The Use of Linguistic Variables and the FMEA Analysis in Risk Assessment in Inland Navigation

• Autorzy: Skupień E. , Tubis A.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.12.01.16

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper continues the study of the same authors, who previously proposed a method of risk assessment in inland navigation. In the literature there is a gap in the research area of a risk management of transportation systems, especially: inland navigation. The authors carried out interdisciplinary research and presented the results related to the identification of risk factors present in the systems of inland navigation. The paper presents inland navigation risk analysis, conducted using the linguistic variables and the FMEA method, taking into account technical, economic and social aspects. The aim of the article is to present a procedure for the assessment of risk in inland waterways transport, and carry out risk analysis for transport companies. In paper the proposal of behavior scenarios, methods of preventing and minimizing effects of pointed risks are shown.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

inland shipping; risk assessment; Failure Modes and Effects Analyses (FMEA); FMEA analysis; FMEA method; linguistic variables; risk factors; inland navigation

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: Vol. 12, no. 1
• Strony: 143--148
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 33 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Skupień E.

• Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland

autor

Tubis A.

• Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1 Apostolakis G.E. 2004. How useful is quantitative risk assessment? Risk Analysis 24: 515–520.
• 2 Aven T. 2009. Perspectives on risk in a decision-making context – review and discussion. Safety Science 47: 798–806
• 3 Aven T. 2010. On how to define, understand and describe risk. Reliability Engineering&System Safety 95: 623–631.
• 4 Aven T., 2012. The risk concept—historical and recent development trends. Reliability Engineering&System Safety 99: 33–44.
• 5 Aven T. & Zio E. 2014. Foundational issues in risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 34 (7): 1164–1172
• 6 Aven T. 2016. Risk assessment and risk management: review of recent advances on their foundation, European Journal of Operational Research, 253: 1-13.
• 7 Brown J., Hosseini A., Karcher M., Kauker F., Dowdall M., Schnur R., Strand P. 2016. Derivation of risk indices and analysis of variablility for the management of incidents involving the transport of nuclear materials in the Northern Seas; Journal of Environmental Management 171: 195-203
• 8 Bubbico R., Di Cave S., Mazzarotta B. 2009. Preliminary risk analysis for LNG tankers approaching a maritime terminal, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 22: 634–638
• 9 Burduk A. 2012. Assessment of risk in a production system with the use of the FMEA analysis and linguistic variables. W: Hybrid artificial intelligent systems : 7th international conference, HAIS 2012, Salamanca, Spain, March 28-30, 2012, Springer, 250-258
• 10 Goerlandt F., Hänninen M., Ståhlberg K., Montewka J., Kujala P.: Simplified Risk Analysis of Tanker Collisions in the Gulf of Finland. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 381-387, 2012
• 11 Goerlandt F. Kujala P. 2011. Traffic simulation based ship collision probability modelling Reliability Engineering and System Safety 96(1): 91-107
• 12 Goerlandt F., Montewka J. 2015. Maritime transportation risk analysis: Review and analysis in light of some foundational issues. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 138: 115–134
• 13 GUS. 2015. Transport wodny śródlądowy w Polsce w 2015, www.stat.gov.pl
• 14 Hampel J. 2006. Different concepts of risk – a challenge for risk communication. International Journal of Medical Microbiology 296: 5–10.
• 15 Jeong J.S., Park G-K., Kim K.I. 2012 Risk assessment model of maritime traffic in time-variant CPA environments inwaterway. Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics 16(7): 866-873
• 16 Jorion P. 2006. Value at Risk. New York. McGraw-Hill.
• 17 Kaplan S. 1997. The words of risk analysis. Risk Analysis 17: 407–417.
• 18 King J.L. 2001. Operational Risk: Measurement and Modelling. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
• 19 Langard B, Morel G., Chauvin C. 2015 Collision risk management in passenger transportation: A study of the conditions for success in a safe shipping company; Psychologie française 60: 111–127
• 20 Li S., Meng Q., Qu X. 2012. An Overview of MaritimeWaterway Quantitative Risk Assessment Models, Risk Analysis, Vol. 32, No. 3, 496-512
• 21 Montewka J., Krata P., Goerlandt F., Mazaheri A., Kujala P. 2011. Marine traffic risk modelling – an innovative approach and a case study. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability 225(3): 307-322
• 22 National Research Council. 2000. Risk Management in the Marine Transportation System. Conference Proceedings 22. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
• 23 PN-ISO 31000:2010: Zarządzanie ryzykiem – techniki oceny ryzyka, PKN, Warszawa, 2010.
• 24 Rasmussen F.M., Glibbery K.A., Melchild K, Hansen M.G., Jensen T.K., Lehn- Schioler T., Randrup-Thomsen S. 2012. Quantitative assessment of risk to ship traffic in the Fehmarnbelt Fixed Link project. Journal of Polish Safety and Reliability Association 3(1-2): 1-12
• 25 Smallman C. 2000 What is operational risk and why is it important? Risk Management: An International Journal 2(3): 7-14.
• 26 Suman S., Nagarajan V., Sha O.P., Khanfir S., Kobayashi E., Malik A.M. 2012 Ship collision risk assessment using AIS data. International Journal of Innovative Research & Development 1 (10): 509-524
• 27 Szczepański M. 2011. Ubezpieczenia w logistyce, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Poznańskiej, Poznań
• 28 Yuebo J., Xuefen Z. 2014. Risk Management Discussion on Transport of Bulk Liquid Dangerous Goods. Applied Mechanics and Materials 638-640: 2019-2022
• 29 van Dorp R., Merrick J.R. 2011. On a risk management analysis of oil spill risk using maritime transportation system simulation. Annals of Operations Research 187: 249-277 [87]
• 30 Wang Y., Cheng G., Hu H., Wu W. 2012. Development of a risk-based maintenance strategy using FMEA for a continuous catalytic reforming plant. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 25: 958-965
• 31 Ward S. 2001. Exploring the role of the corporate risk manager. Risk Management: An International Journal 3(1): 7-25
• 32 Weng J., Meng O., Qu X. 2012. Vessel Collision Frequency Estimation in the Singapore Strait. The Journal of Navigation 65(2): 207-221
• 33 Zawiła – Niedźwiecki J. 2012. Analiza ryzyka operacyjnego z perspektywy teorii organizacji. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego 690: 179-188

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).