Factors, increasing the efficiency of work of maintenance, repair and operation units of industrial enterprises

• Autorzy: Krynke Marek , Ivanova Tatiana Nikolaevna , Revenko Nikolay Fedorovich

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/mspe-2022-0012

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article contains the analysis of factors influencing the efficiency of work of equipment maintenance, repair and operation (MRO) units of industrial enterprises. We have systematized various classifications of these factors, which were proposed in economic literature by different authors. We have divided the factors into following groups: general and local; primary and secondary; external and internal; major and non-essential; direct and oblique; reducing and boosting the expenses on equipment MRO and repair cost; production and non-production; depending on management and independent; economic, operation, organization ones; structural and production-technical ones; which are interconnected. It has been proposed to classify factors influencing the efficiency of equipment MRO units into five groups: economic, exploitation, organization, production-technical and structural ones. Using expert evaluation method, the factors have been divided into three groups according to degree of their influence on efficiency of work of equipment MRO units of industrial enterprises. The priority was given to the factors of the first group, having decisive influence on formation of efficiency. The most significant factors have been identified. In opinion of experts, these factors include: method of organization of work of equipment MRO service; level of economic autonomy of MRO enterprise in terms of organization of equipment MRO; financial and market situation of enterprise; the degree of repair complexity of production equipment.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

maintenance; repair and operation (MRO); method of organization of work of equipment MRO service; level of economic autonomy of MRO enterprise

• Wydawca: STE GROUP
• Czasopismo: Management Systems in Production Engineering
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: nr 1 (30)
• Strony: 91--97
• Opis fizyczny: Bibiogr. 28 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Krynke Marek

• Czestochowa University of Technology ul. J.H. Dąbrowskiego 69, 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4417-1955

autor

Ivanova Tatiana Nikolaevna

• Tchaikovsky Branch “Perm National Research Polytechnic Institute”, Russia
• Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science “Udmurt Federal Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences“, Institute of Mechanics, Russia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2284-2949

autor

Revenko Nikolay Fedorovich

• Academy of Economic Sciences of Ukraine Academy of Military Sciences of the Russian Federation Izhevsk State Technical University named after M.T. Kalashnikov, Russia
• Autonomous Noncommercial Organization “Study Accreditation Center” Sarapul, Russia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3423-9039

Bibliografia

• [1] Z.B. Khmelnitskaya. Organizational and economic problems of increasing the efficiency of production and technical services. Ural University. 205 p. 1987.
• [2] A.N. Vodolazov. Economic assessment of the activities of auxiliary production facilities of the enterprise: methodology and tools. DonSTU. 22 p. 2002.
• [3] V.N. Goncharov, O.A. Burbelo, A.I. Vavin. The efficiency of the production infrastructure of enterprises. LOT. 164 p. 1994.
• [4] L.N. Dragun. Improving the economic management of repair production (theory and practice). Irkutsk University Publ., 140 p. 1985.
• [5] R.N. Kolegaev, K.I. Melnikova, B.I. Krivoberets. Efficiency of the repair service of the enterprise and association. Tech-nique, 160 p. 1976.
• [6] G.A. Morgun. Efficiency management of enterprises in the conditions of reforming the electric power industry. UPI, 192 p. 2004.
• [7] V.K. Myltsev. Questions of increasing the organizational and technical level and efficiency of repair production. UPI. 25 p. 1981.
• [8] U.F. Nasibullin. Interplant management of the repair service. SPb GIEA. 17 p. 1997.
• [9] S.F. Pokropivny. Efficiency of car repair. Tekhnika, 256 p. 1975.
• [10] R.R. Stepanova. Methods and tools for increasing the economic efficiency of repair services of chemical enterprises. D. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia. 145 p. 2004.
• [11] N.G. Chumachenko. Problems of organizing the effective functioning of auxiliary production in mechanical engineering. IEM USSR Academy of Sciences, 30 p. 1979.
• [12] J. Tabor. Ranking of management factors for safe maintenance system based on Grey Systems Theory. Production Engineering Archives. 2021, 27(3), pp. 196-202, doi: 10.30657/pea.2021.27.26
• [13] K. Kowalik, D. Klimecka-Tatar. The process approach to service quality management. Production Engineering Archives. issue 18, pp. 31-34 doi:10.30657/pea.2018.18.05. 2018.
• [14] R. Ulewicz, M. Mazur. Economic aspects of robotization of production processes by example of a car semitrailers manufacturer, Manufacturing Technology. 19(6), pp. 1054-1059, doi: 10.21062/ujep/408.2019/a/1213-2489/MT/19/6/1054. 2019.
• [15] J. Furman. Work Safety Improvement Within Autonomous Maintenance. Multidisciplinary Aspects of Production Engineering MAPE 2020, vol. 3, issue 1, pp. 161-171 https://doi.org/10.2478/mape-2020-0014. 2020.
• [16] P. Gackowiec. General overview of maintenance strategies – concepts and approaches Multidisciplinary Aspects of Production Engineering MAPE 2019, vol. 2, issue 1, https://doi.org/10.2478/mape-2019-0013. 2019.
• [17] B. Al-Najjar, & I. Alsyouf, I. Selecting the most efficient maintenance approach using fuzzy multiple criteria deci-sion making. International Journal of Production Economics, 84(1), pp. 85-100. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00380-8.10. 2003.
• [18] H. Cherkaoui, K.T. Huynh, & A. Grall. On the Assessment of Performance and Robustness of Condition-Based Maintenance Strategies. IFAC-PapersOnLine, Elsevier B.V. 49(12), pp. 809-814. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.874.10.1016.
• [19] J. Mikler. Life Cycle Costing Used for Justifying Transition to Predictive Maintenance Strategies. Journal of Machine Engineering, 11(4), 2011. pp. 49-58.
• [20] J. Tabor. Maintenance management and occupational safety in manufacturing organizations. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 10 (2), pp. 225-235. 2014.
• [21] E.C. Özcan, S. Ünlüsoy, & T. Eren. A combined goal programming – AHP approach supported with TOPSIS for maintenance strategy selection in hydroelectric power plants. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier Ltd, 78 (May 2016), pp. 1410-1423. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.039. 2016.
• [22] L. Oubahman, S. Duleba. Review of PROMETHEE method in transportation, Production Engineering Archives. 27(1), pp. 69-74. doi: 10.30657/pea.2021.27.9. 2021.
• [23] D.L. Krutikhin. V.E. Lyalin. Application of queuing systems to improve the efficiency of maintenance and equipment repair services at an industrial enterprise//Mathematical models and information technologies in the organization of production. no. 2 (23). pp. 48-52. 2011.
• [24] V.M. Semyonov. Problems of the efficiency of maintenance of mechanical engineering production. UPI. 40 p. 1978.
• [25] K. Knop. Analysing the machines working time utilization for improvement purposes. Production Engineering Ar-chives. 2021, 27(2), pp. 137-147, doi: 10.30657/pea.2021.27.18
• [26] N.F. Revenko. The economic mechanism in repair production (on the example of industrial associations and enterprises of the mechanical engineering industry). IEP AN UkrSSR. 351 p. 1991.
• [27] Z.B. Khmelnitskaya. Organization and management of production and technical maintenance of mechanical engineering enterprises. 1992.
• [28] M. Krynke. Management optimizing the costs and duration time of the process in the production system. Production Engineering Archives. 2021, 27(3), pp. 163-170, doi: 10.30657/pea.2021.27.21.