Problem of Non-Measured Points in Surface Texture Measurements

• Autorzy: Pawlus P. , Reizer R. , Wieczorowski M.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/mms-2017-0046

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This work is focused on the issue of non-measured points – one of the most important problems in surface texture measurements using optical methods. The fundamental aim of this research is to analyse errors of surface texture measurements caused by the presence of non-measured points. This study is divided into two parts. In the first part, circles with non-measured points were artificially created on peak portions of measured surfaces. In the second part – the results of measurement by a Talysurf CCI Lite interferometer were analysed. A measurement area of 3.3 × 3.3 mm contained 1024 × 1024 points. The measurements were performed with different intensity of light. Changes of parameters regarding the analysed errors depended on a surface type. The following parameters are susceptible to errors: skewness Ssk, areal material ratio Smr, as well as the following feature parameters: Spd, Sda, Sdv, Sha and Shv. Inaccuracies of measurement in valley parts of two-process textures led usually to larger errors of parameter computations compared with deviations in peak portions.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

surface texture measurements; optical method; non-measured points; white light interferometer

• Wydawca: Komitet Metrologii i Aparatury Naukowej PAN
• Czasopismo: Metrology and Measurement Systems
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 24, nr 3
• Strony: 525--536
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Pawlus P.

• Rzeszow University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Al. Powstańcow Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland

autor

Reizer R.

• University of Rzeszow, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Centre for Innovative Technologies, Al. Rejtana 16c, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland

autor

Wieczorowski M.

• Poznan University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Management, Pl. Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie 5, 60-965 Poznań, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Wieczorowski, M., Mrozek, R., Andrałojć. P. (2010). The use of surface asperities analysis to investigate wear of bodies in contact on example of brake elements. Metrol. Meas. Syst., 17(2), 271-278.
• [2] Twardowski, P. (2011). Surface roughness analysis in milling tungsten carbide with CBN cutters. Metrol. Meas. Syst., 18(1), 105-114.
• [3] Wojciechowski, S., Twardowski, P., Wieczorowski, M. (2014). Surface texture analysis after ball end milling with various surface inclination of hardened steel. Metrol. Meas. Syst., 21(1), 145-156.
• [4] Krolczyk, G.M., Legutko, S. (2014). Experimental analysis by measurement of surface roughness variations in turning process of duplex stainless steel. Metrol. Meas. Syst., 21(4), 759-770.
• [5] Lipiński, D., Kacalak, W. (2016). Metrological aspects of abrasive tool active surface topography evaluation. Metrol. Meas. Syst., 23(4), 567-577.
• [6] Krolczyk, G.M., Krolczyk, J.B., Maruda, R.W., Legutko, S., Tomaszewski, M. (2016). Metrological Changes in Surface Morphology of High-Strength Steels in Manufacturing Processes. Measurement, 88, 176-185.
• [7] Krolczyk, G.M., Maruda, R.W., Nieslony, P., Wieczorowski, M. (2016). Surface morphology analysis of Duplex Stainless Steel (DSS) in Clean Production using the Power Spectral Density. Measurement, 94, 464-470.
• [8] Rosen, B.G., Anderberg, C., Ohlsson, R. (2008). Parameter correlation study of cylinder liner roughness for production and quality control. Proc. of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 222, 1475-1487.
• [9] Blateyron, F. (2013). The areal field parameters. Leach, R.K. Characterisation of Areal Surface Texture, Springer, 15-43.
• [10] Pawlus, P., Wieczorowski, M., Mathia, T. (2014). The errors of stylus methods in surface topography measurements. Zapol.
• [11] Murugarajan, A., Samuel, G.L. (2011). Measurement, modelling and evaluation of surface parameter using capacitive-sensor-based measurement system. Metrol. Meas. Syst., 18(3), 403-418.
• [12] Zawada-Tomkiewicz, A. (2010). Estimation of surface roughness parameter based on machined surface image. Metrol. Meas. Syst., 17(3), 493-504.
• [13] Salazar, F., Belenguer, T., García, T., Ramos, T. (2012). On roughness measurement by angular speckle correlation. Metrol. Meas. Syst., 19(2), 373-380.
• [14] Whitehouse, D.J. (1983). Some theoretical aspects of a practical measurement problem in plateau honing. Int. J. Prod. Res., 21(2), 215-221.
• [15] Mummery, L. (1990). Surface texture analysis, the handbook. Hommelwerke GmbH.
• [16] Brinkman, S., Bodschwinna, H. (2003). Advanced Gaussian filters. Assessment surface topography, Blunt, L., Jiang, X. (eds.). Kogan Page Science, London and Sterling, 62-89.
• [17] Brinkman, S., Bodschwinna, H., Lemke, H.W. (2000). Development of a robust Gaussian regression filter for three-dimensional surface analysis. X International Colloquium on Surfaces. Chemnitz, Germany, 122-131.
• [18] Li, H., Jiang, X., Li, Z. (2004). Robust estimation in gaussian filtering for engineering surface characterization. Precis. Eng., 28(2), 186-193.
• [19] Dobrzanski, P., Pawlus, P. (2010). Digital filtering of surface topography: Part II. Applications of robust and valley suppression filters. Precis. Eng., 34 (3), 651-658.
• [20] Whitehouse, D.J. (2011). Surface metrology today: complicated, confusing effective? Proc. of the 13th International Conference on Metrology and properties of Engineering Surfaces. Twickenham Stadium, UK, 1-10.
• [21] Leach, R.K. (2011). Optical measurement of surface topography. Springer.
• [22] Vorburger, T.V., Rhee, H.G., Renegar, T.B., Song, J.F., Zheng A. (2007). Comparison of optical and stylus methods for measurement of surface texture. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 33(1), 110-118.
• [23] De Groot, P. (2015). Principles of interference microscopy for the measurement of surface topography. Adv. Opt. Photonics, 7(1), 1-65.
• [24] de Groot, P. (2011). Coherence scanning interferometry. Optical Measurement of Surface Topography, Leach, R. (ed.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg.
• [25] Podulka, P., Pawlus, P., Dobrzański. P., Lenart, A. (2014). Spikes removal in surface measurement. J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 483(1), 012025.
• [26] Pawlus, P., Grabon, W., Reizer, R., Gorka, S. (2015). A study of variations of areal parameters on machined surfaces. Surf. Topog.: Metrol. Prop., 3(2), 025003.
• [27] Dzierwa, A., Reizer, R., Pawlus, P., Grabon, W. (2014). Variability of areal surface topography parameters due to the change in surface orientation to measurement direction. Scanning, 36(1), 170-183.
• [28] Grabon, W., Pawlus, P., Sep, J. (2010). Tribological characteristics of one-process and two-process cylinder liner honed surfaces under reciprocating sliding conditions. Tribol. Int., 43(10), 1882-1892.
• [29] Johansson, S., Nilsson, P.H., Ohlsson, R., Anderberg, C., Rosen, B.G. (2008). New cylinder liner surfaces for low oil consumption. Tribol. Int., 41(9-10), 854-859.
• [30] Yousfi, M., Mezghani, S., Demirci, I., El Mansori, M. (2015). Smoothness and plateauness contributions to the running-in friction and wear of stratified helical slide and plateau honed cylinder liners. Wear, 332-333, 1238-1247.
• [31] Mezghani, S., Demirci, I., Yousfi, M., El Mansori, M. (2013). Mutual influence of crosshatch angle and superficial roughness of honed surfaces on friction in ring-pack tribo-system. Tribol. Int., 66, 54-59.

Uwagi

EN

Part of this work was supported by the Polish National Centre of Research and Development (the project contract No. PBS2/A6/20/2013/NCBiR/24/10/2013; “Research and evaluation of reliability of modern methods of surface topography measurements in micro and nano scale”).

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).