Fuzzy logic-decision-making system dedicated to evaluation of logistics project effectiveness

• Autorzy: Pisz I. , Łapuńka I.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17270/J.LOG.2016.3.2

Warianty tytułu

PL

Rozmyty system podejmowania decyzji dedykowany ocenie skuteczności realizacji projektów logistycznych

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background: Project effectiveness is synonymous with project success. It is measured or assessed in terms of the degree to which project objectives are achieved. This paper presents an approach to evaluating the effectiveness of logistics projects. The starting point is the analysis of the current state of knowledge in the area of assessing project effectiveness, including logistics projects. The purpose of the study was to identify the critical factors determining the success of logistics projects and develop a model of logistics project effectiveness. Methods: The paper is based on the available recent scientific-theoretical research and publications and on practical studies in 25 enterprises seated in Poland. The study carried out by the authors had the form of questionnaires. The authors used a case study to validate the model of fuzzy decision-making system dedicated to estimate the level of logistics project effectiveness. Results: Based on a literature review and research findings, the authors propose the key success factors for logistics project effectiveness. In the paper the authors propose an approach to measure the level of logistics project effectiveness using their model based on fuzzy logic. This model laid the foundations for a fuzzy decision-making system in MATLAB environmental. The paper describes the implementation of the model via a case study. Conclusions: This approach allows for a more detailed description of logistics project effectiveness. The proposed model may be implemented by logisticians in an enterprise and/or supply chain. The approach can be useful to assess the level to which logistics project objectives are achieved - logistics project effectiveness.

PL

Wstęp: Efektywność projektu jest często utożsamiana z sukcesem projektu. Praca podejmuje zagadnienia związane z pomiarem i oceną skuteczności projektów, w tym przypadku projektów logistycznych. Autorzy dokonali analizy literatury tematu. Wyodrębnili kluczowe mierniki sukcesu projektów logistycznych. Na bazie przeprowadzonych badań zbudowano model skuteczności projektów logistycznych, który następnie zaimplementowano w systemie MATLAB. Metody: Praca została przygotowana w oparciu o dostępne badania zarówno teoretyczne, jak i praktyczne. Przeprowadzono badania ankietowe w 25 przedsiębiorstwach w Polsce. Wykorzystano studium przypadku celem ilustracji podjętego problemu. Rezultaty: Przygotowano zestaw mierników umożliwiających dokonanie oceny stopnia skuteczności realizacji celów projektów. Przygotowano model umożliwiający pomiar i ocenę skuteczności działań projektowych, który wykorzystuje logikę rozmytą. Opracowany model został zaimplementowany w systemie MATLAB. Wnioski: Proponowane podejście umożliwia opis problemu pomiaru i oceny skuteczności realizacji projektów logistycznych. Zaproponowane podejście może zostać wykorzystane przez logistyków, menedżerów projektów w ocenie skuteczności działań podejmowanych przez nich projektów logistycznych.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

project; logistics project; performance; effectiveness; efficiency; project success; fuzzy system; fuzzy decision-making system; fuzzy logic; MATLAB software system

PL

projekt; projekt logistyczny; efektywność; skuteczność; sprawność; sukces projektu; system rozmyty; system podejmowania decyzji; logika rozmyta; system MATLAB

• Wydawca: Wyższa Szkoła Logistyki
• Czasopismo: LogForum
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 12, no. 3
• Strony: 199--213
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Pisz I.

• Department of Logistics and Marketing, Faculty of Economics, Opole University, Ozimska 46a St, 45-058 Opole, Poland

autor

Łapuńka I.

• Department of Project Management, Faculty of Production Engineering and Logistics, Opole University of Technology, Ozimska 75 St, 45-370 Opole, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Anari R.Y., Rezaei S.F., 2013. Supply chain management competence and performance an entrepreneurial approach in Irania IT SMEs, Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4, 12, 1212-1222.
• 2. Artto K.A., Kujala J., 2008. Project business as a research field, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1, 4, 469-497.
• 3. Arway Dr.A.G., 2013. Supply chain security. A comprehensive Approach, CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Florida.
• 4. Baccarini D., 1999. The logical framework method for defining project success, Project Management Journal, 30, 4, 25-32.
• 5. Belout A., 1998. Effects of human resource management on project effectiveness and success, toward a new conceptual framework, International Journal of Project Management, 16, 1, 21-26.
• 6. Brewer P.C., Speh T.W., 2000, Using the Balanced Scorecard to measure supply chain performance, Journal of Business Logistics, 21, 1, 75-93.
• 7. Chen S.-P., 2007, Analysis of critical paths in a project network with fuzzy activity times, European Journal of Operational Research, 183, 442-459.
• 8. Dweiri F.T., Kablan M.M., 2006, Using fuzzy decision-making for the evaluation of the project management internal efficiency, Decision Support Systems, 712-726.
• 9. Floricel S., Bonneau C., Aubry M., Sergi V., 2014, Extending project management research: Insights from social theories, International Journal of Project Management, 32, 1091-1107.
• 10. Fugate B.S., Mentzer J.T., Stank T.S., 2010, Logistics performance - efficiency, effectiveness, differentiation, Journal of Business Logistics, 31, 1, 43-62.
• 11. Gokhan N.M., Needy N., 2010, Development of a Simultaneous Design for Supply Chain Process for the Optimization of the Product Design and Supply Chain Configuration Problem. Engineering Management Journal, 22, 4, 20-30.
• 12. Jaafari A., 2001, Management of risk, uncertainties and opportunities on projects: time for a fundamental shift. International Journal of Project Management, 19, 89-101.
• 13. Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P., 1992, The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance, Harvard, Business Review, January-February, 2, 71-79.
• 14. Kisperska-Moroń D., Krzyżaniak S., 2009, Logistics. ILiM, Poznań, (in Polish).
• 15. Mir F.A., Pinnington A.H., 2014, Exploring the value of project management: Linking Project Management Performance and Project Success, International Journal of Project Management, 32, 202-217.
• 16. Mustapha F.H., Naoum S., 1998, Factors influencing the effectiveness of construction site managers, International Journal of Project Management, 16, 1, 1-8.
• 17. Nassa V.K., Yadav S.K., 2012, Project Management Efficiency - A Fuzzy Logic Approach, International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 1, 3, 34-38.
• 18. PPML Polish Logistics Managers Panel. Report 2011. Logistics projects - experience of Polish enterprises. Logisys, Kraków. (in Polish)
• 19. Pisz I. 2011a, Controlling of logistics project. Total Logistics Management, 4, 107-125.
• 20. Pisz I. 2011b, Identification and risk assessment of logistics project. [in:] Selected logistics problems and solutions. MONOGRAPH. Grzybowska K., Golińska P. (eds.), Poznan House of Poznan University of Technology, Poznań, 227-242.
• 21. Pisz I., 2013. Multi-criteria evaluation of the efficiency of logistics projects based on the Balanced Scorecard and fuzzy set theory. Logistics, 5, 64-169. (in Polish)
• 22. Pisz I., Kolasa-Więcek A., 2013. Approach to the assessment of the efficiency of logistics projects using fuzzy inference systems (in Polish). [in:] The chosen issue of logistics in practice. Lichota A., Majewska K. (eds.), AGH, Kraków, 1, 281-294.
• 23. Pisz I., Łapuńka I., 2015. Project management in Logistics, Difin, Warszawa, (in Polish).
• 24. Porter M.E., Kramer M.R., 2011. Creating Shared Value, Harvard Business Review, Jan/Feb, 89, 1/2, 62-77.
• 25. Rudnik K., Pisz I., 2014. Probabilistic fuzzy approach to evaluation of logistics service effectiveness. Management and Production Engineering Review, 5, 4, December, 66-75.
• 26. Santos F.J.J., Camargo H.A., 2010. Fuzzy systems for multicriteria decision-making, CLEI Electronic Journal, 13, 3, December, 1-8.
• 27. Zadeh L.A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.