Evaluation of Several Biochar Types as Inoculant Carrier for Indigenous Phosphate Solubilizing Microoorganism from Acid Sulphate Soil

• Autorzy: Husna Nurul , Budianta Dedik , Munandar , Napoleon Adipati

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/109078

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The research aimed at evaluating four biochar types which have the most adequate characteristics as inoculant carrier of indigenous Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganism (PSM) from acid sulphate soil. The observed biochar characteristics consist of the bulk density, total pore space, water holding capacity, C organic, N, pH, EC, charcoal percentage, and ash content. The pore diameters and photomicrograph of biochar were observed by using SEM. The viability test was conducted in order to determine the appropriateness of biochar as PSM inoculant through inoculation on four biochar types made of rice husk, coconut shell, corncob, and oil palm empty bunch, followed by six months storage period. Monthly observation was conducted related to the PSM population, pH, and moisture content. The results show that interaction of biochar types and storage periods has no significant effect on the PSM viability, pH, and moisture content. The PSM viability of four biochars after six months storage period is relatively stable in the range of log 7.07 cfu.g^-1 to log 9.18 cfu.g^-1. The highest PSM viability was found on coconut shell biochar with the magnitude of log 9.18 cfu.g^-1 and pH of 7.01 as well as moisture content of 26.86% after six months storage period. This research offers the advantage of using agricultural waste substance as biochar that capable to maintain microbial viability with six months storage period.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

biochar; inoculant carrier; phosphate solubilizing microorganisms; viability

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 20, nr 6
• Strony: 1--8
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 24 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Husna Nurul

• Faculty of Agriculture, IBA University, Jl. Mayor Ruslan, Palembang 30114, South Sumatra, Indonesia

autor

Budianta Dedik

• Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University Sriwijaya, Inderalaya 30662, South Sumatra, Indonesia

autor

Munandar

• Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University Sriwijaya, Inderalaya 30662, South Sumatra, Indonesia

autor

Napoleon Adipati

• Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University Sriwijaya, Inderalaya 30662, South Sumatra, Indonesia

Bibliografia

• 1. Annisa W. and Nursyamsi D. 2016. The effect of ameliorant, fertilizer and management system of acid sulphate soil on rice yield and methane emission. Journal of Land Resources, 2 (40), 51-64
• 2. Atkinson C.J., Fitzgerald J.D. and Hipps N.A. 2010. Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil, (337), 1–18.
• 3. Behera, B. C., Singdevsachan, S. K., Mishra, R. R., Dutta, S. K. and Thatoi, H. N., 2014. Diversity, mechanism and biotechnology of phosphate solubilising microorganism in mangrove—A review. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 3(2), 97–110. doi:10.1016/j.bcab.2013.09.008.
• 4. Downie A., Crisky A. and Munroe P. 2009. Physical properties of biochar. In: Biochar for Environmental Management. Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. (Eds.), 2nd Ed. Earthscan Publications Ltd, London, pp 13-32
• 5. Egamberdieva, Reckling M. and Wirth S. 2017. Biochar-based Brady rhizobium inoculum improves growth of lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) under drought stress. European Journal of Soil Biology, (78), 38-42.
• 6. Głodowska M., Schwinghamer T., Husk B., Smith D. 2017. Biochar based inoculants improve soybean growth and nodulation. Agric Sci, (8), 1048–1064
• 7. Graber E., Meller Harel Y., Kolton M., Cytryn E., Silber A., Rav David D., Tsechansky L., Borenshtein M. and Elad Y. 2010. Biochar impact on development and productivity of pepper and tomato grown in fertigated soilless media, (337), 481–496.
• 8. Hale L., Luth M. and Crowley D. 2015. Biochar characteristics relate to its utility as an alternative soil inoculum carrier to peat and vermiculite. Soil Biology and Biochem, (81), 228-235
• 9. Khan M.S., Zaidi A. and Ahmad E. 2014. Mechanism of Phosphate Solubilization and Physiological Functions of Phosphate-Solubilizing Microorganisms. In: Khan M., Zaidi A., Musarrat J. (eds) Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms. Springer, Cham.
• 10. Jaafar N.M., Clode P. L. and Abbott L.K. 2014. Microscopy observations of habiTable space in biochar for colonisation by fungal hyphae from soil. J Integr Agr,13(3) : 483–490.
• 11. Lehmann J., Rilli , M.C., Thies J., Masiello C.A., Hockaday W.C. and Crowley D. 2011. Biochar effects on soil biota – A review. Soil Biol Biochem, (43), 1812–1836.
• 12. Major J., Rondon M., Molina D., Riha S.J. and Lehmann J. 2012. Nutrient leaching in a Colombian Savanna oxisol amended with biochar. Journal of Environmental Quality (41), 1076.
• 13. Marra L.M., de Oliveira S. M., Sousa Soares C. L. F. and Moreira1 F. M. S. 2012. Solubilisation of inorganic phosphates by inoculant strains fromtropical legumes. Sci. Agric. (Piracicaba, Braz.), 68 (5), 603-609.
• 14. Masulili A., Utomo W. H. and Syechfani M. S. 2010. Rice husk biochar for rice based cropping system in acid soil the characteristics of rice husk biochar and its influence on the properties of acid sulfate soils and rice growth in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2(1), 39-47.
• 15. Nurita and Saleh M. 2016. Testing of Biofertilizer Formulation on Rice Crop at Tidal Lowland Area. Proceeding of National Seminar of Wet Land. Part 3, 916-920.
• 16. Rees F., Simonnot O.M., and More J.L. 2014. Short-term effects of biochar on soil heavy metal mobility are controlled by intra-particle diffusion and soil pH increase. European Journal of Soil Science, (65), 149–161.
• 17. Rousk J., Brookes P.C. and Bååth E. 2009. Contrasting soil pH effects on fungal and bacterial growth suggest functional redundancy in carbon mineralization. Applied and Environmental Microbiology (75), 1589-1596.
• 18. Santi L.P. and Goenadi D.H. 2010. Biochar utilization as microbe carrier for Utilsol soil aggregate stabilizer at Bogo Park-Lampung. Menara Perkebunan, 78(2), 52-60.
• 19. Saranya K., Santhana P., Kumutha K. and French J. 2011. Potential for biochar as an alternate carrier to lignite for the preparation of biofertilizers in India. Int. J. Agric. Biol, (4), 167–172.
• 20. Sohi S. P., Krull E., Lopez-Capel E. and Bol R., 2010. A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. In Donald L S (ed.) Advances in Agronomy. Vol. 105. Academic Press, New York. pp. 47–82.
• 21. Thies J.E. and Rillig M.C. 2009. Characteristics of biochar: biological properties. In Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds.) Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. Earthscan, London. pp. 85–105.
• 22. Vanek S.J., Thies J., Wang B., Hanley K. and Lehmann J. 2016. Pore-Size and Water Activity Effects on Survival of Rhizobium tropici in Biochar Inoculant Carriers. Jurnal Microb Biochem Technol, (8), 296-306. doi: 10.4172/1948-5948.1000300
• 23. Verheijen F., Jeffery S., Bastos A.C., Van der Velde M. and Diafas I. 2009. Biochar Application to Soils—A Critical Scientific Review of Effects on Soil Properties, Processes and Functions. Joint Research Centre (JRC) Scientific and Technical Report No.EUR 24099 EN. Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
• 24. Xu G., Sun H.B., Shao J.B.,., and Chang S.X. 2014. Biochar had effects on phosphorus sorption and desorption in three soils with differing acidity. Ecology Engineering. J, (62), 54-60.