Tytuł artykułu
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Analiza efektywności zarządzania innowacjami w krajach Eurazjatyckiej Unii Gospodarczej
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The article contains a cross-country analysis of the effectiveness of innovation management based on information from the Global Innovation Index among the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). From the analysis, it follows that the problem in the EAEU countries is low demand for innovations and its inefficient structure: it is more profitable for enterprises in the EAEU countries to purchase ready-made equipment abroad than to engage in their own innovative activities. A comparative analysis of the Global Innovation Index shows that indicators of the development of institutions and infrastructure ensure the relatively high positions of Kazakhstan, first of all, with a significant lag in all measurements of the efficiency of resource use of innovation.
Artykuł zawiera ogólnokrajową analizę skuteczności zarządzania innowacjami opartą na informacjach z Global Innovation Index wśród krajów Eurazjatyckiej Unii Gospodarczej (EAEU). Z analizy wynika, że problemem w krajach EAEU jest niski popyt na innowacje i jego nieefektywna struktura: bardziej opłacalne jest dla przedsiębiorstw w krajach EAEU kupowanie gotowego sprzętu za granicą niż angażowanie się we własną działalność innowacyjną. Analiza porównawcza Global Innovation Index pokazuje, że wskaźniki rozwoju instytucji i infrastruktury zapewniają stosunkowo wysokie pozycje Kazachstanu, przede wszystkim ze znacznym opóźnieniem we wszystkich pomiarach efektywności wykorzystania zasobów przez innowacje.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
204--214
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 20 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Department of Management, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana, Kazakhstan
autor
- Caspian Maritime University, Aktau, Kazakhstan
- Center for Scientific Strategic Research, Astana, Kazakhstan
autor
- Innovation Management, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana, Kazakhstan, PhD Student
Bibliografia
- 1. Eurasian Economic Union in numbers: a short statistical compendium, 2018, Eurasian Economic Commission, Moscow.
- 2. GII, 2011, Accelerating Growth and Development, WIPO, Cornell University, INSEAD, https://www.globalinnovationindex.org
- 3. GII, 2012, Stronger Innovation Linkages for Global Growth, WIPO, Cornell University, INSEAD, https://www.globalinnovationindex.org
- 4. GII, 2013, The Local Dynamics of Innovation, WIPO, Cornell University, INSEAD, https://www.globalinnovationindex.org
- 5. GII, 2014, The Human Factor in Innovation, WIPO, Cornell University, INSEAD, https://www.globalinnovationindex.org
- 6. GII, 2015, Effective Innovation Policies for Development, WIPO, Cornell University, INSEAD, https://www.globalinnovationindex.org
- 7. GII, 2016, Winning with Global Innovation, WIPO, Cornell University, INSEAD, https://www.globalinnovationindex.org
- 8. GII, 2017, Innovation feeding the world, WIPO, Cornell University, INSEAD, https://www.globalinnovationindex.org.
- 9. Golichenko O.G., Balycheva Yu.E., 2016, The dimension of the process as a factor determining the structure of the innovation process, “Innovations”, 3.
- 10. Hollanders H., Celikel-Esser F., 2007, Measuring Innovation Efficiency. INNO Metrics, Available at: http://www.pedz.uni-mannheim.de/daten/edz-h/gdb/07/eis_2007_Innovation_efficiency.pdf/, Accessed: 6 October 2018.
- 11. Kirdasinova K.A., Kurmanov N.A., 2017, Modern mechanisms of innovation management in the development of entrepreneurship of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Interim report, Astana, L.N. Gumilyov ENU.
- 12. Kirdasinova K.A., Turmakhanbetova S.S., Shayakhmetova S.T., Mukhadzhanova A.G., Nurmukhametov N.N., 2016, Development of the Education System in the Republic of Kazakhstan, “International Business Management”, 10(16).
- 13. Kireyeva A.A., Mussabalina D.S., Tolysbaev B.S., 2018, Assessment and Identification of the Possibility for Creating IT Clusters in Kazakhstan Regions, “Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region]”, 14(2).
- 14. Kurmanov N., Tolysbayev B., Aibossynova D., Parmanov N., 2016, Innovative activity of small and medium-sized enterprises in Kazakhstan and factors of its development, “Economic Annals-XXI”, 158(3-4(2)).
- 15. Nardo M., Saisana M., Saltelli A., Tarantola S., Hoffman A., Giovannini E., 2008, Handbook on constructing composite indicators, methodology and user guide, Paris: OECD.
- 16. OECD, 2004, Center for Economic and Business Research, http://www.oecd.org/site/worldforum/33705586.pdf.
- 17. Popova M.V., 2013, International Experience for Construction of Innovative Development Indices, “Modern Scientific Researches and Innovations”, 3.
- 18. Sharma S., Thomas V., 2008, Inter - Country R&D Efficiency Analysis: an Application of Data Enforcement Analysis, “Scientometrics”, 76(3).
- 19. Technopolis group & MIOIR, 2012, Evaluation of Innovation Activities. Guidance on methods and practices, Study funded by the European Commission, Directorate for Regional Policy.
- 20. Wang E.C., Huang W., 2007, Relative Efficiency of R&D Activities: The DEA Approach, “Research Policy”, 36 (2).
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-b7ed63c3-7861-4f91-9946-4ec0135fe8a9