 9(4), 137-159.
• 7.Bhattacharjee, A., Berman, J. Z. and Reed, A. I., (2013). Tip of the hat, wag of the finger: How moral decoupling enables consumers to admire and admonish. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 1167–1184.
• 8.Brown, S., O’Donnell, E., (2011). Proactive personality and goal orientation: A model of directed effort. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 15(1), 103.
• 9.Bryant, W., Merritt, S. M., (2021). Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior and Positive Leader–Employee Relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(4), 777–793.
• 10.Bugdol, M., (2023). Czynniki wpływające na proces zarządzania celami jakości. Wnioski z istniejących teorii celów. Problemy Jakości, 3, 19–25.
• 11.Bugdol, M., Wontorczyk, A., (2021). Factors moderating the process of managing environmental objectives and identification of possible behavioural scenarios – results of a literature review. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 32(6), 1334–1351.
• 12.Carver, C. S., (2018). Control Theory, Goal Attainment, and Psychopathology. Psychological Inquiry, 29(3), 139–144.
• 13.Cavico, F. J., Mujtaba, B. G., (2017). Wells Fargo's fake accounts scandal and its legal and ethical implications for management. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 82(2), 4.
• 14.Chen, H., Kwan, H. K. and Xin, J., (2022). Is behaving unethically for organizations a mixed blessing? A dual-pathway model for the work-to-family spillover effects of unethical pro-organizational behavior. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 39(4), 1535–1560.
• 15.Chen, M., Chen, C. C., (2023). The moral dark side of performance pressure: how and when it affects unethical pro-organizational behavior. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(7), 1359–1389.
• 16.Chen, M., Chen, C. C. and Schminke, M., (2023). Feeling Guilty and Entitled: Paradoxical Consequences of Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(3), 865-883.
• 17.Cheng, K., Wei, F. and Lin, Y., (2019). The trickle-down effect of responsible leadership on unethical pro-organizational behavior: The moderating role of leader-follower value congruence. Journal of Business Research, 102, 34-43.
• 18.Clugston, M., Howell, J. P. and Dorfman, P. W., (2000). Does cultural socialization predict multiple bases and foci of commitment? Journal of Management, 26(1), 5-30.
• 19.Cohen, N., (2005). The Bank borrows an idea-from Enron. New Statesman, 134(4763), 14-15.
• 20.Corner, S., (2016). Enterprises ramping up network investments, but for quick returns. ComputerWorld, 0813295X.
• 21.Cutting the pie., (2020). Economist February 22nd.
• 22.Deming, W. E., (1986). Out of the Crisis, MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study. MA, Cambridge.
• 23.Deming, W. E., (1994). The New Economics for Industry, Education, Government, second ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
• 24.Dennerlein, T., Kirkman, B. L., (2022). The hidden dark side of empowering leadership: The moderating role of hindrance stressors in explaining when empowering employees can promote moral disengagement and unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(12), 2220-2242.
• 25.Ding, H., Liu, J., (2022). The dark side of strengths-based approach in the workplace: Perceived strengths-based human resource system spurs unethical pro-organizational behavior. Current Psychology, 1-10.
• 26.Ding, H., Yu, E. and Xu, S., (2021). Preliminary development and validation of perceived strengths-based human resource system scale. International Journal of Manpower, 43(4), 1019-1032.
• 27.Dźwigoł, H., Trzeciak, M., (2023). Pragmatic methodology in management science. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 11(1), 67-90.
• 28.Easterby-Smith M., Thorne R. and Jackson P. R., (2015). Management and Business Research. Los Angeles-Singapore: Sage.
• 29.Effelsberg, D., Solga, M., (2015). Transformational Leaders’ In-Group versus Out-Group Orientation: Testing the Link Between Leaders’ Organizational Identification, their Willingness to Engage in Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior, and Follower-Perceived Transformational Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(4), 581-590.
• 30.Farasat, M., Azam, A., (2022). Supervisor bottom-line mentality and subordinates’ unethical pro-organizational behavior. Personnel Review, 51(1), 353-376.
• 31.Fehr, R., Welsh, D., Yam, K.C., Baer, M., Wei, W. and Vaulont, M., (2019). The role of moral decoupling in the causes and consequences of unethical pro-organizational behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 153, 27-40.
• 32. Foster, J., (2003) Motywacja w miejscu pracy. In N. Chmiel (ed.), Psychologia pracy i organizacji. Gdańsk: GWP.
• 33. Gagné, M., (Ed.)., (2014). The Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory. Oxford University Press, USA.
• 34. Gardner, R. G., Harris, T. B., Li, N., Kirkman, B. L. and Mathieu, J. E., (2017). Understanding “It depends” in organizational research: A theory-based taxonomy, review, and future research agenda concerning interactive and quadratic relationships. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 610-638.
• 35.Ghosh, S. K., (2017). The direct and interactive effects of job insecurity and job embeddedness on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Personnel Review, 46(6), 1182-1198.
• 36.Graham, K. A., Resick, C. J., Margolis, J. A., Shao, P., Hargis, M. B. and Kiker, J. D., (2020). Egoistic norms, organizational identification, and the perceived ethicality of unethical pro-organizational behavior: A moral maturation perspective. Human Relations, 73(9), 1249-1277.
• 37.Graham, K., Ziegert, J. and Capitano, J., (2015). The Effect of Leadership Style, Framing, and Promotion Regulatory Focus on Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(3), 423-436.
• 38.Griep, Y., Kraak, J. M., Fenneman, J., Jiménez, A. and Lub, X. D., (2023). You scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours: Unethical pro-organizational behavior and deviance in response to different psychological contract states. Journal of Business Research, 156, 113537.
• 39.Harvey, P., Harris, K. J., (2010). Frustration-based outcomes of entitlement and the influence of supervisor communication. Human Relations, 63, 1639-1660.
• 40.Holmes, P. E., Howard, M. C., (2023). The duplicitous effect of organizational identification: applying social identity theory to identify joint relations with workplace social courage and unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Journal of Positive Psychology, 18(5), 784-797.
• 41.Inam, A., Ho, J. A., Ng, S. I. and Mohamed, R., (2021). Inhibiting unethical pro-organizational behavior: Harnessing the effects of responsible leadership and leader–member exchange. International Journal of Manpower, 42(7), 1183-1201.
• 42.Jacobs, G., Belschak, F. D. and Den Hartog, D. N., (2014). (Un) ethical behavior and performance appraisal: The role of affect, support, and organizational justice. Journal of business ethics, 121, 63-76.
• 43.Janke, S., Dickhäuser, O., (2019). A neglected tenet of achievement goal theory: Associations between life aspirations and achievement goal orientations. Personality and Individual Differences, 142, 90-99.
• 44. Jha, J. K., Singh, M., (2023). Who cares about ethical practices at workplace? A taxonomy of employees’ unethical conduct from top management perspective. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(2), 317-339.
• 45.Jiang, W., Liang, B. and Wang, L., (2023). The Double-Edged Sword Effect of Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior: The Relationship Between Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Work Effort. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(4), 1159-1172.
• 46.Johnson, H. H., Umphress, E. E., (2019). To Help My Supervisor: Identification, Moral Identity, and Unethical Pro-supervisor Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(2), 519-534
• 47.Kaplan, A., Maehr, M. L., (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational psychology review, 19, 141-184.
• 48.Kayes, D. C., (2005). The destructive pursuit of idealized goals. Organizational Dynamics, 34(4), 391-401.
• 49.Kim, C., Lee, C. and Lee, G., (2023). Impact of Superiors’ Ethical Leadership on Subordinates’ Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: Mediating Effects of Followership. Behavioral Sciences (2076-328X), 13(6), 454. King, I. M., (1992). King's Theory of Goal Attainment. Nursing Science Quarterly, 5(1), 19-26.
• 50. Klein, L., Beuren, I.M. and Dal Vesco, D., (2019). Effects of the management control system in unethical behaviors. RAUSP Management Journal, 54, 54-76.
• 51. Knezevic, D., (2023). The impact of technologies on leadership styles in Southeast European counties. Journal of International Studies, 16(2), 127-139.
• 52.Kong, D. T., (2016). The pathway to unethical pro-organizational behavior: Organizational identification as a joint function of work passion and trait mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 86-91.
• 53.Kristinsson, K., Minelgaite, I. and Stangej, O., (2022). In the eye of the beholder? Gendered perception of CEOs’ ethical and unethical leadership. Economics and Sociology, 15(4), 21-38.
• 54. Kristinsson, K., Stangej, O., Sund, B. and Minelgaite, I., (2024). Does gender matter in ethical leadership perceptions? Cross-national evidence. Economics and Sociology, 17(1), 236-255.
• 55. Kruglanski, A.W., Shah, J.Y., Fishbach, A., Friedman, R., Chun, W.Y. and Sleeth-Keppler, D., (2018). A theory of goal systems. The motivated mind, 207-250.
• 56. Lee, A., Schwarz, G., Newman, A. and Legood, A., (2019). Investigating when and why psychological entitlement predicts unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(1), 109-126.
• 57. Lee, J., Oh, S.-H. and Park, S., (2022). Effects of Organizational Embeddedness on Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior: Roles of Perceived Status and Ethical Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 176(1), 111-125.
• 58. Li, C., (2023). Organizational identification and unethical pro-organizational behavior: A culture-moderated meta-analysis. Ethics and Behavior, 11-21.
• 59. Liao, Z., Yam, K. C., Lee, H. W., Johnson, R. E. and Tang, P. M., (2023). Cleansing or Licensing? Corporate Social Responsibility Reconciles the Competing Effects of Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior on Moral Self-Regulation. Journal of Management, 50(5), 1643-1683.
• 60.Liu, F., Liang, J. and Chen, M., (2021). The Danger of Blindly Following: Examining the Relationship Between Authoritarian Leadership and Unethical Pro-organizational Behaviors. Management and Organization Review, 17(3), 524-550.
• 61.Liu, X.L., Lu, J.G., Zhang, H. and Cai, Y., (2021). Helping the organization but hurting yourself: How employees’ unethical pro-organizational behavior predicts work-to-life conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 167, 88-100.
• 62. Locke, E. A., (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3,157-189.
• 63. Locke, E. A., (1978). The ubiquity of the technique of goal setting in theories of and approaches to employee motivation. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 594-601.
• 64.Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P., (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265-268.
• 65.Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P., (1990). A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• 66.Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P. and Erez, M., (1988). The determinants of goal commitment. Academy of management review, 13(1), 23-39. Lopes, A. D. O. F., (2023). Performance appraisal and unethical behavior: A quasi- experimental study [Dissertação de mestrado, Iscte - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa]. Repositório Iscte.
• 67.Masood, A., Zhang, Q., Singh, N., Meena, B. and Perano, M., (2024). Exploring leader’s unethical proorganizational behavior and follower attitudes toward knowledge hiding and sharing in the service industry: a social learning perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management. ahead-of-print
• 68. Matherne III, C. F., Litchfield, S. R., (2012). Investigating the Relationship Between Affective Commitment and Unethical Pro-Organizational Behaviors: The Role of Moral Identity. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 9(5), 35-46.
• 69. McCorvey, K., Woehr, D. J., (2022). Perceived Ethical Climate and Unethical Behavior: The Moderating Role of Moral Identity. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 19(4), 98-120.
• 70.Merritt, A. C., Effron, D. A. and Monin, B., (2010). Moral self‐licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and personality psychology compass, 4(5), 344-357.
• 71. Miao, Q., Newman, A., Yu, J. and Xu, L., (2013). The relationship between ethical leadership and unethical pro-organizational behavior: Linear or curvilinear effects? Journal of business ethics, 116, 641-653.
• 72.Mo, S., Song, Y., Fang, Y., Wang, M., Shi, J., Jin, W. and Zhao, X., (2022). Performance goal orientation and unethical pro-organizational behavior: a moderated mediation model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(18), 3431-3463.
• 73.Naseer, S., Bouckenooghe, D., Syed, F., Khan, A. K. and Qazi, S., (2020). The malevolent side of organizational identification: Unraveling the impact of psychological entitlement and manipulative personality on unethical work behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35(3), 333-346.
• 74.Nguyen, C. M., Zhang, L. and Morand, D., (2021). Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior: A Moderated Mediational Model of Its Transmission from Managers to Employees. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 28(3), 379-393.
• 75. Niu, C., Liang, F., Meng, X. and Liu, Y.O. (2020). The inverted U-shaped relationship between authentic leadership and unethical pro-organizational behavior. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 48(11), 1-11.
• 76.Ordonez, L. D., Welsh, D. T., (2015). Immoral goals: How goal setting may lead to unethical behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 93-96.
• 77.Park, M., Song, R. and Jeong, J. O. (2017). Effect of goal attainment theory based education program on cardiovascular risks, behavioral modification, and quality of life among patients with first episode of acute myocardial infarction: Randomized study. International journal of nursing studies, 71, 8-16.
• 78. Piest, S., Schreck, P., (2021). Contests and unethical behavior in organizations: a review and synthesis of the empirical literature. Management Review Quarterly, 71(4), 679-721,
• 79. Pervaiz, S., Li, G. and He, Q., (2021). The mechanism of goal-setting participation’s impact on employees’ proactive behavior, moderated mediation role of power distance. Plos one, 16(12), e0260625.
• 80.Presslee, A., Vance, T. W. and Webb, R. A., (2013). The effects of reward type on employee goal setting, goal commitment, and performance. The Accounting Review, 88(5), 1805-1831.
• 81.Qureshi, A. R., Ahmed, A., (2021). The Mediating Role of Reflective Moral Attentiveness between Organizational Identification, Perceived Insider Status and Unethical Pro- Organizational Behaviors. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 15(3), 522-544.
• 82. Schuh, S. C., Cai, Y., Kaluza, A. J., Steffens, N. K., David, E. M. and Haslam, S. A., (2021). Do leaders condone unethical pro‐organizational employee behaviors? The complex interplay between leader organizational identification and moral disengagement. Human Resource Management, 60(6), 969-989.
• 83. Schweitzer, M. E., Ordóñez, L. and Douma, B., (2002, August). The Dark Side of Goal Setting: The Role of Goals in Motivating Unethical Decision Making. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2002, No. 1, pp. B1-B6). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
• 84.Shah, M., Sarfraz, M., Khawaja, K. F. and Tariq, J., (2020). Does narcissism encourage unethical pro‐organizational behavior in the service sector? A case study in Pakistan. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 40(1), 44-57.
• 85.Sharma, V., Mishra, V. and Uppal, N. (2023). Support to sin: a moderated mediation model of perceived organizational support’s effect on unethical pro-organizational behavior among Indian nationals. International Journal of Manpower, 44(3), 484-502.
• 86.Shaw, K.-H., Liao, H.-Y., (2021). Does Benevolent Leadership Promote Follower Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior? A Social Identity Perspective. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 28(1), 31-44.
• 87.Smiley, P. A., Buttitta, K. V., Chung, S. Y., Dubon, V. X. and Chang, L. K., (2016). Mediation models of implicit theories and achievement goals predict planning and withdrawal after failure. Motivation and Emotion, 40(6), 878-894.
• 88.Stanisławska, M., (2019). Kreatywna rachunkowość a manipulacja danymi. Wydawnictwa Drugie.
• 89. Sułkowski, Ł., (2019). On bullshit management–the critical management studies perspective. Economics and Sociology, 12(1), 302-312.
• 90. Tacke, F., Knockaert, M., Patzelt, H. and Breugst, N., (2023). When Do Greedy Entrepreneurs Exhibit Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior? The Role of New Venture Team Trust. Journal of Management, 49(3), 974-1004.
• 91.Tang, P. M., Yam, K. C. and Koopman, J., (2020). Feeling proud but guilty? Unpacking the paradoxical nature of unethical pro-organizational behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 160, 68-86.
• 92. Tang, P. M., Yam, K. C., Koopman, J. and Ilies, R., (2022). Admired and disgusted? Third parties’ paradoxical emotional reactions and behavioral consequences towards others’ unethical pro‐organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology, 75(1), 33-67.
• 93.Tang, Y., Li, Y., (2022). Ethicality neutralization and amplification: a multilevel study of ethical leadership and unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 37(2), 111-124.
• 94. Theodosiou, A. E., Mavvidis, A. and Tsigilis, N., (2018). Dealing with stress during tennis competition. The association of approach- and avoidance-coping with metacognition and achievement goal theory perspectives. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 18(4), 2454-2465.
• 95.Tian, Q., Peterson, D. K., (2016). The effects of ethical pressure and power distance orientation on unethical pro-organizational behavior: the case of earnings management. Business Ethics: A European Review, 25(2), 159-171. Umphress, E. E., Bingham, J. B., (2011). When Employees Do Bad Things for Good Reasons: Examining Unethical Pro-Organizational Behaviors. Organization Science, 22(3), 621-640.
• 96. Umphress, E. E., Bingham, J. B. and Mitchell, M. S., (2010). Unethical Behavior in the Name of the Company: The Moderating Effect of Organizational Identification and Positive Reciprocity Beliefs on Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 769-780.
• 97.Uymaz, A. O., Arslan, S., (2022). Unethical pro-organizational behavior as an outcome of servant leadership. Journal of Management and Organization, 28(1), 33-57.
• 98.Van Yperen, N. W. and Orehek, E., (2013). Achievement goals in the workplace: Conceptualization, prevalence, profiles, and outcomes. Journal of Economic Psychology, 38, 71-79.
• 99.Vitell, S.J., Keith, M. and Mathur, M., (2011). Antecedents to the justification of norm violating behavior among business practitioners. Journal of Business ethics, 101, 163-173.
• 100. Wang, C. K. J., Tan, L. and Dairianathan, E. I., (2018). Achievement Goals, Implicit Theories, and Intrinsic Motivation: A Test of Domain Specificity Across Music, Visual Art, and Sports. Journal of Research in Music Education, 66(3), 320-337.
• 101. Wang, D., Weng, Q., Kiani, A. and Ali, A., (2022a). Job insecurity and unethical pro-organizational behavior: The joint moderating effects of moral identity and proactive personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 195, 111685.
• 102. Wang, H., Zhang, Y., Li, P. and Henry, S. E., (2023). You raise me up and I reciprocate: linking empowering leadership to organizational citizenship behavior and unethical pro‐organizational behavior. Applied psychology, 72(2), 718-742.
• 103.Wang, T., Long, L., Zhang, Y. and He, W., (2019). A social exchange perspective of employee–organization relationships and employee unethical pro-organizational behavior: The moderating role of individual moral identity. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(2), 473-489.
• 104. Wang, X., Xiang, C., Meng, L., Chi, L., and Li, S., (2022b). External corporate social responsibility promotes employees’ unethical pro-organizational behavior: an attribution perspective. Current Psychology, 42(25), 21326-21340.
• 105. Welsh, D. T., Ordóñez, L. D., (2014). The dark side of consecutive high-performance goals: Linking goal setting, depletion, and unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(2), 79-89.
• 106. William Lee, T., Burch, T. C. and Mitchell, T. R., (2014). The story of why we stay: A review of job embeddedness. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav, 1(1), 199-216.
• 107.Wirthwein, L., Steinmayr, R., (2021). Performance-approach goals: The operationalization makes the difference. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(4), 1199-1220.
• 108.Xiong, G., Huang, H., Ma, Y., Liang, C. and Wang, H., (2021). Abusive supervision and unethical pro-organizational behavior: The mediating role of status challenge and the moderating role of leader–member exchange. SAGE Open, 11(3), 1-10.
• 109. Xu, T., Lv, Z., (2018). HPWS and unethical pro-organizational behavior: a moderated mediation model. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(3), 265-278.
• 110. Yang, J., Lu, L., Yao, N. and Liang, C., (2020). Self-sacrificial leadership and employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior: Roles of identification with leaders and collectivism. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 48(2), 1-12. Yang, J., Wei, H. and Wu, Y., (2021). Influence of Self-Sacrificial Leadership on the Pro-Organizational Unethical Behavior of Employees: A Moderated Mediating Model. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 14, 2245-2255.
• 111.Yao, Z., Luo, J., Fu, N., Zhang, X. and Wan, Q., (2022). Rational counterattack: The impact of workplace bullying on unethical pro-organizational and pro-family behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 181(3), 661-682.
• 112.Yin, C., Zhang, Y. and Lu, L., (2021). Employee-Oriented CSR and Unethical ProOrganizational Behavior: The Role of Perceived Insider Status and Ethical Climate Rules. Sustainability, 13(12), 6613.
• 113.Yu, M. C., G Wang, G., Zheng, X. T. and Shi, W. J., (2020). Entrepreneur narcissism and unethical pro-organizational behaviour: an examination of mediated-moderation model. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 33(1), 501-520.
• 114. Zeng, K., Wang, D., Huang, W., Li, Z. and Zheng, X., (2022). Role of moral judgment in peers’ vicarious learning from employees’ unethical pro-organizational behavior. Ethics and Behavior, 32(3), 239-258.
• 115. Zhan, X., Liu, Y., (2022). Impact of employee pro-organizational unethical behavior on performance evaluation rated by supervisor: a moderated mediation model of supervisor bottom-line mentality. Chinese Management Studies, 16(1), 102-118.
• 116. Zhang, X., Yao, Z., (2019). Impact of relational leadership on employees’ unethical pro-organizational behavior: A survey based on tourism companies in four countries. PLoS ONE, 14(12), 1-19.
• 117.Zhang, Y., Du, S., (2022). Moral cleansing or moral licensing? A study of unethical pro-organizational behavior’s differentiating Effects. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1-18.
• 118. Zhang, Y., He, B., Huang, Q. and Xie, J., (2020). Effects of supervisor bottom-line mentality on subordinate unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 35(5), 419-434.
• 119. Zonghua, L., Junyun, L., Yulang, G., Ming, Z. and Xu, W., (2022). The effect of corporate social responsibility on unethical pro-organizational behavior: the mediation of moral identity and moderation of supervisor-employee value congruence. Current Psychology, 42(17), 14283-14296.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).