Use of big data analysis to identify possible sources of supply chain disruption through the DOTMLPFI method

• Autorzy: Nagy Judit , Foltin Pavel , Ondryhal Vojtech

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17270/J.LOG.2022.731

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Backgrounds: The presented research deals with the investigation of how big data analytics can help predict possible disruptive events in supply chains. The supply chain can be considered a complex system with a wide spectrum of possible sources of internal and external disruptions. Since the individual entities of the supply chains operate in a particular environment and interact with this environment, there is a certain level of mutual interdependency. This set of interconnected interactions within the supply chain will be the unit of analysis. Methods: There are many internal and external sources of supply chain disruption, which opens up the potential application of Big Data Analysis (BDA) as an early warning tool. To analyse the possible application of the BDA to identify sources of supply chain disruptions, we conduct a bibliometric analysis to define an appropriate structure for supply chain risk classification as well as appropriate keywords that make data collection quicker and easier. The DOTMLPFI methodology was used to systematically identify the most relevant risks threatening the supply chains. Results: The proposed research approach creates a possible framework to support the operational sustainability and resilience of the supply chain as a system, toward internal and external disruptions. The research results also point out the most explored attributes of supply chain disruption. The conducted bibliometric research and content analysis support the theoretical framework of using BDA as a possible early warning tool, especially for the identification of possible sources of supply chain disruption. The approach of grouping Big Data sources into categories based on DOTMLPFI groups allows to identify the appropriate keywords for their later BDA analysis. The analytical framework provides a starting point for individual supply chain entities to understand risks and systematically collect the appropriate data in the required structure about them. Conclusion: The complexity of supply chains, together with the increasing possibility of digital applications, requires a new analytical framework for evaluating the overall supply chain, with the possible application of new data sources and analytical approaches regarding the risks threatening the chain. DOTMLPFI methodology allows covering all the relevant categories of supply chain risks, and by proposing relevant keywords and data sources it can help companies to find the appropriate open-source, up-to-date information and be prepared for disruptive events.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

supply chain disruption; supply chain resilience; Big Data analysis; DOTMLPFI method

PL

zakłócenia łańcucha dostaw; odporność łańcucha dostaw; analiza Big Data; metoda DOTMLPFI

• Wydawca: Wyższa Szkoła Logistyki
• Czasopismo: LogForum
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 18, no. 3
• Strony: 309--319
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Nagy Judit

• Corvinus University of Budapest, Institute of Operations and Decision Sciences, Department of Supply Chain Managemen, Budapest, Hungary

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8275-1550

autor

Foltin Pavel

• University of Defence, Faculty of Military Leadership, Department of Logistics, Brno, Czech Republik

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8270-0390

autor

Ondryhal Vojtech

• University of Defence, Faculty of Military Leadership, Department of Logistics, Brno, Czech Republik

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8091-1300

Bibliografia

• 1. Bahrami, M., Shokouhyar, S., 2021. The role of big data analytics capabilities in bolstering supply chain resilience and firm performance: a dynamic capability view. ITP ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2021-0048
• 2. BCI 2021. BCI Horizon Scan Report 2021. Business Continuity Institute, Caversham, United Kingdom, 1–72.
• 3. Cellan-Jones, R., 2019. Robots “to replace up to 20 million factory jobs” by 2030. BBC News.
• 4. Clarivate. 2022. Web of Science. Web of Science - Search. [Online] Clarivate, 2022. [Cited: 02 07 2022.] The link to research query in WoS is available here: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/summary/6960c73e-c07e-4cc3-828b-709de2acda5a-41628593/times-cited-descending/1
• 5. David, F., 2011. Strategic Management - Concept and Cases, 13 ed. ed. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
• 6. Demeter, K., Losonci, D., Nagy, J., 2020. Road to digital manufacturing - a longitudinal case-based analysis. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32, 820-839. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-06-2019-0226
• 7. EU, 2021. Global Gateway [WWW Document]. European Commission - European Commission: Global Gateway. URL https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/stronger-europe-world/global-gateway_en%20(accessed%202.3.2022)
• 8. Fatorachian, H., Kazemi, H., 2021. Impact of Industry 4.0 on supply chain performance. Production Planning & Control 32, 63-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1712487
• 9. Foltin, P., 2011. Security of Logistics Chains Against Terrorist Threats, in: 17th International Conference the Knowledge-Based Organization, Conference Proceedings 1: Management and Military Sciences. Nicolae Balcescu-Land Forces Academy, Sibiu, 100–105.
• 10. Freier, N., 2008. Known Unknowns: Unconventional “Strategic Shocks” in Defense Strategy Development. Strategic Studies Institute, Carlisle.
• 11. Hodicky, J., Prochazka, D., 2020. Modelling and Simulation Paradigms to Support Autonomous System Operationalization, in: Mazal, J., Fagiolini, A., Vasik, P. (Eds.), Modelling and Simulation for Autonomous Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43890-6_29
• 12. Huan, S.H., Sheoran, S.K., Wang, G., 2004. A review and analysis of supply chain operations reference (SCOR) model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9, 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540410517557
• 13. ISO 31000. ISO 31000:2018 Risk management, 2018. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
• 14. Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B., 2019. The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. International Journal of Production Research, 57, 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086
• 15. Knemeyer, A.M., Zinn, W., Eroglu, C., 2009. Proactive planning for catastrophic events in supply chains. Journal of Operations Management 27, 141-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2008.06.002
• 16. Mentzer, J.T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J.S., Min, S., Nix, N.W., Smith, C.D., Zacharia, Z.G., 2001. Defining Supply Chain Management. Journal of Business Logistics 22, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00001.x
• 17. Modgil, S., Singh, R.K., Hannibal, C., 2021. Artificial intelligence for supply chain resilience: learning from Covid-19. International Journal of Logistics Management, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2021-0094
• 18. Narasimhan, R., Talluri, S., 2009. Perspectives on risk management in supply chains. Journal of Operations Management 27, 114-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.02.001
• 19. Neiger, D., Rotaru, K., Churilov, L., 2009. Supply chain risk identification with value-focused process engineering. Journal of Operations Management 27, 154-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.11.003
• 20. Papadopoulos, T., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., Altay, N., Childe, S.J., Fosso-Wamba, S., 2017. The role of Big Data in explaining disaster resilience in supply chains for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production 142, 1108-1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.059
• 21. Rehak, D., Danihelka, P., Bernatik, A., 2014. Criteria risk analysis of facilities for electricity generation and transmission, in: Steenbergen, R., Van Gelder, P., Miraglia, S., Vrouwenvelder, A. [Eds.], Safety, Reliability and Risk Analysis: Beyond the Horizon. Crc Press-Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, 2073-2080. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1653016
• 22. Rehak, D., Novotny, P., 2016. Bases for Modelling the Impacts of the Critical Infrastructure Failure, in: Cozzani, V., DeRademaeker, E., Manca, D. [Eds.], Cisap7: 7th International Conference on Safety & Environment in Process Industry. Aidic Servizi Srl, Milano, 91-96.
• 23. Shamala, P., Ahmad, R., Zolait, A., Sedek, M., 2017. Integrating information quality dimensions into information security risk management (ISRM). Journal of Information Security and Applications 36, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2017.07.004
• 24. Singh, N.P., Singh, S., 2019. Building supply chain risk resilience: Role of big data analytics in supply chain disruption mitigation. BIJ 26, 2318-2342. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2018-0346
• 25. Stepanek, L., Urban, Roman, Urban, Rudolf, 2013. A new operational risk assessment technique: the CASTL method. Journal of Operational Risk, 8, 101-117.
• 26. UN, n.d. THE 17 GOALS | Sustainable Development. Department of Economic and Social Affairs - Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/goals (accessed 2.3.2022)
• 27. Wang, G., Gunasekaran, A., Ngai, E.W.T., Papadopoulos, T., 2016. Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management: Certain investigations for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics 176, 98-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.03.014

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).