Characteristics and Household Toxic Hazardous Waste Generation Based on Economic Status and Topographic Regions in Semarang City, Indonesia

• Autorzy: Fikri E. , Purwanto P. , Sunoko H. R.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/76209

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Hazardous and toxic waste are not only produced by industry, but also by households. But in fact, the household activities also produce Household Toxic and Hazardous Waste (HTHW). Considering the potential of the impact of HTHW to worsening environment quality, the effort of HTHW management must have been started well. One important aspect in the management strategy is to determine the characteristics and the HTHW generation. The method used to determine the characteristics HTHW refers to SNI 19–2454–2002, while the calculation of HTHW generation refers to the SNI 19–3694–1994 calculated based on weight and volume. Sampling was conducted in four districts of Semarang (Pedurungan, Semarang Barat, Semarang Utara and Banyumanik). The samples used in this study were 400 families that were selected based on the proportion of Slovin Formula. Data analysis performed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal-Walis test (α = 0.05). The largest characteristic of HTHW in Semarang City is infectious (79%), further Poisonous (13%), Combustible (6%) and Corrosive (2%). While HTHW generation is 0.01 kg/person/day (5.1% MSW). Statistical test result showed there was a significant difference (p-value : 0.001) between HTHW generation based on economic level, but there was no significant difference (p-value :0.442) between HTHW characteristics in Semarang city. The level of education, occupation, income level and lifestyle may become potential factors in differentiating the characteristics and HTHW generation in Semarang city.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

households toxic; hazardous waste; economic level; generation; topographic regions

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 18, nr 5
• Strony: 8--17
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz., tab., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Fikri E.

• Department of Environmental Health, Bandung Health Polytechnic, Cimahi Utara, 40514, Doctorate Program of Environmental Studies, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia, 50241

autor

Purwanto P.

• Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia, 50241

autor

Sunoko H. R.

• Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia, 50241

Bibliografia

• 1. Atmasari, N.N., 2011, The relationship between education level with Main Industry in East Java in 2009. Malang: State Islamic University of Maulana Malik Ibrahim.
• 2. Burnley, S.J., 2007, A review of municipal solid waste composition in the United Kingdom. Journal Waste Management. 27, 1274–1285.
• 3. Cahyono, S.A., Nur A.J., Yonki I. 2006. Socio-economic Characteristics Affecting Household Income pine sap tappers in the village Somagede, Kebumen, Central Java. Journal of Social and Economic Research Forestry. 3,1–18.
• 4. Damanhuri, E., 2010. College textbooks TL-3104 Solid Waste Management. Bandung: Penerbit ITB.
• 5. Delgado, O.B., Ojeda-Benitez, S., Marquez, BL., 2007, Comparative Analysis of Hazardous Household Waste in Two Mexican Regions. Journal Waste Management. 27, 792–801.
• 6. Dewilda, Y., Yeggi, D., Indriyani, Z., 2014, Generation Unit and Domestic Waste Composition Tanah Datar. Journal of Environmental Engineering UNAND, 1:28–33.
• 7. Eisted, R., Christensen, T.H. 2011, Characterization of Household Waste in Greenland. Journal Waste Management. 31, 1461–1466.
• 8. Fikri, E., Purwanto., Henna, R.S., 2015, Modelling of Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Management in Semarang City (Indonesia) by Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Approach to Reduce Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions, Procedia Environmental Sciences. 23, 123–129.
• 9. Fikri, E., Purwanto., Henna, R.S., 2016. Life cycle assessment of household hazardous waste management options for Semarang City, Indonesia. Int. J. Environment and Waste Management. 17(2), 146–157.
• 10. Jin, J., Wang Z., Ran S., 2006, Solid waste management in Macao: Practices and challenges. Journal Waste Management. 26, 1045–1051.
• 11. Lakshmikantha, H., Lakshminarasimaiah N. 2007, Household Hazardous Waste Generation-Management. Proceeding of The International Conference on Sustainable Solid Waste Management 5–7 September 2007, Chennai, India; 163–168.
• 12. Ololade, I.A., Adewunmi, A., Ologundudu, A., Adeleye, A., 2009, Effect of Household Waste on Surface and Underground Waters. International Journal of Phisical Science. 4, 22–29.
• 13. Otoniel, B.D., Liliana, M.B., Francelia, P.G., 2008, Consumption Patterns and Houshold Hazardous Solid Waste Generation in an Urban Settlement in Mexico. Waste Management. 28, 52–56.
• 14. Papachristou, E., Hadjianghelou, H., Darakas, E., Alivanis, K., Belou, A., Ioannidou D., Paraskevopoulou, E., Poulios, K.., Koukourikou, A., Kosmidou N., Sortikos K. 2009, Perspectives for integrated municipal solid waste management in Thessaloniki, Greece. Journal Waste Management, 29.1158–1162.
• 15. Putri, A.D., Nyoman, D.S., 2013, Effect of Age, Education, Employment Against Poor Household Income in Rural Bebandem. E-Jurnal EP Unud; 2: 173–180.
• 16. Rivera, M.M., & Rivera R.V., 2007, Practical Guide to Thesis and Dissertation Writing. Quezon City, Philippines: Katha Publishing.
• 17. Ryan T.P., 2013, Sample Size Determination and Power. Hoboiken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• 18. Sevilla, C.G., 1990, A Research Primer. Quezon City Philippines: Rex Printing Company. Inc.
• 19. Stanek, E.J., Tuthill R.W., Willis C., Moore, G.S., 1987, Household Hazardous Waste in Massachusetts. Archives of Environmental Health; 42, 84–86.
• 20. Sumardi, M., Hans D.E., 1982, Poverty and basic needs. Jakarta: Yayasan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Rajawali.
• 21. Tchobagnolous, G., Theisen H., Vigil, S., 1993, Integrated Solid Waste Management (Engineering Principles and Management Issues). Singapore: McGraw-Hill International Editions.
• 22. Thanh, N.P., Matsui Y., Fujiwara T. 2010, Household Solid Waste Generation and Characteristic in a Mekong Delta City, Vietnam. Jounal of Environmental Management. 2307–2321.
• 23. Tuthill, R.W., Edward, J.S., Willis, C., Moore, G.S., 1987, Degree of Public Support for Household Hazardous Waste Control Alternative. American Journal of Public Health (AJPH). 77, 304–306.
• 24. Udin, K.A., 2010, The relationship between level of education and type of work with community participation in development in Jetis Subdistrict Jaten Karanganyar year 2009/2010. Surakarta: The Faculty of Education University of March Surakarta.
• 25. Zhuang, Y., Wu, S.W., Wang Y.L, Wu, W.X., Chen, Y.X. 2008, Source separation of household waste: A case study in China. Journal Waste Management. 28, 2022–2030.
• 26. Ziaee, S., Omrani, G., Agha, M.M.A., Mansouri, N., 2012, Qualitative and Quantitative Examination of Household Hazardous Waste in Tehran. Advances in Environmental Biology. 6, 676–68.
• 27. Zotos, G., Karagiannidis A., Zampetoglou S., Malamakis A., Antonopoulos I.S., Kontogianni S., Tchobanoglous G. 2009, Developing a holistic strategy for integrated waste management within municipal planning: Challenges, policies, solutions and perspectives for Hellenic municipalities in the zero-waste, low-cost direction. Journal Waste Management; 29,1686–1692.