International Comparison of Occupational Safety and Health Research - A Review Based on Published Articles

• Autorzy: Brueggmann M. , Roetting M. , Luczak H.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

A comparison of international literature in occupational safety and health (OSH) research over the years from 1980 to 1998 was conducted. The comparison is based on the different languages of the over 35,000 articles, which were collected from different databases. The distribution of languages in the analyzed data has to be considered carefully with respect to the original purpose of the data collection and the specific role of the international publication language, English. The comparison shows that in several aspects OSH research does not differ in different publication languages. In some methodological aspects, and in specific objects of research, differences between articles published in different languages can be found.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

automatic classification; international comparison; literature database; meta-analysis; quantitative research

PL

klasyfikacja automatyczna; baza literatury; metaanaliza

• Wydawca: Taylor & Francis
• Czasopismo: International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
• Rocznik: 2001
• Tom: Vol. 7, No. 4
• Strony: 387--401
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 9 poz., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Brueggmann M.

• Institute of Industrial Engineering and Ergonomics, Aachen University of Technology, Aachen, Germany

autor

Roetting M.

• Liberty Mutual Research Center for Safety and Health, Hopkinton, MA, USA

autor

Luczak H.

• Institute of Industrial Engineering and Ergonomics, Aachen University of Technology, Aachen, Germany

Bibliografia

• 1.Encyclopaedia Britannica online. (2000). Available: http://www.eb.com
• 2.European Statistics on Accidents at Work. (1997). Accidents at work in the European Union in 1993. Available: http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment-social/h&s/figures/accidents93-en.htm
• 3.Grieco, A., Iavicoli, S., & Belinguer, G. (Eds.). (1999). Contributions to the history of occupational and environmental prevention. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
• 4.International Labour Organization (ILO). (1981). Occupational safety and health convention. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
• 5.Luczak, H., Brueggmann, M., Päßler, K., Rösler, D., & Rötting, M. (2001). Struktur der Arbeitsschutzforschung - Quantitativer Vergleich der nationalen und internationalen Literatur sowie der nationalen Forschungsförderung [Structure of occupational safety and health research - A guantitative comparison of the national and international literature as well as of the German national research funding]. In H. Luczak & M. Rötting (Eds.), forum arbeitsschutz - Bilanz und Zukunftsperspektiven des Forschungsfeldes. Bremerhaven, Germany: Wirtschaftsverlag NW.
• 6.Luczak, H., & Rötting M. (1999). Balance of occupational safety and health research in Germany -The use of WWW-based tools. In P. Mondelo, M. Mattila, & W. Karwowski(Eds.), Proceedings of CAES ’99 - Computer Aided Ergonomics and Safety, Barcelona, May 19th-21st, 1999 [CD-ROM]. Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya.
• 7.Luczak, H., Rötting, M., & Brueggmann, M. (2000). International comparison of OSH research. In Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress. July 29-August 4, 2000, San Diego, California USA (pp. 4-652-4-655). Santa Monica, CA, USA: Human Factors and Ergonomic Society.
• 8.Takala, J. (1999). Introducory report of the International Labour Office. Paper presenteed at the 15th World Congress on Occupational Safety and Health. São Paulo, Brazil. Available: http://www.ilo.org/public/english/protection/safework/cis/oshworld/xvwc/intrep.htm,accessed on October 15, 2001.
• 9.World Health Organization (WHO). (2000). Definition of health. Available: http://www.who.int/aboutwho/en/definition.html