Condition of young scientists of cartography in Poland: searching for a diagnosis (2016-2022)

• Autorzy: Słomska-Przech Katarzyna , Zawadzki Mateusz , Stadnicka Maria , Wabiński Jakub , Adolf Albert , Róg Marta , Sompolski Marek

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/pcr-2024-0007

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article assesses the condition of cartographic research in the context of young scientists. Based on an analysis of the 469 academic achievements of 77 young Polish cartographers in the 2016–2022 period, the authors highlight challenges in defining contemporary cartography and difficulties in classifying research due to its interdisciplinary nature, overlap with GIS, and the use of cartographic methods in studies from other fields. The study also examines thematic trends, mobility constraints, and patterns of scientific collaboration. The findings emphasise the need to support young researchers and foster interinstitutional cooperation.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

cartography; young scientist; research direction; research funding; academic achievements; Poland

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Geograficzne. Oddział Kartograficzny
• Czasopismo: Polish Cartographical Review
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 56, No. 1
• Strony: 91--114
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 59 poz., mapy, rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Słomska-Przech Katarzyna

• Tadeusz Manteuffel Institute of History of the Polish Academy of Sciences Warsaw, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3669-0018

autor

Zawadzki Mateusz

• Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Department of Geomatics and Cartography Lublin, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2126-282

autor

Stadnicka Maria

• Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Department of Geomatics and Cartography Lublin, Poland

• https://orcid.org//0000-0002-6166-480X

autor

Wabiński Jakub

• Military University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy Warsaw, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9995-1329

autor

Adolf Albert

• University of Warsaw, Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies Warsaw, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3077-8935

autor

Róg Marta

• AGH University of Krakow Faculty of Geo-Data Science, Geodesy, and Environmental Engineering Kraków, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6126-7524

autor

Sompolski Marek

• Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Geoengineering, Mining and Geology Wrocław, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7321-7057

Bibliografia

• Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2011). Research productivity: Are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones? Scientometrics, 88, 915–928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0426-6
• Ackers, L. (2005). Moving people and knowledge: Scientific mobility in the European Union. International Migration, 43(5), 99–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-2435.2005.00343.X
• Ahmed, M. A., Behbahani, A. H., Brückner, A., Char-pentier, C. J., Morais, L. H., Mallory, S., & Pool, A-H. (2020). The precarious position of postdocs during COVID-19. Science, 368(6494), 957–958. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc5143
• ArcGIS Survey123. (n.d.). https://doc.arcgis.com/pl/survey123/get-started/whatissurvey123.htm
• Auriol, L. (2010). Careers of doctorate holders: Employment and mobility patterns. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 4. https://doi.org/10.1787/5kmh8phxvvf5-en
• Australian Bureau of Statistics and Stats NZ. (2020, June 30). Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification (ANZSRC). https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/classifications/australian-andnew-zealand-standard-research-classification-anzsrc/latest-release
• Baranowski, M., Gotlib, D., & Olszewski, R. (2018). Próba zdefiniowania domeny współczesnej kartografii. Roczniki Geomatyki, 16(4(83)), 269–281. http://rg.ptip.org.pl/index.php/rg/article/view/RG2018-4-BaranowskiGotlibOlszewski
• Blume-Kohout, M. E., & Adhikari, D. (2016). Training the scientific workforce: Does funding mechanism matter? Research Policy, 45(6), 1291–1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.011
• Brewer, C. A., & McMaster, R. B. (1999). The state of academic cartography. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 26(3), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304099782330680
• Bukowska, G., & Łopaciuk-Gonczaryk, B. (2013). Determinanty sukcesów publikacyjnych naukowców. Nauka, 3, 59–86.
• Cahusac de Caux, B. (2022). The effects of the pandemic on the research output and strategies of early career researchers and doctoral candidates. In B. Cahusac de Caux, L. Pretorius & L. Macaulay (Eds.), Research and teaching in a pandemic world (pp. 361–374). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7757-2_24
• Cheruvelil, K. S., Soranno, P. A., Weathers, K. C., Hanson, P. C., Goring, S. J., Filstrup, C. T., & Read, E. K. (2014). Creating and maintaining high-performing collaborative research teams: the importance of diversity and interpersonal skills. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1890/130001
• Czaika, M., & De Haas, H. (2018). The globalization of migration: Has the world become more migratory? International Migration Review, 48(2), 283–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/IMRE.12095
• Deville, P., Wang, D., Sinatra, R., Song, C., Blondel, V. D., & Barabási, A. L. (2014). Career on the move: Geography, stratification and scientific impact. Scientific Reports, 4, Article 4770. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04770
• European Research Council. (2020). ERC evaluation panels and keywords. https://erc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document/file/ERC_Panel_structure_2020.pdf
• European Research Council. (2024). ERC dashboard. https://erc.europa.eu/projects-statistics/erc-dashboard
• Finelli, C. J., Borrego, M., & Rasoulifar, G. (2015). Development of a taxonomy of keywords for engineering education research. Journal of Engineering Education, 104(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.1002/JEE.20101
• FNP. (2019). Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej. Mobility and information behavior of international young researchers. https://www.fnp.org.pl/wyniki--raportu-o-mobilnosci-mlodych-naukowcow/
• Fox, M. F. (2005). Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 35(1), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705046630
• Fox, M. F., & Mohapatra, S. (2007). Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication productivity among academic scientists in doctoral-granting departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(5), 542–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2007.11772329
• Franzoni, C., Scellato, G., & Stephan, P. (2012). Foreign-born scientists: mobility patterns for 16 countries. Nature Biotechnology, 30(12), 1250–1253. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2449
• Gotlib, D., Konopska, B., Kozieł, Z., Medyńska-Gulij, B., Ostrowski, W., & Żyszkowska, W. (2021a). “Kondycja współczesnej kartografii”. XLIII Ogólnopolska Konferencja Kartograficzna, October 26, online.
• Gotlib, D., Konopska, B., Kozieł, Z., Medyńska-Gulij, B., Ostrowski, W., & Żyszkowska, W. (2021b). Dyskusja panelowa „Kondycja współczesnej kartografii” na XLIII Ogólnopolskiej Konferencji Kartograficznej 26 października 2021 r. Polish Cartographical Review. Suplement w języku polskim, 6(1–2), 45–59. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YAJJIZN8BcIT2vd4lgECvoq_KqN1Ixtw/view
• International Cartographic Association Working Group Next Generation Cartographers (n.d.) https://next-generation-cartographers.github.io/
• Ivancheva, L., & Gourova, E. (2011). Challenges for career and mobility of researchers in Europe. Science and Public Policy, 38(3), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234211X12834251302445
• Kozieł, Z. (Ed.). (2021). Biblioteka Polskiego Przeglądu Kartograficznego. Vol. 4. Polskie piśmiennictwo kartograficzne 1968–2020. Polskie Towarzystwo Geograficzne Oddział Kartograficzny, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMK.
• Kulczycki, E. (2019). Raport VII “Procedury ewaluacji jednostek podstawowych i instytucji”. Centrum Studiów nad Polityką Publiczną UAM. https://repozytorium.amu.edu.pl/server/api/core/bitstreams/61aae275-4d37-4e73-926b-dd423dc2dfe6/content
• Kwiek, M. (2019). Raport I „Umiędzynarodowienie badań naukowych i widzialność polskiej nauki w świecie”. Centrum Studiów nad Polityką Publiczną UAM.
• Laband, D. N., & Tollison, R. D. (2000). Intellectual collaboration. Journal of Political Economy, 108(3), 632–662. https://doi.org/10.1086/262132
• Lapaine, M., Midtbø, T., Gartner, G., Bandrova, T., Wang, T., & Shen, J. (2021). Definition of the map. Proceedings of the 30th International Cartographic Conference (ICC 2021), Florence, Italy, 14–18 December, 3, 9. https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-adv-3-9-2021
• Liu, T., Pei, T., Fang, Z., Wu, M., Liu, X., Yan, X., Song, C., Jiang, J., Jiang, L., & Chen, J. (2024). Spatiotemporal mobility network of global scientists, 1970–2020. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 38(10), 1991–2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2024.2369540
• Meier, S., Bogucka, E. P., Ledermann, F., Roth, R. E., Słomska-Przech, K., & Vörös, F. (2023). Opportunities and challenges for the next generation of cartographers. Abstracts of the International Cartographic Association, 6. 31st International Cartographic Conference (ICC 2023), Cape Town, South Africa, 13–18 August, 162. https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-6-162-2023
• Moed, H. F., & Halevi, G. (2014). A bibliometric approach to tracking international scientific migration. Scientometrics, 101, 1987–2001. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-014-1307-6
• Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju. (2024). LIDER. https://archiwum.ncbr.gov.pl/programy/programy-krajowe/lider/
• Narodowe Centrum Nauki. (2024a). Fakty i liczby – efekty NCN. https://www.ncn.gov.pl/efekty/fakty-liczby
• Narodowe Centrum Nauki. (2024b). Finansowanie młodych naukowców w konkursach NCN. https://www.ncn.gov.pl/userfiles/file/2023_finansowanie--mlodych-naukowcow-w-konkursach-ncn.pdf
• Nauka Polska. (1999). https://nauka-polska.pl/
• van Noorden, R. (2012). Global mobility: Science on the move. Nature, 490, 326–329. https://doi.org/10.1038/490326A
• OECD. (2015). Frascati Manual: Guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264239012-en
• Olechnicka, A., & Płoszaj, A. (2008). Raport z badań „Polska nauka w sieci? Przestrzeń nauki i innowacyjności”. https://www.euroreg.uw.edu.pl/dane/web_euroreg_publications_files/1248/polska_nauka-_w_sieci.pdf
• ORCID. (2012). Open Researcher and Contributor ID. https://orcid.org/
• Ormeling, F., Rystedt, B., Virrantaus, K., & Wood, M. (2003). “A Strategic Plan for the International Cartographic Association 2003–2011”. International Cartographic Association. https://icaci.org/files/documents/reference_docs/ICA_Strategic_Plan_2003-2011.pdf
• Porter, S. R., & Umbach, P. D. (2001). Analyzing faculty workload data using multilevel modeling. Research in Higher Education, 42, 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026573503271
• RAD-on. (2017, November 2). Wyniki ewaluacji działalności naukowej w Polsce za lata 2017–2021. https://radon.nauka.gov.pl/raporty/ewaluacja_kategorie_naukowe
• Ren, J., Wang, F., & Li, M. (2023). Dynamics and characteristics of interdisciplinary research in scientific breakthroughs: case studies of Nobel--winning research in the past 120 years. Sciento-metrics, 128(8), 4383–4419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04762-x
• Rozporządzenie Ministra Edukacji i Nauki z dnia 11 października 2022 r. w sprawie dziedzin nauki i dyscyplin naukowych oraz dyscyplin artystycznych Dz. U. 2022 poz. 2202 (2022) (Polska). https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20220002202
• Sá, C. M. (2008). ‘Interdisciplinary strategies’ in U.S. research universities. Higher Education, 55, 537–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9073-5
• Schiermeier, Q. (2011). Career choices: The mobility imperative. Nature, 470, 563–564. https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7335-563a
• Sigelman, L. (2009). Are two (or three or four... or nine) heads better than one? Collaboration, multidisciplinarity, and publishability. PS: Political Science & Politics, 42(3), 507–512. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096509090817
• Sivertsen, G. (2019). Developing Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) as data sources for studies of research. In W. Glänzel, H. F. Moed, U. Schmoch & M. Thelwall (Eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators (pp. 667–683). Springer.
• Statistics Canada. (2020). Canadian Research and Development Classification. www.statcan.gc.ca
• Stephan, P. E., & Levin, S. G. (2001). Exceptional contributions to US science by the foreign-born and foreign-educated. Population Research and Policy Review, 20, 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010682017950
• Sugimoto, C. R., Robinson-Garcia, N., Murray, D. S., Yegros-Yegros, A., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2017). Scientists have most impact when they’re free to move. Nature, 550, 29–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/550029a
• von Tunzelmann, N., Ranga, M., Ben Martin, B., & Geuna, A. (2003). Report “The effects of size on research performance: A SPRU Review”. SPRU – Science and Technology Policy Research, The Freeman Centre, University of Sussex.
• Ustawa z dnia 20 lipca 2018 r. – Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce Dz.U. 2018 poz. 1668 (2018) (Polska). https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDe-tails.xsp?id=WDU20180001668
• Zygomatic. (2024). Free online word cloud generator and tag cloud creator. https://www.wordclouds.com/
• Vrkić, D. (2014). Are they a perfect match? Analysis of usage of author suggested keywords, IEEE terms and social tags. Proceedings of the 37th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), Opatija, Croatia, 26–30 May, 732–737. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIPRO.2014.6859662
• XLV Ogólnopolska Konferencja Kartograficzna. (2023). https://www.umcs.pl/pl/xlv-ogolnopolska-konferencja-kartograficzna,26287.htm
• Yegros-Yegros, A., Rafols, I., & D’Este, P. (2015). Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher citation impact? The different effect of proximal and distal interdisciplinarity. PLoS ONE, 10(8), Article e0135095. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0135095