Powiadomienia systemowe
- Sesja wygasła!
- Sesja wygasła!
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
This study examines how integrating digital technologies into government operations can enhance urban governance in smart cities. It specifically looks at how these advancements can contribute to the development of sustainable smart cities in alignment with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The research employs two analytical frameworks to assess how advanced technologies impact and integrate with government functions. The first framework examines the effects of digitalization on sustainable smart cities, while the second offers a holistic approach to optimizing government processes through digital transformation. The research demonstrates the various advantages of digitalization, such as enhanced public services, advanced infrastructure, and greater transparency and accountability. Nevertheless, obstacles like data security, privacy issues, and disparities in digital access are recognized, requiring cautious handling. The research affirms that while integrating digital technologies in government operations can significantly support urban sustainability, the strategy is crucial to manage potential threats and foster inclusivity and environmental responsibility. These models provide practical recommendations for governments to responsibly and effectively utilize digital tools, ultimately fostering the development of resilient, efficient, and inclusive smart cities.
Wydawca
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
298--310
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 94 poz., rys.
Twórcy
autor
- Joint Doctoral School, Silesian University of Technology 44-100 Gliwice, Poland Department of Applied Social Sciences Faculty of Organization and Management Silesian University of Technology Roosevelt 26 Street, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland
autor
- Department of Applied Social Sciences Faculty of Organization and Management Silesian University of Technology Roosevelt 26 Street, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland Oleg Balatskyi Department of Management Sumy State University, 40007 Sumy, Ukraine
Bibliografia
- [1] Capurro, R., Fiorentino, R., Galeotti, R.M. and Garzella, S. (2023) ‘The Impact of Digitalization and Sustainability on Governance Structures and Corporate Communication: A Cross-Industry and Cross-Country Approach’, Sustainability, 15, p. 2064. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032064.
- [2] Monge, E.C. and Soriano, D.R. (2023) ‘The Role of Digitalization in Business and Management: A Systematic Literature Review’, Review of Managerial Science, 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00647-8.
- [3] Wang, Z., Lin, S., Chen, Y., Lyulyov, O. and Pimonenko, T. (2023) ‘Digitalization Effect on Business Performance: Role of Business Model Innovation’, Sustainability, 15, p. 9020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15119020.
- [4] Brodny, J. and Tutak, M. (2024) ‘Assessing the Level of Innovativeness and Digitalization of Enterprises in the European Union States’, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10, p. 100210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100210.
- [5] Duraivelu, K. (2022) ‘Digital Transformation in Manufacturing Industry – a Comprehensive Insight’, Materials Today: Proceedings, 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.07.409.
- [6] Deja, A., Dzhuguryan, T., Dzhuguryan, L., Konradi, O. and Ulewicz, R. (2021) ‘Smart Sustainable City Manufacturing and Logistics: A Framework for City Logistics Node 4.0 Operations’, Energies, 14, p. 8380. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14248380.
- [7] Deja, A., Ślączka, W., Dzhuguryan, L., Dzhuguryan, T. and Ulewicz, R. (2023) ‘Green Technologies in Smart City Multifloor Manufacturing Clusters: A Framework for Additive Manufacturing Management’, Production Engineering Archives, 29, pp. 428-443. https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2023.29.48.
- [8] Ha, L.T. (2022) ‘Effects of Digitalization on Financialization: Empirical Evidence from European Countries’, Technology in Society, 68, p. 101851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101851.
- [9] Paul, M., Maglaras, L., Ferrag, M.A. and Almomani, I. (2023) ‘Digitization of Healthcare Sector: A Study on Privacy and Security Concerns’, ICT Express, 9, pp. 571-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2023.02.007.
- [10] Mukul, E. and Büyüközkan, G. (2023) ‘Digital Transformation in Education: A Systematic Review of Education 4.0’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, pp. 122664-122664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122664.
- [11] Kwilinski, A. (2023) ‘The Relationship between Sustainable Development and Digital Transformation: Bibliometric Analysis’, Virtual Economics, 6, pp. 56-69. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2023.06.03(4).
- [12] Nguyen, T.M.P. and Davidson, K. (2023) ‘Institutionalising 100 Resilient Cities Governance Experiments in Cities with No Metropolitan Government: A Case Study of Living Melbourne (Resilient Melbourne), Australia’, Cities, 141, p. 104500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104500.
- [13] Zou, Q., Mao, Z., Yan, R., Liu, S. and Duan, Z. (2023) ‘Vision and Reality of E-Government for Governance Improvement: Evidence from Global Cross-Country Panel Data’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, pp. 122667-122667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122667.
- [14] Halásková, R., Halásková, M. and Pomp, M. (2023) ‘The Effect of Government Expenditures on the Economic and Institucional Dimension of Governance in European Countries’, Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration, 31. https://doi.org/10.46585/sp31011690.
- [15] Kuzior, A., Postrzednik-Lotko, K. and Pradela, J. (2023) ‘Social Challenges Resulting from the Implementation of Technical Solutions in Smart Cities’, in 2023 International Conference on Computer and Applications (ICCA). Cairo, Egypt.
- [16] Umbach, G. and Tkalec, I. (2022) ‘Evaluating E-Governance through E-Government: Practices and Challenges of Assessing the Digitalisation of Public Governmental Services’, Evaluation and Program Planning, 93, p. 102118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102118.
- [17] Lyulyov, O., Pimonenko, T., Saura, J.R. and Barbosa, B. (2024) ‘How Do E-Governance and E-Business Drive Sustainable Development Goals?’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 199, p. 123082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123082.
- [18] Iuliano, G., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B. and Bisogno, M. (2024) ‘Citizens’ E-Participation in the Digital World: Empirical Insights from Europe’, Public money and management/Public money & management, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2024.2329709.
- [19] European Parliamentary Research Service (2020) BRIEFING (Re-)Thinking Democracy Digital Democracy Is the Future of Civic Engagement Online?
- [20] Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government – A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001.
- [21] Gil-Garcia, J. R., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2020). Digital government and public management research: Finding the crossroads. Public Management Review, 22(12), pp. 1784-1810. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181.
- [22] Janowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001.
- [23] Cortés-Cediel, M. E., Cantador, I., & Gil, O. (2018). Recommender systems for e-governance in smart cities: State of the art and research opportunities. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Recommender Systems for Citizens (pp. 1-6). https://doi.org/10.1145/3127325.3128331.
- [24] Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector – Applications and Challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103.
- [25] Kumar, P., Morawska, L., Martani, C., Biskos, G., Neophytou, M., Di Sabatino, S., Bell, M., Norford, L., & Britter, R. (2018). The rise of low-cost sensing for managing air pollution in cities. Environment International, 75, pp. 199-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.11.019.
- [26] Mergel, I., Kleibrink, A., & Sörvik, J. (2018). Open data outcomes: U.S. cities between product and process innovation. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), pp. 622-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.004.
- [27] Yeh, H. (2017). The effects of successful ICT-based smart city services: From citizens’ perspectives. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), pp. 556-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.05.001.
- [28] Strengers, Y., Hazas, M., Nicholls, L., Kjeldskov, J., & Skov, M. B. (2019). Pursuing pleasance: Interrogating energy-intensive visions for the smart home. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 136, 102379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.102379.
- [29] Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2017). Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 31, pp. 183-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.016.
- [30] Hilty, L. M., & Aebischer, B. (2015). ICT for sustainability: An emerging research field. In L. M. Hilty & B. Aebischer (Eds.), ICT Innovations for Sustainability (pp. 3-36). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09228-7_1.
- [31] Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Pardo, T. A., & Scholl, H. J. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2289-2297. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.615.
- [32] Van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2019). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media & Society, 21(2), pp. 354-375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082.
- [33] Aina, Y. A. (2017). Achieving smart sustainable cities with GeoICT support: The Saudi evolving smart cities. Cities, 71, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.07.007
- [34] Cordella, A., & Tempini, N. (2015). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), pp. 279-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.005.
- [35] Janssen, M., & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean government and platform-based governance – Doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly, 30, S1-S8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.003.
- [36] Pardo, T.A., Nam, T., & Burke, G.B. (2012). E-Government Interoperability: Interaction of Policy, Management, and Technology Dimensions. Social Science Computer Review, 30(1), pp. 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310392184 .
- [37] Panagiotopoulos, P., Klievink, B., & Cordella, A. (2019). Public value creation in digital government. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101421
- [38] Calhan, H.S., Karkin, N., & Ozgul, M.E. (2021). The reflection of public values in twitter use of metropolitan municipalities: A content analysis employing the analytic hierarchy process. Information Polity, 26(4), pp. 367-386. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-210327.
- [39] Pereira, G.V., Parycek, P., Falco, E., & Kleinhans, R. (2018). Smart governance in the context of smart cities: A literature review. Information Polity, 23(2), 143-162. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170067
- [40] Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C.G., Giannakidou, I., & Mavridis, N. (2016). Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), pp. 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.003.
- [41] Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K.E. and Ranfagni, S. (2023) ‘A Step-By-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22..
- [42] Ferrer, J.N., Taranic, I., Veum, K. and van den Oosterkamp, P. (2021) The Making of a Smart City: Policy Recommendations. Edited by C. Wilson. EU Smart Cities Information System.
- [43] Yadav, G., Mangla, S.K., Luthra, S. and Rai, D.P. (2019) ‘Developing a Sustainable Smart City Framework for Developing Economies: An Indian Context’, Sustainable Cities and Society, 47, p. 101462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101462.
- [44] Mursalov, M., Yarovenko, H. and Vasilyeva, T. (2023) ‘Entrepreneurial Ecosystem and Digitalization: Relationship and Synergy of Development’, in Springer proceedings in business and economics. Prague, pp. 109-127.
- [45] Cugurullo, F., Caprotti, F., Cook, M., Karvonen, A. and McGuirk, P. (2023) ‘Conclusions’, in Marvin, S. (ed.) Artificial Intelligence and the City: Urbanistic Perspectives on AI. Routledge.
- [46] Szpilko, D., Naharro, F.J., Lãzãroiu, G., Nica, E. and de la Torre Gallegos, A. (2023) ‘Artificial Intelligence in the Smart City – a Literature Review’, Engineering Management in Production and Services, 15, pp. 53-75. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2023-0028.
- [47] Chowdhary, R., Paul, V., Jaisinghania, G. and Ansari, M.A. (2024) Revolutionising Urban Landscapes with GenAI.
- [48] Pellegrin, J., Colnot, L. and Delponte, L. (2021) Artificial Intelligence and Urban Development. European Union.
- [49] Hudson-Smith, A., Wilson, D., Gray, S., Dawkins, O. (2021) ‘Urban IoT: Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities for Mass Data Collection, Analysis, and Visualization’, in S., W., G., M.F., B., M., K., MP, Z., A. (eds) Urban Informatics. Springer: Singapore, pp. 701-719.
- [50] Syed, A.S., Sierra-Sosa, D., Kumar, A. and Elmaghraby, A. (2021) ‘IoT in Smart Cities: A Survey of Technologies, Practices and Challenges’, Smart Cities, 4, pp. 429-475. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4020024.
- [51] Yang, C., Liang, P., Fu, L., Cui, G., Huang, F., Teng, F. and Bangash, Y.A. (2022) ‘Using 5G in Smart Cities: A Systematic Mapping Study’, Intelligent Systems with Applications, 14, p. 200065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2022.200065.
- [52] Gohar, A. and Nencioni, G. (2021) ‘The Role of 5G Technologies in a Smart City: The Case for Intelligent Transportation System’, Sustainability, 13, p. 5188. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095188.
- [53] Grijpink, F., Ménard, A., Sigurdsson, H. and Vucevic, N. (2018) The Road to 5G: The Inevitable Growth of Infrastructure Cost.
- [54] Ross, A., Banerjee, S. and Chowdhury, A. (2020) ‘Security in Smart Cities: A Brief Review of Digital Forensic Schemes for Biometric Data’, Pattern Recognition Letters, 138, pp. 346-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2020.07.009.
- [55] Kim, H.M., Sabri, S. and Kent, A. (2021) ‘Smart Cities as a Platform for Technological and Social Innovation in Productivity, Sustainability, and Livability: A Conceptual Framework’, in Kim, H.M., Sabri, S., Ken, A. (eds) Smart Cities for Technological and Social Innovation, pp. 9-28.
- [56] Karger, E., Jagals, M. and Ahlemann, F. (2021) ‘Blockchain for Smart Mobility – Literature Review and Future Research Agenda’, Sustainability, 13, p. 13268. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313268.
- [57] Srinivas, T.A.S., Donald, A.D., Srihith, I.D., Anjali, D. and Chandana, A. (2023) ‘Blockchain: The Future of Smart City Development’, International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, 3, pp. 68-75. https://doi.org/10.48175/ijarsct-9009.
- [58] Nassereddine, H., Veeramani, A. and Veeramani, D. (2020) ‘Exploring the Current and Future States of Augmented Reality in the Construction Industry’, in Collaboration and Integration in Construction, Engineering, Management and Technology, pp. 185-189.
- [59] Hakimi, O., Liu, H., Abudayyeh, O., Houshyar, A., Almatared, M. and Alhawiti, A. (2023) ‘Data Fusion for Smart Civil Infrastructure Management: A Conceptual Digital Twin Framework’, Buildings, 13, pp. 2725-2725. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112725.
- [60] Kamarulzaman, A.M.M., Jaafar, W.S.W.M., Said, M.N.M., Saad, S.N.M. and Mohan, M. (2023) ‘UAV Implementations in Urban Planning and Related Sectors of Rapidly Developing Nations: A Review and Future Perspectives for Malaysia’, Remote Sensing, 15,p. 2845. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112845.
- [61] Nguyen, D.D., Alharasees, O. and Kale, U. (2023) ‘Drone Models in Urban Transport (New Concept Integration)’, in Springer proceedings in energy. Springer International Publishing, pp. 683-695.
- [62] European Commission and European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (2022) Drones and Sustainable Urban Air Mobility (UAM). Publications Office of the European Union.
- [63] Ibrahim, A., Chigozie, A., Onwusinkwue, N.S., Onimisi, S., Akagha, V. and Ejairu, N.E. (2024) ‘Cybersecurity challenges in Smart Cities: A case review of African Metropolises’, Computer science & IT research journal, 5, pp. 254-269. https://doi.org/10.51594/csitrj.v5i2.756.
- [64] Beckers, D., Gerli, P., Mora, L., Thabit, S. and Tonnarelli, F. (2023) Managing Smart City Governance a Playbook for Local and Regional Governments.
- [65] European Commission (2017) The Making of a Smart City: Best Practices across Europe Empowering Smart Solutions for Better Cities.
- [66] Mehmood, R., See, S., KatibIyad, I. and KatibImrich, K. (2020) Smart Infrastructure and Applications: Foundations for Smarter Cities and Societies. Springer: Cham, Switzerland.
- [67] Krishnan, S., Balas, V., Golden, E., Robinson, Y. and Kumar, R. (2021) Blockchain for Smart Cities.
- [68] Garcia-Font, V. (2021) ‘Conceptual Technological Framework for Smart Cities to Move towards Decentralized and User-Centric Architectures Using DLT’, Smart Cities, 4, pp. 728-745. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4020037.
- [69] Dluhopolskyi, O., Pakhnenko, O., Lyeonov, S., Semenog, A., Artyukhova, N., Cholewa-Wiktor, M. and Jastrzębski, W. (2023) ‘Digital Financial Inclusion: COVID-19 Impacts and Opportunities’, Sustainability, 15 p. 2383. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032383.
- [70] Kuzior, A., Pakhnenko, O., Tiutiunyk, I. and Lyeonov, S. (2023) ‘E-Governance in Smart Cities: Global Trends and Key Enablers’, Smart cities, 6, pp. 1663-1689. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6040078.
- [71] Santinha, G., Dias, A., Rodrigues, M., Rodrigues, C., Bastardo, R., Pavão, J. and Rocha, N.P. (2022) ‘Smart Cities and Urban Logistics: A Systematic Review of the Literature’, Europa XXI, 41. https://doi.org/10.7163/eu21.2021.41.2.
- [72] Dubey, S., Mishra, A., Verma, D.K., Chauhan, P.S., Nair, R., Dikshit, G. and Gupta, N. (2023) ‘Why Big Data and Data Analytics for Smart City’, in IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Machine Intelligence (CVMI). Gwalior: India, December 10.
- [73] Koch, F., Beyer, S. and Chen, C.-Y. (2023) ‘Monitoring the Sustainable Development Goals in Cities: Potentials and Pitfalls of Using Smart City Data’, GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 32, pp. 47-53. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.32.S1.8.
- [74] United Nations (no date a) Goal 9 | Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal9.
- [75] United Nations (no date b) Goal 11 | Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal11.
- [76] United Nations (no date c) Goal 13 | Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal13.
- [77] United Nations (no date d) Goal 16 | Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal16.
- [78] Fang, Y. and Shan, Z. (2023) ‘Optimising Smart City Evaluation: A People‐Oriented Analysis Method’, IET smart cities, 6. https://doi.org/10.1049/smc2.12073.
- [79] Khan, H.H., Malik, M.N., Zafar, R., Goni, F.A., Chofreh, A.G., Klemeš, J.J. and Alotaibi, Y. (2020) ‘Challenges for Sustainable Smart City Development: A Conceptual Framework’, Sustainable Development, 28, pp. 1507-1518. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2090.
- [80] Bhattacharya, T.R., Bhattacharya, A., Mclellan, B. and Tezuka, T. (2018) ‘Sustainable Smart City Development Framework for Developing Countries’, Urban Research & Practice, 13, pp. 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2018.1537003.
- [81] Kwilinski, A. (2023) ‘The Relationship between Sustainable Development and Digital Transformation: Bibliometric Analysis’, Virtual Economics, 6, pp. 56-69. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2023.06.03(4).
- [82] Cortés-Cediel, M.E., Segura-Tinoco, A., Cantador, I. and Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P. (2023) ‘Trends and Challenges of E-Government Chatbots: Advances in Exploring Open Government Data and Citizen Participation Content’, Government Information Quarterly, 40, p. 101877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101877.
- [83] Adie, B.U., Tate, M. and Valentine, E. (2024) ‘Digital Leadership in the Public Sector: A Scoping Review and Outlook’, International Review of Public Administration, 29, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2024.2323847.
- [84] ITU and UNDP (2023) SDG Digital Acceleration Agenda.
- [85] Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T. and Grimes, J.M. (2010) ‘Using ICTs to Create a Culture of Transparency: E-Government and Social Media as Openness and Anti-Corruption Tools for Societies’, Government Information Quarterly, 27, pp. 264-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001.
- [86] Lyeonov, S., Zakharkin, O. and Okhrimchuk, Y. (2023) ‘Information Openness as a Factor of Business Leadership in Today’s Digital Environment’, in Springer proceedings in business and economics. Prague, pp. 287-300.
- [87] Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C. and Nijkamp, P. (2011) ‘Smart Cities in Europe’, Journal of Urban Technology, 18, pp. 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117.
- [88] United Nations (no date e) UN E-Government Survey 2022. Available at: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/enus/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2022.
- [89] Vorontsova, A., Vasylieva, T., Lyeonov, S., Artyukhov, A. and Mayboroda, T. (2021) ‘Education Expenditures as a Factor in Bridging the Gap at the Level of Digitalization’, in 2021 11th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT). Deggendorf.
- [90] Sarno, N. and Maulidar, N. (2024) ‘Cybersecurity Challenges in the Era of Digital Transformation a Comprehensive Analysis of Information Systems’, Journal Informatic Education and Management (JIEM), 6, pp. 18-23. https://doi.org/10.61992/jiem.v6i1.56.
- [91] Hoofnagle, C.J., Sloot, B.V.D. and Borgesius, F.Z. (2019) ‘The European Union General Data Protection Regulation: What It Is and What It Means’, Information & Communications Technology Law, 28, pp. 65-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2019.1573501.
- [92] OECD (2022) Digital Transformation Maturity Model. OECD: Paris.
- [93] Andrae, A. and Edler, T. (2015) ‘On Global Electricity Usage of Communication Technology: Trends to 2030’, Challenges, 6, pp. 117-157. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe6010117.
- [94] Teng, Z., Guo, C., Zhao, Q. and Mubarik, M.S. (2023) ‘Antecedents of Green Process Innovation Adoption: An AHP Analysis of China’s Gas Sector’, Resources Policy, 85, p. 103959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103959.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2025).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-b31972c1-f0b6-4278-a73e-3b51fad1868e
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.