E-leadership as a booster of employees’ dynamic capabilities influence on job performance

• Autorzy: Luo Guangyan , Tworek Katarzyna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2022.155.16

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The article concerns the influence of employees’ dynamic capabilities on job performance and the role of e-leadership in strengthening such a relation. Design/methodology/approach: The hypotheses were verified among 1200 organizations operating in Poland, Italy and USA during 2nd wave of COVID-19 pandemic. The statistical reasoning was based on linear regression model with moderator. Findings: The results show that e-leadership is indeed strengthening the positive influence of employees’ dynamic capabilities on job performance, and moreover – such effect is much stronger among organizations operating in crisis during circumstances of COVID-19 pandemic, striving to survive. Research limitations/implications: The empirical research should be treated as a pilot study, as the systemic literature review is limited and has a character of an initial review aiming at the identification of future direction of research in this regard. Practical implications: The obtained results show that organizations, which experience crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic are characterized by a much higher level of EDC influence on job performance than those, which do not experience crisis. It is clearly showing the important role of EDC in managing such organizations and transforming their way of doing business in order to survive the crisis. Originality/value: The obtained results contribute new knowledge to the field of job performance management during crisis, confirming that dynamic capabilities are crucial among employees and this specific type of capabilities should be shaped and enhanced among those organizations struggling through crisis caused by COVID-19 pandemic.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

e-leadership; employee dynamic capabilities; job performance; COVID-19

PL

e-przywództwo; możliwości pracowników dynamiczne; wydajność pracy; COVID-19

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: z. 155
• Strony: 237--248
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 25 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Luo Guangyan

• Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, Department of Management Systems and Organizational Development

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7647-8228

autor

Tworek Katarzyna

• Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, Department of Management Systems and Organizational Development

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6276-2436

Bibliografia

• 1. Ali-Hassan, H., Nevo, D., & Wade, M. (2015). Linking dimensions of social media use to job performance: The role of social capital. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(2), 65-89.
• 2. Aviso, K.B., Mayol, A.P., Promentilla, M.A.B., Santos, J.R., Tan, R.R., Ubando, A.T., & Yu, K.D.S. (2018). Allocating human resources in organizations operating under crisis conditions: A fuzzy input-output optimization modeling framework. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 250-258.
• 3. Avolio, B.J., Kahai, S., & Dodge, G.E. (2000). E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice. The leadership quarterly, 11(4), 615-668.
• 4. Bell, B.S., & Kozlowski, S.W. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group & organization management, 27(1), 14-49.
• 5. Bieńkowska, A., & Tworek, K. (2020). Job performance model based on Employees’ Dynamic Capabilities (EDC). Sustainability, 12(6), 2250.
• 6. Bieńkowska, A., & Tworek, K. (2021). The moderating role of IT in process of shaping organizational performance by dynamic capabilities of controlling. Applied Sciences, 11(2), 889.
• 7. Bieńkowska, A., Tworek, K., & Zabłocka-Kluczka, A. (2020). Organizational Reliability Model Verification in the Crisis Escalation Phase Caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 12(10), 4318.
• 8. Campbell, J.P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. Retrieved from http://www.psycnet.apa.org, 02.11.2021.
• 9. Fuller Jr, J.B., Hester, K., & Cox, S.S. (2010). Proactive personality and job performance: Exploring job autonomy as a moderator. Journal of Managerial Issues, 35-51.
• 10. Hackman, J.R., & Oldham, G.R. (1974). The Job Diagnostic Survey: An instrument for the diagnosis of jobs and the evaluation of job redesign projects. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/, 02.11.2021.
• 11. Hernandez, M., Eberly, M.B., Avolio, B.J., & Johnson, M.D. (2011). The loci and mechanisms of leadership: Exploring a more comprehensive view of leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1165-1185.
• 12. Hoch, J.E., & Dulebohn, J.H. (2017). Team personality composition, emergent leadership and shared leadership in virtual teams: A theoretical framework. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 678-693.
• 13. Hoch, J.E., & Kozlowski, S.W. (2014). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. Journal of applied psychology, 99(3), 390.
• 14. Kayworth, T.R., & Leidner, D.E. (2002). Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. Journal of management information systems, 18(3), 7-40.
• 15. Kerfoot, K.M. (2010). Listening to see: The key to virtual leadership. Nursing Economics, 28(2), 114.
• 16. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization science, 3(3), 383-397.
• 17. Kwahk, K.Y., & Park, D.H. (2018). Leveraging your knowledge to my performance: The impact of transactive memory capability on job performance in a social media environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 314-330.
• 18. Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., & Rosen, B. (2007). Leading virtual teams. Academy of Management perspectives, 21(1), 60-70.
• 19. Purvis, R.L., Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R.W. (2001). The assimilation of knowledge platforms in organizations: An empirical investigation. Organization science, 12(2), 117-135.
• 20. Shoss, M.K., Witt, L.A., & Vera, D. (2012). When does adaptive performance lead to higher task performance? Journal of organizational behavior, 33(7), 910-924.
• 21. Skogstad, A., Einarsen, S., Torsheim, T., Aasland, M.S., & Hetland, H. (2007). The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behavior. Journal of occupational health psychology, 12(1), 80.
• 22. Sonnentag, S., & Frese, M. (2002). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological management of individual performance, 23(1), 3-25. 23. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533.
• 24. Waldman, D.A., Ramirez, G.G., House, R.J., & Puranam, P. (2001). Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived environmental uncertainty. Academy of management journal, 44(1), 134-143.
• 25. Yuen, K.F., Thai, V.V., Wong, Y.D., & Wang, X. (2018). Interaction impacts of corporate social responsibility and service quality on shipping firms’ performance. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 113, 397-409.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).