PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Entrepreneurial core motivation as a success factor for rural entrepreneurship in Western India

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Motywacja podstawowej przedsiębiorczości jako czynnik sukcesu dla przedsiębiorczości wiejskiej w zachodniej Indii
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Entrepreneurship development is increasingly being considered a potential contributor to economic growth and development as it opens various possibilities for rural people specifically regarding the creation of employment opportunities and the promotion of local markets and skills. India is categorised predominantly as an agricultural country with nearly 73 percent of the total Indian population living in rural areas. Consequently, agricultural entrepreneurial associated activities could be considered one of the main sources of rural income. This study attempts to investigate whether any significant differences exist between various owner demographic and business information groups specifically considering their entrepreneurial core motivation decisions. This research employed small medium entrepreneurship activities using 297 randomly selected registered entrepreneurs from the Vidarbha region. A simple random sampling technique was used for primary data collection. Data collected were analysed using descriptive statistics, MANOVA and ANOVA. Findings showed that in the case of rural entrepreneurs’ core motivations, significant differences were observed amongst the difference education and income groups. This implies that a rural entrepreneur’s level of income and education will have an influence on his or her core entrepreneurial motivation.
PL
Rozwój przedsiębiorczości jest coraz częściej uznawany za potencjalny czynnik wzrostu gospodarczego i rozwoju, ponieważ otwiera ludziom zamieszkałym na terenie wiejskim różne możliwości, zwłaszcza w zakresie tworzenia możliwości zatrudnienia oraz promocji lokalnych rynków i umiejętności. Indie klasyfikowane są głównie jako kraj rolniczy, prawie 73% całkowitej populacji Indii mieszka na obszarach wiejskich. W związku z tym działalność związaną z przedsiębiorczością rolną można uznać za jedno z głównych źródeł dochodu wiejskiego. W niniejszym badaniu podjęto próbę zbadania, czy istnieją znaczne różnice między różnymi grupami demograficznymi właścicieli i grupami biznesowymi, szczególnie biorąc pod uwagę ich kluczowe decyzje motywacyjne. W badaniu wykorzystano małe działania w zakresie średniej przedsiębiorczości z wykorzystaniem 297 losowo wybranych zarejestrowanych przedsiębiorców z regionu Vidarbha. Do pierwotnego gromadzenia danych wykorzystano prostą technikę losowego próbkowania. Zebrane dane analizowano za pomocą statystyki opisowej, MANOVA i ANOVA. Wyniki pokazały, że w przypadku głównych motywów przedsiębiorców wiejskich zaobserwowano znaczące różnice między różnymi grupami edukacyjnymi i dochodowymi. Oznacza to, że poziom dochodów i wykształcenia przedsiębiorcy wiejskiego będzie miał wpływ na jego motywację do przedsiębiorczości.
Rocznik
Strony
218--230
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 55 poz., tab.
Twórcy
  • North-West University, South Africa
  • North-West University, South Africa
autor
  • North-West University, South Africa
  • Szent Istvan University, Hungary
Bibliografia
  • 1. Acs Z., Szerb L., Lloyd A., 2018, Global entrepreneurship development Index 2018, The Global Entrepreneurship and Development Institute, Washington, D.C., USA.
  • 2. Atieno O., 2009, An analysis of the strengths and limitation of qualitative and quantitative research paradigms, Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 13.
  • 3. Baporikar N., 2014, Youth Entrepreneurship in Indian Scenario, “International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management”, 5(2).
  • 4. Bozsik N., 2012, Macroeconomic Experiences of Hungary Since the Accession to the European Union, “Journal of Volyn Institute for Economics and Management”, 3(3).
  • 5. Bushell B., 2008, Women entrepreneurs in Nepal: what prevents them from leading the sector?. Gender and Development, 16(3).
  • 6. Buthelezi T.T.B., 2011, Exploring women entrepreneurship in the construction industry, Potchefstroom: North-West University. (Mini-dissertation - MBA).
  • 7. Charantimath P.M., 2005, Entrepreneurship development and small business enterprises, Pearson Education India.
  • 8. Clark L.A., Watson D., 1995, Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development, Psychological Assessment, 7(3).
  • 9. Cromie A., Hayes J., 1991, Business Ownership as a Means of Overcoming Job Dissatisfaction, Personnel Review, 20(1).
  • 10. Davidsson P., 1995, Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intentions. In RENT XI Workshop, Nov 23-24.1995, Piacenza, Italy.
  • 11. Drotski A., Okanga B., 2016, Managing the early stages of SMEs' sustainability and growth, “Journal of Contemporary Management”, 13(1).
  • 12. Dvorsky J., Popp J., Virglerova Z., Kovács S., Oláh J., 2018, Assessing the importance of market risk and its sources in the SME of the Visegrad Group and Serbia, Advances in Decision Sciences, 22(A) 22nd Anniversary Special Issue.
  • 13. Edelman L.F., Brush C.G., Manolova T.S., Greene P.G., 2010, Start-up motivations and growth intentions of minority nascent entrepreneurs, “Journal of Small Business Management”, 2(2).
  • 14. Engle R.L., Dimitriadi N., Gavidia J.V., Schlaegel C., Delanoe S., Alvarado I., He X., Buame S., Wolff B., 2010, Entrepreneurial intent: A twelve-country evaluation of Ajzen's model of planned behaviour, “International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research”, 16(1).
  • 15. Ferreira J.J., Raposo L.M., Rodrigues R.G., Dinis A., do Paco A., 2012, A model of entrepreneurial intention: An application of the psychological and behavioural approaches, “Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development”, 19(3).
  • 16. Government of India Ministry of Labour & Employment - Statistical Year Book India 2017-2018. Available at: http://mospi.nic.in/download-reports.
  • 17. Greblikaite J., Sroka W., Gerulaitiene N., 2016, Involving young people in Polish and Lithuanian social enterprises by fostering entrepreneurial skills and abilities as entrepreneurial opportunity at university, Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(3).
  • 18. Greblikaite J., Sroka W., Grants J., 2015, Development of social entrepreneurship in European Union: policy and situation of Lithuania and Poland, Transformations in Business & Economics, 14(2B).
  • 19. Greblikaite J., Gerulaitiene N., Sroka W., 2017, From traditional business to social one: new possibilities for entrepreneurs in rural areas, [in] A. Raupelienė (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Scientific Conference Rural Development 2017, 23-24 November 2017, Kaunas, Lithuania.
  • 20. Hamilton L., 2015, Generation Y female students’ inclination towards entrepreneurship: a comparative study between South Africa and the Netherlands, Vanderbijlpark: North-West University (Doctoral thesis).
  • 21. Herrington M., Kew P., Mwanga A., 2017, South Africa report 2016/2017: Can small businesses survive in South Africa? University of Cape Town Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Cape Town: South Africa.
  • 22. Hisrich R.D., 1985, The woman entrepreneur in the United States and Puerto Rico: a comparative study, “Leadership and Organizational Development Journal”, (5).
  • 23. Isaga N., Masurel E., van Montfort K., 2015, Owner-manager motives and the growth of SMEs in developing countries: Evidence from the furniture industry in Tanzania, “Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies”, 7(3).
  • 24. Johnson B., 1990, Toward a multidimensional model of entrepreneurship: The case of achievement motivation and the entrepreneur, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14.
  • 25. Katekhaye D., 2018, Barriers and opportunities of rural entrepreneurship: Indian and Hungarian scenario, Godollo: Szent Istvan University (Doctoral thesis).
  • 26. Kock A., 2008, A framework for the development of entrepreneurship in the Ekuruleni district, Potchefstroom: North-West University. (Mini-dissertation - MBA).
  • 27. Kot S., Meyer N., Broniszewska A., 2016, A cross-country comparison of the characteristics of Polish and South African women entrepreneurs, Economics and Sociology, 4.
  • 28. Krueger N., 1993, The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(1).
  • 29. Lahiri R., 2012, Problems and prospects of micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in India in the era of globalization, [In] International Conference on the Interplay of Economics, Politics, and Society for Inclusive Growth.
  • 30. Lall M., Sahai S., 2008, Entrepreneurship, New Delhi: Excel Books.
  • 31. Linan F., Rodriguez-Cohard J.C., Rueda-Cantuche J.M., 2005, Factors affecting entrepreneurial intention levels, paper presented at the 45th Congress of the European regional Science Association, Amsterdam, (8).
  • 32. Lortie J., Castogiovanni G., 2015, The theory of planned behavior in entrepreneurship research: what we know and future directions, “International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal”, 11(4).
  • 33. Ključnikov A., Kozubíková L., Sopková G., 2017, The Payment Discipline of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. “Journal of Competitiveness”, 9(2).
  • 34. Meyer D.F., Meyer N., 2017, Management of small and medium enterprise (SME) development: An analysis of stumbling blocks in a developing region, “Polish Journal of Management Studies”, 16(1).
  • 35. Meyer D.F., Neethling J.R., 2017, Measurement of the Enabling Developmental Environment: A Comparative Study in a Developing Region, Economics and Sociology, 10(4).
  • 36. Meyer N., De Jongh J.J., 2018, The importance of entrepreneurship as a contributing factor to economic growth and development: The case of selected European countries, “Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies”, 10(4).
  • 37. Meyer N., 2018, South African female entrepreneurs’ intention to remain in business, Vanderbijlpark: North-West University (Doctoral thesis).
  • 38. Murray H., 1938, Explorations in Personality: A Clinical and Experimental Study of Fifty Men of College Age, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 39. Nabi G., Holden R., 2008, Graduate entrepreneurship: Intentions, education and training, Education and Training, 50(7).
  • 40. Ndedi A.A., 2009, Entrepreneurship training and job creation in South Africa: are tertiary institutions filling the gap? “Journal of Contemporary Management”, 6(1).
  • 41. Nel P., Maritz A., Thongprovati O., 2010, Motherhood and entrepreneurship: Themumpreneur phenomenon, “International Journal of Organizational Innovation”, 3(1).
  • 42. Niranjan R., Shivakumar S., 2017, Poverty and Employment Generation in India, “International Journal of Scientific Research”, 3(8).
  • 43. Nunnally J.C., Bernstein I.H., 1994, Psychological theory, New York, NY: MacGraw-Hill.
  • 44. Oláh J., Karmazin Gy., Máté D., Grabara J., Popp J., 2017, The effect of acquisition moves on income, pre-tax profits and future strategy of logistics firms, „Journal of International Studies”, 10(4).
  • 45. Oláh J., Kovács S., Virglerova Z., Lakner Z., Popp J., 2019, Analysis and Comparison of Economic and Financial Risk Sources in SMEs of the Visegrad Group and Serbia, Sustainability, 11(7).
  • 46. Pato M.L., Teixeira A.A., 2016, Twenty years of rural entrepreneurship: a bibliometric survey, Sociologia Ruralis, 56(1).
  • 47. Peterman N.E., Kennedy J., 2003, Enterprise education: Influencing students’ perceptions of entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 28(2).
  • 48. Pretorius M., Shaw G., 2004, Business plans in bank decision-making when financing new ventures in South Africa, “South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences”, 7(2).
  • 49. Sahasranamam S., Sud M., 2016, Opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship: A comparative study of India and China, “Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal”, 22(1).
  • 50. Shane S., Locke E., Collins C.J., 2012, Entrepreneurial motivation, Human Resource Management Review, 13(2).
  • 51. Veena M., Nagaraja N., 2013, Comparison of male and female entrepreneurs: An empirical study, “International Journal of Engineering and Management Research”, 3(6).
  • 52. Verick S., Islam I., 2010, The Great Recession of 2008-2009: Causes, Consequences and Policy Responses, IZA DP, 4934.
  • 53. Vijaya V., Kamalanabhan T.J., 1998, A scale to assess entrepreneurial motivation, “Journal of Entrepreneurship”, 7(2).
  • 54. Yimamu N., 2018, Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial motivation, Kokkola: Centria University of applied sciences Business Management (Doctoral thesis).
  • 55. Zhao H., Seibert S.E., Hills G.E., 2005, The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions, “Journal of applied psychology”, 90(6).
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-b5d36984-e567-4252-a32b-02cce2f0e076
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.