Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The main objective of the research work was to identify the dimensions of complexity and study the relationship between these defined dimensions in the industrial automation sector. To achieve these objectives in the study, there was assumed the following major hypothesis: With the increasing role of dynamic cross-section of the complexity there is growing importance of relationship dimension for competitive advantage. In the study there were diagnosed four dimensions of complexity. Existence of the relationship between these four identified dimensions of complexity occurred by the use of the Fisher’s exact test, which is a variant of the test of independence χ2. Furthermore, there were calculated V-Cramer factors to estimate the intensity of the above-mentioned relationship between analyzed dimensions. The research discovered that the three out of four dimensions such as the number of elements, variety of elements and uncertainty depend on the last dimension of complexity which is the relationship between elements. In the turbulent environment there is a growing importance of the relationship dimension. It forms competitive advantage and is a key condition of success in creating a new type of modern enterprise strategy that occurs within complexity management in the industrial automation sector.
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
3--14
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 41 poz., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Poznan University of Economics and Business, Department of Logistics, Al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland
Bibliografia
- Arthur W.B. (1990), Positive Feedbacks In Economy, USA.
- Azadegan A., Patel P.C., Zangoueinezhad A. and Lindermas K. (2013), “The effect of environment al complexity and environment al dynamizm on lean practices”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 193–212.
- Barkley Rossey Jr J. (1999), On the complexities of Complex Economic Dynamics, Journal of Economic Prespectives, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 169–192.
- Barkley Rosser Jr J. (2010), Introduction to special issue on transdisciplinary perspectives on economic complexity, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, Vol. 75, No. 1, pp. 1–2.
- Binzberger J. (1983), Komplexitaetsbewaeltigung durch organisatorische Gestaltung, Diss., Friedrichshafen, pp. 56–61.
- Bozarth C.C., Warsing D.P., Flynn B.B. and Flynn E.J. (2009), The impact of supply chain complexity on manufacturing plant performance, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 27, pp. 80–82.
- Casti J.L. (1979), Connectivity, Complexity and Catastrophe in Large-Scale Systems, John Wiley & Sons, USA.
- Cho J. and Kang B. (2001), Benefits and challenges of global sourcing: perceptions of U.S. apparel retail firms, International Marketing Review, Vol. 18, pp. 542–561.
- Clegg L.J., Voss H. and Chen L. (2019), Can VUCA help us generate new theory within international business?, International Business in a VUCA World: The Changing Role of States and Firms, Vol. 14, pp. 55– 56.
- Closs D.J., Jacobs M.A., Swink M. and Webb G.S. (2008), Toward a theory of competencies for the management of product complexity: Six case Studies, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 26, pp. 560–599.
- Closs D.J., Nyaga G.N. and Voss M.D. (2010), The differential impact of product complexity, inventory level and configuration capacity on unit and order fill rate performance, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 47–57.
- Desai P., Kekre S. and Srinivasan K. (2001), Product differentiation and commonality in design: balancing revenue and cost drivers, Management Science, Vol. 47, pp. 37–51.
- Fisher M.L. and Ittner C.D. (1999), The impact of product variety on automobile assembly operations: empirical evidence and simulation analysis, Management Science, Vol. 45, pp. 771–786.
- Gault S.B. and Jaccaci A.T. (1996), Complexicity meets periodicity, The Learning Organization, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 33–39. [Online]. Available: http://www.emerald insight.com/.
- Ginsberg A. (1997), “New Age” Strategic Planning: Bridging Theory and Practice, Long Range Planning, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 125–129.
- Gospodarek T. (2012), Aspects of complexity and philosophy of science in management, WWSZIP, Poland. (in Polish).
- Gupta S. and Krishnan V. (1996), Integrated component and supplier selection for a product family, Production and Operations Management, Vol. 5, pp. 163–182.
- Hoole R. (2006), Drive complexity out of your supply chain, Harvard Business School Newsletter, Vol. 01, pp. 3–5.
- Hundsnes T. and Meyer C.B. (2006), Living with paradoxes of corporate strategy, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 437–446. [Online]. Available: http://www.emerald insight.com/.
- Jacobs M.A. and Swink M. (2011), Product portfolio architectural complexity and operational performance: Incorporating the roles of learning and fixed assets, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 29, pp. 677–691.
- Kasiewicz S. (2003), Globalization of enterprises – Polish dilemmas, Warsaw School of Economics, Poland. (in Polish).
- Lewandowska A. (2009), Product innovations and customer satisfaction, Enterprise management in the work of doctoral students, Warsaw School of Economics, Poland. (in Polish).
- Lewandowska-Ciszek A. (2010), Basics of the offensive policy of controlling the growth of the product portfolio, Enterprise management in practice, p. 252 (in Polish).
- Lewandowska-Ciszek A. (2020), Complexity of a modern enterprise and its flexibility in the sector of industrial automation, Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Technical Sciences, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 575–584.
- Lissack M. (1997), Mind your Metaphors: Lesson from Complexity Science, Long Range Planning, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 294–298.
- McKergow M. (1996), Complexity Science and Management: What’s In it for Business? Long Range Planning, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 721–727.
- Mainzer K. (2007), Exploring Complexity, Maria Curie Skłodowska University Press, Poland. (in Polish).
- Meeker B., Parikh D. and Jhaveri M. (2009), The complexity conundrum, Marketing Management, Vol. 18, pp. 54–59.
- Meyer M.H. and Mugge P.C. (2001), Make platform innovation drive enterprise growth, Research-technology Management, Vol. 44, pp. 25–39.
- Ramdas K. and Sawhney M.S. (2001), A cross-functional approach to evaluating multiple line extensions for assebled products, Management Science, Vol. 47, pp. 22–36.
- Salvador F., Forza C. and Rungtusanatham M. (2002), Modularity, product variety, production volume, and component sourcing: theorizing beyond generic prescriptions, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 20, pp. 549–575.
- Sargut G. and McGrath R.G. (2011), Learning to Live with Complexity, Harvard Business Review, No. 9, pp. 73–74.
- Senge P.M. (2012), The Fifth Discipline. Theory and practice of learning organizations, Wolters Kluwer Business Press, Poland. (in Polish).
- Simon H.A. (1962), The architecture of complexity, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, p. 468.
- Stanisz A. (2007), Statistical course using STATISTICA PL on the examples of medicine. Multidimensional analysis, Vol. 1, Statsoft, Poland. (in Polish).
- Tredinnick L. (2009), Complexity theory and the Web, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 5, pp. 796–815. [Online]. Available: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/.
- Trisoglio A. (1996), Managing Complexity, Long Range Planning, Vol. 29, No. 8, p. 589.
- Tulder R., Jankowska B. and Verbeke A. (2019), Introduction: International Business in a VUCA World, International Business in a VUCA World: The Changing Role of States and Firms, Vol. 14, pp. i–xiv.
- Vollmann T., Berry W., Whybark D.C. and Jacobs R. (1997), Manufacturing Planning and Control for Supply Chain Management, 1st edition, Irwin/McGraw Hill, USA.
- Wadhawan K. (2018), Complexity explained, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, California. [Online]. Available: http://www.racjonalista.pl/kk.php/s,6850/q,Zlozonosc.wyjasniona. (in Polish).
- Zhang D., Lindermann K. and Schroeder R. G. (2012), The moderating role of contextual factors on quality management practices, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 30, pp. 14–18.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023)
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-b8140c66-190e-46b0-a2ed-ef0b7ea7d964