Implementation of the LQG controller for a wind turbine tower-nacelle model with an mr tuned vibration absorber

Rosół, M.; Martynowicz, P.

doi:10.15632/jtam-pl.54.4.1109

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Implementation of the LQG controller for a wind turbine tower-nacelle model with an mr tuned vibration absorber

Autorzy

Rosół M. , Martynowicz P.

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Rosół_Martynowicz_Implementation_54_4_2016.pdf

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15632/jtam-pl.54.4.1109

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Vibration of a wind turbine tower is related to fatigue wear, influencing reliability of the whole structure. The current paper deals with the problem of Linear-Quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) tower vibration control using specially designed and built simulation and laboratory tower-nacelle models with a horizontally aligned, magnetorheological (MR) damper based tuned vibration absorber located at the nacelle. Force excitation applied horizontally to the tower itself, or to the nacelle, is considered. The MR damper LQG control algorithm, including the Kalman state observer and LQR (Linear-Quadratic-Regulator) controller is analysed numerically and implemented on the laboratory ground, in comparison with the system with a deactivated absorber. Simulation and experimental results are presented.

Słowa kluczowe

wind turbine tower vibration tuned vibration absorber MR damper LQG control

Wydawca

Polskie Towarzystwo Mechaniki Teoretycznej i Stosowanej

Czasopismo

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics

Rocznik

2016

Tom

Vol. 54 nr 4

Strony

1109--1123

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 42 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Rosół M.

mr@agh.edu.pl

AGH University of Science and Technology, Department of Automatics and Biomedical Engineering, Cracow, Poland

autor

Martynowicz P.

pmartyn@agh.edu.pl

AGH University of Science and Technology, Department of Process Control, Cracow, Poland

Bibliografia

1. Asai T., Spencer Jr. B.F., 2014, Model-free algorithms for seismic response control employing controllable dampers, Proceedings of the VI World Conference on Structural Control and Monitoring, Barcelona
2. Asai T., Spencer Jr. B.F., Iemura H., Chang C.-M., 2013, Nature of seismic control force in acceleration feedback, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 20, 789-803
3. Athans M., 1971, The role and use of the stochastic linear-quadratic-Gaussian problem in control system design, IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, 16, 6, 529-552
4. Bak C., Bitsche R., Yde A., Kim T., Hansen M.H., Zahle F., Gaunaa M., Blasques J., Dossing M., Wedel-Heinen J-J., Behrens T., 2012, Light rotor: the 10-MW reference wind turbine, European Wind Energy Association Annual Event, 16-19.04, Copenhagen, Denmark
5. Butt U.A., Ishihara T., 2012, Seismic load evaluation of wind turbine support structures considering low structural damping and soil structure interaction, European Wind Energy Association Annual Event, 16-19.04, Copenhagen, Denmark
6. COMSOL AB, 2008, COMSOL Multiphysics MATLAB Interface Guide, COMSOL Version 3.5a, November
7. Den Hartog J.P., 1985, Mechanical Vibrations, Dover Publications, Mineola, NY
8. Dyke S.J., Spencer Jr. B.F., Sain M.K., Carlson J.D., 1996a, A new semi-active control device for seismic response reduction, Proceedings of the 11th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Specialty Conference, 886-889
9. Dyke S.J., Spencer Jr. B.F., Sain M.K., Carlson J.D., 1996b, Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction, Smart Materials and Structures, 5, 5, 565-575
10. Enevoldsen I., Mork K.J., 1996, Effects of vibration mass damper in a wind turbine tower, Mechanics of Structures and Machines, 24, 2, 155-187
11. Favoreel W., De Moor B., Gevers M., Van Overschee P., 1999, Closed loop model- -free subspace-based LQG-design, Proceedings of the 7th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED99), Haifa, Israel, 1926-1939
12. Hansen M.H., Fuglsang P., Thomsen K., Knudsen T., 2012, Two methods for estimating aeroelastic damping of operational wind turbine modes from experiments, European Wind Energy Association Annual Event, 16-19.04, Copenhagen, Denmark
13. Hjalmarsson H., Gevers M., Gunnarsson S., Lequin O., 1998, Iterative feedback tuning: theory and applications, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 18, 26-4.
14. Jain P., 2011, Wind Energy Engineering, McGraw-Hill
15. Jelavić M., Perić N., Petrović I., 2007, Damping of wind turbine tower oscillations through rotor speed control, EVER Conference 2007, March 29-April 1, Monaco
16. Kawamura Y., 1998, Direct construction of LQ regulator based on orthogonalization of signals: Dynamical output feedback, Systems and Control Letters, 34, 1-9
17. Kciuk S., Martynowicz P., 2011, Special application magnetorheological valve numerical and experimental analysis, [In:] Diffusion and Defect Data – Solid State Data. Pt. B, Solid State Phenomena, Vol. 177: Control Engineering in Materials Processing, 102-115
18. Kirkegaard P.H. et al., 2002, Semiactive vibration control of a wind turbine tower using an MR damper, Structural Dynamics EURODYN 2001, H. Grundmann (Edit.), CRC Press
19. Koo J.H., Ahmadian M., 2007, Qualitative analysis of magneto-rheological tuned vibration absorbers: experimental approach, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 18
20. Łatas W., Martynowicz P., 2012, Modelling of vibration of the tower-nacelle system of a wind power plant with a dynamic damper (in Polish), Modelowanie Inżynierskie, 13, 44, 187-198
21. Ljung L., 2015, System Identification ToolboxTM. User’s Guide, MATLAB&Simulink R2015a, The MathWorks Inc., USA
22. Lord Rheonetic, 2002, MR Controllable Friction Damper RD-1097-01 Product Bulletin
23. Martynowicz P., 2014a, Development of laboratory model of wind turbine’s tower-nacelle system with magnetorheological tuned vibration absorber, Solid State Phenomena, 208, 40-51
24. Martynowicz P., 2014b, Wind turbine’s tower-nacelle model with magnetorheological tuned vibration absorber – numerical and experimental analysis, 6WCSCM: Proceedings of the 6th Edition of the World Conference of the International Association for Structural Control and Monitoirng (IACSM), 15-17.07, Barcelona, Spain
25. Martynowicz P., 2015, Vibration control of wind turbine tower-nacelle model with magnetorheological tuned vibration absorber, Journal of Vibration and Control, doi: 10.1177/1077546315591445
26. Martynowicz P., 2016, Study of vibration control using laboratory test rig of wind turbine tower- -nacelle system with MR damper based tuned vibration absorber, Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Technical Sciences, 64, 2, 347359
27. Martynowicz P., Szydło Z., 2013, Wind turbine’s tower-nacelle model with magnetorheological tuned vibration absorber: the laboratory test rig, Proceedings of the 14th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC), 26-29.05, Rytro, Poland
28. Matachowski F., Martynowicz P., 2012, Analysis of dynamics of a wind power plant by making use of Comsol Multiphysics environment (in Polish), Modelowanie Inżynierskie, 13, 44, 209-216
29. Namik H., and Stol K., 2011, Performance analysis of individual blade pitch control of offshore wind turbines on two floating platforms, Mechatronics, 21, 691-703
30. Oh S., Ishihara T., 2013, A study on structure parameters of an offshore wind turbine by excitation test using active mass damper, EWEA Offshore, 19-21.11, Frankfurt
31. Rotea M.A., Lackner M.A., Saheba R., 2010, Active structural control of offshore wind turbines, 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 4-7.01, Orlando, Florida
32. Sapiński B., Martynowicz P., 2005, Vibration control in a pitch-plane suspension model with MR shock absorbers, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 43, 3.
33. Sapiński B., Rosół M., 2007, MR damper performance for shock isolation, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 45, 1, 133-146
34. Sapiński B., Rosół M., 2008, Autonomous control system for a 3 DOF pitch-plane suspension model with MR shock absorbers, Computers and Structures, 86, 3/5, 379-385
35. Shan W., Shan M., 2012, Gain scheduling pitch control design for active tower damping and 3p harmonic reduction, European Wind Energy Association Annual Event, 16-19.04, Copenhagen, Denmark
36. Singhal T., Harit Akshat, Vishwakarma D.N., 2012, Kalman filter implementation on an accelerometer sensor data for three state estimation of a dynamic system, International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 1, 6, ISSN 2277-4378
37. Snamina J., Martynowicz P., 2014,Prediction of characteristics of wind turbine’s tower-nacelle system from investigation of its scaled model, 6WCSCM: Proceedings of the 6th Edition of the World Conference of the International Association for Structural Control and Monitoirng (IACSM), 15-17.07, Barcelona, Spain
38. Snamina J., Martynowicz P., Łatas W., 2014, Dynamic similarity of wind turbine’s Tower- -nacelle system and its scaled model, Solid State Phenomena, 208, 29-39
39. Snamina J., Sapiński B., 2011, Energy balance in self-powered MR damper-based vibration reduction system, Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Technical Sciences, 59, 1, 75-80
40. TMS, 2010, 60 Lbf Modal Shaker, The Modal Shop Inc.
41. Tsouroukdissian A., Carcangiu C.E., Pineda Amo I., Martin M., Fischer T., Kuhnle B., Scheu M., 2011, Wind turbine tower load reduction using passive and semiactive dampers, European Wind Energy Association Annual Event, Brussels
42. Wang Y., Dyke S., 2013, Modal-based LQG for smart base isolation system design in seismic response control, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 20, 5, 753-768

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniajacą naukę.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-b35a5636-e633-48fd-9272-20697831caba