Methods and tools in landscape persistence imaging with the example of a stratigraphy model

• Autorzy: Żemła-Siesicka Anna , Myga-Piątek Urszula

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.57599/gisoj.2021.1.1.5

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Cultural landscape stratigraphy is a concept based on geological epoch imaging. It refers to a method of interpretation of the specific arrangement and relations between cultural layers visible in the landscape. The number of layers and their age carry information about the persistence of a given landscape type and structure. For a specific site (region, landscape unit) and scale, the layers can be illustrated in a graphical notation of a coordinate system, where the vertical axis (y) represents the time intervals and the x and z axes illustrate the spatial location in Cartesian coordinates of a given landscape unit. This paper aims to present the landscape stratigraphy model, taking into account the necessary differences depending on the landscape scales. Three levels of analysis are presented. On the mesoscale (level of geographical mesoregion), the landscape stratigraphy includes the biography and schematic imaging of the area. The microscale (level of landscape units and level of landscape interior) contains three types of imaging: cartographic, spatial digital (3D), and spatial graphic drawing. These two scales differ in their imaging detail. The landscape stratigraphy model is based on analysis of both literature and cartographic sources. The stratigraphy imaging includes two steps: the analysis of historical and contemporary maps performed in GIS, and the creation of an appropriate type of imaging, using 3D modelling software, vector graphic software, and a graphic tablet. The landscape stratigraphy model can be used in landscape persistence identification, and landscape protection and forecasting. Moreover, the attractive visualisation of landscape changes can be helpful in landscape education.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

landscape stratigraphy; historic landscape imaging; landscape visualisation; landscape changes; landscape analysis; cultural landscape

PL

stratygrafia krajobrazu; obrazowanie krajobrazu historycznego; wizualizacja krajobrazu; zmiany krajobrazu; analiza krajobrazu; krajobraz kulturowy

• Wydawca: SILGIS Association ; Croatian-Polish Scientific Network
• Czasopismo: GIS Odyssey Journal
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 1, no. 1
• Strony: 5--20
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 40 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Żemła-Siesicka Anna

• University of Silesia, Department of Natural Sciences, Sosnowiec, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1677-8119

autor

Myga-Piątek Urszula

• University of Silesia, Department of Natural Sciences, Sosnowiec, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4735-8582

Bibliografia

• 1. Affek. A. (2016). Dynamika krajobrazu. Uwarunkowania i prawidłowości na przykładzie dorzecza Wiaru w Karpatach (XVIII–XXI wiek) (Landscape dynamics. Determinants and patterns on the example of the Wiar river basin in the Carpathians (18th–21st century). Prace Geograficzne, 251, 247 pp.
• 2. Birks H.H., Birks H.J.B., Kaland P.E., Moe D. (ed.) (1988). The cultural landscape: past, present and future. Cambridge University Press.
• 3. Buttler R.W.H., Spencer S. (1999). Landscape evolution and the preservation of tectonic landforms along the northern Yammouneh Fault. Lebanon Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 162, pp. 143–156.
• 4. Chmielewski, T.J. (2012). Systemy krajobrazowe: struktura-funkcjonowanie-planowanie (Landscape systems: structure-functioning-planning). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• 5. Chmielewski T.J., Kułak A., Michalik-Śnieżek M. (2015). How to evaluate and forecast changes in landscape image: The case of a Small River Valley in Poland. Landscape Research, 40(4), pp. 466–475.
• 6. Chmielewski T.J., Myga-Piątek U., Solon J. (2015). Typologia aktualnych krajobrazów Polski (Typology of Poland’s current landscapes). Przegląd Geograficzny, 87(3), pp. 377–408.
• 7. Chmielewski T.J., Butler A., Kułak A., Chmielewski S. (2018). Landscape’s physiognomic structure: conceptual development and practical applications. Landscape Research, 43(3), pp. 410–427. DOI:10.1080/01426397.2017.1314454.
• 8. Crumley C.L., Kolen J.C., de Kleijn M., van Manen N. (2017). Studying long-term changes in cultural landscapes: Outlines of a research framework and protocol. Landscape Research, 42(8), pp. 880-890. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1386292.
• 9. Darvill T. (2006). Stonehenge. The biography of a landscape. Stroud: Tempus Publishing.
• 10. Database of Topographic Object, 2014 and 2020, 1:10 000. https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl [access: 10.05.2021].
• 11. Database of Topographic Object, V Map Level 2, 2007, 1:50 000. https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl [access: 10.05.2021].
• 12. Dobrowolska M. (1948). Dynamika krajobrazu kulturalnego (Cultural landscape dynamics). Przegląd Geograficzny, 21(1), pp. 151–205.
• 13. Geoportal.gov.pl. https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html?gpmap=gp0 (access: 1.06.2021).
• 14. Godziek J., Szypuła B. (2020). Durability of forest cover in the Ochotnica Valley (Gorce mts.) and in the Solinka Valley (Bieszczady mts.) in the 18th-21st centuries. Geographia Polonica, 93(1), pp. 69-88, DOI: 10.7163/GPol.0163.
• 15. Grădinaru S.R., Iojă C.I., Pătru-Stupariu I., Hersperger A.M. (2017). Are spatial planning objectives reflected in the evolution of urban landscape patterns? A framework for the evaluation of spatial planning outcomes. Sustainability, 9(8), p. 1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081279.
• 16. Houtkamp J., de Boer A., Kramer H. (2014). Visualisation of Place and Landscape. In: L. Egberts, K. Bosma (ed.), Companion to European Heritage Revivals. Springer, pp. 169–188.
• 17. Jenkins J., Milligan B., Huang Y. (2020). Seeing the forest for more than the trees: aesthetic and contextual malleability of preferences for climate change adaptation strategies. Ecology and Society, 25(4).
• 18. Kobyliński Z. (2019). Od archeologii osadnictwa do biografii krajobrazu: archeologia polska wobec współczesnych perspektyw badań relacji między człowiekiem a środowiskiem w przeszłości (From the archaeology of settlement to the biography of landscapes: polish archaeology and the contemporary prospects for research on the relationship between humans and the environment in the past). Przegląd Archeologiczny, 67, pp. 9–30. DOI: 10.23858/PA67.2019.001.
• 19. Kondracki J. (2002). Geografia regionalna Polski (Regional geography of Poland), PWN, Warszawa.
• 20. Koter M. (1976). Relikty osadnictwa średnio-wiecznego w planie współczesnej Łodzi (Relics of medieval settlements in the plan of contemporary Łódź). Przegląd Geograficzny, 48, pp. 667–687.
• 21. Koter M., Kulesza M. (1994). Badania geograficzno-historyczne osadnictwa miejskiego w Polsce w latach 1918–1993 (Geographical and historical studies of urban settlements in Poland between 1918 and 1993). In: S. Liszewski (ed.), Geografia osadnictwa i ludności w latach 1918–1993, 2, PTG, Łódź, pp. 131–158.
• 22. Lieskovský J., Kenderessy P., Špulerová J., Lieskovský T., Koleda P., Kienast F., Gimmi U. (2014). Factors affecting the persistence of traditional agricultural landscapes in Slovakia during the collectivization of agriculture. Landscape Ecology, 29, pp. 867–877. DOI:10.1007/s10980-014-0023-1.
• 23. Lieskovský J., Bürgi M. (2017). Persistence in cultural landscapes: A pan-European analysis. Regional Environmental Change, 18, pp. 175–187. DOI:10.1007/s10113- 017-1192-7.
• 24. Musiaka Ł., Sudra P., Spórna T. (2021). Spatial Chaos as a Result of War Damage and Post-War Transformations. Example of the Small Town of Węgorzewo. Land, 10(5), p. 541. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10050541.
• 25. Myga-Piątek U. (2012). Krajobrazy kulturowe. Aspekty ewolucyjne i typologiczne (Cultural Landscapes. Evolutionary and typological aspects). Katowice: Uniwersytet Śląski, Poland, pp. 1–376.
• 26. Myga-Piątek U. (2018). Model stratygrafii krajobrazów kulturowych. W poszukiwaniu typologii ewolucyjno-genetycznej (Stratigraphic model of cultural landscapes – in search for evolutionary-genetic typology). Prace Komisji Krajobrazu Kulturowego, 39(1), pp. 207-223. DOI:10.30450/201812.
• 27. Orthophotomaps, 1:5 000, M-34-52-C-a-3 – 1996, 2003, 2009, 2015, 2019. https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl [access: 10.05.2021].
• 28. Pernreiter S., González-Álvarez I., Klump J., Smith G., Ibrahimi T. (2019). Landscape evolution mapping in the south of Western Australia: a proxy to assist mineral exploration under cover. Geophysical Research, Abstracts, p. 21.
• 29. Plotnick R.E. (2012). Landscape ecology and quantitative stratigraphy parallel perspectives on spatial heterogeneity. Society for Sedimentary Geology (SEPM).
• 30. Pouncett J. (2007). Network Analysis and Landscape Stratigraphy. In: A. Figueiredo, G. Leite Velho (ed.) The world is in your eyes. CAA2005. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Proceedings of the 33rd Conference, Tomar, March 2005. CAA Portugal, Tomar, pp. 397–402.
• 31. Raszeja E. (2015). Ochrona krajobrazu w procesie przekształceń obszarów wiejskich (Landscape protection in rural transformation). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego w Poznaniu.
• 32. Sauer C.O. (1925). Morphology of landscape. Univ. of Calif., Public in Geography, 2/2, University of California, Berkley, pp. 19–54.
• 33. Schama S. (1995). Landscape and memory. A.A. Knopf.
• 34. Schulp C.J., Levers C., Kuemmerle T., Tieskens K., Verburg P. (2019). Mapping and modelling past and future land use change in Europe’s cultural landscapes. Land Use Policy, 80, pp. 332–344. DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.030.
• 35. Sobala M. (2018). Pasture landscape durability in the Beskid Mountains (Western Carpathians, Poland), Geographia Polonica, 91(2), pp. 197-216. DOI: 10.7163/GPol.0117.
• 36. Solon J., Borzyszkowski J., Bidłasik M., Richling A., Badora K., Balon J., Brzezińska- Wójcik T., Chabudziński Ł., Dobrowolski R., Grzegorczyk I. et al. (2018). Physico- geographical mesoregions of Poland: Verification and adjustment of boundaries on the basis of contemporary spatial data. Geographia Polonica, 91, pp. 143–170. DOI:10.7163/gpol.0115.
• 37. Topographic map 1965, 1:50 000. https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl [access: 10.05.2021].
• 38. Topographic map of the Kingdom of Poland, 1831, 1:126 000. https://bg.uwb.edu.pl [access: 10.05.2021].
• 39. Topographic map, 1944, 1:100 000 (scans). https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl [access: 10.05.2021].
• 40. Żemła-Siesicka A., Myga-Piątek U. (2021). A Landscape Persistence Assessment of Częstochowa Upland: A Case Study of Ogrodzieniec, Poland. Sustainability, 13(11), 6408. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116408.