Offset printing results analysis of different based inks in cardboard packaging production

• Autorzy: Şimşeker Osman

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/pjct-2021-0022

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The main raw material of paper and cardboard used in packaging is cellulose. Cardboard packages made of cardboard, which can be produced in much different quality and weight, are obtained in numerous shapes and appearances^{1, 2}. Paper and cardboard packaging are among the most economical packaging types. Using less raw materials, more durable but thin, light, economical cardboard is produced^{2, 3}.In this study, under equal printing conditions, test prints were made on cardboard substrates (for cardboard pack-aging) with mineral oil based, vegetable oil (soy oil) based and UV cured inks used for the printing of the same images. After these prints, the properties of mineral oil, vegetable oil and UV ink; the effect on the print results was measured from different ways (Chroma*, Print density, unprinted surface Gloss 75°, Print Gloss 60°). At the same time, the visual differences between the print results were determined by the optical imaging (SEM) method and were examined by the elemental analysis method.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Mineral Oil; Soy Oil; UV Ink; Printability; Cardboard Packaging

• Wydawca: West Pomeranian University of Technology. Publishing House
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Chemical Technology
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 23, nr 2
• Strony: 88--93
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 23 poz., rys., tab., wz.

Twórcy

autor

Şimşeker Osman

• Marmara University, Technical Education Faculty, Printing Education Department and School of Applied Sciences, Printing Technologies Department, Göztepe 34722 – İstanbul, Turkey

Bibliografia

• 1. Şimşeker, O. (2006). “Fundamentals of Printing Education” Marmara University Technical Education Faculty, Department of Printing Education, Lecture Notes, Istanbul, pp. 23–34.
• 2. https://ambalaj.org.tr/en/environment-paper-and-cardboard-packaging (Date of Access: 30.01.2021 dd.mm.yy).
• 3. Şimşeker, O. (2019). “Flexible Packaging and Label Production” Lecture Notes, Marmara University, School of Applied Sciences, Department of Printing Technologies, Istanbul, pp. 18–19.
• 4. Pfaff, G. (2008) “Special Effect Pigments”, European Coating Tech Files, Hannower Germany, Vincentz Network, ISBN: 978-3-86630-905-0.
• 5. Maile J.F., Pfaff G. and Reynders P. (2005). “Effect Pigments-Past, Present and Future”, Progress in Organic Coatings 54, Germany, 150–163.
• 6. Solomon, D.H. (1967). “The Chemistry of Organic Film Formers”, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 34.
• 7. Ha, Y.B., Jin, M.Y., Oh, S.S. & Ryu, D.H., (2012). Synthesis of an environmentally friendly phenol-freeresin or printing ink, Bulletin of The Korean Chemical Society, 33, 3413–3416. DOI: 0.5012/bkcs.2012.33.10.3413.
• 8. Kipphan, H. (2000), Handbuch der Printmedien, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, 139.
• 9. Thompson, B. (2004). Printing Materials Science and Technology. 2nd Edition, DK, 371–380.
• 10. Bieleman, J., (2000). “Additives for Coatings”, Wiley-VCH Verlag, Weinheim (ISBN 3-527-29785-5), 372.
• 11. Şimşeker, O. (2017). “Graphic Production Techniques” Lecture Notes, Marmara University, Faculty of Fine Arts, Graphic Department, Istanbul, pp. 13.
• 12. https://cdn-s3.sappi.com/s3fspublic/091019_Web_v6.pdf (Date of Access: 28.01.2020 dd.mm.yy).
• 13. https://www.psprint.com/resources/soy-based-inks-vs-petroleum-based-inks/ (Date of Access: 28.01.2020 dd.mm.yy).
• 14. Robert, T. (2014). Green ink in all colors-printing ink from renewable resources, Progress in Organic Coatings, 78 pp 287–292. DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.08.007.
• 15. Aydemir, C., Yenidoğan, S., Karademir, A. & Kandırmaz, E.A. (2018). The examination of vegetable and mineral oil based inks’ effects on print quality: green printing effects with different oils. J. Appl. Biomat. Function. Mater. 1–7 pp. 137–143. DOI: 0.1177/2280800018764761.
• 16. Gerrietts, M., Cooke, L. & Wood, M. (1993). “Soy! It’s no ordinary bean.” Agricultural Research, November 1, https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Soy!+It%27s+no+ordinary+bean.-a014673309 (Date of Access: 20.01.2021 dd.mm.yy)
• 17. Gabriele, M., Olesya, D., Katja, H., Tom, S., Beatrix, G., Carolin, S. & Carsten, S. (2014). In-line monitoring of the conversion in UVcured printed layers by NIR spectroscopy in an offset printing press. Progress in Organic Coatings Volume 77, Issue 3, pp. 719–724. DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2013.12.012.
• 18. http://www.olbiaprinter.com/konu/11-uv-murekkep-nedir.html (Date of Access: 25.01.2021 dd.mm.yy).
• 19. https://www.byk-instruments.com/en/Appearance/c/1978 (Date of Access: 17.01.2021 dd.mm.yy).
• 20. https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/27/12/article-p1254.pdf (Date of Access: 30.01.2021 dd.mm.yy).
• 21. Dharavath, H.N. & Hahn, K. (2009). Green Printing: Colorimetric and Densitometric Analysis of Solvent-based and Vegetable Oil-based Inks of Multicolor Offset Printing. J. Technol. Stud. 35(2), pp. 36–46.
• 22. https://xritephoto.com/documents/literature/en/L7093_Understand_Dens_en.pdf (Date of Access: 29.03.2021 dd.mm.yy).
• 23. Ström, G. & Karathanasis M. (2008)“Relationship between ink film topography and print gloss in offset prints on coated surfaces” De Gruyter Published online: July 19, 2018, pp. 156–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj,

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).