Considering Microelectronic Trends in Advanced Wireless System Design

• Autorzy: Noguet D. , Masera G. , Ramakrishnan V. , Belleville M. , Morche D. , Asheid G.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Wireless communication system design has been a booming topic since the shift into the digital era in the 1990s. In the same period of time, microelectronic technologies have reached new paradigm points as they were going deeper into the sub-micron area. This paper gives an overview of these emerging constraints and enablers, looking through the specific angle of how much this may impact future wireless system design. To this end, the paper analyzes the major requirements from modern digital communication systems, the way it is foreseen to evolve, and how it can be mapped onto the microelectronic roadmap.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

considering microelectronic trends; Wireless System Design

• Wydawca: Publishing House of Poznan University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Advances in Electronics and Telecommunications
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: Vol. 1, no. 1
• Strony: 112--123
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 26 poz., fig.

Twórcy

autor

Noguet D.

• CEALETI, MINATEC, 17 rue des Martyrs, 38054 Grenoble Cedex 9, France

autor

Masera G.

• Dipartimento di Elettronica Politecnico di Torino, corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino - Italy

autor

Ramakrishnan V.

• Institute for Integrated Signal Processing Systems, RWTH Aachen University, Templergraben 55, 52056 Aachen, Germany

autor

Belleville M.

• CEALETI, MINATEC, 17 rue des Martyrs, 38054 Grenoble Cedex 9, France

autor

Morche D.

• CEALETI, MINATEC, 17 rue des Martyrs, 38054 Grenoble Cedex 9, France

autor

Asheid G.

• Institute for Integrated Signal Processing Systems, RWTH Aachen University, Templergraben 55, 52056 Aachen, Germany

Bibliografia

• [1] B. M. Hochwald and S. ten Brink, “Achieving near-capacity on a multiple-antenna channel,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 389–399, Mar. 203.
• [2] International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, http://www.itrs.net.
• [3] J. Mitola, “The software Radio Architecture,” IEEE Commun. Mag., pp. 26–38, May 1995.
• [4] J. A. Hutchby, G. I. Bourianoff, V. V. Zhirnov, and J. E. Brewer, “Extending the Road Beyond CMOS,” IEEE Circuits Devices Mag., vol. 18, no. 2, p. 2841, Mar. 2002.
• [5] R. Cavin and V. R. Zhirnov, “Future devices for information processing,” in Proceedings of ESSDERC 2005, Sep. 200p, pp. 7–12.
• [6] MEDEA+ Scientific Committee Working Group, “Towards and Beyond 2015: technology, devices, circuits and systems,” http://www.medeaplus.org/web/about/scientific.php?request temp=2015, 2007.
• [7] H. D. Man, “Ambient intelligence: Gigascale Dreams and Nanoscale Realities,” in ISSCC 2005 Digest of Technical Papers, Feb. 2005, pp. 29–35.
• [8] T. Chen, “Where CMOS is going: Trendy hype vs. real technology,” in ISSCC 2006 Digest of Technical Papers, Feb. 2006, pp. 22–28.
• [9] G. Declerck, “A look into the future of nanoelectronics,” in Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical papers, Kyoto, Jun. 2006, pp. 6–10.
• [10] M. Belleville and O. Faynot, Evolution of Deep submicron Bulk and SOI technologies in Low Power Electronics Design. CRC press, 2004.
• [11] F. H. P. Fitzek, M. Katz, and Q. Zhang, Cellular Controlled Short-Range Communication for Cooperative P2P Networking. Wireless Personal Communications, Springer Netherlands, Jan. 2008.
• [12] E. Walsh, R. Grimes, and P. Walsh, “The performance of active cooling in a mobile phone,” in Thermal and Thermo mechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems. ITHERM Conference 2008, 2008.
• [13] C. Michalke et al., “Linear Mimo Receivers vs. Tree Search Detection: A Performance Comparison Overview,” in IEEE 17th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), 11-14 Sept 2006, pp. 1–7.
• [14] L. Alaus, J. Palicot, C. Roland, Y. Louet, and D. Noguet, “Promising technique of parametrisation for reconfigurable radio, the common operators technique : fundamentals and examples,” Journal of Signal Processing Systems, 2008.
• [15] A. Rodriguez, “Defense Communications: US MIL-STD-188-110B Waveform Simulation,” http://www.mathworks.com, Jul. 2003.
• [16] Department Of Defense Interface Standard, Interoperability And Performance Standards For Data Modems: MIL-STD-188-110B., Department of Defense, USA, 2000.
• [17] Wimax TI Library, http://www.ti.com/corp/docs/landing/wimax/index.htm, May 2009.
• [18] JTRS, http://sca.jpeojtrs.mil/, May 2009.
• [19] S. Singh, M. Adrat, S. Couturier, M. Antweiler et al., “SCA Based Implementation Of STANAG 4285 In A Joint Effort Under The NATO RTO/IST Panel,” in Technical Conference and productExposition (SDR 08), Washington D.C., USA, 2008.
• [20] E. M. Witte, T. Kempf, V. Ramakrishnan, G. Ascheid et al., “SDR Baseband Processing Portability: A Case Study,” in 5th Karlsruhe Workshop on Software Radios (WSR2008), Germany, 2008.
• [21] Software Defined Radio, http://www.sdrforum.org/, Nov. 2009.
• [22] Next Generation Mobile Networks (NGMN) Alliance, http://www.ngmn.org/, Nov. 2009.
• [23] V. Ramakrishnan, E. M. Witte, T. Kempf, D. Kammler, G. Ascheid et al., “Efficient and Portable SDR Waveform Development: The Nucleus Concept,” in Military Communications Conference (MILCOM 2009), Boston, USA, 2009.
• [24] P. Wurm, “A Digital LINC Radio Transmitter Architecture for Opportunistic Radio,” in IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC), Barcelona, Apr. 2009.
• [25] IST-ORACLE project deliverable, “Overall complexity guidelines of an OR Terminal,” www.ist-oracle.org, Nov. 2008.
• [26] D. Morche, M. Belleville, C. Delaveaud, D. Ktenas, S. Mayrargue, and F. C. W. Po, “Future needs in RF reconfiguration from a system point of view,” in IEEE Bipolar/BiCMOS Circuits and Technology Meeting, 2009.