The impact of institutional pressures and top management regulations on firm performance

• Autorzy: Dinh Cong Khai , Ngo Quang Thanh

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2021.23.2.06

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wpływ presji instytucjonalnych i przepisów najwyższego zarządu na wyniki firmy

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The manufacturing industry performance in Vietnam has become a significant issue due to covid-19 and other economic factors and needs to examine frequently. Thus, the present research aims to investigate the impact of institutional pressures, such as human resource pressure, resources management pressure and operations management pressures, on the firm performance of the manufacturing industry in Vietnam. This research also examines the mediating impact of top management regulations among the relations of human resource pressure, resources management pressure, operations management pressures and firm performance of the manufacturing industry in Vietnam. The researchers followed the quantitative methods of data collection and used the questionnaires to obtain the data from respondents. A total of 610 questionnaires were sent to them, but only 380 were returned after three weeks and represented approximately 62.29 percent rate of response. This study also used the smart-PLS to examine the relations among the variables. The results indicated that human resource pressure, resources management pressure and operations management pressures positively associate with a firm performance of the manufacturing industry in Vietnam. The results also revealed that top management regulations positively mediate among the links of human resource pressure, resources management pressure, operations management pressures, and firm performance in Vietnam's manufacturing industry. This research has guided the regulators to increase their focus on managing institutional pressures that could enhance the firm performance.

PL

Wyniki przemysłu wytwórczego w Wietnamie stały się istotnym problemem ze względu na covid-19 i inne czynniki ekonomiczne i należy je często badać. Dlatego niniejsze badanie ma na celu zbadanie wpływu presji instytucjonalnych, takich jak presja zasobów ludzkich, presja zarządzania zasobami i presja zarządzania operacjami, na wyniki firmy w przemyśle wytwórczym w Wietnamie. Badanie to analizuje również pośredniczący wpływ regulacji najwyższego kierownictwa między relacjami presji zasobów ludzkich, presji zarządzania zasobami, presji zarządzania operacjami i wydajności firmy w przemyśle wytwórczym w Wietnamie. Badacze zastosowali ilościowe metody zbierania danych i wykorzystali kwestionariusze do pozyskania danych od respondentów. W sumie wysłano do nich 610 kwestionariuszy, ale tylko 380 zostało zwróconych po trzech tygodniach i stanowiło około 62,29 procent odpowiedzi. W badaniu wykorzystano również smart-PLS do zbadania relacji między zmiennymi. Wyniki wskazują, że presja na zasoby ludzkie, presja na zarządzanie zasobami i presja na zarządzanie operacjami pozytywnie wiążą się z dobrymi wynikami przemysłu wytwórczego w Wietnamie. Wyniki ujawniły również, że regulacje najwyższego kierownictwa pozytywnie pośredniczą między powiązaniami presji zasobów ludzkich, presji zarządzania zasobami, presji zarządzania operacjami i wydajności firmy w wietnamskim przemyśle wytwórczym. Badanie to skłoniło organy regulacyjne do zwiększenia koncentracji na zarządzaniu naciskami instytucjonalnymi, które mogłyby poprawić wyniki firmy.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

institutional pressure; human resource pressure; resources management pressure; firm performance

PL

presja instytucjonalna; presja zasobów ludzkich; presja zarządzania zasobami; wyniki firmy

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 23, No. 2
• Strony: 90--105
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 36 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Dinh Cong Khai

• School of Government, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

autor

Ngo Quang Thanh

• School of Government, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Bibliografia

• 1.Arteaga, R., Menéndez-Requejo, S., (2017). Family constitution and business performance: Moderating factors. Family Business Review, 30(4), 320-338.
• 2.Bilan, Y., Hussain, H.I., Kot, S., Haseeb, M. and Jermisittiparsert, K., (2020) Sustainability and Economic Performance: Role of Organizational Learning and Innovation, Engineering Economics, 31 (1), 93-103.
• 3.Chaudhry, N. I., Amir, M., (2020). From institutional pressure to the sustainable development of firm: Role of environmental management accounting implementation and environmental proactivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3542-3554.
• 4.Chu, S. H., Yang, H., Lee, M. and Park, S., (2017). The impact of institutional pressures on green supply chain management and firm performance: Top management roles and social capital. Sustainability, 9(5), 764-773.
• 5.Ding, L., Zhao, Z. and Wang, L., (2020). Executive incentives matter for corporate social responsibility under earnings pressure and institutional investors supervision. Sustainability, 12(6), 24-36.
• 6.Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., Hazen, B. T. and Roubaud, D., (2018). Examining top management commitment to TQM diffusion using institutional and upper echelon theories. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2988-3006.
• 7.Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Helo, P., Papadopoulos, T., Childe, S. J. and Sahay, B., (2017). Explaining the impact of reconfigurable manufacturing systems on environmental performance: The role of top management and organizational culture. Journal of cleaner production, 141, 56-66.
• 8.Goto, M., (2017). A Comparison Case Study of Unintended Decoupling under Institutional Pressure. Transactions of the Academic Association for Organizational Science, 6(1), 87-93.
• 9.Gričar, S., Šugar, V. and Bojnec, Š., (2020). The missing link between wages and labour productivity in tourism: evidence from Croatia and Slovenia. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 15, 1-22.
• 10.Hair Jr, J. F., Babin, B. J. and Krey, N., (2017). Covariance-based structural equation modeling in the Journal of Advertising: Review and recommendations. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 163-177.
• 11.Heitkamp, D. E., Kamer, A. P. and Koontz, N. A., (2017). Institutional pressure to reduce report turnaround time is damaging the educational mission. 14(4), 537-540.
• 12.Hussain, H.I., Kamarudin, F., Mohamad Anwar, N.A., Nassir, A.M., Sufian, F. and Mang Tan, K., (2020), Impact of Country’s Governance Dimensions on Bank Revenue Efficiency: Overview on Middle East, Southeast Asia, and South Asia Countries, Transformations in Business & Economics, 19 (1), 191-228.
• 13.Kerlin, J. A., Peng, S. and Cui, T. S., (2020). Strategic responses of social enterprises to institutional pressures in China. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 12, 1-25.
• 14.Khan, E. A., Quaddus, M., (2018). Dimensions of human capital and firm performance: Micro-firm context. IIMB management review, 30(3), 229-241.
• 15.Kropp, E., Totzek, D., (2020). How institutional pressures and systems characteristics shape customer acceptance of smart product-service systems. Industrial Marketing Management, 91, 468-482.
• 16.Leung, J., Cheung, W. and Chu, S.-C., (2018). Heteromorphism: beaconing IT innovations under institutional pressure towards unique capabilities. International Journal of Internet and Enterprise Management, 9(1), 1-18.
• 17.Matthews, M., Mokoena, B. A., (2020). The Influence of Service Quality Dimensions On Customer Satisfaction Within Visa Facilitation Centres in South Africa. International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies, 12(2), 122-135.
• 18.Meyer, N., Hamilton, L., (2020). Female entrepreneurs’ business training and its effect on various entrepreneurial factors: Evidence from a developing country. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 12(1), 135-151.
• 19.Mohsin, M., Kamran, H. W., Nawaz, M. A., Hussain, M. S. and Dahri, A. S., (2021). Assessing the Impact of Transition from Non-renewable to Renewable Energy Consumption on Economic Growth-Environmental Nexus from Developing Asian Countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 284, 1-8.
• 20.Nawaz, M. A., Hussain, M. S., Kamran, H. W., Ehsanullah, S., Maheen, R. and Shair, F., (2020). Trilemma association of energy consumption, carbon emission, and economic growth of BRICS and OECD regions: quantile regression estimation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-15.
• 21.Nguyen, C.-H., Ngo, Q.-T., Pham, M.-D., Nguyen, A.-T. and Huynh, N.-C., (2021). Economic linkages, technology transfers, and firm heterogeneity: The case of manufacturing firms in the Southern Key Economic Zone of Vietnam. Cuadernos de Economía, 44(124), 1-25.
• 22.Othman, Z., Nordin, M. F. F. and Sadiq, M., (2020). GST fraud prevention to ensure business sustainability: a Malaysian case study. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 27 (3), 245-265.
• 23.Pan, Q., (2020). Research on the Impact Mechanism of Environmentally Sensitive Areas on Corporate Environmental Responsibility - The Intermediary Role Based on Institutional Pressure. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 3(4), 132-148.
• 24.Rentizelas, A., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Al Balushi, A. D. and Tuni, A., (2020). Social sustainability in the oil and gas industry: institutional pressure and the management of sustainable supply chains. Annals of Operations Research, 290(1), 279-300.
• 25.Ribeiro, E. C. B., Moreira, A. C., Ferreira, L. M. D. and da Silva César, A., (2018). Biodiesel and social inclusion: An analysis of institutional pressures between biodiesel plants and family farmers in southern Brazil. Journal of cleaner production, 204, 726-734.
• 26.Sachpazidu-Wójcicka, K., (2014). Conditions for Innovativeness of Industrial Entrepreneurs in Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 9(2), 93-107.
• 27.Sadiq, M., Pantamee, A. A., Mohamad, S., Aldeehani, T. M. and Ady, S. U., (2020). Corporate governance and earnings management: evidence from listed non-financial firms. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 22(2), 456-465.
• 28.Sadiq, M., Singh, J., Raza, M. and Mohamad, S., (2020). The impact of environmental, social and governance index on firm value: evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(5), 555-565.
• 29.Steenkamp, N., Roberts, R., (2020). Does workload and institutional pressure on accounting educators affect academia at Australian universities? Accounting & Finance, 60(1), 471-506.
• 30.Sun, H., Awan, R. U., Nawaz, M. A., Mohsin, M., Rasheed, A. K. and Iqbal, N., (2020). Assessing the socio-economic viability of solar commercialization and electrification in south Asian countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-23.
• 31.Villena, V. H., Dhanorkar, S., (2020). How institutional pressures and managerial incentives elicit carbon transparency in global supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 66(6), 697-734.
• 32.Voges, K. W., (2014). Improving performance in for] profit contracts: a study of buyer] seller communication and red tape. Management & Marketing, 9(4), 385-393.
• 33.Vrbka, J., (2020). Business environment quality model in the SME segment. Transformations in Business & Economics, 19(1), 49-57.
• 34.Wang, F., Sun, J. and Liu, Y. S., (2019). Institutional pressure, ultimate ownership, and corporate carbon reduction engagement: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 104, 14-26.
• 35.Wang, S., Li, J. and Zhao, D., (2018). Institutional pressures and environmental management practices: The moderating effects of environmental commitment and resource availability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(1), 52-69.
• 36.Yang, C.-S., (2018). An analysis of institutional pressures, green supply chain management, and green performance in the container shipping context. Transportation research part D: transport and environment, 61, 246-260.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).