Carbon Accumulation Potential from Natural Forest Regrowth of Godech Municipality, Western Bulgaria

• Autorzy: Grigorov Borislav

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ceer-2021-0014

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The present research deals with carbon sequestration, as an important process for mitigating the effects of climate change. The investigation focuses on a 30-year period and it covers only aboveground biomass that builds up from natural forest regrowth, excluding any plantation techniques. Potential carbon sequestration rate from natural forest regrowth in Godech Municipality was measured in Mg C ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ and the resolution of the map was 1x1 km. The results of the study display that carbon accumulation values in the researched area were consistent with those that were expected in the largest parts of Bulgaria. The biggest share of Godech Municipality falls within the range of 0.82 – 0.96 Mg C ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ with restricted areas around the villages of Barlya, Smolcha, Gubesh, Murgash and Varbnitsa that may accumulate between 0.96 – 1.11 Mg C ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹. In conclusion, carbon accumulation only from natural forest regrowth provides representative information, however it would have been better if different plantation techniques were regarded as well. The successful results of the investigation should encourage other studies of this type in the neighbouring municipalities.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

natural forest regrowth; climate change mitigation; carbon sequestration; aboveground biomass; Bulgaria

PL

naturalny odrost lasu; zmiany klimatu; sekwestracja dwutlenku węgla; biomasa nadziemna; Bułgaria

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego
• Czasopismo: Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 31, no. 1
• Strony: 192--199
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Grigorov Borislav

• Faculty of Geology and Geography, University of Sofia, Bulgaria

Bibliografia

• 1. Assenov, A, Saraffov, A and Bozhkov, P 2017. Ecosystem/landscape services provided by Umbrosols (UM) in selected mountainous municipalities of Sofia District. Comptes rendus de l’Academie bulgare des Sciences, Geologie: 69 (3): 319-326.
• 2. Anderson-Teixeira, K. et al. 2018. ForC: a global database of forest carbon stocks and fluxes. Ecology 99, 1507.
• 3. Bastin, J et al. 2019. The global tree restoration potential. Science 365, 76-79.
• 4. Betts, R 2011. Climate science: afforestation cools more or less. Nat. Geosci. 4, 504-505.
• 5. Burciaga, U 2020. Sustainability assessment in housing building organizations for the design of strategies against climate change. HighTech and Innovation Journal 1 (4), 136-147.
• 6. Chaturvedi, R et al. 2011. Carbon density and accumulation in woody species of tropical dry forest in India. Forest Ecology and Management 262 (8), 1576-1588.
• 7. Chaturvedi, R and Raghubanshi, A 2015. Assessment of carbon density and accumulation in mono- and multi-specific stands in Teak and Sal forests of a tropical dry region in India 2015, Forest Ecology and Management 339, 11–21.
• 8. Cook-Patton, S, Leavitt, S, Gibbs, D et al., 2020. Mapping carbon accumulation potential from global natural forest regrowth. Nature 585, 545–550.
• 9. Dimitrova, V, Lyubenova, M and Vanguelova, E 2014. Biomass and carbon accumulation in herb layer of representative forest ecosystems in Bulgaria. Journal of Balkan Ecology 17 (1), 55-71.
• 10. Fenu, G and Malloci, F. 2020. DSS LANDS: A decision support system for agriculture in Sardinia. HighTech and Innovation Journal 1(3), 129-135.
• 11. Gilroy, J et al. 2014. Cheap carbon and biodiversity co-benefits from forest regeneration in a hotspot of endemism. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 503–507.
• 12. Griscom, B et al. 2017. Natural climate solutions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11645–11650.
• 13. Grassi, G et al. 2017. The key role of forests in meeting climate targets requires science for credible mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 220–226.
• 14. Holl, K and Brancalion, P 2020. Tree planting is not a simple solution. Science 368, 580–582.
• 15. Javadinejad, S, Rebwar, D, Jafary F 2020. Climate Change Scenarios and Effects on Snow-Melt Runoff. Civil Engineering Journal 6 (9), 1715-1725.
• 16. Koulov, B, Ivanova, E, Borisova, B, Assenov, A, Ravnachka, A 2017. GISbased Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Mountain Regions: A Case Study of the Karlovo Municipality in Bulgaria. One Ecosystem 2: e14062.
• 17. Lewis, S, Wheeler, C, Mitchard, E and Koch, A 2019. Regenerate natural forests to store carbon. Nature 568, 25–28.
• 18. Masson-Delmotte, V et al. (eds) 2018. Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C Above Preindustrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty (IPCC, 2018).
• 19. Meli, P. et al. 2017. A global review of past land use, climate, and active vs. passive restoration effects on forest recovery. PLoS One 12, e0171368.
• 20. Oo, H, Zin, W and Kyi, C 2020. Analysis of streamflow response to changing climate conditions using SWAT model. Civil Engineering Journal 6 (2), 194-209.
• 21. Paul, K and Roxburgh, S 2020. Predicting carbon sequestration of woody biomass following land restoration. For. Ecol. Manage. 460, 117838.
• 22. Reid, J, Fagan, M. and Zahawi, R. 2018. Positive site selection bias in meta analyses comparing natural regeneration to active forest restoration. Sci. Adv. 4, eaas9143.
• 23. Schlup, K, Nabuurs, G, Verburg, P. 2008. Future carbon sequestration in Europe – effects of land use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems &Environment.127 (3-4), 251-264.
• 24. Speed, J, Martinsen, V, Mysterud, A, Holand, O andAustrheim, G. 2014. Long-term increase in aboveground carbon stocks following exclusion of grazers and forest establishment in an alpine ecosystem. Ecosystems 17, 1138–1150.
• 25. Stoeva, L, Markoff, I. and Zhiyanski, M. 2018. National Forestry Accounting Plan for Bulgaria, Including Forest Reference Levels for the Period 2021–2025 (Ministry of Environment and Water, Republic of Bulgaria); https://www.moew.government.bg/static/media/ups/articles/attachments/NFAP_final_ENe30a12d4d7dff0f589ad84b69bb90b12.pdf.
• 26. Accessed through Global Forest Watch on [30.09.2020]. www.globalforestwatch.org).): Cook-Patton et al. 2020. Uncertainty in carbon accumulation potential from natural forest regrowth in forest and savanna biomes.
• 27. Zhiyanski, M, Glushkova, M 2013. Carbon storage in selected European chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) ecosystems in Belasitsa Mountain, SW Bulgaria. Silva Balcanica, 14 (1), 60-75.
• 28. Zhiyanski, M, Glushkova, M, Ferezliev, A, Menichetti, L, Leifeld, J 2016. Carbon storage and soil property changes following afforestation in mountain ecosystems of the Western Rhodopes, Bulgaria. iForest, 9, SISEF - Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology, ISSN:1971-7458, DOI:10.3832/ifor 1866-008, 626-634.
• 29. Zhiyanski, M 2020. Forest ecosystems in Bulgaria under environmental change – carbon sequestration potential and vulnerability zones. In: Smart Geography (eds. S. Nedkov, G. Zhelezov, N. Ilieva, M. Nikolova, B. Koulov, K. Naydenov, S. Dimitrov), 417-441.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).