PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

The 5C model : a new approach to asset integrity management

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
As organizations grow more complex in operation and more global in scope, assets and technical integrity become key success factors. A company's asset integrity business process needs to be mapped in order to 1) provide a proper overview of operation and business processes, 2) identify all critical interfaces and 3) ensure that all gaps and overlap in processes are eliminated. Achieving asset integrity requires companies to sustain their activities and identify the hazards, weaknesses and objectives of their strategic assets. Technical integrity emphasizes a complete overview of technical conditions and related information, and the ability of the companies to document the technical state of its assets. It is based on an integrated view of the current state of operations, and the identification of all critical interfaces, in order to ensure that all gaps and unnecessary overlaps in processes are eliminated. Companies look increasingly at their asset integrity management system as a means to extend the life of their assets, beyond the original design conditions and production capacity. Establishing an asset integrity management system requires the documentation of the company’s technical integrity management, a strategy and the processes for carrying it out, identifying gaps; selecting corrective interventions and conducting follow up actions. The paper will discuss various aspects of asset integrity management, including its planning and implementation. We begin with an introduction to asset technical integrity, provide some theoretical backgrounds, present a model we call 5C and conclude with a summary and discussion.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
353--360
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 16 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
  • University of Torino, Torino, Italy and Det Norske Veritas, Stavanger, Norway
autor
  • StatoilHydro, Bergen, Norway
autor
  • KPA Limited, Raanana, Israel
  • University of Torino, Italy
  • NYU - Poly Center for Risk Engr, NY, USA
Bibliografia
  • [1] Atherton, J, & Gil, F. (2008). Incidents that Defie process safety. Joint publication of the Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, John Wiley & Sons Inc. New Jersey.
  • [2] Baily, M. J. (2002). Inter-Governmental Cooperation in the North Sea Oil and Gas Industry. Health and Safety Executive, UK. http://www.npd.no/English/Om+OD/Internasjonalt+samarbeid/NSOAF.htm
  • [3] Bale, E. & Edwards, D. (2000). Technical integrity-an engineer’s view. Engineering Management Journal. Vol. 10, Issue 2, 88-94.
  • [4] Basso, B., Carpegna, C., Dibitonto, C., Gaido, G., Robotto, A. & Zonato, C. (2004). Reviewing the safety management system by incydent investigation and performance indicators. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 17, 225-231.
  • [5] Grote, G., Weichbrodt, J. C., Günter, H., Zala-Mezö, E. & Künzle, B. (2009). Coordination In high-risk organisation: The need for flexible routines. Cognition, Technology, and Work, 11 (1): 17-27.
  • [6] Health and Safety Executive: Key Programme 3. (2003) Asset Integrity Programme. A report by the Offshore Division of HSE’s Hazardous Installations Directorate.
  • [7] Hudson, P., Riley, E. D. & Gidley, J. K. (1998). A new model for integrity in management systems. Society of Petroleum Engineers. Paper presented at the 1998 SPE International Conference on Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production held in Caracas, Venezuela, 7-10 June.
  • [8] Kenett, R. S. & Lambardo, S. (2006). The Role of Change Management in IT Systems Implementation. Chapter from the Handbook of Enterprise Systems Architecture in Practice, Dr. Pallab Saha editor, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Idea Group Inc.
  • [9] Kenett, R. S. & Raphaeli, O. (2008). Multivariate methods in enterprise system implementation, risk management and change management. Int. J. Risk Assessment and Management. 9 (3): 258-276.
  • [10] Nordhaug, O. & Gronhaug, K. (1994). The International Journal of Human Resource. Management, 5, 89-106.
  • [11] NPD (Oljedirektoratet). Basisstudie vedlikeholdsstyring. Metode for egenvurdering Av vedlikeholdsstyring. Revisjon 0, - 1.5.1998 (In Norwegian)
  • [12] OECD. (2008) Guidance on Developing Safety Performance Indicators Related to Chemical Accident Prevention, Preparedness and Response. Guidance for Industry. OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications. Series on Chemical Accidents. No. 19. Paris.
  • [13] OGP. Asset integrity - the key to managing major incident risks. Report No.415. December 2008.
  • [14] PSA (Petroleum Safety Authority Norway). (2009) Safety status and signals 2008-2009. www.ptil.no.
  • [15] Schroder, H. M. (1989). Managerial competence: The key to excellence. Kendall Hunt, Iowa.
  • [16] Wireman, T. (1990). World Class Maintenance Management. Industrial Press Inc. New York.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-b3198125-1c52-41ed-ad8d-1170828d7a57
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.