Factors affecting perceived organizational support levels of employees in container shipping agencies

• Autorzy: Kiliç Alper , Akdamar Emrah , Baştuğ Sedat , Goğebakan Maruf , Uzun Öykü Savan

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17402/599

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This study explores determinants of organizational support perceptions among employees within container shipping agencies. It examines the influence of leadership styles employed by shipping agency managers on perceived organizational support. Employing correlation and multiple regression analyses, the non-normally distributed data prompts the utilization of the Kruskal-Wallis H test. A survey was administered to 258 employees in 255 shipping agencies from major Turkish shipowner companies dominating the maritime transport sector. A positive correlation is established between perceived organizational support and leadership style dimensions. Additionally, it suggests that efforts to create a supportive environment, especially for junior employees, can mitigate high turnover rates and enhance organizational performance. Practical implications include the recommendation for shipping agencies to focus on leadership development, communication improvement, and skill-building initiatives to foster a supportive workplace environment.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

shipping agency; container shipping; leadership styles; perceived organizational support

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Politechniki Morskiej w Szczecinie
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Morskiej w Szczecinie
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: nr 77 (149)
• Strony: 76--89
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr.61 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kiliç Alper

• Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University, Maritime Faculty Marine Engineering Department

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2700-9094

autor

Akdamar Emrah

• Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University, Maritime Faculty Maritime Business Administration Department

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5136-3587

autor

Baştuğ Sedat

• Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University, Maritime Faculty Maritime Transportation and Management Department Bandirma, Turkey

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7121-2882

autor

Goğebakan Maruf

• Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University, Maritime Faculty Maritime Business Administration Department

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0447-8311

autor

Uzun Öykü Savan

• Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University, Maritime Faculty Maritime Business Administration Department

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2879-8651

Bibliografia

• 1. Abid, G., Zahra, I. & Ahmed, A. (2015) Mediated mechanism of thriving at work between perceived organization support, innovative work behavior and turnover. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences 9 (3), pp. 982–998.
• 2. Ackoff, R.L. & Pourdehnad, J. (2009) A useful distinction between managers and leaders. Strategy & Leadership 37 (3), doi: 10.1108/sl.2009.26137cab.002.
• 3. Akan, D., Yıldırım, İ. & Yalçın, S. (2014) Okul Müdürleri Liderlik Stili Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi (Omlsö). Electronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 13 (51), doi: 10.17755/esosder. 28743.
• 4. Akdoğan, R. (1988) Akdoğan, Deniz Ticareti Zihni Eğitim No. 5. İstanbul.
• 5. Akın, M. (2008) Örgütsel destek, sosyal destek ve iş/aile çatışmalarının yaşam tatmini üzerindeki etkileri. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 1 (25), pp. 141–171.
• 6. Alijanpour, M., Dousti, M. & Khodayari, A. (2013) The relationship between the perceived organizational support and organizational commitment in staff (A case study: General office for sport and the youth, Mazandaran province). European Journal of Experimental Biology 3 (5), pp. 165‒171.
• 7. Anafarta, N. (2015) Algılanan örgütsel destek ve işten ayrılma niyeti ilişkisi: İş tatmininin aracılık rolü. İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Yönetim Dergisi 26 (79), pp. 112–130.
• 8. Asegid, A., Belachew, T. & Yimam, E. (2014) Factors influencing job satisfaction and anticipated turnover among nurses in Sidama zone public health facilities, South Ethiopia. Nursing Research and Practice, doi: 10.1155/2014/909768.
• 9. Bass, B.M. & Avolio, B.J. (1995) MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
• 10. Burns, J.M. (1978) Leadership. Harper & Row.
• 11. Burns, J.M. (2010) Leadership. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.
• 12. Deveci, D.A. & Çetin, İ.B. (2013) Gemi Acenteleri ve Forvarder İşletmeleri: İşlevler ve Hizmetler. Cerit, G., Deveci, D.A., Esmer, S. (eds). Denizcilik İşletmeleri Yönetimi içinde. İstanbul: Beta Basım A.Ş.
• 13. Doh, J.P. & Stumpf, S.A. (2005) Handbook on Responsible Leadership and Governance in Global Business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
• 14. Dong, B. (2023) A systematic review of the transactional leadership literature and future outlook. Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences 2 (3), pp. 21‒25, doi: 10.54097/ajmss.v2i3.7972.
• 15. Drzewiecka, M. & Roczniewska, M. (2018) The relationship between perceived leadership styles and organisational constraints: An empirical study in Goleman’s typology. European Review of Applied Psychology 68 (4–5), 161–169.
• 16. DTO (2007) Deniz Ticaret Odası Deniz Sektör Raporu, Deniz Ticaret Odası Yayınları, İstanbul.
• 17. Ebrahimi, P., Rezvani Chamanzamin, M., Roohbakhsh, N. & Shaygan, J. (2017) Transformational and transactional leadership: Which one is more effective in the education of employees’ creativity? Considering the moderating role of learning orientation and leader gender. International Journal of Organizational Leadership 6 (1), pp. 137‒156, doi: 10.33844/ijol.2017.60196.
• 18. Eğriboyun, D. (2013) Ortaöğretim Okullarında Görev Yapan Yönetici Ve Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Güven, Örgütsel Destek Ve Örgütsel Bağlılıkları Arasındaki İlişki.
• 19. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S. & Sowa, D. (1986) Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology 71 (3), pp. 500‒507, doi: 10.1037/0021- 9010.71.3.500.
• 20. Eisenberger, R., Malone, G.P. & Presson, W.D. (2016) Optimizing perceived organizational support to enhance employee engagement. SHRM-SIOP Science of HR series, 1‒22.
• 21. Eisenberger, R. & Stinglhamber, F. (2011) Perceived Organizational Support: Fostering Enthusiastic and Productive Employees. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
• 22. Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I.L. & Rhoades, L. (2002) Perceived supervisor support: contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology 87 (3), 565.
• 23. Elçi, M., Erdilek Karabay, M. & Akbas, T.T. (2016) The effects of job satisfaction and ethical climate on whistleblowing: An empirical study on public sector. Journal of Global Strategic Management 10 (1), pp. 55–66, doi: 10.20460/JGSM.20161022386.
• 24. Eraslan, L. (2006) Liderlikte post-modern bir paradigma: dönüşümcü liderlik. Journal of Human Sciences 8 (1). Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index. php/IJHS/article/view/168.
• 25. Eren, E. (2009) Yönetim ve Organizasyon (Çağdaş ve Küresel Yaklaşımlar). Beta Basım A.Ş. İstanbul.
• 26. Erol, F. & Bozbayindir, F. (2018) Öğretmenlerin algilanan örgütsel destek, sosyal sorumluluk temelli liderlik ve pozitif psikolojik sermayeleri arasindaki ilişki. Journal of Social Sciences/Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 8 (16), pp. 2146–4561.
• 27. Erturgut, R. (2009) Toplam Kalite Yönelimli Eğitim Kurumlarinda Eğitim Yöneticilerinin Dönüştürücü ve Sürdürümcü Liderlik Düzeylerinin Karşilaştirilmasi: Meb Merkez Ve Taşra Teşkilatindaki Örgütlerde Ampirik Bir Araştirma. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 8 (30), pp. 181–199.
• 28. Eser, G. (2011) Güven Eğiliminin Algilanan Örgütsel Destek Üzerindeki Etkisi. Marmara University Journal of the Faculty of Economic & Administrative Sciences 30 (1).
• 29. Gaudet, M.C. & Tremblay, M. (2017) Initiating structure leadership and employee behaviors: The role of perceived organizational support, affective commitment and leader– member exchange. European Management Journal 35 (5), pp. 663–675.
• 30. Gerstner, C.R. & Day, D.V. (1997) Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology 82 (6), pp. 827–844, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827.
• 31. Gunst, R.F. & ve Mason, R.L. (1980) Regression Analysis and Its Applications. New York: Marcel Dekker.
• 32. Institute of Chartered Shipbrokers (2012) Dry cargo chartering. Witherby Publishing Group Ltd.
• 33. Işığıçok, E. (2018) Çıkarımsal İstatistik. Aktüel Yayınları.
• 34. Jyoti, J. & Dev, M. (2015) The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Employee Creativity: The Role of Learning Orientation. Journal of Asia Business Studies 9, pp. 78–98, doi: 10.1108/JABS-03-2014-0022.
• 35. Karip, Y.D.D.E. (1998) Dönüşümcü Liderlik. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi 16 (16), pp. 443–465.
• 36. Klein, G. (2023) Transformational and transactional leadership, organizational support and environmental competition intensity as antecedents of intrapreneurial behaviors. European Research on Management and Business Economics 29 (2), 100215, doi: 10.1016/j.iedeen.2023.100215.
• 37. Korejan, M.M. & Shahbazi, H. (2016) An analysis of the transformational leadership theory. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences 8 (3), pp. 452‒461, doi: 10.4314/ jfas.v8i3s.192.
• 38. McKale, L. (2019) Leadership. December 22, 2019 tarihinde Resourceful Manager: https://www.resourcefulmanager. com/leaders-vs-managers/.
• 39. Mekonnen, M. & Bayissa, Z. (2023) The effect of transformational and transactional leadership styles on organizational readiness for change among health professionals. SAGE Open Nursing 9, pp. 1‒8, doi: 10.1177/23779608231185923.
• 40. Meyer, J.P., Stanley, D.J., Herscovitch, L. & Topolnytsky, L. (2002) Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior 61 (1), pp. 20–52.
• 41. Mittal, S. & Dhar, R.L. (2015) Transformational leadership and employee creativity: mediating role of creative self-efficacy and moderating role of knowledge sharing. Management Decision 53 (5), pp. 894‒910, doi: 10.1108/ MD-07-2014-0464.
• 42. Natunann, S.E., Bies, R.J. & Martin, C.L. (1995) The roles of organizational support and justice during a layoff. Academy of Management 1, pp. 89‒93, doi: 10.5465/ ambpp.1995.17536322.
• 43. Northouse, P.G. (2018) Introduction to Leadership: Concepts and Practice. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd.
• 44. Oshagbemi, T. (2004) Age influences on the leadership styles and behaviour of managers. Employee Relations 26 (1), pp. 14‒29, doi: 10.1108/01425450410506878.
• 45. Porath, C., Spreitzer, G., Gibson, C. & Garnett, F.G. (2012) Thriving at work: toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Organizational Behavior 33 (2), pp. 250–275, doi: 10.1002/job.756.
• 46. Rhoades, L. & Eisenberger, R. (2002) Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology 87 (4), pp. 698–714, doi: 10.1037//0021- 9010.87.4.698.
• 47. Robinson, R.N.S. & Beesley, L.G. (2010) Linkages between creativity and intention to quit: an occupational study of chefs. Tourism Management 31 (6), pp. 765‒776, doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2009.08.003.
• 48. Roemer, A. & Harris, C. (2018) Perceived organisational support and well-being: The role of psychological capital as a mediator. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology 44 (2), doi: 10.4102/sajip.v44i0.1539.
• 49. Rost, J.C. (1993) Leadership for the Twenty-First Century. London: Praeger.
• 50. Şahin, S. (2003) Okul müdürlerinin liderlilk stilleri ile okul kültürü arasındaki ilişkiler. Thèse de doctorat. DEÜ Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
• 51. Shanock, L.R. & Eisenberger, R. (2006) When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates’ perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 91 (3), pp. 689–695, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.689.
• 52. Shin, S.J. & Zhou, J.M. (2003) Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal 46 (6), pp. 703‒714, doi: 10.2307/30040662.
• 53. Shoss, M., Eisenberger, R., Restubog, S. & Zagenczyk, T. (2013) Blaming the organization for abusive supervision: The roles of perceived organizational support and supervisor’s organizational embodiment. Journal of Applied Psychology 98 (1), pp. 158‒168. doi: 10.1037/a0030687.
• 54. Shriberg, A., Shriberg, D. & Lloyd, C. (2002) Practicing Leadership: Principles and Applications. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
• 55. Stinglhamber, F., Marique, G., Caesens, G., Hanin, D. & Zanet, F.D. (2015) The influence of transformational leadership on followers’ affective commitment. Career Development International 20 (6), pp. 583‒603, doi: 10.1108/ CDI-12-2014-0158.
• 56. Suifan, T.S., Abdallah, A.B. & Al Janini, M. (2018) The impact of transformational leadership on employees’ creativity: The mediating role of perceived organizational support. Management Research Review 41 (1), pp. 113‒132, doi: 10.1108/MRR-02-2017-0032.
• 57. Suifan, T.S. & Marwa, A.J. (2017) The relationship between transformational leadership and employees’ creativity in the Jordanian Banking Sector. International Review of Management and Marketing 7 (2), pp. 284–292.
• 58. Tosunoglu, H. & Ekmekci, O.T. (2016) Laissez-faire leaders and organizations: how does laissez-faire leader erode the trust in organizations? Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting 3 (1), pp. 89‒99, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116538.
• 59. Vecchio, R.P. (ed.) (2007) Leadership: Understanding the dynamics of power and influence in organizations. University of Notre Dame Press.
• 60. Walumbwa, F.O., Muchiri, M.K., Misati, E., Wu, C. & Meiliani, M. (2017) Inspired to perform: A multilevel investigation of antecedents and consequences of thriving at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior 39 (3), pp. 249– 261, doi: 10.1002/job.2216.
• 61. Yu, C. & Frenkel, S.J. (2013) Explaining task performance and creativity from perceived organizational support theory: Which mechanisms are more important? Journal of Organizational Behavior 34 (8), pp. 1165–1181, doi: 10.1002/ job.1844.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).