The support of port regulation creation and update by real-time ship manoeuvring simulation studies exampled by Port of Kołobrzeg

• Autorzy: Gucma L. , Łazuga K.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.13.02.13

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The port areas are specific in terms of navigational accidents. Usually, accidents with low consequences dominate, but due to many users with contradictory needs, there is a requirement to keep the balance between business and safety. This balance is usually achieved by the Port Authority or like in Poland by Maritime Office together with Port Authority. Maritime Offices are the governmental body responsible to maintain the acceptable navigational safety level. Such an approach leads to several frictions between the users that needs are often contradictory. To ensure minimal safety level and introduce new or amended port regulations the scientific methods are demanded to support this process. The paper present methodology to adjust the port regulations of Kołobrzeg Port where the passenger ship owners moored in close vicinity of the waterway and therefore restricted it to the other users. The compromise was achieved with the application of real-time simulation method. Moreover, the paper presents the important role of harbor regulations in whole navigation risk management process within the port area. Today’s port regulations are created mostly based on good practice of pilots and experts, whereas the quantitative methods are used less frequently. The intention of the presented case study was to demonstrate how the quantitative risk assessment could be used in port policy development.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Ship Manoeuvring Simulation; port regulation; port regulation creation; Port of Kolobrzeg; port authority; navigational safety; navigation risk; good practice

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 13, no. 2
• Strony: 365--371
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 14 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Gucma L.

• Maritime University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland 

autor

Łazuga K.

• Maritime University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland 

Bibliografia

• 1. Artyszuk J. 2005. Towards a Scaled Manoeuvring Mathematical  Model for a Ship of Arbitrary Size. Scientific Bulletin no6,  Maritime University of Szczecin. 
• 2. Billington C.J. 2001. Managing risks in ports. Managing Risks  in Shipping: A Practical Guide. London: The Nautical  Institute, 2001, 57–69.
• 3. Determination 2016. Determination of maximum ships, which  may be operated in the port of Kołobrzeg, taking into account  possible  simulation  methods  of  port  reconstructing.  (in  polish).  Unpublished  report.  Maritime  University  of  Szczecin. 
• 4. Gucma  L.  (ed.)  2013  LNG  terminals  design  and  operation.  Navigational  safety  aspects.  Marine  Traffic  Engineering.  Szczecin: 1‐268, 2013 
• 5. Gucma  L.  2009.  Maritime  risk  management.  (in  polish).  Maritime University of Szczecin Press. Szczecin. 2009. 
• 6. Harrald  J.R.,  Mazzuchi  TA  and  Stone  Ch.M.  1992.  Risky  Business:  Can  We  Believe  Port  Risk  assessments?.  Proceedings of the Conference: Ports ʹ92 (ed. Torseth D.),  Seattle, USA, 20‐22 July 1992, 657–669. 
• 7. Iribarren J.R. 1999. Determining the horizontal dimensions of  ship  manoeuvring  areas.  PIANC  Bulletin  No  100,  Bruxelles. 
• 8. Pearson J, Kuzmin V. and Clouter E. 2015. Application of FSA  in Polar Transportation. IAMU published research project. 
• 9. PIANC. 2014. Harbour Approach Channels Design Guidelines.  PIANC Report PIANC Secretariat General. Bruksela. 
• 10. Port Marine Safety Code. 2012. Department for Transport and  Maritime and Coastguard Agency. Amended Nov. 2016. 
• 11. R0M  3.1‐99.  2007.  Recommendations  for  the  Design  of  the  Maritime  Configuration  of  Ports,  Approach  Channels  and  Harbour Basins. Puertos del Estado.  
• 12.Trbojevic  V.  and  Carr  B.  2000.  Risk  based  methodology  for  safety  improvement  in  ports.  Journal  of  Hazardous  Material 2000; 71: 467–480. 
• 13. Wang J and Foinikis P.  2001. Formal Safety Assessment for  Containership. Maritime Policy 2001; 25: 143‐157. 
• 14. Zec D, Zorović D. and Vranić D. 1998. Impact of the Formal  Safety  Assessment  on  Shipboard  Operations.  Scientific  Journal on Traffic and Transportation Research 1998. 10  (3): 127‐130.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).