Cooperation of scientific centres and companies on implementation of research results

• Autorzy: Trzmielak D.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Analysing the issue of building cooperation between the entrepreneur and scientists in order to implement research results it is necessary to pay attention to various aspects of functioning of these entities. The division into entrepreneurs and scientists itself creates barriers in thinking. This often results in unjustified fears of cooperation. One of the key factors necessary to enter science-business relations is the ability of scientific and research organizations and entrepreneurs to absorb information about their partners. The goals of scientists and entrepreneurs are often completely different and getting them closer may be as difficult as bringing the West and the East together. Nevertheless, the innovative potential of entrepreneurs requires new ideas. At the same time the efficiency of scientific and research works depends to a large extent on applying research results in economic practice. This is why it is necessary to look for areas of cooperation already at early stages of research projects. The sooner a scientist establishes relations with an entrepreneur, the greater the justification for further works on a research and scientific project.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

products R & D; technological foundation for economic and managerial; cooperation between science and industry

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwa Naukowe Instytutu Lotnictwa
• Czasopismo: Prace Instytutu Lotnictwa
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: Nr 5 (226)
• Strony: 17--34
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Trzmielak D.

• Center for Technology Transfer University of Lodz, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Balbinot Z., Bignetti L. P., Technological capabilities of high technology firm in cross border alliances, [in:] Management of technology new directions in technology management, ed. M. H. Sherif, T. M. Khail, Elsevier, 2007, p. 249-261.
• 2. Barker K., Gheorghiu L, Cameron H., United Kingdom public and collaboration in R&D, [in:] European collaboration in research and development, business strategy and public Policy, ed. Y. Caloghirou, N. S. Vonortas, S. loannides, Edward Eldar, 2002, p. 186-209.
• 3. Betz F., Academic government industry strategic research relationships, "Journal of Technology Transfer" 1997, Vol. 22, nr 2, p. 9-16.
• 4. Busenitz L. W., Innovation and performance implications of venture capital involvement in the ventures they fund, [in:] Handbook of research on venture capital, ed. H. Landstrom, Edward Eldar, 2007, p. 194-218.
• 5. Christensen C. M., Eyring H. J., The innovative university. Changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out, Jossey-Bass, 2011.
• 5. Christensen C. M., Eyring H. J.,The innovative university. Changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out, Jossey-Bass, 2011.
• 6. Conceiçâo P., Heitor M. V. Oliveira P. Santos R, On the socioeconomic context and organizational development of the research university, [in:] Science technology and innovation policy. Opportunities and challenges for the knowledge economy, ed. P. Conceiçâo, D. V. Gibson. M. V. Heitor, S. Shariq, Quorum Books, 2000, p. 99-118.
• 7. Etzkowitz H., The triple helix. University-industry- government innovation in action, Routledge, London 2009.
• 8. Guliński J., Praktyczne aspekty zarządzania przedsiębiorczością akademicką w szkole wyższej, [in:] Kreowanie działań innowacyjnych i przedsiębiorczych, - wybrane aspekty, ed. W. Potwora, Wydawnictwo Instytut Śląski, Opole 2009, p. 79-103.
• 9. Gwarda-Gruszczyńska E., Czapla T., Kluczowe kompetencje menedżera ds. komercjalizacji, PARP, Łódź 2011.
• 10. Heitor M., Introduction... in the way of a manifesto: Competence building for innovation, [in:] Collaborative design and learning competence building for innovation, ed. J. Bento, J. P. Duarte, M. V. Heitor, W. J. Mitchell, Praeger, London 2004.
• 11. Innowacje i transfer technologii. Słownik pojęć, ed. K. B. Matusiak, PARP, Seria Innowacje, Warszawa 2011.
• 12. Książek E., Pruvot J.M., Budowa sieci współpracy i partnerstwa dla komercjalizacji wiedzy i technologii, PARP, Poznań/Lille 2011.
• 13. Lange D., Belinko K., Kalligatsi K., Building successful technology commercialization teams: Pilot empirical support for the theory of cascading commitment, "Journal of Technology Transfer" 2000, Vol. 25. d. 169-180.
• 14. Markowski T., Bariery współpracy na styku nauka-praktyka a rozwój regionalny, [in:] Partnerstwo dla Innowacji, ed. B. Piasecki, K. Kubiak, Wydawnictwo SWSPiZ, Łódź 2009, p. 97-104.
• 15. Mazzoleni R., Nelson R. R., The benefits and cost of strong patent protection: A contribution to the current debate, "Research Policy" 1998, nr 27, p. 273-284.
• 16. Miller R. C, Le Boeuf B. J., Developing, Pathways to innovation from the West Coast, John Wiley, 2009.
• 17. Mitchell W. J., Challenges and opportunities for Remote Collaborative Design, [in:] Collaborative design and learning competences building for innovation, ed. J. Bento, J. P. Duarte, M. V. Heitor, W J. Mitchell, Praeger, 2004, p. 4-12.
• 18. Nowak M., Mażewska M., Mazurkiewicz S., Współpraca ośrodków innowacji z administracją publiczną, PARP, Łodź-Gdańsk- Kielce 2011.
• 19. Oh D. S., Kang B. J., Creative model of science park development: case study on Daedeok Innopolis, Korea, [in:] Global Perspectives on Technology Transfer and Commercialization. Building Innovative Ecosystems, Edward Elgar, 2011, p. 162-188.
• 20. Technology Rewiev, 2012, October, p. 40-1,46, 60-61.
• 21. Rupik K., Orientacja a wiedza przedsiębiorstwa - wybrane relacje i ich uwarunkowania, [in:] Marketing - handel-konsument w globalnym społeczeństwie informacyjnym, ed. B. Gregor, Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Wyd. UŁ, Łódź, p. 88.
• 22. Trzmielak D., Grzegorczyk M., Rola relacji w procesach komercjalizacji technologii na rynkach międzynarodowych, [in:] Transfer technologii, przedsiębiorczość innowacyjna w rozwoju firm, ed. D. Trzmielak, Centrum Transferu Technologii UŁ, Łódź 2011, p. 151-172.
• 23. Trzmielak D., Zehner W. B., Metodyka i organizacja doradztwa w zakresie transferu i komercjalizacji technologii, PARP, Łódź-Austin 2011.
• 24. Zasiadły K., Trzmielak D., Doświadczenia amerykańskie, [in:] Innowacyjna przedsiębiorczość akademicka - światowe doświadczenia, ed. J. Guliński, K. Zasiadły, PARP, Warszawa 2005, p. 119-139.
• 25. Yoon B., Phaal R., Probert D., Morphology analysis for technology roadmapping: application of text mining, "R&D Management" 2008, Vol. 38, no. 1, p. 51-68.
• 26. Yuval E., Integration of academic research into innovation projects: The case of collaboration with a University Research Institute, [in:] Applied technology and innovation management. Insights and experiences from an Industry-leading innovation center, ed. H. Arnold, M. Erner, P. Möckel, Ch. Schlaffer, Springer, Berlin 2012, p. 26-28.
• Websites
• http://www.nauka.gov.pl/fileadmin/user_upload/ministerstwo/Aktualnosci/20101210_KomercjalizacjaBR_web2.pdf.