Perception of cycling risks and needs associated with skill level, gender, and age

• Autorzy: Alhomaidat Fadi , Eljufout Tamer

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0015.2390

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Many traffic accidents are caused by unforeseen and unexpected events in a site that was hidden from the driver's eyes. Road design parameters determining required visibility are based on relationships formulated decades ago. It is worth reviewing them from time to time in the light of technological developments. In this paper, sight distances for stopping and crossing situations are studied in relation to the assumed visual abilities of autonomous vehicles. Current sight distance requirements at unsignalized intersections are based among others on speeds on the major road and on accepted gaps by human drivers entering or crossing from the minor road. Since these requirements vary from country to country, regulations and sight terms of a few selected countries are compared in this study. From the comparison it is remarkable that although the two concepts, i.e. gap acceptance on the minor road and stopping on the major road have different back-grounds, but their outcome in terms of required sight distances are similar. Both distances are depending on speed on the major road: gap sight distances show a linear, while stopping sight distances a parabolic function. In general, European SSD values are quite similar to each other. However, the US and Australian guidelines based on gap acceptance criteria recommend higher sight distances. Human capabilities and limitations are considered in sight field requirements. Autonomous vehicles survey their environment with sensors which are different from the human vision in terms of identifying objects, estimating distances or speeds of other vehicles. This paper compares current sight field requirements based on conventional vehicles and those required for autonomous vehicles. Visibility requirements were defined by three vision indicators: distance, angle of view and resolution abilities of autonomous cars and human drivers. These indicators were calculated separately for autonomous vehicles and human drivers for various speeds on the main road and for intersections with 90° and 60° angles. It was shown that the required sight distances are 10 to 40 meters shorter for autonomous vehicles than for conventional ones.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

cycling; safety; cyclist’s skill; skills level; perceived risk; questionnaire

PL

rower; bezpieczeństwo; poziom umiejętności; rowerzysta; ryzyko; ankieta

• Wydawca: Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Transport
• Czasopismo: Archives of Transport
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 59, iss. 3
• Strony: 113--127
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 51 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Alhomaidat Fadi

• Department of Civil Engineering, Al-Hussein Bin Talal University, Ma’an, Jordan

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6876-4945

autor

Eljufout Tamer

• Department of Civil and Environment Engineering, American University of Madaba , Madaba, Jordan

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1834-3047

Bibliografia

• [1] ADAM, A.M., 2020. Sample Size Determination in Survey Research. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 90-97. https://doi.org/ 10.9734/jsrr/2020/v26i530263.
• [2] AL-FUQAHA, A., OH, J., KWIGIZILE, V., MOHAMMADI, S., ALHOMAIDAT, F., 2017. Integrated Crowd sourcing Platform to Investigate Non-Motorized Behavior and Risk Factors on Walking , Running , and Cycling Routes. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34776.39683.
• [3] ALHOMAIDAT, F., KWIGIZILE, V., OH, J.-S., AL-FUQAHA, A., MOHAMMADI, S., 2017. The Relationship Between Cycling Risk Perception and Skill Level of Different Age Groups. The 6th International Cycling Safety Conference.
• [4] BARTLETT, J.E., KOTRLIK, J.W. K.J.W., HIGGINS, C., 2001. Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43.
• [5] BASSETT, D.R., PUCHER, J., BUEHLER, R., THOMPSON, D. L., CROUTER, S.E., 2008. Walking, cycling, and obesity rates in Europe, North America and Australia. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 5(6), 795-814. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.5.6.795.
• [6] BERGLUND, U., 2015. Walkability in the everyday landscape of small towns – For transport, pleasure and health. History of the Future: 52nd World Congress of the International Federation of Landscape Architects, IFLA 2015 - Congress Proceedings, 414-419.
• [7] BILL, E., ROWE, D., FERGUSON, N., 2015. Does experience affect perceived risk of cycling hazards? Scottish Transport Applications and Research (STAR) Conference (2015).
• [8] BUEKERS, J., DONS, E., ELEN, B., INTPANIS, L., 2015. Health impact model for modal shift from car use to cycling or walking in Flanders: Application to two bicycle highways. Journal of Transport and Health, 2(4), 549-562.
• [9] CHAPMAN, R., KEALL, M., HOWDEN-CHAPMAN, P., GRAMS, M., WITTEN, K., RANDAL, E., WOODWARD, A., 2018. A cost benefit analysis of an active travel intervention with health and carbon emission reduction benefits. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050962.
• [10] COLEY, D.A., 2002. Emission factors for human activity. Energy Policy, 30(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00061-1.
• [11] CRONBACH, L.J., 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555.
• [12] DEMERS, A., SUDDARTH, A. MAHMASSANI, H.S., ARDEKANI, S.A.S.G., 1995. Bicycle hazard mitigation manual (Vol. 7, Issue 2).
• [13] GACA, S. (2002). Regression models of accidents. Archives of Transport, 14(3), 17–30.
• [14] GONZALEZ, R.A., FERRO, R.E., LIBERONA, D., 2020. Government and governance in intelligent cities, smart transportation study case in Bogotá Colombia. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 11(1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.05.002.
• [15] GÖTSCHI, T., GARRARD, J., GILES-CORTI, B., 2016. Cycling as a Part of Daily Life: A Review of Health Perspectives. Transport Reviews, 36(1), 45-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1057877.
• [16] HAIR, J., BLACK, W., BABIN, B., ANDERSON, R., 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. In Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective (7th ed., Vol. 7th). Pearson.
• [17] HAMANN, C., PEEK-ASA, C., 2013. On-road bicycle facilities and bicycle crashes in Iowa, 2007-2010. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 56, 103-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.031.
• [18] HAMILTON, R.J., STOTT, JR.R., 2004. Cycling: the risks. Trauma, 6(2), 161-168. https://doi.org/10.1191/146 0408604ta309oa.
• [19] HEESCH, K.C., SAHLQVIST, S., GARRARD, J., 2012. Gender differences in recreational and transport cycling: a cross-sectional mixed-methods comparison of cycling patterns, motivators, and constraints. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-106.
• [20] JARRETT, J., WOODCOCK, J., GRIFFITHS, U.K., CHALABI, Z., EDWARDS, P., ROBERTS, I., HAINES, A., 2012. Effect of increasing active travel in urban England and Wales on costs to the National Health Service. The Lancet, 379(9832), 2198-2205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60766-1.
• [21] JOE, R., 2019. US Cities with the Most Bicycle Commuters per Capita. https://www.move.org/cities-most-bicycle-commuters/.
• [22] LAWSON, A.R., PAKRASHI, V., GHOSH, B., SZETO, W.Y., 2013. Perception of safety of cyclists in Dublin City. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 50, 499-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.05.029.
• [23] LI, T., YANG, Y., WANG, Y., CHEN, C., YAO, J., 2016. Traffic fatalities prediction based on support vector machine. Archives of Transport, 39(2), 21-30.
• [24] LITMAN, T., 2016. Evaluating Active Transport Benefits and Costs. In Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
• [25] MAIBACH, E., STEG, L., ANABLE, J., 2009. Promoting physical activity and reducing climate change: Opportunities to replace short car trips with active transportation. Preventive Medicine, 49(4), 326-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.06.028.
• [26] MATEU, G., SANZ, A., 2021. Public Policies to Promote Sustainable Transports: Lessons from Valencia. Sustainability, 13(3), 1141.
• [27] MCKENZIE, B.M., 2014. Modes Less Traveled-Bicycling and Walking to Work in the United States: 2008–2012: Vol. No.ACS-25.
• [28] MESSERLI, P., MURNININGTYAS, E., ELOUNDOU-ENYEGUE, P., FOLI, E.G., FURMAN, E., GLASSMAN, A., VAN YPERSELE, J.P., 2019. Global sustainable development report 2019: the future is now science for achieving sustainable development.
• [29] MOoHSP, 2017. MICHIGAN OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PLANNING, 2017. Michigan Traffic Crash Facts. https://www.michigan trafficcrashfacts.org/.
• [30] MØLLER, M., HELS, T., 2008. Cyclists perception of risk in roundabouts. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(3), 1055-1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.10.013.
• [31] MUELLER, N., ROJAS-RUEDA, D., SALMON, M., MARTINEZ, D., AMBROS, A., BRAND, C., DE NAZELLE, A., DONS, E., GAUPP-BERGHAUSEN, M., GERIKE, R., GÖTSCHI, T., IACOROSSI, F., INTPANIS, L., KAHLMEIER, S., RASER, E., NIEUWENHUIJSEN, M., 2018. Health impact assessment of cycling network expansions in European cities. Preventive Medicine, 109, 62-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.12.011.
• [32] OJA, P., TITZE, S., BAUMAN, A., DE GEUS, B., KRENN, P., REGER-NASH, B., KOHLBERGER, T., 2011. Health benefits of cycling: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 21(4), 496-509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01299.x.
• [33] OKRASZEWSKA, R., BIRR, K., GUMIŃSKA, L., MICHALSKI, L., 2017. Growing role of walking and cycling and the associated risks. MATEC Web of Conferences,122, 01006. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201712201006.
• [34] PANTER, J., HEINEN, E., MACKETT, R., OGILVIE, D., 2016. Impact of New Transport Infrastructure on Walking, Cycling, and Physical Activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 50(2), e45–e53.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.09.021.
• [35] PARKIN, J., MEYERS, C., 2010. The effect of cycle lanes on the proximity between motor traffic and cycle traffic. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(1), 159-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.07.018.
• [36] PARKIN, J., WARDMAN, M., PAGE, M., 2007. Models of perceived cycling risk and route acceptability. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39(2), 364-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006 .08.007.
• [37] PAZDAN, S., 2020. The impact of weather on bicycle risk exposure. Archives of Transport, 56(4), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.5629.
• [38] POOLEY, C., TIGHT, M., JONES, T., HORTON, D., 2011. Understanding walking and cycling: Summary of key findings and recommendations. http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/50409/%5Cnhttp://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/50409/1/Understanding_Walking_Cycling_Report.pdf %5Cnhttp://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/50409/1/Under standing_Walking_Cycling_Report.pdf.
• [39] PUCHER, J., BUEHLER, R., BASSETT, D.R., DANNENBERG, A.L., 2010. Walking and cycling to health: A comparative analysis of city, state, and international data. American Journal of Public Health, 100(10), 1986-1992. https://doi.org/10.2105/ AJPH.2009.189324.
• [40] RIISER, A., SOLBRAA, A., JENUM, A.K., BIRKELAND, K.I., ANDERSEN, L. B., 2018. Cycling and walking for transport and their associations with diabetes and risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Journal of Transport & Health, 11, 193-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2018.09.002.
• [41] RIZK HEGAZY, I., 2020. The quality of life between theory and implementation in Egypt: The case of Al-Rehab City, Egypt. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.09.010.
• [42] SÆLENSMINDE, K., 2004. Cost-benefit analyses of walking and cycling track networks taking into account insecurity, health effects and external costs of motorized traffic. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 38(8), 593-606. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.tra.2004.04.003.
• [43] SANDERS, R.L., 2015. Perceived traffic risk for cyclists: The impact of near miss and collision experiences. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 75, 26-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap. 2014.11.004.
• [44] SHARARA, E., AKIK, C., GHATTAS, H., MAKHLOUF OBERMEYER, C., 2018. Physical inactivity, gender and culture in Arab countries: A systematic assessment of the literature. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 1–19.https://doi.org/10.1186 /s12889-018-5472-z.
• [45] SHEIK MOHAMMED ALI, S., GEORGE, B., VANAJAKSHI, L., VENKATRAMAN, J., 2012. A multiple inductive loop vehicle detection system for heterogeneous and lane-less traffic. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 61(5), 1353-1360. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2011.2175037.
• [46] SHEIKH MOHAMMAD ZADEH, A., RAJABI, M.A., 2013. Analyzing the effect of the street network configuration on the efficiency of an urban transportation system. Cities, 31, 285-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.08.008.
• [47] SONG, Y., PRESTON, J., OGILVIE, D., 2017. New walking and cycling infrastructure and modal shift in the UK: A quasi-experimental panel study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 95, 320-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.11.017.
• [48] SOUTHWORTH, M., 2005. Designing the Walkable City. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 131(4), 246-257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246).
• [49] LoAB, 2014. THE LEAGUE OF AMERICAN BICYCLISTS, 2014. The growth of bike commuting.
• [50] USECHE, S.A., ALONSO, F., MONTORO, L., TOMAS, J.M., 2019. When age means safety: Data to assess trends and differences on rule knowledge, risk perception, aberrant and positive road behaviors, and traffic crashes of cyclists. Data in Brief, 22, 627-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.12.066.
• [51] WINTERS, M., BABUL, S., JACK BECKER, H.J.E.H., BRUBACHER, J.R., CHIPMAN, M., CRIPTON, P., CUSIMANO, M.D., FRIEDMAN, S.M., ANNE HARRIS, M., HUNTE, G., MONRO, M., REYNOLDS, C.C. O., SHEN, H., TESCHKE, K., 2012. Safe cycling: How do risk perceptions compare with observed risk? Canadian Journal of Public Health, 103(3), S42–S47. https://doi.org/10.17269/cjph.10 3.3200.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).