Selection of an industrial robot for assembly jobs using multi-criteria decision making methods

• Autorzy: Suszyński Marcin , Rogalewicz Michał

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/mper.2020.132944

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper proposes three multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods for the selection of an industrial robot for a universal, flexible assembly station, taking into consideration the technical and performance parameters of the robot. Fuzzy versions of AHP and TOPSIS methods as well as SMART were chosen from the variety of MCDM methods as they represent different attitudes to analysis. In order to minimise the impact of the method applied on the final decision, a list of results of the analyses has been developed and a final classification has been made based on decision makers’ preferences concerning selected parameters of the robot

Słowa kluczowe

EN

robotisation; technical parameter; performance parameter; universal assembly station; MCDM; method

• Wydawca: Production Engineering Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences ; Polish Association for Production Management
• Czasopismo: Management and Production Engineering Review
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 11, No. 1
• Strony: 62--72
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 28 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Suszyński Marcin

• Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland

autor

Rogalewicz Michał

• Poznan University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Materials Technology, Division of Production Engineering, Piotrowo 3, 61-138 Poznan, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Starzyńska B., Szajkowska K., Diering M., A Study of Raters’ Agreement in Quality Inspection with the Participation of Hearing Disabled Employees – Continuation, [in:] Diering M., Wieczorowski M., Brown C. [Eds], Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, MANUFACTURING 2019: Advances in Manufacturing II, vol. 2, pp. 212–220, Springer, Cham, 2019.
• [2] Sika R., Szajewski D., Hajkowski J., Popielarski P., Application of instance-based learning for cast iron product defects prediction, Man. Prod. Eng. Rev., 10, 4, 101–107, 2019.
• [3] Kozłowski J., Jakimiuk M., Rogalewicz M., Sika R., Hajkowski R., Analysis and control of highpressure die-casting process parameters with use of Data Mining Tools, [in:] Hamrol A., Kujawińska A., Barraza M.F.S. [Eds], Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, MANUFACTURING 2019: Advances in Manufacturing II, vol. 2, pp. 253–267, Springer, Cham, 2019.
• [4] Varela M.L.R. et al., Collaborative manufacturing based on cloud, and on other i4. 0 oriented principles and technologies: a systematic literature review and reflections, Man. Prod. Eng. Rev., 9, 3, 90–99, 2018.
• [5] Velazquez M., Hester P.T., An analysis of multicriteria decision making methods, Int. J. Oper. Res., 10 , 2, 56–66, 2013.
• [6] Kujawinska A., Vogt K., Diering M., Rogalewicz M., Sachin D. Waigaonkar, Organization of visual inspection and its impact on the effectiveness of inspection, Advances in Manufacturing, in Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering (LNME), pp 899– 909, Springer, 2018.
• [7] Kujawińska A., Diering M., Rogalewicz M., Żywicki K., Hetman Ł., Soft modelling-based methodology of raw material waste estimation, Intelligent Systems in Production Engineering and Maintenance – ISPEM 2017, in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, vol. 637), pp. 407– 417, Springer, 2017.
• [8] Sabaei D., Erkoyuncu J., Roy. R., A review of multi-criteria decision making methods for enhanced maintenance delivery, Procedia CIRP 37, pp. 30–35, 2015.
• [9] Majumder M., Impact of Urbanization on Water Shortage in Face of Climatic Aberrations, 1, 35–47, Singapore, Springer, 2015.
• [10] Suresh B., Erinjery J.J., Jegathambal P., A critical review of multi criteria decision making methods for infrastructure planning and sustainability assessment of infrastructure projects, Int. J. Earth Sc. Eng., 9, 3, 109–123, 2016.
• [11] Kabir G., Sadiq R., Tesfamariam S., A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management, Str. and Infrastr. Eng., 10, 9, 1176–1210, 2014.
• [12] Penadés-Plà V., García-Segura T., Martí J.V., Yepes V., A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods applied to the sustainable bridge design, Sustainability, 8, 12, 1–21, 2016.
• [13] Kujawińska A., Rogalewicz M., Muchowski M., Stańkowska M., Application of cluster analysis in making decision about purchase of additional materials for welding process, Smart Technology, Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering (LNICST, vol. 213), pp. 10–20, Springer, 2018.
• [14] Trzaskalik T., Multicriteria decision making. Methods and applications in Polish, Warsaw, Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, 2014.
• [15] Saaty T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
• [16] Bhattacharya A., Sarkar B., Mukherjee S.K., Integrating AHP with QFD for robot selection under requirement perspective, Int. J. of Prod. Res., 43, 17, 3671–3685, 2005.
• [17] Vahidnia M.H., Alesheika A.A., Alimohammadi A., Hospital site selection using AHP and its derivatives, J. Env. Man., 90, 3048–3056, 2009.
• [18] Rouyendegh B.D., Erkan T.E., Selection of academic staff using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP): A pilot study, Tech. Gaz., 19, 4, 923–929, 2012.
• [19] Ayhan M.B., A Fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection problem: A case study in a gear motor company, Int. J. Man. Val. Sup. Chains, 4, 3, 11–23, 2013.
• [20] Paksoy T., Pehlivan N.Y., Kahraman C., Organizational strategy development in distribution channel management using fuzzy AHP and hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS, Exp. Sys. with App., 39, 3, 2822– 2841, 2012.
• [21] Łuczak A., Wysocki F., Porządkowanie liniowe obiektów z wykorzystaniem rozmytych metod AHP i TOPSIS, Przegl. Stat., 53, 1–2, 3–23, 2011.
• [22] Ayhan M.B., Fuzzy TOPSIS application for supplier selection problem, Int. J. Inf. Bus. Man., 5, 2, 159–174, 2013.
• [23] Boran F.E., Gen¸c S., Kurt M., Akay D., A multi criteria intuitionistic Fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method, Exp. Sys. with Appl., 36, 8, 11363–11368, 2009.
• [24] Lima F.R., Osiro L., Carpinetti L. C. R, A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection, Appl. Soft Comp., 21, 194–209, 2014.
• [25] Selech J., Andrzejczak K., An aggregate criterion for selecting a distribution for times to failure of components of rail vehicles, Maint. Rel., Eksploatacja i Niezawodność, 22, 1, 102–111, 2020.
• [26] Barfod M.B., Leleur S., Multi-criteria decision analysis for use in transport decision making, Department of Transport, Technical University of Denmark, 2014.
• [27] Risawandi, Rahim R., Study of the simple multiattribute rating technique for decision support, Int. J. Sc. Res. in Sc. Tech., 2, 6, 491–494, 2016.
• [28] Olson D. L., Decision aids for selection problems New York, Springer, 1996.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).