On non-Pareto efficiency

• Autorzy: Kaliszewski Ignacy

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.37190/ord240405

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

We investigate assessment functions, i.e., functions that aggregate numerical attribute values into single numbers. All assessment functions in the current use share the same limitation: they do not explicitly account for the attribute values balance. Here, we present assessment functions that provide for that. However, those functions are at odds with the well-established paradigm of Pareto efficiency. As an example, the relevance of assessment functions to rankings is discussed.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

multiple-attribute; attribute values balance; assessment functions; Leontief function; Pareto dominance-consistency

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
• Czasopismo: Operations Research and Decisions
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 34, No. 4
• Strony: 81--88
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Kaliszewski Ignacy

• Systems Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
• Warsaw School of Information Technology, Warsaw, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5404-7400

Bibliografia

• [1] Chernev, A. Extremeness aversion and attribute-balance effects in choice. Journal of Consumer Research 31, 2 (2004), 249–263.
• [2] Chernev, A. Context effects without a context: Attribute balance as a reason for choice. Journal of Consumer Research 32, 2 (2005), 213–223.
• [3] Ehrgott, M. Multicriteria Optimization. Springer, 2005.
• [4] Fishburn, P. C. Utility theory and decision theory. In Utility and Probability (London, 1990), J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman, Eds., Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 303–312.
• [5] Kaliszewski, I. Quantitative Pareto Analysis by Cone Separation Technique. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.
• [6] Kaliszewski, I. Multiple criteria decision making: selecting variants along compromise lines. Techniki Komputerowe (Computer Aided Methodologies) 1 (2006), 49–66.
• [7] Kaliszewski, I., and Michalowski, W. Efficient solutions and bounds on trade-offs. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 94, 2 (1997), 381–394.
• [8] Kaliszewski, I., and Michalowski, W. Searching for psychologically stable solutions of multiple criteria decision problems. European Journal of Operational Research 118, 3 (1999), 549–562.
• [9] Kaliszewski, I., Miroforidis, J., and Podkopaev, D. Interactive multiple criteria decision making based on preference driven evolutionary multiobjective optimization with controllable accuracy. European Journal of Operational Research 216, 1 (2012), 188-199.
• [10] Kaliszewski, I., Miroforidis, J., and Podkopaev, D. Multiple Criteria Decision Making by Multiobjective Optimization -A Toolbox. Springer, 2016.
• [11] Miettinen, K. Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Springer, 1999.
• [12] Miller, E. An Assessment of CES and Cobb-Douglas Production Functions Working Paper No. 19992, Congressional Budget Office, 2008.
• [13] Moscati, I. The History and Methodology of Expected Utility. Series: Elements in Decision Theory and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 2023.
• [14] Ray, S. C., Chambers, R. G., and Kumbhakar, S. C., Handbook of Production Economics. Springer, 2023.
• [15] Simonson, I. Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research 16, 2 (1989), 158–174.
• [16] Simonson, I., and Tverski, A. Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research 29, 3 (1992), 281–295.
• [17] Steuer, R. E. Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application. John Wiley & Sons, 1986.
• [18] Truett, D., and Roberts, B. Classical production functions, technical optimality, and scale adjustments of the firm. The American Economic Review 63, 5 (1973), 975–982.
• [19] Wierzbicki, A. P. Reference point approaches. In Multicriteria Decision Making: Advances in MCDM Models, Algorithms, Theory and Applications (New York, NY, 1999), T. Gal, T. J. Stewart, and T. Hanne, Eds., vol. 21 of International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Springer, pp. 237–275.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).