Agriculture and science collaboration: the case of Łódź Voivodeship (Poland)

• Autorzy: Baraniak Marta

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.34659/2021/4/32

Warianty tytułu

PL

Współpraca rolnictwa z nauką: przykład województwa łódzkiego (Polska)

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article aims to evaluate the cooperation of Polish farmers from ŁódźVoivodeship with science and other farmers in the field of implementing innovation in farms. Paper and Pencil Interview (PAPI) method was used. The analysis covers150 Polish farms located in the Łódź Voivodeship. The farms for the study were selected from the Polish FADN (Farm Accountancy Data Network) sample. The study was made in 2018. The conducted research has proved that interest in scientific achieve-ments depends on the innovativeness of farms. The cooperation between Polish farmers from Łódź Voivodeship in the field of innovation activity does not differ in terms of their farming type. A conse-quence of the farms' selection is the lack of the ability to generalise the results to the entire population of farms in the Łódź Voivodeship. The added value of the analysis is the presentation of the results in terms of farm innovation.

PL

Celem artykułu jest ocena współpracy polskich rolników z województwa łódzkiego z nauką i innymi rolnikami w zakresie wdrażania innowacji w gospodarstwach rolnych. Wykorzystano metodę Paper and Pencil Interview (PAPI). Analiza obejmuje 150 polskich gospodarstw położonych w województwie łódzkim. Gospodarstwa do badań zostały wybrane z próby Polskiego FADN (Sieć Danych Rachunkowych Gospodarstw Rolnych). Badania wykonano w 2018 roku. Przeprowadzone badania wykazały, że zainteresowanie osiągnięciami naukowymi zależy od innowacyjności gospodarstw. Relacje polskich rolników z województwa łódzkiego w zakresie działalności innowacyjnej nie różnią się w zależności od prowadzonej działalności. Konsekwencją doboru podmiotów jest brak możliwości uogólnienia wyników na całą populację gospodarstw w województwie łódzkim. Wartością dodaną analizy jest prezentacja wyników w zakresie innowacyjności gospodarstw.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

agricultural innovation; farm; science collaboration

PL

innowacje rolnicze; gospodarstwo rolne; współpraca rolnictwa z nauką

• Wydawca: Polskie Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistów Środowiska i Zasobów Naturalnych
• Czasopismo: Ekonomia i Środowisko
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: nr 4
• Strony: 133--148
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 34 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Baraniak Marta

• University of Lodz, Faculty of Management, Matejki Street 22/26, 90-237, Łódź, Poland

• https://orcid.org/+0000-0002-6186-9514

Bibliografia

• Berthet, E. T., Bosshardt, S., Malicet-Chebbah, L., Frank, G. V., Weil, B., Segrestin, B., Goldringer, I., 2020. Designing innovative management for cultivated biodiversity: lessons from a pioneering collaboration between french farmers, facilitators and researchers around participatory bread wheat breeding. Sustainability, 12(2), 605, doi:10.3390/su12020605.
• Blank, S. C., & Weber, S. 1994. Financing agriculture in California’s new risk environment: Proceedings of a conference on December 1, 1993, in Sacramento, California. Davis, CA: Agricultural Issues Center, University of California.
• Böök, S. A., & Johansson, T., 1988. The co-operative movement in Sweden: past, present – the future. Stockholm: Swedish Soc. for Co-operative Studies.
• Broekel, T., & Boschma, R., 2012. Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: the proximity paradox. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(2), 409-433, doi:10. 1093/jeg/lbr010.
• Cialdella, N., Dobremez, L., & Madelrieux, S., 2009. Livestock farming systems in urban mountain regions. Outlook on Agriculture, 38(2), 127-135, doi:10.5367/000000 009788632412.
• Deuninck, J., Carels, K., Van Gijseghem, D., & Piessens, I., 2008. Innovatie in land- en tuinbouw in Vlaanderen: resultaten van het Landbouwmonitoringsnetwerk [Innovation in agriculture and horticulture in Flanders: Results of the Agricultural Monitoring Network] (Rep.). Brussels, Belgium: Department Landbouw en Visserij.
• Diederen, P., Wolters, A., & Van Meijl, H., 2002. Innovation and farm performance: the case of Dutch agriculture. In A. Kleinknecht & P. Mohnen (Eds.), Innovation and firm performance: econometric explorations of survey data (pp. 73-85), London, United Kingdom: Palgrave MacMillan.
• Floriańczyk, Z., Osuch, D., & Płonka, R., 2019. Wyniki Standardowe 2018 uzyskane przez gospodarstwa rolne uczestniczące w Polskim FADN: Część I. Wyniki Standardowe, Warszawa, Polska: Polski FADN.
• Franks, J. R., Emery, S., Whittingham, M., & McKenzie, A., 2016. Farmer attitudes to cross-holding agri-environment schemes and their implications for Countryside Stewardship. International Journal of Agricultural Management, 5(4), 78-95, doi:10.5836/ijam/2016-05-78.
• Franks, J., & Gloin, A. M., 2007. Environmental co-operatives as instruments for delivering across-farm environmental and rural policy objectives: Lessons for the UK. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(4), 472-489, doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.03.002.
• Hoffmann, V., Probst, K., & Christinck, A., 2007. Farmers and researchers: how can collaborative advantages be created in participatory research and technology development? Agriculture and Human Values, 24(3), 355-368, doi:10.1007/s10460-007-9072-2.
• Hong, J., Yu, W., Guo, X., & Zhao, D., 2014. Creative industries agglomeration, regional innovation and productivity growth in China. Chinese Geographical Science, 24(2), 258-268, doi:10.1007/s11769-013-0617-6.
• Kilungu, S., & Meadu, V., 2014. Helping farmers catch their dreams, even as the climate changes,https://ccafs.cgiar.org/blog/helping-farmers-catch-their-dreamseven-climate-changes [01-07-2020].
• Lalic, B., Tasic, N., Marjanovic, U., Delic, M., & Cvetkovic, N., 2016. Inter-organisational collaboration for innovation in manufacturing firms. Proceedings of the 27th International DAAAM Symposium 2016 DAAAM Proceedings, 0721-0729, doi:10.2507/27th.daaam.proceedings.104.
• Lantbrucarnas Riksförbund and Swedish Cooperative Centre, 1980. Farmers’ cooperation in Sweden: origins and development, Stockholm: Lts. Förlag.
• Läpple, D., Renwick, A., & Thorne, F., 2015. Measuring and understanding the drivers of agricultural innovation: Evidence from Ireland. Food Policy, 51, 1-8, doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.11.003.
• Li, E., Li, X., & Liu, Z., 2011. Relationships and evolving networks of rural manufacturing clusters: a case study in Yucheng County, Henan Province of China. Chinese Geographical Science, 21(3), 364-376, doi:10.1007/s11769-011-0449-1.
• Liefner, I., & Hennemann, S., 2011. Structural holes and new dimensions of distance: the spatial configuration of the Scientific Knowledge Network of China’s optical technology sector. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 43(4), 810- 829, doi:10.1068/a43100.
• Lipton, M., 1976. Agricultural finance and rural credit in poor countries. World Development, 4(7), 543-553. doi:10.1016/0305-750x(76)90065-6.
• Liu, B., Xu, W., Liu, J., Yao, B., Zhou, Z., & Pham, D. T., 2019. Human-robot collaboration for Disassembly Line Balancing Problem in remanufacturing. Volume 1: Additive Manufacturing; Manufacturing Equipment and Systems; Bio and Sustainable Manufacturing, doi:10.1115/msec2019-2919.
• Loboguerrero, A. M., Boshell, F., León, G., Martinez-Baron, D., Giraldo, D., Mejía, L. R., Cock, J., 2018. Bridging the gap between climate science and farmers in Colombia. Climate Risk Management, 22, 67-81, doi:10.1016/j.crm.2018.08.001.
• Lutz, J., Smetschka, B., & Grima, N., 2017. Farmer cooperation as a means for creating local food systems – Potentials and Challenges. Sustainability, 9(6), 925, doi:10.3390/su9060925.
• Meinke, H., Howden, S. M., Baethgen, W., Hammer, G. L., Selvaraju, R., & Stone, R. C., 2013. Can climate knowledge lead to better rural policies and risk management practices? NOAA Workshop: Insights and Tools for Adaptation: Learning from Climate Variability, Washington.
• Mikhaylov, S. J., Esteve, M., & Campion, A., 2018. Artificial intelligence for the public sector: opportunities and challenges of cross-sector collaboration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2128), 20170357, doi:10.1098/rsta.2017.0357.
• Mishra, A., Hansen, J. W., Dingkuhn, M., Baron, C., Traoré, S. B., Ndiaye, O., & Ward, M. N., 2008. Sorghum yield prediction from seasonal rainfall forecasts in Burkina Faso. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148(11), 1798-1814, doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.06.007.
• Moraru, R., 2018. The cooperative system from Sweden agriculture: main features and evolution. Lucrări Ştiinţifice, Seria Agronomie, 61(1), 43-48.
• OECD, 2005. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data: Oslo manual. Paris, France. OECD, 2010. The OECD innovation strategy: getting a head start on tomorrow. Paris, France.
• OECD, 2018. Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Polski FADN, Szeregi czasowe, https://fadn.pl/publikacje/szeregi-czasowe/ [03-07-2020].
• Prager, K., & Vanclay, F., 2010. Landcare in Australia and Germany: comparing structures and policies for community engagement in natural resource management. Ecological Management & Restoration, 11(3), 187-193, doi:10.1111/j.1442-8903.2010.00548.x.
• Riley, M., Sangster, H., Smith, H., Chiverrell, R., & Boyle, J., 2018. Will farmers work together for conservation? The potential limits of farmers’ cooperation in agrienvironment measures. Land Use Policy, 70, 635-646, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.049.
• Siebert, R., Toogood, M., & Knierim, A., 2006. Factors affecting European farmers’ participation in biodiversity policies. Sociologia Ruralis, 46(4), 318-340, doi:10. 1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00420.x.SIR, O SIR, https://sir.cdr.gov.pl/o-sir/ [02-07-2020].
• Slovenc, M., 2019. Can a “good farmer” and a “bad farmer” cooperate?: An examination of conventional and organic farmers’ perceptions of production and environmental protection. In A. A. Lukšič, & T. Tkalec (Eds.), Intertwining of Diverse Minds in(to) Political Ecology (pp. 111-129). Ljubljana, Slovenia: Inštitut Časopis za kritiko znanosti.
• Soini, K., & Aakkula, J., 2007. Framing the biodiversity of agricultural landscape: The essence of local conceptions and constructions. Land Use Policy, 24(2), 311-321, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.03.001.
• Van der Meulen, H., Van Asseldonk, M., & Ge, L., 2016. Adoption of innovation in European agriculture (Rep.). FLINT Deliverable. Von Pischke, J. D., 1978. When is a smallholder credit necessary? Development Digest, 16(3), 6-14.