From geopolitical anomie to a syncretic metamodel of the Greater Black Sea Region – “Five Sea Region”

Rusetsky, Alexander; Dorokhina, Olga; Boychuk, Alina

doi:10.35467/sdq/146882

Powiadomienia systemowe

Sesja wygasła!

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

From geopolitical anomie to a syncretic metamodel of the Greater Black Sea Region – “Five Sea Region”

Autorzy

Rusetsky Alexander , Dorokhina Olga , Boychuk Alina

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35467/sdq/146882

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The main goal of this study is to search for new effective mechanisms to assist in preventing the internationalisation of armed conflicts using conventional weapons and the creation of more weapons of mass destruction in the geostrategic region, the Greater Black Sea Region, which includes the countries of the “Five Seas” (Black Sea, Caspian Sea, Arabian Sea, and Mediterranean Sea), positive transformation of conflicts and the creation of a “Black Sea Security Community”. The methodological approach taken is based on the theory of meta-cognitive management, which implies a qualitative expansion of the dimensions for solving those problems that are unsolvable in the dimensions given today; a holistic approach focused on the multi-level and democratic participation of all participants in the process; and the method of geopolitical modelling being applied to discuss new forms and platforms for cooperation between those involved in confrontation in the Black Sea space. Innovation represents a return to the concept of syncretism in the scientific discourse for describing political and geopolitical tasks. The idea of creating a syncretic meta-model of Black Sea security is one way to improve cooperation between parties that have incompatible positions but are aware of common threats and the need to prevent them. Measures need to be taken for the countries of the Five Sea region to be fully integrated into the process and a new architecture created for the Black Sea Security Community. Scientific support is also necessary for the planning and implementation of peacekeeping processes in the Greater Black Sea Region.

Słowa kluczowe

security Black Sea Region metamodel geopolitical modelling political syncretism

Wydawca

Akademia Sztuki Wojennej

Czasopismo

Security and Defence Quarterly

Rocznik

2022

Tom

Vol. 37, No. 1

Strony

4--23

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 67 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Rusetsky Alexander

alex_scirs@yahoo.com

Caucasus Laboratory of Geopolitical Modelling, Faculty of Social Science, Caucasus International University, 73 Chargali, 0141, Tbilisi, Georgia

autor

Dorokhina Olga

Caucasus Laboratory of Geopolitical Modelling, Faculty of Social Science, Caucasus International University, 73 Chargali, 0141, Tbilisi, Georgia

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8216-4492

autor

Boychuk Alina

The Western Ukrainian Office, European Business Association, 200a Kulparkivska Street, Lviv, 79071, Ukraine

Bibliografia

1. Adler, E. (2011) ‘The OSCE as a security community’, OSCE Magazine, 1, pp. 14–15.
2. Åtland, K. and Kabanenko, I. (2019) ‘Russia and its western neighbours: A comparative study of the security.
3. Situation in the Black, Baltic and Barents Sea regions’, Europe-Asia Studies, 72(2), pp. 286–313. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2019.1690634.
4. Attar, A. (2012) V Black Sea International Symposium ‘Historical and Current Political Issues: Opinions & Suggestions’, Symposium Papers, 6–7 December 2012. EkoAvrasya Yayın No: 2014/4. Available at: https://doczz. biz.tr/doc/9503/tc-giresun-%C3%BCniversitesi (Accessed: 15 March 2022).
5. Bellamy, A.J. (2004) Security communities and their neighbours: Regional fortresses or global integrators? Houndmills, Basingstoke, and Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
6. Ballesteros, M.M.Á. (2015) ‘Method for the analysis of geopolitical regions (MARG)’, Journal of the Spanish Institute for Strategic Studies, 6, pp. 1–43.
7. Belashchenko, D.A., Tolkachev, V.V., Shmelev, A.P. and Shodzhonov, I.F. (2021) ‘GUAM activity in the post-soviet space: Intentions, results, prospects’, Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, 14(3), pp. 84–105. doi: 10.23932/2542-0240-2021-14-3-5.
8. Bifolchi, G. (2020) ‘Assessment of the Russian strategy to contrast terrorism and jihadist propaganda in the North Caucasus’, Janus.net, E-Journal of International Relations, 11(2), pp. 19–32. doi: 10.26619/1647-7251.11.2.2.
9. Bityak, Y., Yakovyuk, I. and Shestopal, S. (2017) ‘Proyekt “Mezhdumor’ye”: geopoliticheskiy analiz’, Baltiyskiy gumanitarnyy zhurnal, 6(4), (21), pp. 458–462 [in Russian].
10. Brusylovska, O., Dubovyk, V. and Koval, I. (eds.) (2020) Black Sea Region in world policy: Actors, factors, and scenarios of the future. Odesa: Odesa Mechnikov National University Press. doi: 10.18524/978-617-689-406-3.
11. CMI (2009) Black Sea peacebuilding network regional meeting report. Tbilisi. Available at: https://reliefweb.int/report/armenia/black-sea-peacebuilding-network-regional-meeting-report-tbilisi-december-2009 (Accessed:4 January 2022).
12. CoEU (Council of European Union) (2009) Joint Declaration of the Prague Eastern Partnership Summit Prague.Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/er/107589.pdf (Accessed: 4 January 2022).
13. Cohen, S. (2014) Geopolitics: The geography of international relations. 3rd edn. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
14. Cornell, S., Jonsson, A., Nilsson, N. and Häggström, P. (2006) The Wider Black Sea Region: An emerging hub in European security. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center.
15. Coser, L. (1956) The functions of social conflict. Reprint 2001. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
16. Dergachev, V.A. (2010) Geopolitika. Russkaja geopoliticheskaja jenciklopedija. 2010–2020 [in Russian].
17. Deutsch, K., Burrell, S., Kann, R., Lee, M., Lichterman, M., Lindgren, R., Loewenheim, F. and Van Wagenen, R. (1957) Political community and the North American area series: Princeton Legacy Library. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
18. Diesen, G. (2017) Russia’s geoeconomic strategy for a greater Eurasia. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315212227.
19. Ditrych, O. (2014) ‘Security community: A future for a troubled concept?’, International Relations, 28(3), pp. 350–366. doi: 10.1177/0047117814545952.
20. Emerson, M. (2006) What should the Community of Democratic choice do? CEPS, Brussels: CEPS Policy Brief No. 98/March.
21. Farris, C.D. (1960) ‘Selected attitudes on foreign affairs as correlates of authoritarianism and political anomie’, The Journal of Politics, 22(1), pp. 50–67. doi: 10.2307/2126588.
22. Fedder, E.H. (1968) ‘The concept of alliance’, International Studies Quarterly, 12(1), pp. 65–86. doi: 10.2307/3013558.
23. Fisher, R., Ury, W. and Patton, B. (2011) Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. 3rd edn., Rev. ed. New York: Penguin.
24. Garfinkle, A. (1999) The greater Middle East 2025. Foreign Policy Research Institute. Available at: https://www.fpri.org/article/1999/12/the-greater-middle-east-2025/ (Accessed: 15 March 2022).
25. Gorelova, G. and Ryabtsev, V. (2014) Development of cognitive models of geopolitical systems (Black Sea Caspian Sea Region). Taganrog: Izvestiya SFedU. Engineering Sciences [in Russian].
26. Hamilton, D. and Mangott, G. (eds.) (2008) The Wider Black Sea Region in the 21st century: Strategic, economic and energy perspectives. Washington, DC: Center for Transatlantic Relations, pp. 351. Available at: https://www. files.ethz.ch/isn/92382/2008_Black_Sea_Text_complete.pdf (Accessed: 7 January 2022).
27. Jalilov, O. (2021) Iran, Azerbaijan and Georgia agree on establishment of Transit Route. Available at: https://caspiannews.com/news-detail/iran-azerbaijan-and-georgia-agree-on-establishment-of-transitroute-2021-12-8-6/ (Accessed: 30 December 2021).
28. Jones, A. (2017) Genocide: A comprehensive introduction. 3rd edn. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315725390-1.
29. Kizilov, M. (2010) Toponim «Khazariya» v istochnikakh pozdnesrednevekovogo i rannego novogo vremeni (ob inertsionnosti istoricheskogo myshleniya). Khazary: Mif i istoriya. Moskva: Iyerusalim, pp. 307–315 [in Russian].
30. Kolers, A. (1994). ‘Review of The New Middle East, by S. Peres & A. Naor’, The Brown Journal of World Affairs,1(2), pp. 412–417. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24593645.
31. Krasheninnikova, A. (ed.) (2020) K stoletiyu khimery Mezhdumor’ye. «Pol’sha v bor’be za Vostochnuyu Yevropu, 1920–2020». Moscow: Kuchkovo Pole [in Russian].
32. Kropotkin, L. (1907) Vzaimnaya pomoshch’, kak faktor evalyutsii. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo «Znanie» [in Russian].
33. Kuryljov, K. (2020) NATO v Chjornom more. Kakova strategija Rossii? Available at: https://ru.valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/nato-v-chyernom-more-kakova-strategiya-rossii/ (Accessed: 10 January 2022) [in Russian].
34.Lepsky, M. (2020). Futures resources as a potential of multi-channel university and academic peace diplomacy. Conference paper, International tele-symposium. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1b4bCIReKqpqHN96uD5e_5cCpUd5dfmi/view (Accessed: 4 January 2022).
35. Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36. Manoli, P. (2011) Black Sea regionalism in perspective, neighbourhood policy paper’s. Available at: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/135477/NeighbourhoodPolicyPaper(02)(1).pdf (Accessed: 6 January 2022).
37. Martin, A. (2021) China in the broader Black Sea Region. Bratislava: GLOBSEC Office.
38. Melkonyan, S. (2021) Gromkoye molchaniye: Izrail’ i voyna v Nagornom Karabakhe. Available at: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/gromkoe-molchanie-izrail-i-voyna-v-nagornomkarabakhe/ (Accessed: 14 February 2022) [in Russian].
39. Merton, R. (1968) Social theory and social structure. New York: The Free Press.
40. Minchev, M. (2012) Chernoye more kak tsentr Yevrazii. Available at: https://bit.ly/3q3PI4M (Accessed: 15 March 2022) [in Russian].
41. Mogarichev, K.Y. (2019) ‘Dogovor SSSR s Agro-Dzhoyntom (1924 g. ) v kontekste mifologemy o “Krymskoy Kalifornii”’, Via in tempore. Istoriya. Politologiya, 46(3), pp. 452–461 [in Russian].
42. Orator.ru. (1995) «Kak Krym chut› Izrailem ne stal» Available at: http://www.orator.ru/stories_k... (Accessed: 10 January 2022) [in Russian].
43. Pirinski, G. and Deyanov, R. (2017) Thinking together. The Black Sea region: Confrontation or cooperation?Facilitation paper, VARNA FORUM 2.0, 13–14 May 2017, Riviera Resort, Varna. Available at: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/sofia/13825.pdf (Accessed: 04 January 2022).
44. Poltoranin, M. Krymskaya Kaliforniya. Poltoranin. Moment istiny, video. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sq7IT2bzC6U (Accessed: 10 January 2022) [in Russian].
45. Raiffa, H. (2020) The founding of the institute. Available at: https://iiasa.ac.at/web/home/about/whatisiiasa/history/history_of_iiasa.html (Accessed: 12 January 2022).
46. Rusetsky, A. (2004) Secessionisty i junionisty: ot mezhobinnogo dialoga k obshhenacional’noj idee. SCIRS, Tbilisi [in Russian].
47. Rusetsky, A. (2005) Democratic values and the role of civil society in improving the efficiency of negotiation processes. Special issue, 2005, SCIRS, Tbilisi: Proceedings of the International Meeting of Experts.
48. Rusetsky, A. (ed.) (2006) Black Sea commission on conflicts. Tbilisi: SCIRS.
49. Rusetsky, A. (2008) Informatsionnaya agressiya i protivostoyaniyeya yey. Gruziya: informatsionnyye soobshcheniya i voprosy bezopasnosti. Tbilisi: SCIRS [in Russian].
50. Rusetsky, A. (2005) Democratic values and the role of civil society in improving the efficiency of negotiation processes.Special issue, 2005, SCIRS, Tbilisi: Proceedings of the International Meeting of Experts.
51. Rusetsky, A. (2021) ‘Political syncretism: From extremism to the “security community”’, in ISPP’s 2021 Annual Meeting, 11–13 July 2021. Available at: https://ispp.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/FULL-PROGRAM2021_23June2021.pdf (Accessed: 26 December 2021).
52. Rusetsky, A. and Dorokhina, O. (2009a) Psevdokonflikty i kvazimirotvorchestvo na Kavkaze, SCIRS: Tbilisi [in Russian].
53. Rusetsky, A. and Dorokhina, O. (2009b) Arhipelag Kavkaz – mify i real-politik. Tbilisi: SCIRS [in Russian].
54. Rusetsky, A. and Dorokhina, O. (2020a) ‘Yadernyye i radiatsionnyye ugrozy kak resursy dlya modelirovaniya soobshchestva bezopasnosti na primere Abkhazskogo politicheskogo krizisa’, Nauchno-teoreticheskiy al’manakh Grani, 23(4), pp. 75–92. doi: 10.15421/172043 [in Russian].
55. Rusetsky, A. and Dorokhina, O. (2020b) ‘Abkhazian crisis: From the concept of awareness of common threats to the building of an “Abkhazian Security Community”’, Grani, 23(3), pp. 118–134 [in Russian]. doi: 10.15421/172032.
56. Rusetsky, A. and Dorokhina, O. (2020c) ‘Specifics of management of divided cities: Concept of awareness of common threats, and the road to the “Sukhum/i Security Community”’, in II All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation Lviv Regional Institute of Public Administration of the National Academy of Public Administration under the President of Ukraine, Lviv, Bryukhovychi, 29 May 2020.
57. Rusetsky, A. and Dorokhina, O. (2021) The struggle for Abkhazia and the Arsenal of meta-politology for peace, Monograph short version in English language, Tbilisi: Caucasus International University.
58. Silk Road Briefing (2021) Iran instigates Persian Gulf – Black Sea connectivity infrastructure. Hong Kong: Dezan Shira & Associates, Asia Briefing Ltd.
59. Shmulevich, A. (2022) Izrail’ – garant stabil’nosti na novom Blizhnem Vostoke. Available at: https://stmegi.com/opinions/posts/96214/izrail-garant-stabilnosti-na-novom-blizhnem-vostoke-/ (Accessed: 17 February 2022)[in Russian].
60. Stewart, D.J. (2005) ‘The greater Middle East and reform in the Bush Administration’s ideological imagination’, Geographical Review, 95(3), 400–424. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30034245.
61. Süsser, D., Ceglarz, A., Gaschnig, H., Stavrakas, V., Flamos A., Giannakidis, G., Lilliestam. J. (2021), ‘Model-based policymaking or policy-based modelling? How energy models and energy policy interact’, Energy Research & Social Science, 75, 101984, pp. 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.101984.
62. Tusicisny, A. (2007) ‘Security communities and their values: Taking masses seriously’, International Political Science Review, 28(4), pp. 425–449. doi: 10.1177/0192512107079639.
63. Valters, C., Rabinowitz, G. and Denney, L. (2014) ‘Security in post-conflict contexts: What counts as progress and what drives it?’, Working paper, Overseas Development Institute London: Development Progress. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3793.0005.
64. Vereshchuk, I. and Umland, A. (2019) ‘How to make Eastern Europe’s Gray zone less gray?’, Harvard International Review, 40(1), pp. 38–41. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26617392 (Accessed: 10 January 2022).
65. Yarar, E. (2021) ‘Post-Brexit Turkey-UK ties show signs of new strategic partnership’, Daily Sabah. Available at: https://www.dailysabah.com/politics/news-analysis/post-brexit-turkey-uk-ties-show-signs-of-new-strategicpartnership (Accessed: 4 January 2022)
66. Yazkova, A. (ed.) (2012) Bol’shoye prichernomor’ye: poisk putey sotrudnichestva. Moscow: Doklady Instituta Yevropy № 284 [in Russian].
67. Zhiltsov, S. (2019) ‘Russian policy in the Black Sea region: Results and new challenges’, Post-Soviet Issues, 6(2), 149–164. doi: 10.24975/2313-8920-2019-6-2-149-164 [in Russian].

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-b666b38b-3d1c-4cce-a6e0-1cb54e5929a5