Neuroscience in Linguistic Patterns of Communication Campaigns for Environmental Sustainability

Saczyna, Magdalena

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Neuroscience in Linguistic Patterns of Communication Campaigns for Environmental Sustainability

Autorzy

Saczyna Magdalena

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

Warianty tytułu

Neuronauka we wzorcach lingwistycznych kampanii komunikacyjnych o ochronie środowiska w kontekście zrównoważonego rozwoju

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Neuroscience is the scientific study of the nervous system and the brain, with the aim to unravel their function. Although the importance of this discipline in the social sciences has been widely discussed (Adolphs, 2009), there are no studies that use this potential for environmental sustainability-related applications. To the author knowledge investigations on environmental problems communication from the linguistic perspective in the context of neuroscience have been scarcely examined. The purpose of this article is to shed light on this gap, indicate the potential of neuroscience in communication campaigns, and highlight the role of linguistics elements as factors enforcing change in human proenvironmental behavior. The author hypostatizes that the future of sustainability efforts must increasingly be seen in a systemic and holistic way and neuroscience should be seen as an alternative remedy for environmental problems. Moreover, the author examines a potential of neuroscience based on linguistic model of communication that could facilitate behavior change in the context of environmental problems and sheds light on relationship between two disciplines: linguistics and the field that investigates unconscious variables that determine human’s behavior – neuroscience. This article is a call for action to incorporate findings made in the field of neuroscience in mass communication message design to promote environmental sustainability more effective.

Neuronauka jest dyscypliną naukową zajmującą się badaniem systemu nerwowego i mózgu, która ma na celu zgłębienie zasad funkcjonowania tych organów. Pomimo faktu, że znaczenie tej dziedziny w naukach społecznych było już szeroko dyskutowane (Adolphs, 2009), kwestia wykorzystania potencjału neuronauki w kontekście ochrony środowiska nie została jeszcze poddana dogłębnej analizie. Zgodnie z wiedzą autorki, kwestia komunikacji o problemach zanieczyszczenia środowiska z perspektywy lingwistycznej w kontekście neuronauki nie została jak dotąd w szerokim zakresie zbadana. Celem niniejszego artykułu jest zwrócenie uwagi na te lukę w badaniach, wskazanie na potencjał neuronauki jako aspektu wpływającego na efektywność kampanii komunikacyjnych i podkreślenie roli lingwistycznych aspektów jako czynników determinujących zmianę w zachowaniu człowieka w kontekście ochrony środowiska. Autorka niniejszego opracowania wysuwa hipotezę, że przyszłe starania zmierzające do osiągniecia zrównoważonego rozwoju powinny mieć charakter systematyczny i holistyczny, a neuronauka powinna być postrzegana jako alternatywne rozwiązanie problemów środowiskowych. Ponadto, w niniejszym artykule autorka bada potencjał neuronauki w oparciu o lingwistyczny model komunikacji, który mógłby w pozytywny sposobów wpłynąć na zmianę zachowania w odniesieniu do problemów środowiskowych, oraz podkreśla związek między dwoma dyscyplinami: lingwistyką i neuronauką – dyscypliną, która zajmuje się nieświadomymi czynnikami determinującymi zachowanie ludzkie. Niniejszy artykuł jest wezwaniem do uwzględnienia wyników badań z dziedziny neuronauki w koncepcie przekazu komunikacji masowej w celu efektywniejszej promocji ochrony środowiska.

Słowa kluczowe

environmental sustainability communication campaigns linguistic pattern neuroscience

zrównoważoność środowiskowa kampania komunikacyjna wzorzec lingwistyczny neuronauka

Wydawca

Lublin University of Technology

Czasopismo

Problemy Ekorozwoju

Rocznik

2019

Tom

Vol. 14, nr 1

Strony

109--118

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 100 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Saczyna Magdalena

ibmasacz@gmail.com

Faculty of Economics at the University of Gdańsk, Armii Krajowej 119, 81-701 Sopot, Poland

Bibliografia

1. ADOLPHS R., 2009, The social brain: neural basis of social knowledge, in: Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), p. 693-716.
2. BAMBERG S., MOSER G., 2007, Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior, in: Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, p. 14-25.
3. BANDURA A., 2004, Health promotion by social cognitive means, in: Health Education & Behavior, 31, p. 143-164.
4. BAZERMAN M. H., HOFFMAN A. J., 1999, Sources of Environmentally Destructive Behavior: Individual, Organizational, and Institutional Perspectives, in: Research in Organizational Behavior, 21.
5. BAZERMAN M. H., BARON J., SHONK, K., 2001, You Can't Enlarge the Pie: Six barriers to effective government, Basic Books, New York.
6. BECHARA A., DAMASIO A.R., 2005, The soma tic marker hypothesis: a neural theory of economic decision, in: Games and Economic Behavior, 52, p. 336-372.
7. BEDDOE R., COSTANZA R., FARLEY J., GARZA E., KENT J., KUBISZEWSKI I., 2009, Overcoming systemic roadblocks to sustainability: The evolutionary redesign of worldviews, institutions, and technologies, in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 106(8), p. 2483-2489.
8. BORD R.J., O’CONNOR R.E., FISHER A., 2000, What sense does the public need to understand global climate change?, in: Public Understanding of Science, 9, p. 205-218.
9. BOYKOFF M.T., BOYKOFF J.M., 2004, Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press, in: Global Environmental Change, 14, p. 125-136.
10. BROWN S.S., EISENBERG L., 1995, The Best Intentions: Unintended Pregnancy and the Well-Being of Children and Families, National Academy Press, Washington DC.
11. CAMERER C., LOEWENSTEIN G., PRELEC D., 2005, Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics, in: Journal of economic literature, p. 9-64.
12. CANTRILL J., 1992, Understanding environmental advocacy: inter-disciplinary research and the role of cognition, in: Journal of Environmental Education, 24(1).
13. CARVALHO A., BURGESS J., 2005, Cultural circuits of climate change in UK, in: Broadsheet newspapers 1985-2003, 25, p. 1457-1469.
14. CHAN R.Y.K., LAU L.B.Y., 2004, The effectiveness of environmental claims among Chinese consumers: Influences of claim type, country disposition and ecocentric orientation, in: Journal of Marketing Management, 20 (3), p. 279-319.
15. CORBETT J.B., DURFEE J.L., 2004, TESTING public (un)certainty of science media representations of global warming, in: Science Communication, 26(2), p. 129-151.
16. CVETKOVICH G., WENER R., 1994, How Can Psychology Help Save the Planet? A Research Agenda on Environmental Problems, in: American Psychological Association, 1.
17. DARNTON A., 2008, Practical Guide: An overview of behaviour change models and their uses, in: Government Social Research Unit, 2.
18. DAVIS J.J., 1993, Strategies for environmental advertising, in: The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10 (2).
19. DESSAI S., ADGER W. N., HULME M., TURNPENNY J., KÖHLER J., WARREN R., 2004, Defining and Experiencing Dangerous Climate Change, in: Climatic Change, 64(1/2), p. 11-25.
20. MCKENZIE-MOHR D., 2000, New Ways to Promote Proenvironmental Behavior. Promoting Sustainable Behavior: An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing, in: Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), p. 543-554.
21. SAPIR E., 1921, Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech, Harcourt, Brace and company, New York.
22. ENGEL J. F., BIACKWEU R. D., MINIARD P. W, 1986, Consumer behavior, Dryden, New York.
23. EREAUT G., SEGNIT N., 2006, Warm words: how are we telling the climate story and can we tell it better?, in: Institute for Public Policy Research, 32.
24. ESCH F. R., MÖLL T., ELGER C. E., NEUHAUS C., WEBER, B., 2008, Wirkung von arkenemotionen: Neuromarketing als neuer verhaltenswissenschaftlicher Zugang, in: Marketing ZFP, 30(2), p. 111-129.
25. FISHBEIN M., 2000, The role of theory in HIV prevention, in: AIDS Care, 12, p. 273-78.
26. FISHER, J. 2007, Mind the sustainability gap, in: Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22(12), p. 621- 624.
27. GARDNER G.T., STERN, P.C., 2002, Environmental problems and human behavior, Pearson Custom Publishing, Boston.
28. GRINSTEIN A., UDI N., 2009, Demarketing, Minorities and Marketing Attachment, in: Journal of Marketing, 73(2), p. 105-22.
29. HARTMANN P., APAOLAZA-IBÁÑEZ V., 2009, Green advertising revisited: conditioning virtual nature experiences, in: International Journal of Advertising, 28(4), p. 715-739.
30. HASSOL S.J., 2008, Improving how scientists communicate about climate change Eos, in: Weekly Journal of the American Geophysical Union, 89, p. 106- 107.
31. HINE R., PEACOCK J., PRETTY J., 2008, Evaluating the impact of environmental volunteering on behaviors and attitudes to the environment. Report for BTCV Cymru, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester.
32. HOFFMAN A., BAZERMAN M. H., 2007, Changing practices on sustainability: Understanding and overcoming the organizational and psychological barriers to action, in: Organizations and the Sustainability Mosaic, eds. Sharma S., Starik M. & Husted B., Edward Elgar Publishing.
33. HOLDER H. D., TRENO A. J., 1997, Media advocacy in community prevention: news as a means to advance policy change, in: Addiction, 92, p. 189-199.
34. HORNIK R., 2002, Evidence for Behavior Change, in: Public Health Communication, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, p. 419-437.
35. HOUGHTON J.T., DING Y., GRIGGS D.J., NOGUER, M., VAN DER LINDEN P.J., DAI X., MASKELL K., JOHNSON C.A., 2001, Climate Change 2001. The Scientific Basis – Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press.
36. JABBOUR C.J.C., OLIVEIRA J.H.C., 2011, Some issues concerning the non-technological side of green technologies, in: International Bulletin of Business Administration, 12, p. 79-83.
37. JACKSON T., 2005, Motivating Sustainable Consumption. A review of evidence on consumer behaviour and behavioral change, A report to the Sustainable Development Research Network, in: Journal of Risk Research, 9(3).
38. KAHAN D. M., JENKINS‐SMITH H., BRAMAN D., 2011, Cultural cognition of scientific consensus, in: Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), p. 147-174.
39. KAHAN D. M., PETERS E., WITTLIN M., SLOVIC P., OUELLETTE L. L., BRAMAN D., MANDEL G., 2012, The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks, in: Nature Climate Change (2), p. 732-735.
40. KAHNEMAN D., TVERSKY A., 1979, Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk, in: Econometrica, 47(2), p. 263-291.
41. KAKKAR P., LUTZ R. J., 1981, Situational influences on consumer behavior: A review, in: Perspectives in consumer behavior, eds. Kassarjian H.H., Robertson T. S., Scott, Foresman, Glenview, IL, p. 204-214.
42. KAZDIN A., 2009, Psychological science’s contributions to a sustainable environment, in: American Psychologist, 64, p. 339-356.
43. ENNING P., PLASSMANN H., 2005, NeuroEconomics: An overview from an economic perspective, in: Brain Research Bulletin, 67(5), p. 343-354.
44. KOLLMUSS A., AGYEMAN J., 2002, Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?, in: Environmental education research, 8(3), p. 239-260.
45. KUMLEHN M., 2011, Consumer Neuroscience: Pricing research to gain and sustain a cutting edge competitive advantage by improving customer value and profitability.
46. LEHMAN P. K., GELLER E. S., 2004, Behavioral analysis and environmental protection: Accomplishments and potential for more, in: Behavioral and Social Issues, 13, p. 13-24.
47. LEISEROWITZ A., 2006, Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of effect, imagery, and values, in: Climatic Change, 77, p. 45-72.
48. LEONIDOU L., LEONIDOU C., PALIHAWADANA D., HULTMAN M., 2011, Evaluating the green advertising practices of international firms: a trend analysis, in: International Marketing Review, 28 (1), p. 6-33.
49. LEWIT E.M. et al., 1981, The effects of government regulations on teenage smoking, in: Journal of Law and Economics, 24, p. 545-570.
50. LINDER S.H., 2006, Cashing-in on risk claims: on the for-profit inversion of signifiers for ‘global warming’, in: Social Semiotics, 16(1), p. 103-132.
51. LORENZONI I., LEISEROWITZ A., DORIA M. D. F., POORTINGA W., PIDGEON N. F., 2006, Cross-National Comparisons of Image Associations with ‘Global Warming’ and ‘Climate Change’ Among Laypeople in the United States of America and Great Britain, in: Journal of Risk Research, 9, p. 265-281.
52. LORENZONI I., NICHOLSON-COLE S.A., WHITMARSH L., 2007, Barriers perceived to engagingwith climate change among the UK public and their policy implications, in: Global Environmental Change, 17, p. 255-273.
53. LORENZONI I., PIDGEON N.F., O’CONNOR R.E.,2005, Dangerous climate change: the role of risk research, in: Risk Analysis, 25(6), p. 1387-1398.
54. LOWE T.D., 2006, Is this climate porn? How does climate change communication affect our perceptions and behavior?, in: Tyndall Centre Working Paper, 98, p. 37.
55. MARMOT M. G., SMITH G. D., STANSFELD S., PATEL C, NORTH F., HEAD J., WHITE I., BRUNNER E., FEENEY A., 1991, Health inequalities among British civil servants: The Whitehall II study, in: Lancet, 337, p. 1387-1393.
56. MARTIN N., MORICH K., 2011, Unconscious mental processes in consumer choice: Towards new model of consumer behavior, in: Journal of Brand Management,18 (7), p. 483–505.
57. MCCRIGHT A. M., DUNLAP R. E., 2000, Challenging Global Warming as a Social Problem: An Analysis of the Conservative Movement’s Counter-Claims, in: Social Problems, 47(4), p. 499-522.
58. MENON A., MENON A., 1997, Enviropreneurial Marketing Strategy: The Emergence of Corporate Environmentalism as Market Strategy, in: Journal of Marketing, 61(1), p. 51-67.
59. MOSER S., DILLING L., 2004, Making climate hot: communicating the urgency and challenge of global climate change, in: Environ., 46, p. 32-46.
60. MOSER S.C., DILLING L., 2011, Communicating climate change: closing the science – action gap, in: The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, eds. Dryzek J. S., Norgaard R. B. & Schlosberg, D., OUP Oxford, Oxford, p. 103-120.
61. MOSER S.C., 2007, More bad news: the risk of neglecting emotional responses to climate change information, in: Creating a climate for change: communicating climate change and facilitating social change, eds. Moser SC, Dilling L, Cambridge University Press, New York, p. 64-80.
62. MURPHY E. R., ILLES J., REINER P. B., 2008, Neuroethics of neuromarketing, in: Journal of Consumer Behavior, 7, p. 293-302.
63. NAKICENOVIC N., SWART R., 2000, IPCC Special Report: Emissions Scenarios, Cambridge University Press.
64. NERLICH B., KOTEYKO N., BROWN B., 2009, Theory and language of climate change communication, in: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1, 97-110.
65. NICHOLSON-COLE S., 2005, Representing climate change futures: a critique on the use of images for visual communication Computers, in: Environment and Urban Systems, 29, p. 255-273.
66. OBERMILLER C., 1995, The baby is sick/ the baby is well: a test of environmental communication appeals, in: Journal of Advertising, 24(2).
67. OCKWELL D., WHITMARSH L. E., O’NEILL S., 2009, Reorienting climate change communication for effective mitigation forcing people to be green or fostering grass-roots engagement ?, in: Science Communication, 30(3), p. 305-327.
68. OEHLER A., REISCH L.A., 2008, Behavioral economics – eine neue Grundlage für Verbraucherpoli-
tik? Eine Studie im Auftrag des Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverbandes, Verbraucherzentrale Bundes-verband, Berlin.
69. O'NEILL S., NICHOLSON-COLE S., 2009, Fear Won't Do It: Promoting Positive Engagement With Climate Change Through Visual and Iconic Representations, in: Science Communication, 30(3), p. 355-379.
70. OSKAMP S., 2000, A sustainable future for humanity: How can psychology help? in: American Psychologist, 55, p. 496-508.
71. OSTERHUS T., 1997, Pro-Social Consumer Influence Strategies: When and How Do They Work?, in: Journal of Marketing, 61, p. 16-29.
72. PATT A., 2007, Assessing model-based and conflict-based uncertainty, in: Global Environmental Change, 17(1), p. 37-46.
73. PEATTIE K. A., PEATTIE S., 2009, Social Marketing: A Pathway to Consumption Reduction?, in: Journal of Business Research, 62 (2), p. 260-68.
74. PELLETIER L.G., SHARP E., 2008, Persuasive communication and proenvironmental behaviors: How message tailoring and message framing can improve the integration of behaviors through self-determined motivation, in: Canadian Psychology, 49(3), p. 210-217.
75. RIK P., BIJMOLT T., VAN RAAIJ F., DE KRUIJK MARK,1998, Consumers’ Attributions of Proenvironmental Behavior, Motivation, and Ability to Self and Others, in: Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17, 215-225.
76. RIEDL R., HUBERT M., KENNING P., 2010, Are there neural gender differences in online trust? An fMRI study on the perceived trustworthiness of eBay offers, in: Mis. Quarterly, 34(2), p. 397-428.
77. RISBEY J.S., 2008, The new climate discourse: alarmist or alarming?, in: Global Environmental Change, 18(1), p. 26-37.
78. ROGERS E. M., STOREY J. D,. 1987, Communication campaigns, in: Handbook of communication science, eds. Berger C. R., Chaffee S., Sage publications, Beverly Hills, p. 817-846.
79. ROTHMAN A. J., SALOVEY, P., 1997, Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing, in: Psychological Bulletin, 12, p. 3-19.
80. SANFEY A. G., LOEWENSTEIN G., MCCLURE S. M., COHEN J. D., 2006, Neuroeconomics: cross-currents in research on decision-making, in: Trends in cognitive sciences, 10(3), p. 108-116.
81. SCHOENFELD A.C., MEIER R.F., GRIYN R.J., 1979, Constructing a social problem: the press and the environment, in: Social Problems, 27 (1), p. 38-61.
82. SCHUHWERK M.E, LEFKOFF-HAGIUS R., 1995, Green or non-green? Does type of appeal matter when advertising a green product? in: Journal of Advertising, 24, p. 45-54.
83. SMITH N.W., JOFFE H., 2009, Climate change in the British press: the role of the visual, in: Journal of Risk Research, 12, p. 647-663.
84. SOUTHERTON S., MCMEEKIN A., EVANS D., 2011, International review of behaviour change initiatives: climate change behavior’s research programme, Government Social Research Unit.
85. SPECTOR KITSUSE J., 1977, Constructing Social Problems, Menlo Park, Cummings, USA.
86. SPENCE A., POORTINGA W., BUTLER C., PIDGEON N. F., 2011, Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience., in: Nature Climate Change, 1, p. 46-49.
87. STERN P., 2000, Psychology and the science of human-environment interactions, in: American Psychologist, 55(5), p. 523-530.
88. SWIM J., CLAYTON S., HOWARD G., 2011, Human behavioral contributions to climate change: Psychological and contextual drivers, in: American Psychologist, 66(4), p. 251-264.
89. THALER R. H., SUNSTEIN C. R., 2009, Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness, Penguin, New York.
90. TOBLER C., VISSCHERS V.H.M., SIEGRIST M., 2011, Eating green. Consumers' willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors, in: Appetite, 57(3), p. 674-682.
91. TRUMBO C., 1996, Constructing climate change: Claims and frames in US news coverage of an environmental issue, in: Public Understanding of Science, 5(3).
92. VAN DER LINDEN S., 2014, Towards a new model for communicating climate change, in: Understanding and governing sustainable tourism mobility: Psychological and behavioural approaches, eds. Cohen S., Higham J., Peeters P., Gössling S., Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group, p. 243-275.
93. VECCHIATO G., ASTOLFI L., DE VICO FALLANI F., TOPPI J., ALOISE F., BEZ F., 2011, On the use of EEG or MEG brain imaging tools in neuromarketing research, in: Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011.
94. WAKEFIELD M. A., LOKEN B., HORNIK R. C., 2010, Use of mass media campaigns to change health behavior, in: The Lancet, 376, p. 1261-1271.
95. WARDHAUGH R., 2002, An introduction to sociolinguistics, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, p. 220.
96. WEBER E. U., 2010, What shapes perceptions of climate change? in: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), p. 332-342.
97. WEINGART P., ENGELS A., PANSEGRAU P., 2000, Risks of communication: discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media, in: Public Understanding of Science, 9 (3), p. 261.
98. WEISS J.A., TSCHIRHART M., 1994, Public Information Campaign as Policy Instruments, in: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 13, p. 82-119.
99. WOLF J., MOSER S. C., 2011, Individual understandings, perceptions, and engagement with climate change: insights from in‐depth studies across the world, in: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(4), p. 547-569.
100. WCED (WORLD COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT), 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, New York.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-b82f2bf8-312a-4519-981e-48c1c5260b45