The threat of CBRN terrorism: an overview and improvised use of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear materials

• Autorzy: Szklarski Łukasz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0054.7565

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper examines the evolving threat of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) materials in terrorism, focusing on their potential use by terrorist organizations and challenges in detection and prevention. It outlines various CBRN materials, including chemical agents like nerve and blister agents, biological pathogens such as anthrax, radiological sources like cesium-137, and nuclear materials. Historical case studies, like the 1995 Tokyo subway sarin attack and the 2001 anthrax letters, illustrate their devastating potential. The Ukraine conflict is used as a case study to highlight increased CBRN risks in war-torn environments. Scenarios involving nuclear power plants or chemical facilities underscore the need for stringent security measures and international cooperation. Technological advancements in detection and response, such as wireless sensor networks, portable detection devices, and advanced decontamination solutions, are crucial. Public awareness and preparedness, through education and training programs for first responders, enhance community resilience and readiness. In conclusion, addressing CBRN terrorism requires a coordinated approach, including international cooperation, stringent regulations, technological advancements and public education.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

CBRN; terrorism; chemical agents; biological threats; nuclear security; detection technologies; public awareness; national security

• Wydawca: Szkoła Główna Służby Pożarniczej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe SGSP / Szkoła Główna Służby Pożarniczej
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Nr 91 (tom 2)
• Strony: 39--62
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 75 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Szklarski Łukasz

• ITTI Sp. z o.o., Poznań, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6779-5897

Bibliografia

• 1. Ackerman, G., & Peterson, H., (2020). Terrorism and COVID-19. Perspectives on Terrorism, 14(3), 59–73. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26918300
• 2. Adefarasin, V.O., (2022). Terrorism and the question of moral justification: A bioethical point of view. NIU Journal of Humanities, 11(1), 78–88. https://ijhumas.com/ojs/index.php/niuhums/article/view/1398
• 3. Alhassani, N.A.M., (2017). Terrorism and the Threat of Insecure Radioactive Material. Master’s Thesis, Khalifa University. From https://khalifauniversity.elsevierpure.com/ws/portalfiles/portal/6827531/file
• 4. Arms Control Center, (2016). Fact Sheet: Nuclear Terrorism: A Clear and Present Danger. https://armscontrolcenter.org/nuclear-terrorism-a-clear-and-present-danger/
• 5. Bieniawski, A., & Iliopulos, I., (2017). Strengthening the Security of Radiological Sources. NTI. https://media.nti.org/documents/IAEA_Conf_2016_Strengthening_Security_of_Radiological_Sources_Bieniawski.pdf
• 6. Black, R., (2016). Development, historical use and properties of chemical warfare agents. In: Chemical Warfare Toxicology, pp. 1–28. DOI:10.1039/9781782622413-00001
• 7. Bunn, M., (2006). Preventing a Nuclear 9/11. In: How to Make America Safe: New Policies for National Security, (ed.) Van Evera, S., Cambridge, MA: Tobin Project. From https://tobinproject.org/sites/default/files/assets/Make_America_Safe_Preventing_Nuclear_9_11.pdf
• 8. Bureau of Counterterrorism and Countering Violent Extremism, (2015). Country Reports on Terrorism 2015. https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/2015/257521.htm
• 9. CBRN Int’l | CBRNe Instruments & Systems, (n.d.). CBRN International. https://www.cbrnintl.com/
• 10. CBSS, (2020). Mapping of Responsibilities for CBRNE Emergency Management in the BSR. https://cbss.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/CBRNE-management-in-BSR.pdf
• 11. Cenciarelli, O., Gabbarini, V., Pietropaoli, S., & Malizia, A., (2015). Viral bioterrorism: Learning the lesson of Ebola virus in West Africa 2013–2015. Virus Research, 210, 318–326. DOI:10.1016/j.virusres.2015.09.002
• 12. Cornish, P., (2007). THE CBRN SYSTEM: Assessing the threat of terrorist use of CBRN. London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs, Chatham House. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/International%20Security/cbrn0207.pdf
• 13. Crenshaw, M., & Pimlott, J., (2019). Encyclopedia of World Terrorism. Taylor & Francis. from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315061702/international-encyclopedia-terrorism-martha-crenshaw-john-pimlott
• 14. DeLuca, M.A., Chai, P.R., & Goralnick, E., (2021). Five decades of global chemical terror attacks: Data analysis to inform training and preparedness. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, Vol. 15, Issue 6, pp. 750–761. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.176
• 15. Denton, J., (1987). International Terrorism – The Nuclear Dimension. Terrorism, Vol. 9, Issue 2, 113–123. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/international-terrorism-nuclear-dimension-0
• 16. DHS, (2021). S&T Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear Defense Research. https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2022-03/22_0316_st_cbrn_rdt%26e_strategy_fy21-25.pdf
• 17. Erickson, T.B., Harvin, D., Schmid, A., Loevinsohn, G., Poriechna, A., Martyshyn, O., Kliukach, K., Sydlowski, M., Strong, J., & Kivlehan, S.M., (2023). Evaluation of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, Explosives (CBRNE) Knowledge Change and Skills Confidence Among Frontline-Line Providers During the Russia-Ukraine War. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 17, e387. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2023.52
• 18. European Commission, (2021). Detection, Identification, and Monitoring of CBRN Threats. https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/opportunities/topic-details/edf-2021-mcbrn-r-cbrndim
• 19. European Nonproliferation and Disarmament Consortium, (2021). Effective and Comprehensive CBRN Security Risk Management in the EU. https://www.nonproliferation.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/eunpdc_no_75.pdf
• 20. European Parliament, (2018). The Mechanisms of Prevention and Detection of CBRN Illegal Material Transfers across Borders and Within the EU. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2018/604963/IPOL_STU(2018)604963_EN.pdf
• 21. Franconi, R., Illiano, E., Paolini, F., & Massa, S., (2018). Rapid and low-cost tools derived from plants to face emerging/re-emerging infectious diseases and bioterrorism agents. Methods in Molecular Biology, 1826, 591–599. DOI:10.1007/978-94-024-1263-5_10
• 22. GAO, (2011). National Preparedness: DHS and HHS Can Further Strengthen Coordination for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Risk Assessment. https://www.gao.gov/assets/a319836.html
• 23. Gawlik-Kobylińska, M., (2022). Current Issues in Combating Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Threats to Empower Sustainability: A Systematic Review. Applied Sciences, 12, no. 16, 8315. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12168315
• 24. Giannakoudakis, D.A., & Bandosz, T.J., (2018). Detoxification of chemical warfare agents. Springer International Publishing. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-70760-0
• 25. Giorgidze, L. & Wither, J.K., (2019). Horror or Hype: The Challenge of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Terrorism. Marshall Center Occasional Paper, no. 32. https://www.marshallcenter.org/en/publications/occasional-papers/horror-or-hypechallenge-chemical-biological-radiological-and-nuclear-terrorism-0
• 26. Green, M.S., LeDuc, J., Cohen, D., & Franz, D.R., (2019). Confronting the threat of bioterrorism: Realities, challenges, and defensive strategies. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 19(1), e2–e13. DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30298-6
• 27. Gromek, P, Szklarski, Ł., (2023). Modern Technologies in Enhancing Situational Awareness and CBRN Detection. Journal of Modern Science, 4, vol. 53. https://doi.org/10.13166/jms/176678
• 28. Gupta, R.C., (2015). Handbook of Toxicology of Chemical Warfare Agents (2nd ed.). DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-374484-5.X0001-6
• 29. IED Attack Fact Sheet, (2022). Homeland Security. https://www.dhs.gov/publication/ied-attack-fact-sheet
• 30. IEEE Xplore, (2018). CBRNe Threat Detection and Monitoring System: Advanced Prototype. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7379755
• 31. Janik, E., Ceremuga, M., Saluk-Bijak, J., & Bijak, M., (2019). Biological toxins as the potential tools for bioterrorism. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(5), 1181. DOI:10.3390/ijms20051181
• 32. Johnson, N.H., Larsen, J.C., & Meek, E.C., (2020). Historical perspective of chemical warfare agents. In: Handbook of Toxicology of Chemical Warfare Agents, pp. 1–16. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-800159-2.00002-6
• 33. Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund, (2007). https://www.asafm.army.mil/Portals/72/Documents/BudgetMaterial/2012/base%20budget/justification%20book/jieddf.pdf
• 34. Joshi, S., (2019). How terrorist actors in Pakistan use nuclear weapons for political influence. Asian Security (March). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14799855.2019.1582522
• 35. JP 3-11, (2018). Operations in Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Environments. Joint Chiefs of Staff. https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/jp3_11.pdf
• 36. JP 3-41, (2016). Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Response. Joint Chiefs of Staff. https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/jp3_41.pdf
• 37. McIntosh, Ch. & Storey, I., (2018). Between Acquisition and Use: Assessing the Likelihood of Nuclear Terrorism. International Studies Quarterly, 62, no. 2, 289–300. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48618502
• 38. Mihell-Hale, O., (2023). Desperate and Opportunistic: CBRN Terrorists and Civilian Radiological Material. Journal of Strategic Security, 16, no. 2, 43–67.https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.16.2.2067
• 39. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, (2023). The Use of Risk Assessment for Nuclear War and Nuclear Terrorism. In: Risk Analysis Methods for Nuclear War and Nuclear Terrorism. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26609
• 40. NATO, (2023a). Deep Dive Recap: Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Threats. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_217722.htm?selectedLocale=en
• 41. NATO, (2023b). Weapons of Mass Destruction – NATO. https://www.nato.int/cps/fr/natohq/topics_50325.htm?selectedLocale=en
• 42. Neo, J.P.S., & Tan, B.H., (2017). The use of animals as a surveillance tool for monitoring environmental health hazards, human health hazards and bioterrorism. Veterinary Microbiology, 203, 40–48. DOI:10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.02.007
• 43. Oliveira, M., Mason-Buck, G., Ballard, D., & Branicki, W., (2020). Biowarfare, bioterrorism and biocrime: A historical overview on microbial harmful applications. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 2, 150–162. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110366
• 44. Patel, S.S., Grace, R.M., Chellew, P., Prodanchuk, M., Romaniuk, O., Skrebets, Y., Ryzhenko, S., Erickson, T., (2020). Emerging Technologies and Medical Countermeasures to Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Agents in East Ukraine. Conflict and Health, 14. DOI:10.1186/s13031-020-00279-9
• 45. Petersen, L., Havârneanu, G. M., Arnold, A., Carbon, D., Görgen, T., Gavel, A., Kroupa, T., & Kardel, D., (2023). Applicability of PROACTIVE recommendations on CBRNe risks and threats to passenger rail and metro sectors. Journal of Transportation Security, 16(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-023-00263-3
• 46. Povoden, G., (n.d.). CBRN attacks on vulnerable targets using UAS. https://www.un.org/counterterrorism/sites/www.un.org.counterterrorism/files/mr.gunter_povoden-unoct_consultant.pdf
• 47. Public Safety Canada, (2021). Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear and Explosives Resilience Strategy for Canada. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/rslnc-strtg-rchvd/rslnc-strtg-rchvd-eng.pdf
• 48. Public Safety Canada, (2018). The Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Strategy of the Government of Canada. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/rslnc-strtg-rchvd/rslnc-strtg-rchvd-eng.pdf
• 49. Interpol, (n.d.). Radiological and Nuclear Terrorism, https://www.interpol.int/en/Crimes/Terrorism/Radiological-and-Nuclear-terrorism
• 50. Rees, B.G., (2018). Radiological Dispersal Devices. A brief overview [Slides] OSTI. https://doi.org/10.2172/1776747
• 51. Rossetti, P., Garzia, F., Genco, N.S., & Rossetti, C., (2017). Dirty Bomb Drones, Physical-Logical Urban Protection Systems and Explosive/Radiological Materials Regulation’s Challenges in the Age of Globalization. Biomedicine & Prevention issues, Vol. 3 – CBRNe safety. Special issue (PART 1), 117, DOI:10.19252/000000075
• 52. Roth, N., (2021). U.S. Priorities for Reducing the Risk of Nuclear Terrorism. Stimson. https://www.stimson.org/2021/u-s-priorities-for-reducing-the-risk-of-nuclearterrorism/
• 53. Ruggiero, A. & Vos, M., (2015). CBRN Terrorism Crises. J Contingencies & Crisis Man, 23, 138-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12065
• 54. Ruggiero, A., & Vos, M., (2014). Communication Challenges in CBRN Terrorism Crises: Expert Perspectives. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, Vol. 23, Issue 3, 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12065
• 55. Sabol, J., & Šesták, B., (2017). Assessing the Real Threat and Mitigating the Impact of a Terrorist Use of Radiological Weapons. DOI:10.21175/RadJ.2017.02.028
• 56. Salem, H., Ternay Jr, A.L., & Smart, J.K., (2019). Brief history and use of chemical warfare agents in warfare and terrorism. In Chemical Warfare Agents, pp. 1–15. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
• 57. Santos, C., El Zahran, T., Weiland, J., & Anwar, M., (2019). Characterizing chemical terrorism incidents collected by the global terrorism database, 1970–2015. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 34(1), 82–88. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X19004539
• 58. Strack, C., (2017). The evolution of the Islamic State’s chemical weapons efforts. CTC Sentinel, 10, 9. https://ctc.westpoint.edu/the-evolution-of-the-islamic-states-chemicalweapons-efforts/
• 59. Sutlieff, G., Berthoud, L. & Stinchcombe, M., (2021). Using Satellite Data for CBRN (Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear) Threat Detection, Monitoring, and Modelling. Surv Geophys, 42, 727–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-021-09637-5
• 60. Szklarski, Ł., (2024a). CBRN Threats, Eu-Sense System: Paving the Way for Future National Security Systems – An Assessment of the Suitability of the Concept for the Future of National Security. Zeszyty Naukowe SGSP, 2(88), 139–156. DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0054.3833
• 61. Szklarski, Ł., (2024b). CBRN threats to Ukraine during the Russian aggression: mitigating gamma radiation hazards-innovative countermeasures and decontamination strategies in the context of potential destruction of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. Zeszyty Naukowe SGSP, 87, 143–164. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0053.9115
• 62. Szklarski, Ł., (2024c). Poland’s strategic potential and capabilities to respond to CBRN threats. Journal of Modern Science, 56(2), 437–464. DOI: 10.13166/jms/188731
• 63. Szklarski, Ł. et al., (2020). Developing a novel network of CBRNe sensors in response to existing capability gaps in current technologies. Proceedings of SPIE – The International Society for Optical Engineering, 11416, 114160Y, pp 264–273. DOI: 10.1117/12.2558044
• 64. Terrorist Use of Explosive Devices, (n.d.). Army.mil. From https://www.sac.usace.army.mil/Portals/43/docs/emergencymanagement/disastersfactsheets/Explosives_Terrorism_Fact_Sheet.pdf?ver=2018-02-26-083620-700
• 65. Thomas, A., (2021). Effects of chemical warfare: A selective review and bibliography of British state papers. Taylor & Francis.
• 66. Typeset, (2023). What Role Do Advanced Technologies Play in Detecting and Mitigating CBRN Threats? https://typeset.io/questions/what-role-do-advanced-technologiesplay-in-detecting-and-71zdp7l3e9
• 67. UN, (n.d.). Workshop on Strengthening Legal Frameworks to Combat CBRN Terrorism. https://www.un.org/counterterrorism/events/workshop-strengthening-legal-frameworks-combat-cbrn-terrorism
• 68. UNICRI, (2023). Handbook to Combat CBRN Disinformation Now Available in Ukrainian. https://unicri.it/News/Handbook-CBRN-disinformtion-Ukrainian
• 69. UNODC, (n.d.). Countering Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Terrorism. From https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/terrorism/expertise/countering-chemicalbiological-radiological-and-nuclear-terrorism.html
• 70. US Department of State, (2024). Statement of the Participant Countries of the Ukraine CBRN Information Sharing Initiative. https://www.state.gov/statement-of-the-participant-countries-of-the-ukraine-cbrn-information-sharing-initiative-isi-may-2024/
• 71. Wagar, E., (2016). Bioterrorism and the role of the clinical microbiology laboratory. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 29(2), 175-189. DOI:10.1128/CMR.00033-15
• 72. Walsh, P.F., (2022). Evolving Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Terrorism. In: National Security Intelligence and Ethics. London: Routledge.
• 73. WHO, (2023). Developing National and Regional Guidance on Hospital Contingency Planning. https://www.who.int/azerbaijan/news/item/13-11-2023-developing-national-and-regional-guidance-on-hospital-contingency-planning
• 74. Williams, H., Hartigan, K., Mackenzie, L., & Youni, R., (2024). Russian Nuclear Calibration in the War in Ukraine. CSIS. https://www.csis.org/analysis/russian-nuclearcalibration-war-ukraine
• 75. Worek, F., Wille, T., Koller, M., & Thiermann, H., (2016). Toxicology of organophosphorus compounds in view of an increasing terrorist threat. Archives of Toxicology, 90(9), 2131–2145. DOI:10.1007/s00204-016-1772-1

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).